nominated. but again, it's a work flow issue even though we are not asking a lot of them but it's still information. it's enough information to be tracking legislation and dealing with that and processing it and getting it ready for you. i just wanted to let you know i'm going to be very mindful as we start to learn this process. what's going to be submitted in our applications, what's going to be involved with it to have a little bit of control right now until we have a staff person to really facilitate the program. >> that's fine. if there is anyway we can assist with that, maybe that can help as well in terms of reviewing the applications. i think the ner term incentive for any supervisor is to celebrate how many legacy businesses they have in their district and to pat themselves and their businesses and those companies on the back for being part of san francisco's legacy. it will clearly not be until after november election whether there is any movement trying to determine whether any of the

supporting the nomination. if the board of supervisors supports the nomination once a supervisor does the resolution the tree is protected and for the planning commission and come commission if you pass a resolution to nominate a tree it's protected from that point for 250 days. there are additional triggers to increase the protection time. if the protection time would end -- if it makes it through the whole process and the board of supervisors passes the ordinance there is a buffer to make sure that the mayor has time to sign it because it's an ordinance and takes time so after that nomination is made the urban forestry council and urban forestry staff -- that's me will evaluate the tree. we use the same criteria in the nomination form. we also perform additional research so we're looking for references, photo data bases. this picture is of the ben croft library what i showed you earlier is in the middle there and we found that out during the evaluation of that tree. once we have the information we hold two pu

that no further motions be in order to the nominations that any statements related to the nominations be printed in the record that the president be immediately notified of the senate's action, and the senate then resume legislative session. the presiding officer: is there objection? without objection. the question is on the nominations en bloc. all in favor say aye. all opposed no. the ayes appear to have it. the ayes do have t it. the nominations is confirmed en bloc. mr. mcconnell: now mr. president, i ask unanimous consent that the senate proceed to executive session for the consideration of calendar number 211, 216 249 251 254 255 20 271 a understand that the commerce committee be discharged of further consideration of pn-524 and that the senate vote without intervening action or debate on all of the nominations en bloc, the motion to reconsider be laid on the table with no intervening action or debate that no further motions be in order to the nominations that any statements related to the nominations be prescriptived in the record, that the president be immediately notified of

when he nominates six individuals to the court. first, in may out 1969, he fills the court's center chair with the noncontroversial warren earl burger. ironic name given who he was replacing. newspaper reports concluded that burger was tough on law and order and moderate on civil rights. that record allowed him to win a quick and easy confirmation. selecting a chief justice with an image of being tough on law and order had great appeal to the president. consider two polls taken immediately before, just before burger's nomination and just after. a january 1969 gallup poll asked the following question. in general, do you think courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals? less than 2% of respondents answered too harshly. another poll placed significant blame for the difficult combatting crime directly on the doorsteps of the supreme court, specifically it showed that 82% of american men, 50% a great deal and 32% somewhat agreed that recent supreme court decisions had made it more difficult to punish crimi

it really turned that nomination over to him. we cannot have the nation's surplus, we instead have a gold standard. if they dare to come out and defend the gold standard, we will fight them to the uttermost. behind the masses of this nation and the world, supported by the commercial interests, the labor interest, we will answer the demand for the gold standard by saying to them, you shall not come down from the crown of thorns. you will not crucify man on a cross of gold. voice bryan had this huge that you could hear all over the whole because in those days, there were not any microphones and loudspeakers etc. he was in a huge hall and most speakers couldn't be heard by a hadof people, but bryan this booming voice though they could hear him and he gave this rousing speech, the final line being, they'll shall not crucify mankind on a cross of gold. again, it was the main issue in that election, monetary policy and whether we stay on gold standard or add silver to the money supply. after he made that speech, people got so excited,

that's a good one to nominate. sometimes an life, if you want to do something the way it ends up, i think elizabeth warren in october could get in the race after biden. in biden getting establishing the principle that the field is not closed. in, why can't she get in? he could do well and could win the nomination. formidable ticket with the two of them but also maybe he does not do so well and elizabeth warren could get in and she's the one they have been waiting for. it would excite you as a liberal democrat to have elizabeth warren in 2016. host: let's get b >> host: let's get back to calls. bill in virginia beach. hi, bill. >> caller: thanks for taking my call. i'll try to make this as brief as possible. there's always more to say than of time to say. due to the benghazi incident, the agreement with iran and the wonderful aca bill that everybody voted for nobody read world least not all the way through, i just cannot allow myself to vote for any democrat at this point in time. i'm going to vote republican. it ma

