. >> item six public comment on nonagenda items. we have no speaker cards.a informational memorandum on marketing outcomes project report, 2500 arelious walker drive for 122-unit hope sf affordable housing including 93 public housing replacement units, 28 affordable housing rental unit and one manager's unit. 8b, informational memorandum on marketing outcome project report 255 fremont street known as natalie gubb commons for 120-unit affordable rental development which includes one manager's unit and redevelopment project area discussion. >> thank you. it's nice to be in position where we're completing these projects. they are getting leased up. today we have 240 units. all are affordable. >> good afternoon commissioners. i am pam sims. i'm a senior development specialist if the housing division. the first project, there were 28 affordable lottery units. the balance of the other units are the 94 other units were public housing replacement units for those of you who attended. those people living there now in the 94 units are relocatees from the old one to the

any other member wish to comment on nonagenda item? we'll close general public compensate. director's announcements. >> commissioners tim frye, the director is out of town. aisle be happy to forward any >> they have concerns over the findings of the v.i.r. and disagreeing with the finding that there was no impact to the national registered district to the demolition of one contributor. there are other construction related impacts that they feel should be further examined. we will give you a full report on that on both appeals after next week. i've also asked the commission secretary to forward you links to both of the appeal documents so you can see the contents of the appeal and our response. certainly happy to follow up with you. that concludes my comments unless you have any questions. >> commissioner pearlman: our role -- it's not a landmark and it's not an article 10 district or article 11 district. we only did commented on the e.i.r. >> that is correct. >> commissioner pearlman: my understanding was that heritage had come to an agreement with developer or department t