he was in the nixon administration and got fired. he went home and became a democrat. he was here for 16 years and came home every weekend. why? it keeps you attached to that area and the constituents you represent. it sure home. the central coast of california, that's my home. i will go back home every weekend as much as i can. my two is a judge and daughters are 10 and 11 and go to the same public schools i did. i want them to be carmel valley kids. i don't want them to be beltway kids. they are going to have their own identity. it's making sure your family that's how we did it with my two older brothers. that's the most important thing. notpe my daughters are known as jimmy's daughters. important thing, that they have their own identity. ,hat's what we're trying to do actually. i am going to look at a place that i may share with two or three other freshmen congress members. i saw it first hand. i lived it. you, it's good to have that sort of living situation. it does add to the chemistry. it can be done here. i look forward to living with other congressmen. >> any r

i happen to be a part of the nixon administration. can you give us an overview of how the baby fits into the overall schedule for the day. pdb fits into the overall schedule for the day. when i see press shots today it looks like president obama has more people there every morning. how does it work? >> eight varies depending on the president's travel schedule and commitments but the typical time for a briefing is 10:00 but as i said in his case we do not go in and brief the articles because he has already read them so we use that time which he and his advisers ascribe a lot of importance to to update it from the time it was cut off and that includes i am getting updated as i am going to the white house to present the intelligence briefing and then of course the white house has its own organic watch function in the white house situation room as well as the presidents advisers who are very competent themselves in intelligence issues, one of whom was john. the president is attended to quite well weather during the period of briefing over

opportunity to prove the cost of ownership for those limitations that existed from the johnson threw nixon administration with the elimination and the fed chairman they were willing to do so but the policies put forward will only help three commissioners could be adopted so the policy was not changed endeavor like to think we could change that with limitations while still protecting diversity in public-interest. >> one more question on net neutrality running a more bipartisan commission. but if you revoke title ii and net neutrality? >> that definitely flows from whoever is the chair person and their agenda but i suspect i would not be surprised the new minority could have trouble with the activities they are doing but at the same time and think we can build a better practice going for word there's only so much you can have with net neutrality the what we fought about for a long time with an opportunity to consider what they would like to do. there is some room but i understand if this say tough couple months ahead as other people have strong views but now at the same time to have good policy to find com

. >> nixon administration. >> exactly. whether you intended it or not, it did get people's attention. they have some concerns about what it means in terms of other countries knowing where the united states stands, how t united states will follow these norms or not. again, it was described as a courtesy call. we will see if that is a policy change down the line, if there's any repercussions. >> kelly o'donnell, i appreciate the conversation. >>> another conversation i appreciate, someone we're having now with congressman adam schiff, ranking member of the intelligence committee. you heard kelly talking about the situation. to your reaction to the phone call with the president of taiwan? the dnc is calling this a threat to national security. would you go so far as to say that? >> i don't know that i would say it's a threat to national security. but it does look like this was another indication of trump bumbling his way through the transition period. it's not as if this call was in isolation. he had a long call it appears wit

but in 1973 the nixon administration, through a pal of nixon's, they were challenging the licenses ofwo of the four television stations. so the stock went from 37 down to 16. at 16, there were about 5 million shares. that was for $80 million. that included other assets and no debt to speak of. so the washington post company, intrinsically worth $400 million or $500 million was selling for $80 million. it was ridiculous. you have a business unquestionably worth five times what it was selling for, and mr. nixon was not going to put them out of business. david: when you are doing these analyses, then and now, do you have computers that help you? did you get printed materials or how did you in those days, how did you read about the washington post, and how do you do it today? mr. buffett: same way, but fewer opportunities now. i met bob woodward and he came up with all the presidents men. all of a sudden, at 30 years of age he was getting quite wealthy. we had lunch at the madison hotel and he said, what do i do with the money? i said, investing is about assigning yourself the right story

basically the nixon administration and henry kissinger and nixon felt that if the north koreans thought that he was a madman that he had a hot temper, they were more likely to come to the negotiating table to find peace and now the "washington post" is saying potentially donald trump is going by this theory as well. it's a pretty generous favor there in some ways to donald trump, basically painting his inconsistent statements with a broad brush and saying maybe this could be donald trump being unpredictable and what does this do? this could unsettle other foreign powers and make them come to the negotiating table even more because they don't know how donald trump would react. they talk about the muslim been being a part of this. they say it could this phone call donald trump had with the president of taiwan. initially we thought this was a fly by the seat of his pants where he just picked up the phone and disrupted and unnerve it had chinese by happenstance. it turns out we found out that there was a lot more work that went into that call. it was much more premeditated so the theory is

