it introduces a level of uncertainty and time into the process, whether it is ceqa or nipa, that may not be handled here, but often goes into the court. that doesn't mean these are inappropriate standards. i think it's very good to see there are 149 examples and only 8 tribbered by stark resources. i would just say, i think we would do well to think about its impact on affordable housing as we think about size and shape to the districts. again, i think there is a path forward here. i think if we're smart and don't allow ourselves to go beyond the bourppedries of what's really laid out in terms of ordinance and statue and regulation, we have a chance. what always troubles me or troubles my colleagues is when i hear people asking for things to be brought into the process that clearly have not been legislated as much by the board or voters. that's what scares me about the survey conversation and other stuff because i think people's understanding is not as clear as it is expressed by the planning department today. >> thank you. are there any questions? thank you. we will next hear from t

it introduces a level of uncertainty and time into the process, whether it is ceqa or nipa, that may not be handled here, but often goes into the court. that doesn'