and derek smith the paramedics we heard the testimony of dr ninan found they came in and they said they began resuscitative effort efforts they introduced oxygen and oxygen supply we were there their manual the breathing for him there really oxygenating his blood so when you look at that piece of evidence when you look at a piece of evidence like that you have to compare against all of the other evidence because you can't come in and say george for on one hand george why died of a 6 year but he has a 98 percent oxygen. his blood is oxygen. then it is stands to reason the opposite is true as well you can't come in and say i can conclusively prove that mr fly didn't have carbon monoxide in his blood because he had this high oxygen saturation you test one statement against the evidence of other people and you compare that is what you as jurors are obligated to do and what i am asking you to do compare the evidence against itself test it challenge it compare it to the law read the instructions in their entirety start from point of the presumption of innocence and see how far the state can g