but in 1973, the nixon administration through a pal of nixon's, they were challenging the licenses off the florida television stations that the post owned. so the stock went from 37 down to 16. now at 16, there were about 5 outstanding, so the whole washington post company was selling for $80 and no debt to speak of. so the washington post company, intrinsically worth $400 million or $500 million was selling for $80 million in the market. we bought most of our stock at about the equivalent of $100 million in the market. it was ridiculous. you had a business that unquestionably was worth four or five times what it was selling for, and mr. nixon was not going to put them out of business. david: when you are doing these analyses, then and now, do you have computers that help you? how did you actually read all materials to read about the washington post, and how do you do it today? mr. buffett: pretty much the same way, except there are fewer opportunities now. i met bob woodward and he came up with all the presidents men. all of a sudden, at 30 years of age, he was getting quite wealthy.

>> it may have been important in the nixon administration because at that time the government of taiwan was the government of china and the government in beijing was the government in china. that's not what people in taiwan think today. they have given up their claims to the mainland. they have a functioning democracy. people call themselves taiwanese and not taiwanese. they meet every customary law of a state and they have a defined population and territory. to act as though they are still a province of china defies reality. >> that's the people's republic of china, that's their stated position. >> good for them. in taiwan they were pretty excited about this, were they not? >> they think they should govern themselves. i know that's a radical proposition, but they have been accomplishing it. they have been showing democracy in action. beyond that it is in the strategic interest of the united states to keep taiwan as a functioning separate state. when we think of the one policy they won wonder if it is a violation of that. it does not indicate how the status of taiwan and china will be r

instance, just media ownership, cross-ownership or limitations that existed from the johnson and nixon administration. and in those instances we had the opportunity to eliminate them. current chairman said he was willing to do so, we had another signal from another commissioner that they were willing to do so, but the policy is put forward that only if all three current majority commissioners supported it could it be adopted and, obviously, one objected, so the policy was not changed. i'd like to believe that we can change it. i think we can do it in a thoughtful way while still protecting diversity, competition and public interest. >> host: one more question on net neutrality and title ii. >> guest: sure. >> host: you talked about wanting a more bipartisan commission. how do you revoke title ii and perhaps, you know, initiate new net neutrality principles in a bipartisan -- >> guest: so two parts. one, it definitely flows from whoever's chairperson and the agenda they choose. but if this is a course of action that is selected, i suspect, you know, i wouldn't be surprised at some, you know, the new m

edgar hoover building is 42 years old on in 1974 nixon administration and justice department in comparisonrs old. final decision on this is expected in march. on capitol hill tom fitzgerald "fox5 local news". >> up next help for a family that lost their home before christmas. how d.c. fire stepped up to help replace the presents for couples six grand kids. >>> >> it was merry christmas after all. cheryl and maurice were upset about losing toys they bought for the grand kids. members of d.c. fire and several organizations replace the >> we were really, really distraught by the fact that their presents were destroyed and at that point we thought christmas was lost for us and thank god for the community and want to thank god for all fighters. >> the spirit in which you guys helped us is allow us to know that there is a community here in ward eight. they're grateful and as for the home they hope to rebuild. >> a waitner virginia got a generous tip a group called tip bombing they tip bomb in northern virginia during holidays and only "fox5" was there are to the surprise this year. alexandra lim

edgar hoover building is 4 years old opened in 1974 nixon administration and justice department in comparison1 years old. final decision on this is expected in march. on capitol hill, tom fitzgerald, "fox5 local news". >>> u.s. navy is restoring a century old tradition today. it's scraping a decision to eliminate dodzens of enlisted sailors job titles including many that end in man. the decision to drop long held traditional titles and instead refer was announced in september and proposed changes brought persistent complaints from sailors around the world and the navy will continue to review ways to update those names and titles. >> coming up tonight on "fox5"news at 11 a loaded hand gun found at a local school. investigators say something the teenager did led them right to him. >> and have you heard about this one a youtube star claims he was kicked off a plane for speaking arabic and the airline has a different story. we'll tell you what he is saying about the publicity the story has drawn coming up tonight at 11. >>> looking for new year's resolution well forget shedding the weight. try sh

