25
25
Sep 13, 2016
09/16
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 25
favorite 0
quote 0
there was under the bush nlrb, there was a case entitled dana corporation. the rule in dana was this. where an employer extended voluntary recognition, it was incumbent upon the employer to give notice to the employees in the bargaining unit that that voluntary recognition had been extended. and allow employees a 45 day window period to file a decertification petition or file for representative by a different union. again, a seemingly benign rule that did nothing more than ex tenld to employees the right under that change in circumstances to ratify the p voluntary recognition that was extended by their employer. again, that rule was changed by the board in 2011 on the very same day that the other one was. to now say there is once again an ir rebuttable presumption in the instance of voluntary recognition, there is a majority from a period from six months to a year. those are just two examples of how ironically there is no automatic way to do this, no external force that prompts another vote. even those that were internal and difficult to begin with have been
there was under the bush nlrb, there was a case entitled dana corporation. the rule in dana was this. where an employer extended voluntary recognition, it was incumbent upon the employer to give notice to the employees in the bargaining unit that that voluntary recognition had been extended. and allow employees a 45 day window period to file a decertification petition or file for representative by a different union. again, a seemingly benign rule that did nothing more than ex tenld to employees...
145
145
Sep 1, 2016
09/16
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 145
favorite 0
quote 0
if they are not happy with that, then they have to go and file a complaint through the nlrb and that happen. again, is a lengthy process and its really worked in the situation where it's hard for the worker themselves to get justice in the end of. but, there are steps that can be taken. is a lengthy process. your situation, we would have to know a lot more about that to answer the question specifically >> to quick follow-ups. of the first is that, what you are suggesting is the tough side of exclusive representation when you have a party exclusively representing you as a legal matter and that party has the authority absent specific circumstances to make a deal on your behalf whether or not you like it or not, so that if employees aren't always pleased with the final outcome of collective bargaining, but that doesn't mean that their representative has not been afforded the authority to make up together deal. that's the first thing. the second thing and i think what kerry is alluding to is that there is a requirement to, duty of fair represent-- representation by their members, but the
if they are not happy with that, then they have to go and file a complaint through the nlrb and that happen. again, is a lengthy process and its really worked in the situation where it's hard for the worker themselves to get justice in the end of. but, there are steps that can be taken. is a lengthy process. your situation, we would have to know a lot more about that to answer the question specifically >> to quick follow-ups. of the first is that, what you are suggesting is the tough side...
81
81
Sep 2, 2016
09/16
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
the nlrb is toothless but your underwear that the roles of began have been drastically changed under a new order issued by the president. encouragedontractor some role labor laws must report them to federal contracting agencies and faith the prospect of losing existing contracts. this corporation and federal contract is in the hundreds of my street do you want to jeopardize the pot of gold to save a few hundred thousand dollars in a union contract? the bottom line is this is an organizing tactic or in this case putting pressure on an employer at the collective-bargaining table borders on extortion by threatening to jeopardize these cases, eligibility for federal contract. it is black and white. been saying it for years. closing on this part, i will say these regulations are incredibly complex. they gives you some indication. routinely only 60 days to comment. the agency take months to do belga news -- develop this. why these agencies were not allowed private sector time. .. it is understandable. they don't want to hear what we have to tell them. we do the best job you can. we asked f
the nlrb is toothless but your underwear that the roles of began have been drastically changed under a new order issued by the president. encouragedontractor some role labor laws must report them to federal contracting agencies and faith the prospect of losing existing contracts. this corporation and federal contract is in the hundreds of my street do you want to jeopardize the pot of gold to save a few hundred thousand dollars in a union contract? the bottom line is this is an organizing...
48
48
Sep 4, 2016
09/16
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 48
favorite 0
quote 0
you say that the nlrb is toothless but you are apparently unaware that the rules of the game have been changed. under a new order issued by the president, a federal contractor that incurred similar labor laws must report them to federal contracting agencies to face the prospect of losing these contracts. counting all its divisions, this corporation has a federal contract in hundreds of millions, do you want to jeopardize the pot of gold to save a few hundred dollars in the union contract? so the bottom line is this is an organizing tactic or in this case putting pressure on an employer at the collective-bargaining table, which really borders on extortion by threatening to jeopardize these frivolous cases and the eligibility for federal contract. it is black and white, we have been saying it for years and there it is. closing on this part, i will say these regulations are incredibly complex. it gives you some indication. and it gives 60 days to comment, the agencies develop these, why these agencies were not allowed the private sector more time to do their own data collection and go out
you say that the nlrb is toothless but you are apparently unaware that the rules of the game have been changed. under a new order issued by the president, a federal contractor that incurred similar labor laws must report them to federal contracting agencies to face the prospect of losing these contracts. counting all its divisions, this corporation has a federal contract in hundreds of millions, do you want to jeopardize the pot of gold to save a few hundred dollars in the union contract? so...
100
100
Sep 1, 2016
09/16
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 100
favorite 0
quote 0
the nlrb is toothless but you are apparently unaware the of the game have been changed under a new order issued by the president, a federal contractor that incurred similar labor laws must report them to federal contracting agencies to face the prospect of losing these contracts. this federal contract in hundreds of millions, do you want to jeopardize the pot of gold to save a few hundred dollars in the union contract? the bottom line is this is an organizing tactic or in this case putting pressure on an employer at the collective-bargaining table borders on extortion by threatening to jeopardize these cases, eligibility for federal contract. it is black and white, we have been saying it for years and there it is. closing on this part, i will say these regulations are incredibly complex giving an indication of 60 days to comment, the agencies develop these, why these agencies were not allowed private sector time. .. >> and healthcare labor, the labor area we have got-- you can count on us come i think, 99.95. overtime is highly likely. the big eeo one compensation effort is over at omb a
the nlrb is toothless but you are apparently unaware the of the game have been changed under a new order issued by the president, a federal contractor that incurred similar labor laws must report them to federal contracting agencies to face the prospect of losing these contracts. this federal contract in hundreds of millions, do you want to jeopardize the pot of gold to save a few hundred dollars in the union contract? the bottom line is this is an organizing tactic or in this case putting...
77
77
tv
eye 77
favorite 0
quote 0
the nlrb, the labor department are doing everything in their power to unionize them, and that's the workforcee people in america. hey, look, look, those republicans out there, if you dislike donald trump, i mean just look at hillary clinton. this is a corrupt family. they are corrupt. you look at what they've done. since tamminy hall, we have not seen it at this level. this is the at the presidential level, the highest level we've seen, and we've seen with the clinton foundation, and we see it with everything she does. look, you got to vote for trump. you may not like him but you got to vote for him. >> i think i know where you're coming from. but you seem to have mixed views on hillary clinton. >> mixed? neil: just wanted to push you off the edge here. thank you very much, thank you very much. bernie marcus, thank you. >>> take a look at corner of wall and broad, sell-off ensuing despite what bernie is saying the federal reserve is increasingly convinced things are going just fine with the economy. so fine, they have to hike interest rates sooner rather than later. sooner being like now. aft
the nlrb, the labor department are doing everything in their power to unionize them, and that's the workforcee people in america. hey, look, look, those republicans out there, if you dislike donald trump, i mean just look at hillary clinton. this is a corrupt family. they are corrupt. you look at what they've done. since tamminy hall, we have not seen it at this level. this is the at the presidential level, the highest level we've seen, and we've seen with the clinton foundation, and we see it...