he taped and charity we have a lil while the real assessment of his puppy i sit down and no loophole was that we don't know exactly when you talk to people when you see even how they are drawn to him always thrown from his whole campaign. you will understand you get the feeling of detachment that the ig was happening. so who's going to vote for him. those who are honest and very grateful to this matter because they considered and this has been paid out during the campaign very stingy she can read my essay. as the dead man who saved them from terrorism police told the keys to the country. who would promise to spend abt and getting ready to go even in florida. i knew that protected the country from having its own apps praying and i just wanna i wanna make it your view is only referring to me is back in nineteen ninety two. islamic party won the elections those elections were canceled and subsequently we had a bloody civil war in algeria in which over a hundred thousand people died due to that still very much a traumatic to scar her for many people in nigeria. then we had to do terrible

no secrecy, no retaliation, no loopholes, no way. today is the day for equal pay. we're on the floor today because it is the equal pay day. and what does that mean? it means the women of the united states of america have to work in many instances 15 months a year, or 15 months to earn what a man makes doing the same job, with the same experience and the same seniority, earns in one year. now we're not against the guys. there are many men who do jobs they hate so their daughters can have the jobs they love. and after working to ensure they have a good home and a good education, they see their daughters are paid less. and we all know there is a generalized suppression going on of the middle class. another topic and another debate. but right now we're on the job, and we want to be paid for what we do. it's hard to believe that women are almost half of the workforce, and yet during that time, as we make up 50% of the workforce, we still make only 77 cents for every $1 that a man makes. african-american women earn 62 cents. latino women 54 cents. almost half. this is a

no loopholes anywhere for anyone. support akraml checks at gun shows? >> if you are a dealer that is the law. >> i'm not trying to play games. if you could say some of the congressman gun control, what would you say? >> i would ask them to step into my shoes. responsibly, raising money for the community and i get up one day from my desk and i had a gun pointed at my face. >> didn't have all the theoretical discussions you want, you can live in a fantasy world if you want to would suggest that the more people who have guns the safer we are, i live in the real world. guns are dangerous. we need to be more serious about them. they represent all of us. the changeing that does not start with one law. the public wants to make this a priority. we need to hold people accountable. >> when people are affected by something, they demand change. that is what a started to happen now. people get to that tipping point where they have had enough, that is when the culture changes. >> the laws become a change in culture. we need to say this is unacceptable. >> we have a s

no retaliation, no loopholes, no veil of secrecy. this has been going on a long time, mr. president. in 1964, president lyndon johnson, as part of the great civil rights movement sweeping our country, wanted to pass three civil rights bills: the equal pay act, the civil rights act, and the voting rights act. he started with the equal pay act because he thought it would be the easiest to pass and the easiest to enforce. 50 years later we are still fighting the battles on all three of those legislations, and today we're talking about equal pay. right now women are an emerging force in the workplace. way back in the 1950's, only 11% of the women were in the workplace, though many had been there during world war ii and rosies. now they are the breadwinners. 40% of the households are really breadwinners -- women make up 40% of the households in which she is the head of the house or the prime, or the breadwinner. and it's time to make the labor market reflect these. but most of all, the pay market. when the equal pay act was signed in 1963, guess what women made? 59 cents for ev

policy that germany, japan, the u.k., everybody else has, which is a tax rate in the mid-20s and no loopholes, zero. the u.s. has the most antiquated tax system. and that means some people are going to pay more taxes, and some people are going to pay less. >> but i guess the big question for most people is, would that create jobs? >> that's a fair debate. you know, personally i think it's going to create jobs. >> but our companies are not spending. they're not investing in a way that would create jobs. and big corporations are sitting on billions and billions of dollars. they're just sitting on it. >> companies should invest in the united states. it's still the world's biggest economy. and if companies just are going to sit on cash, they're going to lose. they're gonna lose, because only the people that are going to invest their way through this crisis are going to win. >> immelt is also supporting a tax holiday for global companies to get them to bring back home more than $1 trillion in profits they're keeping overseas. he says businesses would start hiring, even though they didn't when a ta