and it's part of this very complicated formula that was devised by the nixon administration, a republican administration, four decades ago. if he had talked to a state department briefer for five minutes before the call they would have explained, this was the whole nature of the formula. >> not to pile on but is that too -- that is too simplistic to say, we do this but don't do that? >> as i say, if you want to break with it, fine. but i'd like to know that there was some thought to it. i tell you one other piece of it. kellyanne conway told anderson, revealing moment, she said the president-elect is allowed to have private conversations with foreign leaders. >> let's play that. >> it's a matter of the executive committee, it's a matter of the president-elect, the vice president-elect, other advisers to the transition, making suggestions. and we're happy to schedule the calls. there's a very orderly process. we make sure there is plenty of time for those phone calls, that there's proper briefing. and so far, they've just gone really well. he at least is having these private conversations,

donald trump's first interaction with the federal government is when the nixon administration justice department found him guilty and came to an agreement, a settlement on housing discrimination so donald trump has been, you know, the birther, the one we know the most about how he said barack obama wasn't born here but he actually many, many years ago was found guilty and with housing discrimination and not renting to african-americans and his new h.u.d. appointee seems to share that philosophy. second, i want to see -- i don't know how qualified he will be and how much he knows but i've never heard him talk about how we provide more housing to particularly moderate income people. the neighborhood my wife and i live in in cleveland 44105 had more foreclosures than any zip code in the united states in 2007. there are a whole lot of renters and the price has gone up. they spend 50% of their disposable income in rent. we've got to find a way to provide a moderate price to affordable housing. i'm hopeful that mr. -- dr. carson will come forward with some ideas. i haven't seen them yet. >>

in mind the current fbi building, the jay edgar hoover building is 42 y opened in 1974, the nixon administratione justice department for comparison, that building is 81 years old. final decision on this is expected in march. on capitol hill, tom fitzgerald fox 5 local news >>> the u.s. navy is restoring a century old tradition today. it's scrapping a decision to eliminate dozens of enlisted sailors job titles including many that end in man. the decision to drop long held tradition titles and refer to sailors by rank was proposed in september. but it present persistent complaints. the navy said it will continue to update the famous. >>> we have sad news to report about one of our nation's heros >> one of the oldest living world war ii vets died. bill mohr of pennsylvania served in europe two years. he made national headlines last month when he visited the white house for the annual day breakfast and spent time with president obama. he died of natural causes on sunday. he was 108 years old. a life well lived. >>> seek yell elliot's salvation army stunt has triggered a donation boom. now the effort

and the role she had in her father richard nixon's administration.going to be acting as the normal first lady role after january 20th? will it be melania? is it going to be ivanka? >> we'll have an official first lady, i don't think she'll be physically here. there's going to be an important social secretary role. they're going to have to fill that with someone who has experience. and there are people from the bush administration working with the east wing, with melania trump to try to staff her, that's an important point. they are reaching out to republicans who came before them who have done this before, donald trump's never held elected office. and so i think we might not have a first lady in the traditional sense. i think melania trump will come down for state dinners. she can have a campaign she's involved in. she can do a lot from new york. symbolically i think she'll move here eventually. >> we talked about the role of ivanka trump. what about the two sons and the conflicts of interest? more on that when we come back. this one is from channel

coming up our panel will debate as one reporter compares the obama white house to the nixon administrationmight remember chewbacca and the video that went viral. chewbacca mom, that is. we'll look at that and other videos that captivated us in 2016. >> you were worth every penny. asmy family tree,ing i discovered a woman named marianne gaspard... it was her french name. then she came to louisiana as a slave. i became curious where in africa she was from. so i took the ancestry dna test to find out more about my african roots. the ancestry dna results were really specific. they told me all of these places in west africa. i feel really proud of my lineage, and i feel really proud of my ancestry. ancestry has many paths to discovering your story, get started for free at ancestry.com ♪ ♪ >> this administration has been the most secretive since the nixon administration. they have gone after, they have, as you said, criminalized investigative reporting. eric: that was new york times' top investigative reporter james risen saying the obama white house has been like the nixon administration when i

