these children are victims of abuse in their exploitation situation. >> reporter: nola got the idea totart this three years ago while working at an oakland social service agency. she saw more and more girls were being exploited on the streets and over the internet. >> 1.6 million children run away from home this year. within 48 hours, a teenager that runs away from home will be approached by a man. it's not about them looking for trouble. it's about trouble looking for them. >> reporter: through the organization, nolaed indicates professionals in the field, reminding them kids on the street are kids, mostly poor and sexually abused in early childhood. >> if they are victims, we want them to recover and become survivors, we have to process them through the system as victims, not criminals. >> reporter: in t's case, she chaingsd her life and now works as a peer counselor. at the daytime drop-in center, girls in transition learn about therapy, support to change their life. >> back in the day, when i had experienced my street life, i didn't have any goals. now i have so many goals i can't

nola brandley. >> i needed resources an programs. i needed the idea that it is possible. that there was more to life than the streets. >> reporter: nola helped her discover a better way of life through the program for sexually exploited youth. a nonprofit provides a list of services for child victims of human trafficking and she is clear don't call them prostitutes. >> the very first thing is there is no such thing as a child or teen prostitute period end of the story. and that these children are victims of abuse in their exploitation situations. >> reporter: nola got the idea to start this three years ago while working in an oakland social services agency. she saw more and more girls were being exploited on the streets and internet. >> 1.6 million children run away from home each year. within 48 hours a teenager will be approached by a pimp. so it is not about them looking for trouble, it is about trouble looking for them. >> reporter: educating professionals in the field reminding them kids on the street are kids, mostly poor and sexually abused in early childhood. >> i

madison was no less henry's enemy and jefferson and nola stored in expressing distaste for his rival. in 1789 henry prevented madison from becoming a u.s. senator. madison was the anti-henry. in his style of address as a legislator, his was the order persuasion rather than the art of captivation. he took copious notes, thought through arguments in advance and spoke to influence. he usually succeeded. in the early years of the association madison and jefferson combined on the virginia statute of religious freedom passed in 1785 over the objection of governor henry. which explains jeffersons play on words, praying devoutly for henry's death. jefferson had failed -- sale to france in 1784 to serve as the u.s. minister. when madison was able to seize on an opportunity. he authored one the most vivid in striking position pieces of his long career, memorial against religious assessments which roused his colleagues to take immediate action. it was so strongly worded madison did not admit authorship for over 40 years. in that unheralded but historically critical paper foreshadowing the consti

consultation with those who have the expertise, scientists in and out of government, experts at agencies like nola and the coast guard -- these are the people that should play a major role in evaluating specific permit requests and operation of drilling rigs. it is disturbing to learn that the march 2010 decision to expand areas to additional drilling in the at the intake and eastern gulf -- in the atlantic and eastern gulf were made without looking at the potential consequences. i will conclude my remarks by making a simple and obvious point that is often forgotten when we talk about offshore drilling, and that is again that these properties belong to all of us. they belong to the people of the united states of america. it is our government's responsibility to ensure that exploration and extraction incur in ways that are beneficial to the ccountry. drilling offshore is a privilege to be learned not a right to be exercise by private corporations. our recommendations offer a path to that destination. much has changed in the months since the blowout. we have learned a great deal about how to contain

consultation with those who have the expertise, scientists in and out of government, experts at agencies like nola and the coast guard -- these are the people that should play a major role in evaluating specific permit requests and operation of drilling rigs. it is disturbing to learn that the march 2010 decision to expand areas to additional drilling in the at the intake and eastern gulf -- in the atlantic and eastern gulf were made without looking at the potential consequences. i will conclude my remarks by making a simple and obvious point that is often forgotten when we talk about offshore drilling, and that is again that these properties belong to all of us. they belong to the people of the united states of america. it is our government's responsibility to ensure that exploration and extraction incur in ways that are beneficial to the ccountry. drilling offshore is a privilege to be learned not a right to be exercise by private corporations. our recommendations offer a path to that destination. much has changed in the months since the blowout. we have learned a great deal about how to contain

consultation with those who have the expertise, scientists in and out of government, experts at agencies like nolaand the coast guard -- these are the people that should play a major role in evaluating specific permit requests and operation of drilling rigs. it is disturbing to learn that the march 2010 decision to expand areas to additional drilling in the at the intake and eastern gulf -- in the atlantic and eastern gulf were made without looking at the potential consequences. potential consequences.

consultation with those who have the expertise, scientists in and out of government, experts at agencies like nola and the coast guard -- these are the people that should play a major role in evaluating specific permit requests and operation of drilling rigs. it is disturbing to learn that the march 2010 decision to expand areas to additional drilling in the at the intake and eastern gulf -- in the atlantic and eastern gulf were made without looking at the potential consequences. i will conclude my remarks by making a simple and obvious point that is often forgotten when we talk about offshore drilling, and that is again that these properties belong to all of us. they belong to the people of the united states of america. it is our government's responsibility to ensure that exploration and extraction incur in ways that are beneficial to the ccountry. drilling offshore is a privilege to be learned not a right to be exercise by private corporations. our recommendations offer a path to that destination. much has changed in the months since the blowout. we have learned a great deal about how to contain