you see awesome examples of this commercially and noncommercially, but other types, this type of content we deal in is often that someone can create a blog like you did and be their own writer, editor, promoter, marketer, designer but it seems like we can get more done if we take advantage of the specialization in collaboration. it was really something we talked about a lot in the early days, how can we bring people together to help. and that and that is a theme we are continuing to iterate on. as a whole is looked at very much as a platform and are publishing efforts are there to help spur that platform along. you know the internet develops with two strands 11 was a publishing strand. you could put anything you want out. the other is the community strand which was like the well and others even before the web is around gathered people into communities. those have had somewhat of attention to read i even quoted you you thought o

billboards and other permanent signs that do allow commercial speech, the municipality must allow noncommercial speech. >> what would happen if a church always meets in the same place, and it wants to put up a sign that says every sunday this is the place to go and another church moves around -- would it be the same? >> i think if we're talking about what goes on on the private property but on the right-of-way. the town has decided to allow an unlimited number of political signs up to 32 square feet for nearly the entire year there are four elections in arizona, you have political signs in an unlimited number. those signs affect the safety and aesthetics interest the same way the sign does. >> how did you create the temporary category? what is being related here is not the content but the function of the sign how do you get around that argument? you've already created a category that requires you to read the sign. >> i don't think it does. the way the temporary sign is defined here is a sign that's intended to be constructed and permanent. as long as it's a temporary sign, it doesn't matter wha

and the easiest, most direct way to help save these lives would be this one-lane gravel noncommercial use ten-mile road that you continue to just ignore. so the question to you is what have you included within this budget to help the people of king cove? what have you actually done over these past 14 months to fulfill the promise that you made, because you said that you have concluded that other methods of transport remain that could be improved to meet community needs. what has been done to help the people? >> can i have a few minutes? >> please. >> as we talked, senator, we have engaged conversations with corps of engineers about alternatives. negotiating an mlu with them. it is i think approximately 40 miles between king cove and cold bay, if you drive there. it's ten miles through the refuge. >> you already have most of that road built. >> and as i have spoken with people in the community when you and i were both there it is very difficult in harsh weather conditions to move around that territory, period. so i have worked with the corps of engineers. we're continuing to do that to

when a 10-mile, one lane gravel noncommercial use road could help save these lives. we have to keep working on this, madam secretary. >> senator, i recognize this issue and also having been there i recognize this is not a unique situation that there are many villages that struggle in the case of medical evacuations. and i appreciate that it is part of our job to work on that. >> that is true. there are many villages, but there are none, none with -- that have ready access to an all weather airport right there. >> i think we should talk to the senator that has the appropriations interior committee and talk to her. but i'm just pointing out that in 1998 we appropriated $37 million to provide a whoever craft linking cove and cold bay. i think that was something senator stevens and the clinton administration worked on. maybe we need to look at something in that area for the future. i want to turn to this issue that we are seeing in so many western states, this issue of -- i don't know maybe mr. -- undersecretary connor wants to address this issue because i know that i'm

to hasten to add that the rules are for commercial use of drones nothing about the private or noncommercial use which is at this point largely unrestricted >>> we had an incident last month, a drone crashing into the white house. it's under investigation. but it seemed to involve a recreational user losing control of the aircraft. how do you police the skies where a person can run a drone where they want? >> absolutely. that's the problem. not only can it be done anywhere, but almost anyone that wants to fly a drone that is capable, can fly above 500 feet cap put others at risk if they want to be reckless. all they need is a credit card. drones have been around for some time it seems the fa was a little late to get to a point where we are today, putting in a list of guidelines and protocols that may not go into effect for a year and a half. did the expansion of drones on the market did it hit the fa faster than accepted? >> the f.a.a. was on top of it. the technology behind drones has increased at such a great rate much like the increase in technology in your average laptop computer and mob

and the easiest, most direct way to help save these lives would be this one-lane gravel noncommercial use ten-mile road that you continue to just ignore. so the question to you is what have