no loopholes and no ways without equal pay. it is the equal payday and what does that mean? them into the women of the united states of america have to work in many instances 15 months per year to earn what a man makes doing the same job with the same experience and the same seniority that a man earns in one year. we are not against the guys. there are many men who do jobs that they hate so their daughters to have the jobs they love and after working to ensure that they have a good home and a good education, they see their daughters are paid less and we all know that there is a generalized rate suppression going on of the middle class. another topic and another debate. and it's hard to believe that women are almost half of the work force and during that time as we make up 50% of the workforce, we still make only 77 cents for every dollar that a man makes. african-american women make 62 cents. and it's almost half. we need to change the goal and that is what we seek to do by bringing the paycheck fairness act to ban retaliation against employees who work for federal contracto

no secrecy, no retaliation, no loopholes, no way. today is the day for equal pay. we're on the floor today because it is the equal pay day. and what does that mean? it means the women of the united states of america have to work in many instances 15 months a year, or 15 months to earn what a man makes doing the same job, with the same experience and the same seniority, earns in one year. now we're not against the guys. there are many men who do jobs they hate so their daughters can have the jobs they love. and after working to ensure they have a good home and a good education, they see their daughters are paid less. and we all know there is a generalized suppression going on of the middle class. another topic and another debate. but right now we're on the job, and we want to be paid for what we do. it's hard to believe that women are almost half of the workforce, and yet during that time, as we make up 50% of the workforce, we still make only 77 cents for every $1 that a man makes. african-american women earn 62 cents. latino women 54 cents. almost half. this is a

it buys tax breaks, allowing corporations and the rich to park their money in a no-tax zone, loopholes, favors like carried interest and on and on and on. listen, there's a big study coming out in the fall from princeton and northwestern based on data collected between 1981 and 2002. their conclusion, quote, america's claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened. the preferences of the average american appear to only have a minuscule, near zero, statistically nonsignificant impact upon public policy. sad that it's come to this. the drift that is described in the formidable book has become a mad dash and it will overrun us and overwhelm us unless we stop it. >> at our website you can find out more about the book and a debate that's sparked on both the left and the right. i'll see you there. the left and the right. i'll see you there. and i'll see you here next time. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com >> don't wait a week to get more moyers. visit our website to see blogs. >>> funding is provided by encouraging the renewal of democracy, carnegie corporation of new yor

the gentleman says that their budget closes all the tax loopholes. no tax loopholes. in fact, he says theirs is the only budget that terminates the tax code. all together. gets rid of it. that's interesting. because if you look at the revenue levels coming in under his budget, it's identical to the current tax code. every year exactly as the congressional budget office says. dollar for dollar. in fact, i think he said he got rid of it in fiscal year 2017 or so, but, gee, the dollars keep rolling in just as they would be if you didn't get rid of the tax code. you know why? because they don't close any of those special interest tax breaks. it's the status quo in terms of the revenue coming in. if we were back and close some of those special interest tax breaks so that we could reduce our deficits, then you wouldn't have those numbers that they've got in their budget resolution. now, look, we all agree that we need to impose fiscal discipline. the question all along has been how do we do it? do we do it in a way where we share responsibility as americans? or do we do it

>> we think it is reasonable to criminalandatory background checks at every sale, every show, no loopholes for anywhere for anyone. >> do you feel as you did in 1999, mandatory background checks at gun shows? that you are a dealer, is already the law. something to cook -- if you could say something to congress, what would you say? ini would ask them to step my shoes and what i experienced, working responsibly, raising money for the community come and looking up one day from my desk and having a gun pointed at my face. >> you can't have all the theoretical discussions you want about what the second amendment means and you can live in a fantasy world if you want to come which suggests that the more people have guns, the safer we are, but out here in the real world guns are dangerous come and we need to be more serious about them. andut yourself in my shoes the shoes of other victims, survivors, non-survivors, the families of those people. us. represent all of that change does not start with anyone law. the public has to realize the priority, and to hold elected officials accountable. >> they

no loopholes, anywhere for anyone. >> do you still support mandatory background checks at gun shows? >> if that -- you're a dealer that is already the law. >> that is not my question. i am not trying to play games here. you say?ould >> i would ask him to step in and experience what i experienced working responsibly [inaudible] and looking up one day for my desk in having a gun pointed at my face. >> you can have all the theoretical discussions you want over what the second amendment means. you can live in a fantasy world which suggests that more people have guns the safer we are. gunsere in the real world, are dangerous. and we need to be more serious about them. >> put they represent all of us. doescognizing the change not always start with anyone law. the public has to make it a priority and has to hold elected officials accountable. >> that is what is starting to happen now. that is when the culture changes. >> the law then becomes a reflection of the changing culture. giant -- a sleeping giant has been awakened. there are people out there who are passionate about this, demanding

