one argument we use, i went through the property information nomap. there are 45 homes. what you will see is 34 out of 45 homes have attached walls. gooi am not going to try to understand, but that is three different from belgrade's. we have 34 homes, and 100% are fully detached. when we say comparing them is fundamentally flawed, it is because clarendon is different. if you look of the block mounma they refer to belgrade a clarendon might as -- as clarendon heights. if this had been compared to something else there would be different results, because this property does look like any of the other properties. it is a convenient metric to describe the density of the home on the street. i am using information from the san francisco database. there is a question that they are inaccurate. i cannot be responsible for city accuracies. [list of names] >> i live up 114 del grades, and i was trying to show a picture. this is what we are talking about, and i am here to oppose this because it fails to understand the unique nature of belgrade's avenue, and because it does not underst

one argument we use, i went through the property information nomap. there are 45 homes. what you will see is 34 out of 45 homes have attached walls. gooi am not going to try to understand, but that is three different from belgrade's. we have 34 homes, and 100% are fully detached. when we say comparing them is fundamentally flawed, it is because clarendon is different. if you look of the block mounma they refer to belgrade a clarendon might as -- as clarendon heights. if this had been compared to something else there would be different results, because this property does look like any of the other properties. it is a convenient metric to describee