was part of a carefully arranged deal struck by the nixon administration and maintained since the 1970s. donald trump says he took a congratulatory call from the taiwanese president which chinese view as a ploy by taiwan to lure the president-elect into a diplomatic breach. china's foreign minister even dubbing it a little trick. trump immediately dug in on the issue saying the u.s. sells military equipment to taiwan so he ought to be able to talk a phone call. trump's response raises the question of who he's just doubling down on a kind of improvisational or accidental foreign policy. while the long-term diplomatic problem from the call is unclear, we've got this covered from all angles. we'll start at the white house. what is their view? will it be possible to ascertain whether donald trump is disrupting things on purpose or fumbling his way into a huge diplomatic change? >> that depends how good your sourcing is up there in trump tower in new york. to the larger question whether or not it's a change in policy, the white house is insisting, no. there is no change in policy towards tai

they've been the most anti-press administration since the nixon administration. >> in what ways?, they have gone after -- they have as you said criminalized investigative reporting. they tried to take essentially stories they don't like and try to find some classified information that might be part of that and then turn it into a criminal leak investigation in which they say someone mishandled or disclosed classified information. as you know, you can do that with virtually any story in washington. >> does it mean much to you or anything to you that eric holder, the former attorney general, others have expressed some regret about some of the ways this administration try to pursue whistle-blowers and in some cases wrap up journalists in that? i recall holder saying one of his greatest regrets as indicting james rosen in an unindicted co-conspirator in this case. >> after he said that he kept coming after me. i don't think there was any serious regret by the administration. i think they didn't like negative publicity and so wherever people pointed this out in the press and when it b

seven out of 12 in the nixon administration is a lot. all of sudden we have problem with it now? times have changed. harris: we love you ivy leaguers on the couch. [laughter]. meghan: this is so fancy. harris: the process continues. president-elect donald trump when he sits down with our own chris wallace for an exclusive interview on "fox news sunday." it's this weekend. check your local fox station listings, watch it on fox news channel 2:00 p.m., 10 p.m. eastern on sunday. don't miss it. >>> president obama's admitting he was caught off-guard by the spread and strength of the islamic state savages, my words, not his. despite repeated warnings from intelligence officials. how is that possible? >>> calls for one lawmaker for an indto what he calls president obama's politically-collect policies on homeland security and counterterrorism. whether the incoming trump administration will make big changes, what they could look like. >>> get ready, because when the tv version wraps up on this friday eve, baby we pop up on line. fox news. com/outnumbered. tap the "overtime" tab or watch

>> this involved is unprecedented, but i mean, during the nixon administration, you had julie nixon andisisa h eisenhower very involved and a press conference during watergate and 100 years since a daughter filled a role, when president wilson's wife passed away and in recent history, martha jefferson filled in for her daughter before thomas jefferson. when life expectancies were shorter, we saw daughters-in-law take role as a hostess but. >> melania trump is there. her apparent indifference when it comes to perhaps the role of first lady, although she gave the speech saying she would take on social media, which was interesting. but do you think she sees melania trump, the actual first lady of the white house the way, say, bess trueman saw it, the great white jail? zbli >> i think she's a reluctant first lady. she's so honest about it. someone like jackie kennedy wasn't excited about it. went to virginia to get out of dc and melania is not having the pretense to moving to washington but eventually, she'll feel the need to move here. >> it's a fascinating piece. thank you so much. we app

the nsc and state department were really at loggerheads for much of those early years in the nixon administration and the carter administration. and same with bush 43 between rumsfeld, colin powell, and vice president cheney. what's your sense given your experience with all of that? how to ensure that it doesn't end up disfunctional? or is it nature of the personalities rather than the structure of things that you're going to have these kinds of tensions? is there anything that you can advise about what needs to be done in regard to avoid the things we have seen in the past? >> yes, there is. first let me talk about the nc staff issues and then i'll touch on the cia, fbi issues. is the nsc staff too large? yes. is it micromanaged too much? yes i think so. i think it's because basically it's extremely large and they're holding constant meetings because they don't know better. but it is not a democrat/republican phenomena. >> what was it in those days? >> 50 professionals. >> it was regarded as awe highly functional staff. >> it was too small. >> no. >> i thought it was too small. >> we were able t