no records. >> critics call this the "private sale" loophole, an estimated 40 percent of gun sales that are largely invisible. >> we'd been told that south carolina's weak gun laws contributed to its high rate of domestic homicide. so our crew took a hidden camera to a gun show to see if buying a gun illegally was as easy as sources said. licensed dealers are required to run federal background checks and keep records of sales. we'll stop at a private sellers table >> what's required for the purchase, what do you need from us? >> show me you're a south carolina resident and show me some money. private sales between individuals must be done within the state. >> within the state? >> i can't cross state lines. >> this is $325 and this is $600... we find another group of private sellers, and pick out a handgun. >> is cash all right? >> cash... >> cash and carry's ok? >> yep. south carolina id >> uh, if we're from out of state, is there a way to... we're just passing through... >> there are grey areas that do come in handy. >> well i have to be extremely careful with them grey areas. >> what are you look

. >> is the complying with a lot taking advantage of a loophole that could be very easily close, michael? >> no, i think that is complying with the law. if you are engaging in a private performance, you do not have to compensate rights holders. it is the same reasons you don't rights holders because you are singing in the shower or reading a book off of your shelf -- these are all things that are happening privately in your house. the fact that the broadcasters would like to be paid doesn't mean they have a legal right to be. >> i wonder if you could come back on this. it also hinges on who makes the content. in other words, you have to be compensated for the work and the investment. >> that is why we have copyright law. it protects the intellectual property of the people transmitting this, the broadcasters. this is no different than cable. they pay a royalty, and this company, aereo, is simply transmitting through a different mechanism, but in the same way that a cable or satellite provider transmits. it is a different mechanism of transition. copyright law protects this and the aereo business

. >> what is the complying with a lot taking advantage of a loophole that could be very easily closed, michael? aereo no, i think that is complying -- close, michael? rex know, i think that is complying with the law. if the reasons you don't have to go pay write folders is because you are singing in the shower or reading a book off of your shelf -- these are all things that are happening privately in your house. the fact that the broadcasters would like to be paid doesn't mean they have a legal right to be. if you could come back on this. it also hinges on who makes the content. in other words, you have to be compensated for the work and the investment. >> that is why we have copyright law. it protects the intellectual property of the people transmitting this, the broadcasters. this is no different than satellite or cable. they pay a royalty, and this company, aereo, is simply transmitting through a different mechanism, but in the same way that a m -- a cable or satellite provider transmits. copyright law protects this and the aereo business model simply does not work because it conflicts with copyright

>> this is april madness, we learn every day a loophole of obamacare making absolutely no sense of theand political argument for this is ridiculous. the fact that you are putting on the same level, a working poor person who needs the benefit from the expansion of medicaid and an inmate, who breaks the law and for whom crime pays by giving them medicaid benefits attacks payer expense for life is ridiculous. but so are the economics. all you're doing, bill, is transferring burden this, was said by democrat, former senator, consent conrad who was the budget chairman for the senate. he called this a scheme. all you're doing is transferring burden from the local municipalities and states to federal government as payoff by the obama administration to get them to enroll their felons, their convicts, their inmates, their captive audience into obamacare. there paying 100% of those benefits if you do so from federal tax dollars. that is ridiculous and that unfair to every taxpayer. bill: mary anne, you're a taxpayer. >> yes i am. bill: is this a crazy idea? >> no. everyone is paying one, two, or

no, republicans don't want to do that. they say every time you close a tax loophole, you got to use it to reduce the tax rate for wealthier americans. we don't say if you identify a spending program that no longer makes sense you have to go spend it somewhere else. but when it comes to special interest tax expenditures, that's exactly the republican position. you can only use it to bring down tax rates for multimillionaires. and as a result, while the winners in this republican budget are those folks at the very top, they sock it to everybody else. they do sock it to seniors on medicare. they sock it to our kids' education. and they sock it to the fundamental economic power of this country when they disinvest in the things that have helped make us a global power. and that is the wrong decision for america. so i urge my colleagues to vote no on this washington republican budget. the chair: the time of the gentleman has expired. the chair recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin. mr. ryan: mr. chairman, i yield myself the remainder of the time. the chair: the gentleman is recognized for three minutes. mr. ryan: let me try to

