and they just didn't do it. >> i couldn't agree more, nina. as we've covered this story. and i want to bring in roger. roger, is that what it came down to, that this station didn't monitor what their employees were doing and that they were bringing forth wi ining forth tt was so dangerous? >> well, it's a combination of not monitoring but also not even enforcing rules that they had in place, not training the on-air talent as to what the rules were to be and how they were to comply. i mean, they had specific rules not to put people in contests that are dangerous or put them at risk and not to put contests that were in bad taste. this contest clearly violated all those rules. and we believed from the beginning this case is about responsibility and accountability and we said that at the beginning. beginning and beauty of the civil process is that we went six weeks where 12 people got all the evidence and not what people read in the newspaper or hear on sound bites on tv and they were able to assess that evidence and determine who was accountable. >> are you satisfied that th

nina says, no, leave they are where they are.e united states, do you honestly think they will not do another attack on us just to set them free? so she has some safety concerns other people were talking about on the page as well. chris writes this: i look at this differently. as long as these terrorists are locked up, who cares if it's gitmo or new york? i say it's a good thing to have them close so we can keep an eye on them. so keep talking about this. do you think trying the suspects in civilian court in new york is the right thing to do? these 9/11 suspects. or would you have preferred they face military justice back at guantanamo bay or maybe you're okay with bringing them here, just not in a civilian court, maybe a military tribunal of some sort. e-mail us at cnn.com/hln or call us at 1-877-tell hln or text us at hlntv. >>> here's somebody from my facebook page who writes it's the correct decision but it's going to be a tough one for a lot of americans to swallow. due process is one of the cornerstone principles of our repu

host: nina your next. good morning. caller: yes.g to ask this gentlemen, first of all, the settlement issue is the only one that is - that comes between peace between the palestinians and israel and the government is hell bent on refusing to do that. and also what gives israel the right to go into gaza and destroy homes just bulldozing them. ki&ling 1300 israelis and at the same time, having only ten people killed on the israeli side. that doesn't make any sense. i mean, america gives weapons to israel and is this what you do with them? guest: it's a complicated question. the first part of your question, you said the settlements are the issue and really they aren't the only issue. they're an issue. there's a number of complex issues we discussed the status of israel and exact borders of the final agreement between the two sides so there's a number of very complicated issues. our belief is that it's time for those issues to start to actually be discussed and let's get beyond the discussion about t$e settlement agreement. as far as ga

. >> nina. hi, good to see you. i have a question regarding, resolving the issues that are outstanding between the u.s. and iran. some people speak of a grand bargain, and some people say we have to deal with it one issue at a time. how do you see it developing? >> another question. >> thanks. right here. >> voice of america, persian news network. ambassador limbert, when -- at what point do you say enough is enough, it's not working? >> could you clarify that question a little bit? [laughter] there are many ways of reading that -- >> once you've gone through your 14 points and you've done all your negotiations, you've been patient enough, you have set your expectations high -- >> okay. there was a question here. the man -- and then we'll take the answers. >> hi. alex, london daily telegraph. i mean, the urgency now is the nuclear issue. i'd be interested to know how profound do you think is iran's ambition to have a nuclear weapon? >> excuse me? >> how profound is iran's ambition to have a nuclear weapon? >> are yo

. >> i'm nina, from here in cincinnati. >> what time did you get here this morning. >> about 7:30. >> so you have been here over three hours, going on four hours. >> i had breakfast. while i was waiting for this to start. >> why did you come so early. >> i wanted to make sure i got in and got a place! it is really important to me to be here today. >> why is it important for you to be here. >> because i wanted to meet sarah palin or at least see her in person. i think she's an up and comer and i agree with her politics and i voted for her. >> what do you like about her politics? >> she really follows what most of the people i know, middle class, mid-america, is about. my kind of candidate. >> what are the -- most of the people you know, what are their politics? >> most of the people that i know want a smaller government. we don't want the government interfering with our lives, to the extent that it is. we don't feel that we need a nanny state. i... my people in my family go back for generations in the united states and we do not believe that we need to be taken care of. we take care of