he was in the nixon administration. he got fired. where'd he go?nded up going back home, became a democrat. he was here for 16 years as a congress member. he came home every weekend. why? one, because it keeps you attached to that area. it keeps you attached to the constituents that you represent, but two, it's your home. we work here in washington but the central coast of california, carmel county, california, that's my home. i will go back home as much as i can. my family, my wife. my two daughters who are 10 and 11 go to the same public schools i did. i want them to be cormel valley kids, not beltway kids. they're going to be raised the same way i did. they're going to have their own identity. that's important. it's making sure that your family lives their lives, not just your life. that's how we did it with my two other brothers. they made sure we were jimmy, chris, and carmelo, not that we were leon's kids. that's the most important thing is being sure they have their own identity. >> does that mean your -- you're -- with people here in washin

for instance, just the media ownership, our limitations that existed from the johnson and nixon administration and in those instances, we had the opportunity to eliminate some, the chairman said he was willing to do so. we had another signal from another commissioner that he was willing to do so but only if all three current majority commissioners support were to be adopted and obviously one objective so the policy was not sustained. i think we can do it in a thoughtful way, with no media ownership limitations but protecting the diversity of competition of interests. >> one more question on the net neutrality entitled to, you talked about a more bipartisan commission. how do you revoke title to and perhaps initiate another principle in a bipartisan administration? >> two parts, one is chairperson and the agenda they choose but if this is a course of action that is selected, i suspect i wouldn't be surprised if the new minority will have trouble in some activities we are doing but at the same time i think we can build a better process going forward so i think you can, there's only so much agree

they were at loggerheads for much of those early years in the nixon administration. the carter administration, the same. 43 between rumsfeld, powell, and vice president cheney. so, what is your sense given your experience with all of that? how to ensure that it does not end up dysfunctional? or is it just in the nature of the personalities who structured things that you are going to have these kinds of tensions? is there anything you can advise on what needs to be done in that regard to avoid the kinds of royalesate -- battle we are in the past? >> yes, there is. i will touch on the nfc first. the nfc staff, is a too large? yes. as of micromanage? yes, i think so. i think it is because basically it is extremely large and they are holding constant meetings because they do not know better. but it is not a of a credit-republican phenomenon. kind you are talking about 400? >> yes. it is generally regarded as having been a highly functional stuff. >> i thought it was too small. >> actually, it was not too small. [laughter] >> no, we were only able to end gulf war.ar and th

carter sought to tie forward to really the disgraced nixon administration. ford, of course, did himself no favors by, in his first hundred days, in fact his first 30 days, first pardoned nixon, and of course, for those "saturday night live" fans, you know, that's my first memory is the chef i chase impression of gerald ford which president ford went to an unbelievable undergraduate university. but "snl's" lampooning of ford really had an impact and made people think he had a low intellect, and clumsy. that stuck. i don't think it had the same impact that social media can have today. but again, this is the part of the theme carter saying we're going to change, we're going to be truthworthy, different, versus the old regime. we're going to change washington. i'll get to that a little bit later because that's an important part of carter's first hundred days. he's not met with the plethora of foreign policy crises we're used to today. i suspect having to deal with the existential threat of the soviet union at the time makes up for that. if you look at some of th

presidents' daily brief started in the nixon administration. some like nixon didn't do it at all.it every day like george w. bush. others chose to take it less frequently. the chief of staff, priebus, once he gets his security clearance, will get that briefing every day. security advisor flynn will get briefing every day as will the secretary of defense and secretary of state. there are plenty of people in the government receiving that briefing and if he chooses to talk to them about national security issues, they will talk to him about anything in that briefing he should know. i should imagine he will meet with that national security team on a regular basis. the president has a right to choose how he's going to get information. stuart: the president-elect is tweeting the f-35 costs are out of 0 control. how do you feel about the president -- some people are nitpicking this saying the president-elect should not be setting policy by tweet. what say you? >> i don't have any problem with it. why? the business side of the military, the business side of the military, where 50% of the m

carter sought to tie forward to be part of the disgraced nixon administration. norida of course did himself favors in his first 100 days, in his first 30 days, ford pardoned nixon. for those saturday night live bands, my first memory is the chevy chase impression of gerald ford. absolutely went to unbelievable undergraduate lampooning upward really had an impact and made people think he had a low intellect, was clumsy. and that did not have the same impact social media can have today but this is part of the game. we're going to be trusted, different. making them part of the old regime. saying we are going to change the old washington, that being part of the old washington. he was not met with the foreign policy crisis we're met today. -- having to deal with the existential threat of the soviet union probably makes up for that. that looking at before and policy side, it is quite compared to today. secretary solis vance sworn in, let's see how that goes. he is sent to the middle east within weeks to try to restart geneva conference, the multilateral u.s.-soviet le