you see awesome examples of this, both commercial and noncommercially, especially noncommercially withikipedia and other types of -- this type of content we deal in it is awesome that someone can create a blog like you did and be their own writer editor, promoter marketer designer, but it seems like we can get more done if we take advantage of specialization and collaboration. it was something we talked about a lot in the early days and how can we bring people together to help each other create something better than they can on their own. that's a theme we're working on. we look at it as a platform. our publishing efforts are there to help spur that platform along. >> the internet developed with two strands. one was the publishing strand. put everything you want out if you're a blogger like you or whatever, and the other is the community strand, like the well and others even before the web was around gathered people into community. those have had somewhat of attention. i think i quote you when you were originally doing blogger, you thought of it as a publishing platform but it becomes

you see examples of this commercially and noncommercially with wikipedia and open source software. other types of this content is often that someone can create a blog and be their own writer, editor, designer promoter, but it seems like we can get more done if we take advantage of the specialization of collaboration. how can we use medium to bring people together to create something better than they can on their own? that the theme we are continuing to iterate on. we look at medium as a platform. we are here to help spur that platform along. >> the internet developed with two strength. one was publishing. the other was community. those have had somewhat of contention. you thought of it as a publishing platform. joining the publishing and community platforms, that is where the power lies in the future. >> that is clearly what twitter is. i came to twitter with an information-spreading mindset. i think jack originally was looking at it more as people keeping in touch with each other. that has bloomed into something very powerful. if you look at any major platform today, it obviously

now for those of you who don't know what a ham radio is, it is a noncommercial recreational amateur radioes where you cannot get a cell signal. i thought, "hey, why not get on the old ham radio and interact with some fans?" let's turn her on, there we go, and i will see who is out there. >> mayday! help, mayday. >> seth: yes, hello, hello. >> oh, thank god, i need help. >> seth: oh, my god. how can i help? what's going on? >> i'm a passenger on american airlines flight 361 and there is an emergency. >> seth: oh, my god. what's wrong? >> the flight attendant is telling me i can't recline my seat before takeoff. [ laughter ] >> seth: that doesn't seem like much of an emergency. they do that on every flight. >> also, they're telling me that i need to wear headphones while i watch "expendables 3" on my laptop. >> seth: okay, again, not an emergency. that would be very irritating. >> oh, mayday! mayday! >> seth: stop saying mayday. [ laughter ] >> mayday! >> seth: say it -- stop saying -- >> also, they made me gate check my roller bag even though it fits in the overhead if i really jam it in t

you see examples of this commercially and noncommercially with wikipedia and open source software. other types of this content is often that someone can create a blog and be their own writer, editor, designer promoter, but it seems like we can get more done if we take advantage of the specialization of collaboration. how can we use medium to bring people together to create something better than they can on their own? that the theme we are continuing to iterate on. we look at medium as a platform. we are here to help spur that platform along. >> the internet developed with two strength. one was publishing. the other was community. those have had somewhat of contention. you thought of it as a publishing platform. joining the publishing and community platforms, that is where the power lies in the future. >> that is clearly what twitter is. i came to twitter with an information-spreading mindset. i think jack originally was looking at it more as people keeping in touch with each other. that has bloomed into something very powerful. if you look at any major platform today, it obviously

the line is between plagiarism and a proper citation, where the line is between fair use in a noncommercial academic contest and illegal commercial or personal use of a copyrighted product, so i think this represents a good starting point. i look forward to working with the gentleman from new york on this issue as it moves forward. i support the amendment and i yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from new york. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. the amendment is agreed to. it is now in order to consider amendment number 17 printed in part b of house report 114-29. for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: madam chair, i have an amendment at the desk. the chair: the chair will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 17 printed in part b of house report 114-29 offered by ms. clark of massachusetts. the chair: pursuant to house resolution 125, the gentlewoman from ma