not only would shooting the cost of gas way up affect people, wou puthe nl the coffin of pele in ral ars. alady 2/3 of cnties in the u.s. are losing popatn, yet nce agai radical environmentalisee nothing wrong withs. most ofhem are city pple anyway. hey probably tnk it would be go ifveryone s forced to li i25 or 30rban are with the rest of the country ft empty anpeople could be bus to a naonal park or wilderness area e couple of months, under government rm the land. they would not everyonpays lip service to ener indendence bute readyad 84% of r s. oil limits,n before the prident posed thisatest moratori. environmental radicals will say they, too, want energy inddence but en environmeal groups oppose drilling foril, cuanything trees, digging for coal, o produce anything natural gas caus of the pipelines and refiners and heaven forbi they don't want more nucle powerhosmesigs variesrom group to grd geraphic locatiobuth environmentalists are always the tfighankind of energy production except solar or wind. some of em oppose wdmills too and solar energy, despite ga blions in government su

for nl, you need a hammer. you can hammer a screw with a hammer but you make a mess of it. that is what we have been doing for the past 20 years. we are using our military to shape the world in diplomatic functions. we are focusing on having a lot of permanent presence thrghout the world. even as we develop a capacity for very rapid deployment and four intercontental stke capability. we are saying let's think about the best uses of our military and we are thinking about focusing on traditional notions of defensend deterrence. and that is what they do best. mindecond is let's keep in d think about the overmatch that currently exists between what we have and the threats that have developed in the world and the mismatches that exist. with regard to t overmatches, strike targets has increased0 times. that is since the first gulf war. aounttake that into when we think about how bennett been made. the forces that i described earlier, one of the guidelines re used is this, let's build a force that could take care of al of the conventional wars that we have fought. since 1990. they

seems to be one of those none starters like arguing that income tax is unconstitutional because the 16 nl amendment was never properly ratifying and flour i hadation of the water vie lates the congress. that's not where my worries are. we have to worry about the lack of public information. you have to worry about texas wanting to change most people thought it was a communist farty weekend if wanted people to rye inspect rights. you want people to know when they are talking about that's part of the mission to get the word out through the public and website and meetings like this that the core meeting values are incorporated. thank you for your attention >> up next on c-span, defense secretary robert gates testifying on next year's defense bunl et. and at 7:00 a.m. eastern washington journal. and more to begin on monday june 28th. this past wednesday, bp announced that $20 billion will be placed in an escrow account. they will not pay its share holders a dividend this year. on thursday, tony hayward testified. we'll show you that testimony today starting at 10:45 a.m. eastern on c-span. bot

for nl, you need a hammer. you can hammer a screw with a hammer but you make a mess of it.t is what we have been doing for the past 20 years. we are using our military to shape the world in diplomatic functions. we are focusing on having a lot of permanent presence throughout the world. even as we develop a capacity for very rapid deployment and four intercontinental strike capability. we are saying let's think about the best uses of our military and we are thinking about focusing on traditional notions of defense and deterrence. and that is what they do best. mindecond is let's keep in and think about the overmatch that currently exists between what we have and the threats that have developed in the world and the mismatches that exist. with regard to the overmatches, strike targets has increased 10 times. that is since the first gulf war. accountke that into when we think about how bennett been made. the forces that i described earlier, one of the guidelines were used is this, let's build a force that could take care of all of the conventional wars that we have fought. sin

nl electricity, but receives yer subsidies 2 a watt s much per ur as subsidies for all other forms ofduction. gut: well, those are two differenissues, so let me respond to senator alexander. proponent of a he has been an opponent of wind. we disagree. we think there is a lot of potential for wine. it is in the single digits as far as providing electricity in the united states. we think it can be in the double digits. it will not be the only source of power, but it could have role to play. you can see that in europe -- denmark, germany, spain -- with tremendous amount of wind. i completely disagree on the pope appeared on a point of transportation fuels -- we need much more -- on the point of trannportation fuels -- we need much more mileage per gallon. w 20's, and at's technologilly possible, d we need to go the. nvest heavily in public transrtation for our urban areas so that people hav f terniv and can get out o their cars. need to dop in a ttern that prodes people access to public transpoation so that we stop the approach, r prawl that we've had e last0 yes. and we needleaner burni