and as you note, through republican and democratic administrations, nixon, carter, reagan, serious reductions down to a fraction of where they were. the question is, are you concerned about russian moves that barbara starr referenced there to perhaps violate some of these treaties, the possible deployment and development of a mobile launched missile, is that a real concern from the u.s. per spe -- perspective? >> yes, one of the challenges donald trump will face right away is russian aggression. russia has pushed up against the boundaries of different treaty commitments, including the invasion of crimea. so trump is going to have to demonstrate his ability to stand up to putin and that may be a part of what he's predicting with this tweet is that he's willing to do so. but there are so many other ways which, in the course of his campaign, he's made troubling positive statements about putin. so i don't know what to make of this. i do think that the united states retains a very large and lethal nuclear arsenal, the 7,000 warheads we have today, we have plans in place to modernize them and able

kissinger was national security adviser and secretary of state in the nixon and ford administrationsnd was instrumental in the reestablishment of relations with china. he has spent 45 years helping leaders on both sides navigate this important bilateral relationship. we especially appreciate your being here today because on friday, we all saw you on television with president xi jinping and we know you might be jetlagged after that. we also know you recently visited trump tower so we hope to hear more about that. [laughter] the national committee has been fortunate to have you serve on our board of directors now for more than 12 years. today is the 20th anniversary of secretary albright's nomination to be secretary of state under president clinton. having served -- having served -- [applause] mr. orlins: having served four years of u.s. ambassador to the u.n., sheep became the first -- she became the first woman to serve as secretary of state and at that time, the highest-ranking woman ever in the united states government. a heroine to my three daughters, secretary albright played a l

the mix this weekend, steven hadley, who, of course, first started working in republican administrations for nixon then worked on gerald ford's national security council. also, of course, spent a lot of time working for reagan and working for george w. bush. hadley would be, many washington insiders would absolutely love the idea of having him as rex tillerson's number two, if, in fact, tillerson is confirmed, but that certainly would be seen as a steady hand and somebody that could really help tillerson do what the trump administration wants to get done across the globe. but the word i'm hearing over the weekend is, that this is no longer going to be a decision that's going to be made solely by donald trump, that he's looking to defer to rex tillerson and basically says rex tillerson is going to be making this choice. if, in fact, that's the case, then certainly a lot of people inside suggest that pushes john bolton even further away from the number two slot over at the state department. >> those number two jobs are, obviously, huge, but mccormick and hadley, you couldn't have two names that woul

and i think we have seen is through a variety of administrations beginning with president nixon, we have developed a way of talking to each other that it is a pattern there are certain ways it takes a diplomacy by virtue to put yourself in neither persons shoes you're not negotiating for a hotel. so how to develop the right to farmlands? it takes a while to sort it out by have traveled abroad is to explain to anybody, was born in czechoslovakia tuesday, and they agree they are learning but that actually has not been a foreign policy tool. >> it didn't used to be the election tool either. >> but how technology is used the number of issues that we have with uh chinese with military to military depend on the relationships that have all of the information and the transition period it is too short and too long berger had been transitioned into n transitioning deleterious more fun this a very complicated period with their talking to each other and forget that the foreigners are listening. i airily hope that make good friend henry kissinger has a strong influence on the president-elect. [laught

interests according to every administration back to nixon that said they were willing to give up national security chip so to speak because that wasn't the focus. even if you want to be in a fight with china, the argument on substance not just on politics would be, pick the right fight. >> i think there's the element that jay is speaking to where donald trump very much campaigned on sticking it to china. another big concern that is really just emerged from this call with taiwan is not that he took the call, it's that he wasn't actually briefed in advance. he hasn't been taking a lot of his intelligence briefings. there was not consultation with the state department. it has more do with a question of preparedness. donald trump's team, you heard kellyanne conway say he is aware of the one china policy. is he? over the course of the campaign we saw he is not well versed on the issues. i think the criticism really has more to do with the way he shoots from the hip, that people might compare it to obama -- conservatives compare it to obama's policy toward iran, cuba. those were areas the admin