, just like senator sanders he does not have an opportunity really to win the nomination, he is able to energize a lot of americans but we have seen this before. it doesn't necessarily mean anything. >> this particular year, we are seeing it also on the republican side, because there's donald trump, a man a lot of people think has no chance of winning the nomination yet he is leading in thele pros again. >> absolutely. and i think bernie sanders is equivalent on the left, and we have seen, what happened after the republican debate, all three of the people who have never been elected to public office, have never served the american people donald trump and also ben carson, surging in the polls. if you are in a gov nor, in the senate, if you have been in government, you are not getting a bump out of that, and the same thing with bernie sanders. what we are seeing here is a mirror image, of people really disinstructionful, really frustrating with politicians and politics and really trying to make that case. people are angry, and that makes sense, but as dominic mentions it is highly unli

and i've been nominated -- i've been nominated a lot of times.ties. finally there was a party where people were dancing. lily and i walked in and it was dark and there was music. and somebody said, "that's robin wright. look at her. she's on the dance floor." so it's just -- it's great. indeed, we closed the joint. [ laughter ] >> seth: it was really -- i had to -- because my parents were there. i had to go get my mother who was talking to idris elba -- >> oh, come on. your mother was there? >> seth: my mother was there and my father was there. and my dad basically said "you've got to get your mom to stop talking to idris elba. she's never going to leave." but it was a really fun night. now you have -- you mentioned you've been nominated a lot. this is your sixth nomination for "the good wife." congratulations. >> in a row. i think -- [ cheers and applause ] you can either say that i have been nominated 14 times or that i've lost 13 times. [ light laughter ] >> seth: yes. or you could say you're an emmy winner. >> i say i'm victorially challenged

and who they're prohibiting from the republican nomination. this is the part i would say, oh, you sneaky bastards, it's not at all sneaky, though. it's kind of being rigged in plain sight. after they announced tonight, they had an explanation. after they announced who was going to be in the debate and announced the five polls they used to come up with their debate participants and they weren't the five most recent polls, after they made those announcements tonight, they also for the first time tonight retroactively announced brand new criteria they had never publicly explained before which they say justify why they didn't include what they call the highly respected nbc/"wall street journal" poll. we're learning fox believes that doesn't meet the criteria for the exact manner in which the candidate's names had to be read to poll respondents and in what order and using what titles. this has never been previously announced as part of how fox would decide which polls to include and not include. they said it today for the first time as a retroactiv

and i got nominated but i didn't go. 'cause i was like, "i'm not winning." >> seth: and you know, you chose -- you went classy. you chose the peabody. >> right. the person who was willing to commit. like, they put a ring on it. >> seth: they said, "if you come, you get it." >> exactly. and so we're just sitting there andthe critics' choice awards were going. we weren't even thinking about it. and the girl on stage, it was -- there was, like, a whole market in china, like a black market for organs where they just, like, straight steal your organs. and so our table, we're just like eating tiramisu like, "that sucks." [ laughter ] "god, that sucks." and then there's a girl up there that -- they tried to take her. and then all of a sudden, all our phones light up to say that i'd won the critics' choice award. and so we're all like, "yes!" [ laughter ] she's like, "my liver was --" and we're like, "yeah!" [ laughter ] horrible. >> seth: yeah. and if she was upset about it, it's just because she's pissed off she didn't get a c

