the goal is to have procedural norms that are universal. we propose norms that are accepted across the globe and almost every agency already has recognize them in some form or another. to drive these principles we compared the text of competition chapters in major trade agreements. in every international competition network guideline and recommendation touches on procedural issues. we have also examined the practices of authorities in competition around the world. as a result, we have identified approximately one dozen core values. the mfb includes important due process commitments regarding nondiscrimination, transparency , timely resolution, confidentiality, conflict of interest, proper notice, opportunity to defend, access to counsel and independent judicial review. we gave extensive thought to the appropriate compliance mechanisms. the mfb strives to ensure meaningful compliance among competition agencies towards advancing the culture of free- market competition that we share. suggestions, guidelines, and recommendations were critical f

the goal is to identify procedural norms that are universal. what we have proposed are norms that are accepted across the globe, and indeed, almost every agency already has recognized in some form or another, to drive these principles, we compared the text of competition chapters in major trade agreements. and recommendation touching on procedural issues. we examined the practices of competition authorities around the world, as a result of this effort, we identified approximately a dozen core values. the msp includes nondiscrimination, transparency, timely resolution, confidentiality, conflict of interest, proper notice, opportunity to defend, access to counsel, and independent judicial review. we also have given expensive and considered thought to the appropriate compliance mechanism. it strives to ensure meaningful compliance among competition agencies towards advancing the culture of free market competition that we share. suggestions, guidelines, and recommendations were critical first steps in this process. but now is the time for us to go

and if norms, and if they don't, it also sends a signal. what does it mean if you're not agreeing to the principles of nondiscrimination and transparency? so, i think it's really important. we want to be respectful. there's reserve clauses in the agreement that allows for different agencies to have certain respects. so, some legal systems, for example, in mexico, they do not recognize attorney/client privilege, but perhaps the antitrust agency over there recognizes how important it is for cartel enforcement to have that, because you'll be able to, you know, get access and cooperation in an amnesty program from international counsel. and they may want to recognize some level of it, but we fully appreciate that it might be their broader legal system that doesn't recognize the concept of attorney/client privilege. roger just earlier this week was in mexico and gave a 45-minute speech on attorney/client privilege. so, it's a great one -- >> that must have been fascinating, actually. >> we were invited and asked to do that, and the president of

i think that's a positive norm. that something that is developing because the inherent goal is to have these shared set of values. that's why i'm hopefultuld badrf this. >> a couple more questions. one, one anyreaty, this is not a trty. in ft,t' not binding. it's essentially an m.o.u. but -- >> multilateral m.o.u. i guess. >> is compliance. when it comes to something that's not binding, compliance is long-term because nobody is required to comply. but we want peopleer these procedures because you going to be laying these out as the procedures that we think that antitrust agencies ought to follow. how do we, particularly since it's notdind there are not tribunals, , how do we get them to observe? you mentioned essentially reputational harm, naming and shamou he joi y have complied with the standards. how do we do that? >> i would probably characterize it less as shaming, but rather a mutual interest in enhancing trust in the functions of that enforcement agency, which would be the motivating factor. so there would be

yet owner norm sawicki says customers are mistaking his red hen for being affiliated with this red hen in lexington, virginia. >> we got hundreds and hundreds of phone calls saying how nasty we were. >> reporter: norm says after the owner of lexington's red hen asked president trump's press secretary sarah huckabee sanders to leave her restaurant friday night, a barrage of insults ensued. yelp even posted an alert saying they were cleaning out the reviews on norm's restaurant page which came from both sides of the political aisle. >> i thought it was very weird. i mean, we're not political here. you know? we're open to everybody. and unless you're disorderly, i want you as a customer. >> this morning i actually googled it because if it had been part of the same company we wouldn't have come here for dinner. >> reporter: jim alexander a regular at napa's red hen bar and grill and was pleased to learn the restaurant is independent of the lexington red hen. >> we're republicans. when you get to see the people who run our country you respect them. >> what do you think about people disrespe