was the thing you really detailed of the problems that happened under republican administrations with eisenhower to nixon, to bush and then the present situation under obama, but you did not talk much about sake what for example clinton ending welfare as we know it or other things that might happen under democratic administrations, which also has disproportionate effects on black people. >> thank you and one of the reasons behind that is because i was looking at the moments of advancement and in those moments of advancements where you see the pushback comes, you know,seg before 68, you know, give the republicans and democrats, but one of the things in a piece i did just recently, i do begin to unpack somewhat bill clinton and what he has done. now, the arctic-- article focusing on the gop, but understand there are a couple things happening, that whitete rage moves through parties. m it isn't just isolated like in the republicans or isolated in the democrats and that is alsoth really important to understand. so it was just the epoque's that i looked at that did that, but i could've easily, for instance, d

releaseda recently over 2000 pages of previously classified material from the richard nixon and general ford administration. it they were part of the president -- they were part of the president's daily briefing. up next, a discussion with cia director john brennan and james clapper about the newly released documents. the richard nixon presidential library in nexen foundation hosted this event. it is an hour and a half. >> good afternoon, everyone. on behalf of all of my colleagues, i want to welcome you to today's event titled the president's daily brief. my name is joe lambert and i am the director at the cia and i'll be your agency for today's event. events like this take a lot of work, and i want to take a second technology efforts of the cia officers who reviewed and declassified these 28,000 pages over the last year. they were assisted by a number of intelligence agencies. but one in

administrations. he went from eisenhower to nixon and bush and then the present situation under obama, but you didn't talk much about the clintons ending welfare as we know it or other things that might happen on the democratic administration which are also had disproportionate effects on black people. >> absolutely. thank you. one of those, one of the reasons behind that is because i was looking at these moments of advancement and in those moments of advancement, where you are seeing the pushback comes before 68 if got the republicans and the democrats, but one of the things in a piece that i did just recently, i do begin to unpack, just somewhat, bill clinton and what he has done. the article focused in on the gop, but understand there are couple of things happening. white rage moves through parties. it isn't just isolated, like in the republicans are in the democrats, and that is also really important to understand. it was just the kind of epoque's that i looked at that did that, but i could've easily, for instance, during the great depression when franklin delano are real roosevelt is creating a w

she got along on pbs and then when the reagan administration defunded pbs and nixon tried to defend it and no pbs programming was up-and-down from that. what was greatest to read the letters that buckley sent out to people raising money where he said reagan has defunded pbs, now i need you to pay for it. not surprisingly he was supporting the free market and capitalism and there is a lot of work to capitalist. here's the money to keep your show going. he and particularly the old foundation and other private foundations and so on and so forth funded the show over the years. he had some ups and downs, but basically there is never a doubt he would get the money he needed once that was defunded in the 80s. this altered on. other questions? yes. >> in your preparation and research on the book, you must have read some of his books. i'm sure a lot of them. did you have any favorites among those achieved by assertive really caught -- is other stuff where you felt like he was really have his powers. >> i believe i think it is cruising speed. it's not like 72 or so? that's a really fun one. it r

administration. kennedy, johnson, eisenhower, nixon, ford, carter, reagan, holy cow, 6%, 5.5%. bill clinton, 4.5%. even george bush well abo 3%. not once, eight years, lost decade of economic growth under president obama. and that's with low energy prices. that's with super low interest rates. so when we ask what the plan is, what the administration is doing to grow the economy, they come back and say, well listen, the new normal, the new normal is about 2%, 1.5% g.d.p. growth. so they don't say hey, we're going to grow the economy. they just dumb down american expectations. go google the term "new normal." everybody uses is now in washington. everybody uses it. essentially they're saying that 1.5%, 2% g.d.p. growth is the best we can do. and i have a lot of respect for my colleague from oregon. if you want to talk about an ebenezer scrooge strategy, growing the u.s. economy at 1.5% and not even trying to grow at traditional levels of american growth, as' the ultimate eastbound -- that's the ultimate ebenezer scrooge strategy because the entire country, especially middle-class families are hurt by

so he got along of pbs and thenn when the reagan administration defunded pbs, and nixon trade to defund it and all pbs -- but when reagan defunded pbs, what is great is to read the letters that buckley send out to people raising money. he said, joy, reagan has defunds pbs. now i need you to pay for it. and not surprise ily he was supporting the free market and capitalism and a lot of wealthy capital-its were, yes, here's some money to keep your show m going. so other private foundations and so on and so forthfunds the show over the years so he never -- he schad some ins and downs but base there was never a do you he two get the money he needed once it was defunded in the '80s so it soldiered on. last question? >> in your preparation for -- and research on the book you must have read some of his books, and i'm sure a lot of them.ar did you have enough favorites among those you thought sort of really got him? his other stuff. where you felt like he was s really at he height of this powers. >> i believe -- i think it's cruising speed. '72 or so. that's a really fun one. would recommend "cr