the national conventions decide who wins the nomination. that's why until 2012 no third party candidate in the entire history of the country had ever been kept off the general election ballot because he or she had run in a presidential primary after major party and there's been 12 people in the history of the country who ran in major party presidential primaries and then ran outside the major parties. >> right. and you're saying that because often at the state level it's the collection of state results that leads to the total determination of who the nominee is although in this case in ohio we have a different opinion from someone who matters, the secretary of state at least thus far but, as you say, these are things that have been tested and debated. if he spends enough time, if mr. trump wants to do it, learns all these laws as well as you, publisher and editor, thank you for your time tonight. >> okay, thank you. >>> hillary clinton has been hard at work on the campaign trail addressing the trump phenomenon and trying to trade barbs with

nominated. but again, it's a work flow issue even though we are not asking a lot of them but it's still information. it's enough information to be tracking legislation and dealing with that and processing it and getting it ready for you. i just wanted to let you know i'm going to be very mindful as we start to learn this process. what's going to be submitted in our applications, what's going to be involved with it to have a little bit of control right now until we have a staff person to really facilitate the program. >> that's fine. if there is anyway we can assist with that, maybe that can help as well in terms of reviewing the applications. i think the ner term incentive for any supervisor is to celebrate how many legacy businesses they have in their district and to pat themselves and their businesses and those companies on the back for being part of san francisco's legacy. it will clearly not be until after november election whether there is any movement trying to determine whether any of the

everyone expects taft to get the nomination. bob lafollette thinks that he would be a good candidate. he is an unsuccessful candidate. that he the year thought would be his year. he sounded out teddy roosevelt, teddy said, i will not be running. bob lafollette was going to be the leader of the progressives, challenging leon howard taft republican -- william howard taft the republican nomination. changes his mind and throws his hat in the ring. bob lafollette did not want to support roosevelt. william howard taft gets the nomination, teddy roosevelt runs independent on a progressive boulders ticket --bull moose ticket. the twollette looked at parties, davis and democrats, coolidge and republicans, he said, both of them are conservative parties, neither have the full reform issues. he created a third-party that ran with burton wheeler as vice forident and bob lafollette president. it was poorly funded, they had $250,000 to spend nationally. that was compared to $4 billion that the republicans had and $2 million that the democrats

trump said he would nominate his sister to the high court.ven when you are battling donald trump it's a little low to go after someone for praising his sister. and when you're jeb bush i'm thinking it's best not to start talking about people's siblings. you are jeb bush you have a sibling with baggage of his own. you are jeb bush today this is what your brother is doing dancing in new orleans on the tenth anniversary of a disaster that is synonymous with his administration's mismanagement of one of the defining moments of loss. yeah, also encouraging people to remember that moment as a time when good things happened. >> hurricane katrina is a story of loss beyond measure, also a story of commitment and compassion. i hope you remember what i remember, 30,000 people were saved in the immediate aftermath of the storm. by u.s. military personnel. by louisiana law enforcement. and by citizens who volunteered. i hope you remember what i remember, that was the thousands who came here on a volunteer basis to provide food for the hungry and to help fi

because it is out there, it constantly puts up strong candidates that lose the nomination.ut have an impact on the election. and we've seen the republican party establishment able to pull the party back to the middle of the road conservatives like mitt romney, john mccain, bob dole, et cetera, but, this year may be different, but i don't think it's that different. i think that we're eventually going to get back, probably to jeb bush believe it or not. you heard it from me first here tonight, folks. >> bob dole, bob dole, mitt romney, and john mccain, with all do respect to them, lost. >> but -- >> lost the general election, right. >> the point about that, beth, tim pennsylvania learn city right about who -- pawlenty is right about who won and who lost. what the republicans did each one of the times, especially last time, after they got over some very strange infatuations like herman cain and so forth and when tim pawlenty was no longer able to fund his campaign, what the republicans ended up doing was going with the best candidate they had. and anybody who wants to say bob

can you imagine you were going to run for two years in your party's nomination and every single group is going to try to pull you to there is? you are trying to get every single delegate. that's before you broadly talk to the nation? that's tough. >> this is off topic at the democratic national committee bank donald trump are entering the race because the race needed its scariest candidate. they question our here. >> i'm a fan of jon huntsman junior and i thought it did a good job as governor but he kind of has a history of being a quitter. he quit high school. he quit the governorship before his term was over and he quit ambassadorship. he doesn't seem to be able to catch fire in the race. i think he is very well spoken and very intelligent but what is his fatal flaw in what is the problem? >> he would probably say quittor is the wrong word. he looked for the opportunities that would come toward him but he has set himself talking about being an intellectual person he is a policy wonk at heart. he is not a campaigner. he is not someone who likes to go out and say what people want to h

