. -- of a nonliteral expletive. >> what is the difference between liberal and nonliteral for expletives? >> as i understand it, the way the fcc has referred to it is to say if a presentation of languages actually describing sexual or excretory activity, that is liberal usage. whereas with other context, it is not actually referring to that activity but it is using it as a euphemism, and because of that is still continued to be the omnibus remaned order. but that is where it is explains a change in policy. that is what they're trying to get to now, to say if you are dealing with images, it is necessarily a liberal image, but that is not the policy from the past, which has treated it differently. as this court pointed out in prior decisions, that is because of 1654 itself. it does not distinguish between the two, and instead turns to utterances. so the commission has tried to say that images are different by necessity, but you will not find that in any prior fcc case. to the definite -- so the definition has become the fifth generic -- dictionary definition. >> we did say that they did no

nonliteral. you could conclude that an isolated expletive was pandering. actors at play here. mr. lewis has talked about how the george carlin model was nonliteral uses of the word that the fcc and has argued several times that those words were not all nonliteral uses. there are arbitrary in their application -- defining them one way in one case and finding them anin another way in other cases. >> is there anything else you would like to say? >> i feel like sometone being asked for his last words. >> this was very well-argued and very w sunday on c-span. >> the seale of chipmaker intel -- ceo of chipmaker intel announced that he would buy billions of dollars of u.s. high-tech companies over the next couple of years. here is a look at his speech, just under an hour. >> good morning, i am the vice- president of the brookings institution and i welcome you to this event on rebuilding the foundations of american growth. the last year and a half have been challenging times for everyone. we have suffered through our biggest economic recession since the great depre

nonliteral. you could conclude that an isolated expletive was pandering. it is important to note to the constantly changing factors at play here. mr. lewis has talked about how the george carlin model was nonliteral uses of the word that the fcc and has argued several times that those words were not all nonliteral uses. there are arbitrary in their application -- defining them one way in one case and finding them anin another way in other cases. >> is there anything else you would like to say? >> i feel like sometone being asked for his last words. >> this was very well-argued and very well-briefed. we would like to have a transcript made and ask that you share that. please check with the clerk's office. we'll take it under advisement and we cross is cancelled once again. >> please rise -- and we thank you the council once again. >> please rise. ho[captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2010] memo to night on c-span, president obama's -- >> tonight on c-span, the president's remarks. paul ot