loophole that could be ex mroited. >> we need a vote. >> supervisor cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. >> no. >> supervise mar. >> no. >> tang. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> aye. >> supervisor avalos. >> no. >> supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor campos. >> no. >> supervisor chiu. >> no. >> there are six ayes and five nos. >> the amendment passes and with that, are there further discussion. supervisor tang. >> thank you supervisor chiu. i wanted to kind of echo some of the comments that supervisor farrell made earlier and we've been focusing on the amendments that has taken place and that shows how varied these situations are. i think none of us feel good about anyone being evicted as a tenant, so thank you supervisor campos for spear heading this. a lot of my concerns has to do with the overall idea of this . there is no guarantee as a tenant if i'm going to receive this increase relocation payments that i'll use it here in san francisco to continue renting here in san francisco. and so that is something that definitely does concern me. the other thing is that i'm not su

no such worries. they are so wealthy they can enjoy themselves anywhere in the world. these residents are sure austria's government will keep enough loopholespen that russia's 1% can continue to feel right at home. >> over to macedonia where peace between the different ethnicities seems it is not something to be taken for granted. it has roughly 2 million inhabitants, but only a little more than half of them are ethnic macedonians. one in four is albanian. then there are the turks, serbs, bosniak's, among others. life is difficult in macedonia where life -- unemployment is high and the economy is weak. more than 10 years ago, the country narrowly escaped the civil war. tension is growing again over a controversial project. >> one thing macedonia has no shortage of his history. in just three years, the conservative christian democratic government has cast some of it in stone with 40 new monuments and 20 palatial buildings going up around the capital. the project called skopje 2014 has triggered controversy. in a tiny republic where macedonians, roma, and ethnic albanians, turks, and serbs, live more next to rather than with one another, the

a small fraction said no, 11% say yes, 14% say yes, we need to close the corporate loopholes, but thety, 72% say changes should be made across the board. amen to that. >>> it's a big day for us. the season finale of "the profit" ends tonight. marcus is back with us on this show for a sneak peek, next. [ hypnotist ] you are feeling satisfied without standard leather. you are feeling exhilarated with front-wheel drive. you are feeling powerful with a 4-cylinder engine. [ male announcer ] open your eyes... to the 6-cylinder, 8-speed lexus gs. with more standard horsepower than any of its german competitors. this is a wake-up call. ♪ this is a wake-up call. save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.d everybody knows that. well, did you know pinocchio was a bad motivational speaker? i look around this room and i see nothing but untapped potential. you have potential. you have...oh boy. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. >>> one stock that's in the green today is pier 1, which has repeatedly disappointed investors with over the past year.

no one knows what everyone actually knows. it's kind of a loophole. so many elements to this, some people knew something and some people knew other things. it all seems very convenient because on january 15, she became ceo of gm. two weeks later, she came forward with this news. we will hold that thought and listen right now to the president speaking on health care. >> six months ago today, a big part of the affordable care act anded in as healthcare.gov state insurance marketplaces when live. millions of americans finally had the same chance to buy quality, affordable health care and the peace of mind that comes with it as everybody else. last night, the first open enrollment. came to an end -- open enrollment period came to an end. nowmillion americans have signed up for private insurance plans through the marketplace. 7.1. [applause] [cheers and applause] even more folks want to sign up. folks stuck in line because of the huge surge of demand can still go back and finish your enrollment. 7.1 million is on top of the more than 3 million young adults

loopholes. and the governor signed it into law this week. >> we know one certain fact, no one has rape add child while staying in a state prison, so if we can keep them in prison longer. >> it is an election year, and locking up semioffenders is very popular. >> a unique perspective as both a survivor and a mother of a sex offender, she lobbied for what she called evidence based policies. she says the psych yacht fricke treatment should be offered before an offender entered the system, not after they were served 1020 years. we have made them a ward of the state, we have paid to keep them, and we with have not treated them like a human being. i can hate what somebody does they are still a human being. >> it has released about 300 offenders from the civil commitment program. the director says preparing for reentering society is one of it's goals. >> it is a gift if they would look at it that way, that they have an do you want to make serious and deep seeded changes. to live a more law abiding life. and to not victimize people. >> he served time for rape, he says the woman was his ex-and drug deale

