i think that is very nontrivial.it's a real problem and it requires scientific attention because we typically don't stop -- we typically stop at error bars on a number of interests to us and it doesn't translate to the average person and to the kind of meta questions that are emerging now. simulation is certainly showing its value. we find it in more and more places, largely because there are champions out there who pull it along and know when to inject it, but it isn't still a natural place to go. many of the problems we get -- i mean, we don't have oil spill simulation experts, you know, that we call on for, you know, underwater crises. you know, we don't have the experts for, you know, pick your topic and we can't afford to constitute them for every problem we have, so we have to figure out how to create a more responsive infrastructure from the tools and people we have. so i think there's a lot to offer. i think there is a lot of promise and -- but we're going to have to figure out, again, how to -- how to transm

that training means things as simple but as important as putting on the product i gear, which is a nontrivial saw coming out of texas. >> and this is not the avenue rajs type of gear that your nurse wears. it is a skill that has to be learned very carefully. and the highest risk of exposure for a nurse who is properly protected, as they are at bellevue, is when they remove this personal protective equipment. >> because that gear will come into contact with some of the fluids of the patient. that is what is bearing a high viral load and in the prosays of taking it off, that's when exposure risk is highest. >> that's correct. we are also concerned at the new york state nurses association as at the aflcio that this are no mandatory gadlinuidelines for t type of training and we is you will port that very much. >> thank you very much. >> thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. we've got a big show ahead. this's lots of news including lots of late breaking news tonight. we've also got a shaky new experiment that i have very little confidence that is going to work, but we're going to try it

you can assert they with nontrivial probability of lake extreme dystopia. nevertheless, there are things we can do to make it easier for different parts of the world to coordinate and collaborate inside of the robustly good tape. it would seem to have not just with a.i., for example, to make it less likely you'll have the technology race at the end where nations have to scale back on safety precaution, but also other existential risks, a big choruses conflict, weapon systems built for new tape elegies might be more disturbed you. so the greater the ability, the greater the powers who would have to kind of court made the effort, the better the chances would be. although it might increase the risk of permanent tyranny. and that creates together sufficiently to be worth promoting. >> why did the grass on your last slide flat out over time? >> say that again. >> why did the grass on your last slide flat not overtime? >> but see, the last slide. yeah, well, because ultimately it reached technology technology maturity, bree receives the materials that is physical

values are that would influence the decisions of the single -- so you certainly could imagine with nontrivial probability, like, extremely dystopian single tups. never the -- singletons. if there were things we could do to collaborate instead of having conflict, that that would be a robustly good thing. it would seem to help not just with a.i., like, for example, to make itless likely that -- it less likely that you will have a technology race at the end where different nations have to scale back on safety precautions in order to get there first, but also with other existential risks. a big source, i think, is conflict; weapons systems built for new technologies that might be more destructive than nuclear weapons. so the greater the ability, the great powers would have to coordinate the effort, the better our chances would be with regard to these technologies. although it might increase the risk of permanent tyranny, totalitarianism, it might decrease the others efficiently to still be worth promoting. >> why did the graph on your last slide mount over time? >> say that again? >> why did the

and that is a nontrivial diggs tin distinction. i think jonathan is right, it won't result in overturning garcia, but i think this is a nuance that arguably can put this into the commandeering category rather than the you must live by the rules as every employer must. >> anyone else? >> my name is todd kiefer. i write a blog, freemonkeymarket.com and also contribute to watchdogwire.com in the state of pennsylvania. i'm sorry i don't have my source to cite my source, but the issue came up of what happens if it stands and the pressure comes on the states to then set up exchanges. from what i found there is $629 million still on the table of level-one awards to states that rejected the exchanges. seven states rescinded those award. but the $629 million is the states that did not. the other problem here is that january 1st, 2015, is the application deadline to apply for level. two exchange award. if the republicans control the congress, they certainly are then the -- the proponents would certainly not get any help there. would at that

and so it's a nontrivial success. cost growth is coming down. careful people know it started coming down before the affordable care act, so the affordable care act cannot claim most of the responsibility here. but i do think you could say -- and that what's kind of interesting and bob knows this, if if you go out to the health care system and talk to people running it, they have focused like a laser beam on cost growth production any way they have not before, and has been that focus partly because of the payment reforms engendered by the affordable care act and picked up and amplified by the private sector that you see those last four years of more or less constant per-capita health care cost growth rate way below historical norms. the stability of that growth rate is really what we're talking about here, and that's the success people hope to hang on to. in some ways what matters, this is what's going on in washington, this is cbo's forecast for total health spend big the federal government in 20. and each bar is a different time when the foreca

they do hover by themselves, which is nontrivial, and the directions that we're giving them with the sticks and the traditional controllers are not throttle up, it's really go up. you know, so high-level instructions, go in this direction and we're going to watch that command set kind of move up higher and higher as the technology improves. and so, you know, what most people are experiencing now is that it's very easy to put one of these things in the air and do something simple. the rest of it is based on your personality. if you are very careful, meticulous and you have a goal and you know how to get there, you will probably be very successful immediately with these things. if you, you know, maybe you race motorcycles on the weekend, or you may end up crashing one of these things because it does involve if you're piloting it for creative purposes, you're essentially moving that camera around in space and you need to have right now, you need to have feedback, the controls to respond in a way that lets you feel like you're connected to the device. so i have flown this phantom without

they're autonomous in many ways because they hooverer by themselves which is nontrivial and the directions are not throttle up, it's really go up. they're high level instructions. go in this direction. we'll watch that command set move up higher and higher as the technology improves. so what most people are experiencing now is that it's very easy to put one of these things in the air and to do something simple. and the rest of it, unfortunately, right now is totally based on your personality. if you are very careful, meticulous, and you have a goal and you know how to get there, you will probably be very successful immediately with these things. but if you -- maybe you race motorcycles on the weekend or you may end up crashing one of these things because it does involve -- if you're piloting it for creative purposes, you're moving that camera around in space and you need to have right now you need to have feedback. you need the controls to respond in a way that lets you feel like you're connected to the device. so i have flown this phantom without touching the radio using the apps. you say