and we are a good partner economically trade we we speak to international law and due to national norms but it would was close interesting good here to primakov readings to to listen. away in the sure india in a disciplined just because i'm used to go she said after a visit to the recreated impale from norm said this is truth by the way this made us read all of us that it was really a win win situation and sticking to the norms and respecting the international this is a precondition to go to see now from some parts of the american diffuse ration pvc international norms imo to speak to this is a pity now there was an interesting exchange last week of the same thing to spark a kind of make foreign when the french president the mammy omicron was kind of complaining about the diminished u.s. interest in european security to which president putin responded by saying that don't tortilla russia can provide that security for europe and maybe take that as a joke as a kind of chutzpah but i think mr putin has actually meant to do you think there is still any chance of europe recognizing russia no

thus reads all of us that it was really a win win situation and sticking to the norms and respecting the international this is a precondition it will be seen all from some parts of the american that history shows that except b.b.c. international norms are not to speak to and this is a pity now there was an interesting exchange last week and the same kind of make for on when the french president emanuel macaron was kind of complaining about the diminished u.s. interest in european security to which president putin responded by saying that don't tortilla russia can provide that security for europe and maybe take that as a joke as a kind of chutzpah but i think mr putin has actually meant to do you think there is still any chance of europe recognizing russia not only as a major security threat by as a major security partner good russia is a major part of for peace and security in those other budgets in the onus the always who i think the russia if you want to live p.c. in the middle east and you need russia. to speak to a partner in the constructive part of the europeans see russia that

do we need new norms? yes. in this sense we need a norm as to what the test and evaluation protocol ought to be. does it have to be international treaty? no, because we would never get an international treaty. keep in mind, china has not yet accepted in the cyber realm for -- the law of armed conflict, that the geneva convention and protocol even applies to cyberoperations. two weeks ago, at a conference, talking about the russian technology and autonomous weaponry. as a society said yes, our first targets are political and economic structure of the enemy. which by the way is often much of that is not targetable under existing law of armed conflict. the idea of getting a treaty is not palatable. i think the better thing is developed. these are the norms you go -- must go through in the testing process so that a commander will have a reasonable basis to believe the application of this particular technology, a whole range of technology, in this instance will do what he or she believes it will do and that will com

there's one other very tangible impact from such a norm emerging o of this debate. that is to create the appetite for counter technology. where are the antidotes. where is the ai that reduces the harm of lethal ai. where is that coming from? with this kind of moral context around the debate in geneva i think we are going to have a rich new set of incentives for people to be involved in that kind of virtuous research. i have called for a very similar kind of thing with respect to cyber weapons, and now my last point of what the impact of such a norm could have. maybe, in this country, in the uk and a few other places we will also, in light of this new norm, against fully autonomous robotic weapons we will have a clear national security debatbout wha we have gained in the national security realm from drones and targeted killing, from cyber weapons, and what we might gain from lethal autonomous weapons. is the record of what computerized militarization has done for us really so great? are we safer? is there greater rpehuman life ? is there work being done to protect th

thanks again, norm. >>> i would like to echo those comments and i would just add that the way norm assists the members of the system and the member of the city family and everybody that needs assistance, he always knows when to point us in the right direction. he knows how to get the questions answered and he always does it so quick ly. thank you, norm. thank you very much. he said, don't worry, i have you covered. we can discuss and review everything. and i can tell you, he's been very supportive and i really appreciate the support and everything you've given me. i have a hectic travel schedule and you've worked through it all, so thank you. >>> norm, the first time i met you was when i was running for the board. i usually think i can read people pretty well. and i could not get a read on you at all, absolutely just poker face. what i've learned over the years is you're an absolute professional. any time i need something, if i call you, it just gets done. thank you for your service. >>> this job is never easy. i just simply want to say from the city family, thank you very much for your ye

they're norms. they keep reminding me.o what happens if and when a different party comes into power. and, mind you, you know, the democrats have a lot to work on themselves around this. it isn't to say that the party has got all of the answers. but, you know, are we just going to return back to our polite kind of mode of being and say these are the norms and traditions and we've abided by them, even when we got completely royally screwed by the other side. i think that we -- you know, we've got to play a little tougher. and it isn't to say we need to understand the long-term consequences of our actions and the institutions. you always have to imagine what does this lk like when somebody else is in power. and i'm firmly a believer that we have to protect those things. but i also think sometimes, you know, the tools and tactics we rely on, you know, we want to be the rule -- the kind of -- the nice people who play by the norms and traditions. and qoowe've got to be able to think outside of the box right now and be able to fi