no word just yet on a motive at this time. >>> 11:03 right now. this morning, state leaders are taking a closer look at closing loopholes on laws against sexual assault and cyberbullying. the proposal comes in response to a south bay case that garnered national attention. nbc bay area's christie smith joins us from the newsroom with more details on what's being called audrie's law. >> good morning, peggy. it was a heartbreaking story that also exposed a loophole in the law surrounding juveniles, sexual assault, and sharing photos online. audrie pott's father says that social media has made rape worse than it ever was. the pott family spoke at a hearing in sacramento this morning for senate bill 838, or audrie's law, pushing for changes to the laws that protects victims and establish more severe consequences, specifically for young offenders. audrie pott was a 15-year-old girl from saratoga, who took her own life in 2012. she had drank too much at a house party and passed out, only to later find crude messages written on her body. later on facebook, she suggested she knew that photos had been taken of her and that her classmates knew she had been assa

loopholes. so that is unclear. what this does make clear is that in no uncertain terms, republicans are not giving up on obamacare.impact of doing that now and is there even a prayer that it would happen? >> of course there's no prayer it could happen. the president is not going to approve overturning obamacare, nor should he. and this is more of the flawed intellectual framework in the ryan budget. he repeals obamacare but embeds a bunch of the savings that obamacare is driving. so you kind of can't have it both ways in life and i think mr. ryan is try doing that in his budget. but the cuts to the spending, we need to really put this in context. if you look over 50 years, the historical average for amount of money we've invested in education, infrastructure and basic medical research and these nondefense discretionary spending historically has been about 3% of our economy. this budget bring it s it down 1.7%. it almost cuts it in half. i don't know anyone with reasonable cognitive ability looking at what's going on in the world and our competitiveness and what's happening with globalization and technology who thi

no, that roolly means long-term fiscal sustainability. that's the new definition of balance. they did the same thing on tax reform. the common understanding of tax reform is you lower rates. you use loopholes to bring rates down, and you simplify the code. they said, no, tax reform for us means, let's close loopholes, but let's use those closures to fuel more spending. the richest one i have heard so far is to hear a white house spokesman make the claim basically that a job is now a burden and now it's obamacare there's going to be over two million americans who are shed from that burden, mr. speaker, and they tonight have to worry about working anymore because they have this new health care plan. well, it's now finding itself coming true in this bill as well and what the obama administration has said, we are going to just create a new definition of full-time work. full-time work has meant 9 to 5, full-time work has meant 40 hours a week. not with obamacare. obamacare has now redefined it. it's a long pattern of redefinitions. and these redefinitions, mr. speaker, have led to failure. here's the thing, we have an opportunity to remedy this. we have an opportunity to make it right. we have

no one is going to get expelled from the champions league. the rules are so difficult to read because there are so many loopholes.sively got smaller, that would be viewed favorably. a lot of people look at that and question the spirit of financial fair play. what are these fines going to be like? they can appeal. >> will it stop them spending so much money and paying these players? >> to some extent, people are concerned. what it means is where the money will be spent and where it won't be spent. what we might not see are the likes of roman abramowitz coming to buy midsized clubs and spending hundreds of millions of euros and pounds. they won't be able to do it anymore. we will continue to see these , theywith big revenue will carry on spending because they can. in a way, the consequence of all these roles is that dominance. prettythan ferro with incredible figures. >> let's move from football to fashion. see what we are doing here? pharma, football, fashion. angela ahrendts leaves to apple this week highlighting the focus of the tech giant on improving its retail performance. let's find out what is going on. eve

