legitimately the only democrat in 2008 who had opposed the united states going into iraq, won the nomi the presidency. i'm not saying it was the sole reason but certainle him a uniqueness and distinction he claimed for himself the evidence was not necessarily overelming that he had been from the outset, but he's the opposite of bolton and trump nted a less assertive military presence, and i think the voices of restraint in this adminiration have been minished and i think it's down to mattis and dunford. >> i think it's far from a sure thing that it will be super bellicose, super mil the foreign policy bolton subscribes to goes back to ancient pre-world war ii hpublican history which is much moreeartland, much more isolationist, almost, but no sense of forelicy idealism, no sense of we want to make the world a better place or dignity or human rights. it's mucmore we're in a great power struggle and they're tough and we're tough and that's justh way they see the world. it's an old-fashioned, more, as i say, pre-cold war style republican foreign policy, but it did tend to be non-adventuri