there is a pretty longstanding norm that applies to it. whether the policies themselves are clear enough is up to debate and i think we would work with the department and follow whatever the policy is. >> thank you. if you could follow up with the committee, that would be great. nothing else. >> senator kennedy. >> general, a couple of brief questions first. can we agree that the fbi is the premier law enforcement agency ever? >> i will say one of them since i oversee -- >> can we agree the fbi has about 37,000 employees? >> yes. >> can we agree that there were and perhaps a small minority of bad apples? >> any orriganization you'll ha problems. >> can we agree that director wray has the authority to find the bad apples and determinate them with extreme prejudice. >> yes. >> and prefer them for prosecution if necessary? >> yes. >> can we agree that mr. comey was intentionally subordinate? >> yes. >> can we agree that insubordination in particular intentional can be a symptom of managerial bias? >> it could be. >> did you think that mr. com

norm, you just took over as editor there.irst time in 20 years. staffers are hopeful this is a time for a turn-around after years and years and years of cuts at the "l.a. times." can you give us a preview of what your plan is for one of the nation's biggest papers? >> the first thing we want to do is to really focus on many of the things that the "los angeles times" has continued to do well, despite this period of turmoil that has remained superb in its coverage of community and has also shown a very strong bent toward investigative journal imism that we certainly want to encourage and continue. at the same time, our owner, patrick sun shong wants to leave a legacy, wants it to be credible not only in terms of local coverage but international coverage. so we have a lot of rebuilding to do. >> how long are you planning on being editor for? >> that's up to patrick sun shong. i'm delighted to be here now. i'm focusing on what's in front of me. >> i heard one of your most important jobs is to find a successor, so that's why i was

interests and we are a good partner economically in trade we respect international law and international norms but it would was crazy pristine good here if you primakov readings police and pool away in the issue of india in a disciplined just because i'm used to go she said after world war two we created him pile for norms and this is true by the way this made us read all of us and it was really a win win situation and sticking to the norms and respecting the international law this is a precondition it will be seen now from some parts of the american that this ration their big south keep these international norms are not to speak and this is a pity now there was an interesting exchange last week at the same chris burke economic forum when the french president emmanuel mccraw and i was kind of complaining about the diminished u.s. interest in european security to which president putin responded by saying that don't worry or russia can provide that security for europe and maybe take that as their joke as a kind of chutzpah but i think mr putin has actually meant it do you think there is still an

so our society to write your behavior is just the norm. so how do you get men to talk to each other and say that's not okay, to call it when it happens. it's not up to women to say what's happening but the behavior change of men that needs to shift. how do you say what is the one, not just a doing this. start doing something else. >> michelle, i just wanted to say this is our last question. >> i decide to thank you for being here today. really inspiring presentation. one of the things i really got out of this was if we could really look at any movement that we are looking to change and apply the principles, sitting here thinking about the opioid epidemic and how we change views on it and if we break it down, looking at survivors as the one time in the grandparents raising grandchildren is another 10 in those positions overprescribing in the business is and how we approach recovery in the work place. i really think it is a grass-roots effort that is something we can accomplish. in our collaborative and other local areas, we are also educati

there is a pretty long-standing norm that applies. whether the policy is clear enough that -- i think is up to debate. sen. harris: if you could follow through on that, that would be great. chairman: senator kennedy. nedy: can we agree the fbi is the premier law ?nforcement agency can we agree the fbi has 37,000 employees? >> yes. kennedy: that there were and still are a small minority of bad apples at the fbi? >> you will find problems at any major organization. thatkennedy: can we agree there is the authority to find and terminate those bad apples with extreme prejudice? mr. horowitz: we work closely with the director -- >> and refer them to prosecution -- >> correct. sen. kennedy: can we agree that james comey was intentionally subordinate while he was fbi director? mr. horowitz: yes. sen. kennedy: can we agree that insubordination, particularly intentional insubordination can be a symptom of managerial bias? mr. horowitz: it could be. sen. kennedy: did you find that james comey was unbiased or biased and did not act on his bias? m