>> well, no, -- >> well, -- >> the amount of money, but the dow is growing exponentially. people developed -- you know, found a loophole in existing campaign laws at the time. at think what bob is referring to is not allowing political parties to accept soft money. so he has leveraged these other groups. so i think that the sphere of influence went to these outside organizations as opposed to the political parties who could not, you know, get leverage with candid it's running for political office. that is something maybe we have to look at again in terms of whether or not you want political parties to, you know, accept, you know, certain contributions. have to really look at that. the question is more money in the system. the flood gate is open with citizens united which, again, struck down. my provision was attempting to address the organization. they ran an ad 60 days before an election and identified the individual by name and said, well, tell centers note to vote, you know, this way. i was up for reelection. that would be considered a political ad, and it would be restricted to the amount of money they could receiv

loophole in the statement which ramsey advocates told me this weekend is so big you could drive a truck through. what qualifies as national security interest? hat qualifies as law enforcement interest? there is no clarity on what they would disclose what they would not disclose. they're not in the business of buying bugs and giving them away. that contradicts their mission. >> then what do you make of this statement from the white house? is this ever going to actually happen? is this trying to appease the masses and put something out there? >> if you look at what happened with a lot of the snowden documents that were released, you have a lot of the organizations that specifically look for these flaws, but also go into different government agencies and do surveillance. i think this is to appease the masses. they are not going to disclose their techniques and what they are actively going after. it is going to take something like a snowden released for us to see what is going on behind the. i came from that realm. for me it was a different ballgame back in the early 2000, 2005. we did not have this huge cyber movement. there were very little laws or regulation around what they can actually do what

no way to prosecute him. so they turn juveniles over to locals and they don't have the laws to reach this kind of situation, so he's lucky in that he fell through a loophole in the federal system. so, i think what really needs to happen is yin the world were the security cameras not monitored at either site. why do we have them if nobody is watching them. like the radar in our 370 story, if nobody is watching all this equipment why do we have it? that's the biggest question here and somebody has some explaining to do on that front. >> doctor, we appreciate your time. thanks for wk us. mary, if you stay with me let's turn to the hunt for flight 370. so many days of searching. so many false leads. so much worldwide attention in the fate of flight 370. we go perth, australia. richard quest has moved over to kuala lumpur for our coverage. miguel, start us off. what's the latest on day 45. >> reporter: day 45 there, day 46 here, bill. mission nine, dive nine for bluefin-21 is in the final completion stage now they are saying. sounds like they are basically downloading the data from it. so far no hits. nothing in that area. this is an area that was -- they had

so no matter what it is, it is very wise for malaysia air to be proactive and close all the loopholes to do that so, no, they should not wait. they should move immediately or sooner. >> is it likely that no matter what the outcome here, some sort of change that would be imposed involving all particularly maybe transatlantic or overseas flights that there would be a continuous stream of data information so that control towers know where a plane is or what kind of conversations are taking place in the cockpit, alan? >> well, as i said, i guess four weeks ago now in "the wall street journal," yes. i think we're going to probably see a movement to put on what they call smart black boxes. there's a big argument whether or not these black boxes could even be made to talk to satellites constantly or if you could have a system where the black boxes would do a data dump, if anything seemed to go wrong like acceleration, descents, ascents, roll rate, the black boxes would transmit to the satellites. that way they wouldn't be talking constantly but only when they need to. of course periodly like

no natural constituents constituency say for the economist who come to these things? as well as issues that politicians love at 30,000 feet. is something about the cutting rates and closing loopholes, tax reform has innumerable friends. but once they get down to the dirty work of identifying what those loopholes ours pashtun loopholes are, and they turn out to be subsidies that benefit nearly everybody, the lawmakers mostly fall silent. dave camp, a rare exception to that. the challenge then is how can supporters of reform when a public consensus around an agenda they really don't want to explain? is it possible to win public support for reform? is it necessary? we'll hear about the 86 act and then answer some questions about that. if it is highly do. to answer these questions were pleased to three leading political scientist who spent a good part of their careers thinking about issues like tax reform. karlyn bowman, senior fellow at the american enterprise institute. chris faricy mexico is there to university and bill galston brookings institution to build his top domestic policy adviser to president clinton where representatives beginning of the ultimate here. it turns out we wi