a total of 17 candidates running for the republican nomination for president. 17, zone. except maybe not. because there's another guy who we forgot so hard, we never even put him on our initial list of 22 back in may. he was the commissioner of the irs in the george w. bush administration. he worked in the reagan administration. he was involved in the creation of the department of homeland security. he's now filed a formal complaint seeking to force the fox news channel to allow him not even into their presidential debate thursday night, he filed this complaint just to be allowed to be in the predebate event that involves the other candidates. his make is mark eberson. the question is, on what grounds could fox say no to that request? mark eberson is not bristol palin, or sarah palin. his name is mark eberson, he's not a joke candidate or a protest candidate. he's not the guy that calls himself on the s.e.c. filing "titus the great." he points out in this fec complaint, the rnc in one of their fake polls has been including his name on the list of people who republicans c

if rand paul does not win the republican nomination, he's not going to win the presidential nominationm. balls how much worse are his odds at holding onto his senate seat if he spends all of the next year trying and failing to run for president in places like iowa instead of campaigning across kentucky to hold onto his senate seat. with hills top political operatives federally indicted and fighting to stay out of prison. the same in charge of his own rand paul fundraising which has been anemic, kentucky has this law about only running for one race at a time. they have that law for a reason. and in this case, the sound reasoning behind that law is proven by the fact that kentucky republican party interests are not the same as rand paul's interests. and now those two conflicting interestssh coming to loggerheads. >> his presidential campaign is not going well, and i think he's putting the kentucky senate seat that he now holds and that he's also seeking re-election to, at jeopardy with his presidential campaign. >> quote, let's be honest. nobody still believes u.s. senator rand paul can

presidential nomination -- it's still a problem.e his odds at holding on to he senate seat if he tries and fails for running for president in places like iowa instead of campaigning in kentucky to hold on to his senate seat. with his top politically operatives indicted and fighting to stay out of prison. with those operatives in charge of his own fund-raising which is anemic. kentucky has a law about only running for one race at a time. they have the law for a reason. in this case the sound reasoning behind think law is proven by the fact that kentucky republican party interests are not the same as rand paul's interests. and now those two conflicting interests are coming to loggerheads. >> his presidential campaign is not going well. i think he's put ing the kentucky senate seat that he now holds, and also seeking re-election to, at jeopardy with his presidential campaign. "let's be honest, nobody believes rand paul can win the presidential nomination. paul should either get out of the presidential race right now and focus on the se

pat: the update is that donald trump has vaulted way into the nomination. he's got twice the support of jeb bush and marco rubio is sinking. and trump is ahead in florida, new hampshire, iowa and all these states and the feeling is wait a minute, perhaps he won't implode. everybody thinks he's going to implode. everybody thinks test going to explode and implode, but if the nomination started off today, and it's not. if it started today he'd win the nomination. eleanor: he's getting 22% to 23%. 26%? ok, maybe he can get up to 30%. that's still a small portion. pat: with seven people in the field? eleanor: it's still relatively small. somebody is going to contest him and boy, if the republicans want to give him the nomination, i say bring it on. hillary clinton will win in a landslide. tom: ultimately if it comes to it, all the other republican candidates will gravitate towards one -- all the other support base will go to one other candidate if it's trump. eleanor: anybody but. pat: why? tom: because he cannot win the general election and i and i think a lot