we have norms that seem like they could never be broken. idea that presidents -- that ivanka trump would get trademarks in exchange for government policy. but we'll have to do at the end of this administration is put new laws in place to make sure that presidents release their tax returns. that things are made more explicitly it a federal crime so that things like richard and normal have better laws to litigate against. he's unthinkable to become thinkable. because there have been so many corruption issues, are institutions and rule of law does not have the peace it needs to deal with it. that's a challenge, making sure we bring new teeth to the law. [applause] lemanski this question, we do have constitutional remedies. we have impeachment as a remedy, the 25th amendment, these have been floated. there's a conversation going on now some have written a book suggesting impeachment may or may not be required legally and constitutionally but tactically it's not smart right now. wyers, what is theare good constitutional offramp. is there one or

but certainly the norm is what i described. bizarre. >> we do tell us about president obama's comments about the investigation of hillary clinton's imo the spring and summer of 2016? mr. horowitz: there were several occasions were either president obama or his press secretary made comments about the clinton concernsestigation and by both the investigative team and the attorney general and prosecutors. we also describe, it is one of the reasons cited to us by director comey for his belief that he had to, and essence, go it alone and make the announcement he made on july 5. >> many of us on both sides of the aisle are concerned about the erosion of norms, about article two, officials and ongoing investigations. i think it is a terrible thing in 2017 and 2018, and i think it is a terrible thing in 2016. culture of the department of justice, was there a sense of the president of the united states commenting on an ongoing investigation was a problem? mr. horowitz: it was a concern, and we described the reaction, which was surprised

international norms are not to speak to and this is a pity now there was an interesting exchange last week and the same to spark a kind of make foreign when the french president emmanuel mccraw and i was kind of complaining about the diminished u.s. interest in european security to which president putin responded by saying that don't tortilla russia can provide that security for europe and maybe take that as a joke as a kind of chutzpah but i think mr putin has actually meant to do you think there is still any chance of europe recognizing russia not only as a major security thread but as a major security partner good russia is a major part of for peace and security.

we have norms that seemed like they could never be broken.he idea the president with cells deal, that ivanka trumpeted trademarks in response to government policy. but we have to do at the end of this administration is put new laws in place to make sure that presidents release their returns, the self dealing is more explicitly made so that folks like richard will have better laws to litigate against, unthinkable to really finally become thinkable. because there have been so many different corruption issues, one on top of the other, our institutions, our rule of law does not have the teeth it needs to deal with them. that is one of our big challenges, making sure we bring to the law. [applause] >> so at me ask you this -- this other big framing question that i enter into this debate with and that is we do have constitutional remedies in that we have impeachment as a remedy, the 25th amendment as a remedy. there is a conversation going on right now, have written a book suggesting that impeachment may or may note required to legally and constitu

was not biased in his handling of the investigation but that he did in fact deviate from department norms. this sweeping 500-page report is expected to detail a series of failures by top federal officials, including comey, ahead of that crucial 2016 presidential election. a lot of democrat, including hillary clinton herself, blame her election loss on comey's decision to reopen the investigation just days before that election in 2016 and a lot of republicans felt comey gave clinton a pass when he didn't charge her. this i.g. report is supposed to reveal more critical information against trump. all of this as the white house gets ready to hold its very first press briefing since the president returned from singapore to meet eye to eye with kim jong un. our reporters and legal experts will be combing through the report the moment it's released. let's start with what we know so far. for that our lead reporter laura jarrett, live at the department of justice. laura, you know what's in this thing. let's start with what did the report find? >> reporter: well, brooke, after 17 months, over 100 w

as we can with the unknowns done in policy regimes and norms.it is an regimes and norms that you reach out to your allies in your adversaries, treaties and other venues to have conversation. i used as an example the s.t.a.r.t. treaty, for all of its warrants, the preamble talks about conventional that looks like strategic. defenses is a venue by which both sides can say to you, i'm looking in this area and then giving you a heads up so that i you really don't like it you can say something about it. can talk about the attributes of that system at some point. we may listen to you. we may not. but at least we'll have a conversation and we will elect regimes do not go down at all. even though it may see some perceived advantage to you. i mean, it is robust, but it is still voluntary. >> you actually talk about the example of the biological weapons. our decision was not vied a ruse. big up to their efforts in the area. so i agree that we should be pursed doing all potential paths towards awareness of unintended consequences and mitigation strategies.