julie nixon was very much involved in our president's administration, we haven't had a first daughterser, and she really is one of his core advisers. i don't see her taking the melania trump first lady role in this administration. >> i want you to listen to what ivanka trump says about her role on 60 minutes. >> people think that you're going to be part of the administration, ivanka. >> i'm -- no, i'm going to be a daughter, but i've said throughout the campaign that i'm very passionate about certain issues and i want to fight for them. >> you won't be -- >> wage equality, child care, these are things that are very important to me. i'm very passionate about education, promoting more opportunities for women. so there are a lot of things i feel deeply strongly about, but not in a formal administrative capacity. >> douglas, what does she mean by that? i'm going to be a daughter. >> shah she's going to be there to love on her father, to give him private advice, to be his eyes and ears, a watchdog in washington, d.c., and beyond. she's going to be quite a daughter, quite a powerful daughte

during the 60s and 50s and 40s, we have a law and order\, the nixon election and 68, the donald trump election in 2016, the obama administration had been very specific and aggressive in using that part of justice to address these issues. with that said, questionable, the obama administration has done more than any presidency in using the permit of justice to investigate the police department, to attempt to provide community police resources, and to require information from police the province, tracking police killings, how many were shot and killed by the police, the federal government does not keep. donald trump on the other hand has stated we don't believe the federal government should require local debarment to report this data, we don't want to harass them for this, he stated many times he wants to restore more law and order. he said in a questionnaire to the international association of chiefs of police he wants to rebuild the relationship between the federal government and local police department which sounds to most observers that he wants to be less critical of local police and the obama administration has been, what w

the nixon election in '68, now arguably the trump direction in 2016. the obama administration has been very specific and aggressive in using the department of justice to try to address these issues. most of the activists don't think they've done enough, but with that said, it's unquestionable the obama administration has done more than any modern presidency in terms of using the department of justice to investigate police departments' attempts to provide community policing resources and to, and also to require information from police departments. one project i worked on was tracking police killing, how many people were being shot and kill by the police. that's data the federalki government does not keep. donald trump, on the other hand, he has statemented essentially we don't believe that the federal government should be requiring the local departments to be reporting this data, we don't want to harass them for this. he's stated many times that he wants to restore more law and order. he said in a questionnaire to the international association of chiefs of police that he wants

he got along on pbs and then when the reagan administration defunded pbs and nixon tried to defund itnd all of pbs programming that ups and downs but when reagan defunded pbs it's great to read the letters that buckley sent out to people raising money.ou to pa reagan defunded pbs and now we need to fund it. was supporting s. and a lot of crony capitalists were like yes, it's a great show so the orange foundation, but other private foundations and so on and so forth funded the show over the years. so he had some ups and downs on pbs but basically there was never a doubt that he would get the money he needed once it wasg funded in the 80s so it soldiered on. last question. yes. >> in your preparation for research on the book you must to read some of his looks. i'm sure a lot of them. did you have any favorites among those. his other stuff where you felt like he really had power. >> i think it's cruising speed, is that like 72 or so?o? that's a really fun one and i would recommend cruising speed. it ranks up there with the new journalism and so on and so forth. i think it's okay but crui

through the administrations of president lyndon b johnson and richard nixon, ford and ronald reagan, george h.w. bush, bill clinton and george bush and now barack obama. i want to bring in my colleague, cal perry is with me. it is a no on settlement votes. the settlement must stop. >> traditionally the u.s. voted no on the resolution and most recently on 2011. i want to read a little bit of a language just so viewers can see how strong the language is. that has been the argument from the barack obama administration for the past eight years that these settlements and lets remind our viewers, there are 500,000 settlers who live on both jerusalem and the occupying west bank. it is been long that these settlements are illegal. after we heard of president t m president-elect trump yesterday. we heard from paul ryan and we can go ahead and throw in what he had to say. he's calling this "absolutely shameful." the vote today is a blow to peace. that's a dangerous precedent to further diplomatic efforts to i isolate and demonize israel. we also have from cory booker saying again, the same thi