dog now learning that security loophole could soon have a major impact on anyone who uses the internet. >> : i want ironic effect how pregnant could have on a child with no getting wait. right now sonny mild nice whether citron we have changes in the 7 day forecast taking a look changes in the 7 day forecast taking a look coming up. safeway gets that staying on budget can be a real bear. that's why they've got lots of ways to save. real big club card deals, the safeway app and gas rewards. for easter, get a safeway spiral sliced ham, for just $1.99 a pound. cadbury mini eggs are only $2.69. talk about a sweet deal. and arrowhead water is just $3.33 a case. there's more savings to love at safeway. ingredients for life. but getting enough wait while being pregnant could make your baby fat. that's a medical experts are now telling us new study for kaiser permanente women who don't put on enough weight to watter pregnant could increase chances of raising obese child. the researchers found that was either above or below recommended double was the greatest risk of obesity. they all seem backward santos said but underweight system modified as metabolism and cou

loopholes. why is it that some of the richest in the country get the top tax rate of 15%, the so-called carried interest. >> arrive at equity spends a lot of money lobbying -- thanr noson other their political power. there is not one scintilla of economic sense for this. gets tot that google keep its international earnings in bermuda tax free when all of was done in the united states and paid for by -- >> why is it that we have created a corporate tax environment that is so hostile it is encouraging companies like google to go to bermuda? >> it is not encouraging it. it is allowing it. >> we have the highest corporate taxes in the world. >> and no one pays them because it is a complete game. >> maybe it make sense to bring them down and then people may be paying it them. >> aiken afford to pay a lot -- they can afford to pay a lot more than they do now. to have -- to say google or intellectual property in the caribbean -- i mean, come on. andk, we have limited time need to get something else. it is very different to come out as a star athlete making a couple million bucks on the court. you may not make that next year. you might get injured. you might make that for a

no longer have to be taxed. that would only increase the incentive to shift profits offshore. when you ask where is the political breakdown, if you look at how much it spent lobbying to keep the loopholes i think you would have your answer there. >> lobbying money. everyone seems to want to do something here. i would ask, concern over what you do with the money want to get it back. there has been a school of thought that he needs to go into infrastructure spending so all the money should be taxed at a much lower rate, provided goes infrastructure spending. why not bring it back and it comes back we will tax at a significantly lower rate and the money can go back into the country to do whatever the country sees fit for itself? >> hang on. make sure it to was dug. >> i think that is exactly the right strategy. to the point about the need for strong enforcement and good rules. within the system, you should not be picking winners and losers in investment projects or hiring versus investment projects. you should allow companies to bring it back. this is not a matter of religion. this is looking around the world to see what has worked. and new zealand notably when the other direction and cha

the loopholes that we've offered repeatedly, and although that is referred to rhetorically, they've never been able to follow through with any that they would cut. there are medicaid cuts -- and make no mistake about it -- these medicaid cuts are actually reductions in nursing home care for america's most vulnerable. that's 2/3 of this money, and it's going to be visited back on the states and impacting on families. they repeal the affordable care act, but they keep all the associated revenues. we went through a campaign season excoriating democrats for the reductions in medicare advantage and they keep that in their budget. there's the magic of dynamic scoring, which we've heard about repeatedly for years which never quite proves itself. and then we have cuts to pell grants. we heard described in committee that these cuts to pell grants are not a problem because they're just an excuse to raise tuition and enrich lavish academic salaries. mr. speaker, this republican budget not only would constrain us to have a -- freeze us into a downward decline in our infrastructure, it would be the lowest level of nonmilitary discretionary spending that we have seen in generations. it's not going

no natural constituency say for the economists that usually come to this thing. it is one of those issues that politicians love that 30,000 feet. as long as they can talk about cutting rates and closing loopholes, tax reform has innumerable friends. once they get down to the dirty work of identifying what those loopholes are and, of course, they turn out to be immensely popular tax subsidies, the lawmakers mostly fall silent. they cannot -- there is rare exception to that. the challenges to malcolm's supporters of reform when a public consensus around an agenda they really don't want to explain. is it possible to win public support for reform? is it necessary? we will learn that little bit about the '86 act. if it is, how they do it? to answer these questions, we are pleased to have three leading political scientists who spent a good part of their careers thinking about issues like tax reform. karlyn bowman, assistant professor of political science and public policy at the maxwell school and bill galston, senior fellow at the brookings institution government studies program. domestic policy adviser of president clinton who represented just the beginning of the alphabet here. it turns out we wi