, nominated for seven emmys.or best actor. did you ever imagine that? >> now, slow down. no, i didn't imagine it in a million years. i still can't believe it. yet. i -- it's -- it's crazy. and i am so thankful. and i can't believe i got the chance to do it. and the people have given it a chance. but i am going to say, can i just say, when people talk about this, this emmy nomination that i have get in in dramatic factor. i, i, appreciate -- people have been so nice. and like -- and warm and, i think it is the internet made people nicer. >> jimmy: you think so? >> i think it made people more polite. i blame the internet. >> jimmy: is that right? >> i feel like there are questions they really want to ask me. and they're just too nice -- so i wrote these down. and i, i feel like jimmy, you're the man -- >> jimmy: to do what? >> to ask me the questions people really want to ask when they talk to me about this emmy nomination for best dramatic actor? >> jimmy: people don't usually bring their own questions. >> i feel

look at the nominal gdp trend.al gdp and inflation tell you -- tom: how do we boost inflation? this is important. bolivia blonde chart and scott sumner say boost inflation. michael: you do it through and expectations channel. you say this is the target and we are going to go for it. use the tools in monetary policy. tom: what tools does janet yellen have left? michael: they can do florida guidance on in monetary base from a monitor's perspective. you mentioned paul krugman. his insight in the 1990's was that if base injections on the zero lower bound or temporary they can be viewed as permanent. tom: i agree. she cannot do it. michael: there is no consensus on the fed either. and certainly congress. tom: this is great. we are doing some serious geometry here on what the choice is. michael, that was fabulous. there is the banner headline today -- "michael darda agrees with paul krugman." brendan: the imf and japan's labor shortage. the numbers are extraordinary. not enough construction workers in tokyo. that is comi

could he be nominated? roger: well, was not a carried away. so you would say 9-10 people could be nominated. is trump the favorite? roger: he is the favorite today. if donald trump were hit by a bus today, who among those people you just mentioned would be in the best position to inherit his support? roger: if you look at both public and private surveys, the second choice of the trump supporters tends to be ted cruz, rand paul. very little crossover with those establishment candidate like chris christie or jeb bush. i think it redistributes among the conservatives. what is interesting is that trump the non-politician, a lot , of his second choice voters go to ben carson, the non-politician. those are the two standouts in two guys thate are not the career politicians. john: the businessman and surgeon. we will have more after this word from our sponsors. ♪ mark: we are back with roger stone. formerly of the trump campaign. we wanted you to take us in the mind of donald j. trump. let me ask you this first question. who does he listen to? does he

you get nominated for an emmy. we were so happy to hear this. [ cheers and applause ] >> thank you. >> jimmy: you're fantastic on the show! >> thanks. >> jimmy: were you excited about the nomination? where were you? did you think you were going to get it? did you go "oh, i don't know"? do you think -- >> i am boring when it comes to stuff like that. because i don't really pay attention. i was home. i was getting ready for work, like i do every day, and my phone kept buzzing. and it was people saying, "you know you're gonna get it." and i was like, "i can't -- you guys need to wait. we don't even -- just shut up." so i put the phone somewhere, you know? 'cause they can jinx it, you know. >> jimmy: yeah, yeah, yeah. >> some time i have to think about it. >> jimmy: where are you in l.a. at the time? >> i'm in chicago. getting ready for work. >> jimmy: okay. >> so then the phone rings -- >> jimmy: mmm-hmmm. >> and i look and i see it's my manager. and i'm like, "well, clearly he wouldn't be calling with bad news." >> j

but if the nomination race started off today, and it's not. if it started today he's -- he'd win the nomination. eleanor: he's getting 22% to 23%. 26%? ok, maybe he can get up to 30%. that's still a small portion. pat: with seven people in the field? eleanor: it's still relatively small. and if the republicans want to give him the nomination, i say bring it on. hillary will lend in -- win in a landslide. time all the other republican candidates -- all the other support base will go to one other candidate if it's trump. eleanor: anybody but. pat: why? tom: because he cannot win the general election and i and i think a lot of other conservatives think a lot of what he says is pretty stupid. john: why can't he win the general election? tom: because of the way he is. he's not presidential material. pat: he's got a real hill to climb to get the nomination, no doubt about it. because of what tom says, the other candidates will drop out. he's further down the road than i thought he would be. john: ok, house of cards. on tuesday, republican congressma

