noig - need is wetayos coming d.c. stood for3 years wicscodone two outyen. 62 outsi and leonar52.ortable sta 4 culpeper -- cumberland not there hour n much happent. presidential i've recordui hereool. in asnouof the south and warm-up.ternoo te likely even can believet. likely0s this afternoon. bus st to 62 it around d.c. metrokies do starttemperates nicy agaab 5e r region todroat 91 can't rule i d.c. e can get, runn weekendunsars rms, s, probabl9 that'sn traffic in fcs to tell about you th roadwork it expected to be pm rs under the roa unfortunely impacting pm rush as well going away from the typical am rush hour on eastbound side and still seeing slow downs. be prepared for that one. as far as your eastbound xhunt is concern volumeusing outer looro delae. 9vee cleared. we have residualwio.nd>> we havs 9vee cleared. we have residualwio.nd>> we havs in 30 son ionre both i atdaas texas that walked into the wrong apartment and shot the map that liveder. she thought it was her place. you're familiar withilhe s. we'll show you video involved in this case as jurors are seeing moments af

noigs crime scene evidence and rape kits, the debbie smith funds also are utilized to process offender d.n.a. samples to ensure evidence from unsolved crimes can be matched against our database. the funds provided by the act are incredibly critical since they will help solve crimes and get criminals off the streets. i know friends across the aisle and in our hearing that was just going on that i just left in judiciary, there's an effort as one democratic witness said, gee, we just, we're here to ask you to do something. well, rather than taking guns from law-abiding citizens as is being proposed, i would submit that better answer is, let's get the criminals off the street. i know there's a big effort to get criminals out of prison but how about if we get criminals back in prison for crimes they committed that have not been adjudicated. this needs to be addressed. it shouldn't be a political issue. let's just, if we would just vote no, we could get a majority to vote no on the previous question, then we'll get this in as part of the rule, this amendment, and then we can -- it probably -