in answer to your question, i think that someone could get nominated without fox's support. but i don't think they'll have to. i think as the race narrows down, it will come clear what fox wants. basically, and i don't think roger ailes ois any apology, he wants a republican president. but trump has changed the dimension. he's running an historical line with huey long if louisiana during the 1930s, who in fiction was immortalized by the great robert penn warren -- >> my favorite book of all time. >> huey long runs through,strom thurmond, barry goldwater, he was a different personality than trump. but people tend to forget that the 1960 republican convention, goldwater was considered an outlier. a pre trump trump. he laid the foundation for what was to become reagan years. and also, i think trump is in line with george wallace. people tend to forget george wallace ran in 1968. tried to run again in 1972. >> segregation. >> same thing. and in that line i would put ross perot. i'm not equating perot with trump but perot was a businessman. his basic message was, i'm a businessma

the republican candidates and that nomination process? guest: hillary clinton, on the evening news, has the most amount of coverage. she has about 190 minutes of coverage, trump comes in second at 116 minutes. she has dominated the democratic race. if you look at a candidate that has gotten the most positive coverage, not the most amount, that would be bernie sanders. his coverage has been remarkably positive, about the size of his crowds, and his appeal. the coverage of mrs. clinton has been pretty negative, a lot of that on her e-mails. i think what is remarkable to us is how she has decided to run this campaign, saying, she is not granting interviews or doing sunday shows like donald trump. she will just run and not to much press at all. it is amazing to me that she can get away with that. the media did not have much self-respect when they were roped in on the street. host: she responds on twitter to wherever the debate is happening, in washington, were out of washington, she will come to twitter. what do you make of candidates using t

but we were nominated again. so people haven't forgotten about us. >> jimmy: absolutely not. >> thank you. >> jimmy: no they shouldn't ha. [ cheers and applause ] the new season of this starts tonight on "lifetime," but before we get into that, i want to know, there's a a "project runway junior." >> oh, it's the most wonderful -- i just left them. 13ri-17. >> jimmy: that's the rules? so, they have to be 13-17, and bthey're little designers. >> they're phenomenal. they are absolutely inspirational phenomenons. i have to remind myself of how young they are. >> jimmy: yeah. >> and frankly, i think they could leave the adults in their dust. if anyone's in doubt about our future, just looking at these young people, the future couldn't look brighter. >> jimmy: really?s oh, that's great to nkar. [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: is it tough to judge? >> yes. fortunately, i'm not a judge, but i interact with the judges. they don't want to send anyone home. ths ere are tears. >> no. not the kids. the judges. [ laughter ]

trump also said he wouldn't run as anyone's vice president if he loses the nomination. which is good. i mean, can you imagine vice president who just says weird, random stuff whenever he wants? [ laughter ] >> "i promise you, the president has a big stick." [ laughter ] >> jimmy: of course, another big story this week was the hack of the cheating website, ashley madison. yeah. the hackers are saying that about 95% of its users are male and most of the female profiles are fake. [ laughter ] when asked how she felt about that, ashley madison herself said, "that's just horrible." [ laughter and applause ] what? "horrible thing." some international news here, i saw that vladimir putin went -- this nuy always making me laugh. [ laughter ] he went for a ride, of course he did, he went for a ride in a a russian submarine this week. that's what people do. [ light laughter ] >> steve: yeah. jimmy: tilh. visiting a shipwreck in the black sea. take a look at this. that's a real photo. look. [ laughter ] is it just me, or that guy could be strapped to a rocket ship, still look bore

portland - oregon is not going to make a play in terms of who wins the nomination.ame in california, prime rils are later. in 2008, you know... >> that's my point. he's preaching to the choir. >> he's preaching to the choir. and he has the potential to grow the choir, but he is breaching be. >> is he doing that because he has to appear big, as the legitimate candidate. hillary is trying to appear almost dimminive. >> he's doing something, growing his name in recognition. the reality is most around the country have never seen or herd bernie sanders. and that explains the big splits that you saw earlier between secretary clinton and bernie sanders. i think that that ultimately is his only chance to get deep into the nomination fight. >> speaking of the i.d., name i.d., what about governor o'malley, he was in there before traction. >> less than 1%. >> what is points to is a short bench of the democratic party. if they have a strong enough bench, there'll be others out in droves. you have something unusual in politics, you have an open white house coming up in the next