norm still can't turn over his left wrist which ist his domin hand. and if you can believe this, norm isn't the only one in his family to have been hit by a car. both hife and daughter were also hit while walking in alexandria. luckily they only h minor injuries. you feel like you're familkes sbitten, or do you feel like -- >> bad luck comes in threes. now hopefully it's over.e we arall very cautious now. >> rorter: norm part of a group called alexandria families for safe streets which is pushing for safer streets in the city. alexandria itself has adopted a vision zero panhich aims to eliminate alltr pedian and bicycleatalities and serious injuries. chris zeman is with the city's transportati planning department. do you feel like alexandria itself has gotten safer since e the initiatarted? >> the initiative is very new. i would like to say yes, but we are just starting. >> reporter: for now, he says the conversation is changing with a push toward safer streets for everybody. in alexandria, adamtuss, news4. >>> only news4 shows you security changes in

but disciplined the speaker and used to go she said after world war two we created him pile for norms and this is true by the way this made us read all of us and he was really a win win situation and sticking to the norms and respecting the international law this is a precondition you will do see now from some parts of the american the east ration their big south keep these international norms are not to speak and this is a pity now there was an interesting exchange last week and the same to spark a kind of make foreign when the french president emmanuel mccraw and i was kind of complaining about how did they manage the u.s. interest in european.

it took a grass roots organization to change and put the norm.the money and the government saying stuff doesn't work, right? it has to be a citizen-led grass roots thing. [ inaudible conversations ] >> oh, okay. maybe there's no money. [ laughing ] >> but, you know, the government is not going to solve our problems. you're going to solve them, right? we are going to solve them. okay. other questions or ideas? >> i just wanted to reflect when i was listening to you through all of this that it is so important about not only who is spourgt -- supporting and that leadership where it comes from, but it needs to come from -- which i think what we're hearing today, it needs to come from those who are also trying to affect. >> yes. >> and so that's why i feel a lot of hope possibly for the gun control because it is the youth that are speaking out. and so we need to be the followers of what they're doing. back in the 90s i had opportunities in what i was doing in education and working also alongside the montgomery county health department of going into sc

well, because it' the norm. has no problem destroying those, but those norms are the fundamental underpinning of what we have regarded as the rule of law up until now. >> that's absolutely right. charlie has been hitting it on the head. this idea that donald trump can actually dangle the pardon to those who may incriminate him, right, suggests that the obstruction line of mueller's investigation is stronger, right? it seems as if -- and i'm not a er, butt seems to me this is part and parcel of why people think he's obstructing the investigation. in the midst of him trying to protect his own behind -- beremember, donald trump is like valdemort. only h can live. he's willing to destroy institutions, willing to throw norms out the window. and here it seems to me least fm e outside a clear example of obstruction. but who knows? mueller -- i can only assume that mueller is paying close attention to it all. >> do you want to get in on it real quick, last word? >> mueller has a great team of investigators, but consiste

norm still can't turn over his left wrist which his dominant hand. and if you can believe this, norm isn't the only one in his family to have been hit by a car.t his wife and daughter were also hit while walking in alexandria. luckily they only had minor injuries. you feel like you're family's snake bitten, or do you feel like -- >> bad luck comes in threes. now hopefully it's over. re all very cautious no >> reporter: norm part of a group called alexandria families for safe streets whis pushing for safer streets in the city. alexandria itself has adopted a vision zero plan which aims to eliminate all pedestrian and bicycle fatalities and serious injuries. chris zeman is with the city's transportatpn planning tment. do you feel like alexandria itself has gotten safer since the initiative started? >> the initiative is very new. bui would like to say yeswe are just starting. >> reporter: for now, says the conversation is channg with a push toward safer streets for everybody. in alexandria, adam tuss, news4. >>> only news4 shows you the chae for the fam

as long as we can f the unknowns down at policy regimes and norms, and it is in regimes and norms that you reach out to your allies and your adversaries, your treaties and other venues to have conversation. i will use an example, the treaty, the preamble talks about conventional that looks like strategic, defenses versus pure offense. i mean, it is a venue by which both sides can say to you, i'm looking in this area. you know, and i'm giving you a heads up so that if you really don't like it, you can say something about it. we can talk about the attributes of that system at some point. we may listen to you. we may not. but at least we're going to have a conversation. and we may elect in norms and regimes to not go down that path at all. even though it may see some perceived advantage to you. so i mean it is robust, but it is still voluntary and it is diffic- >> go ahead valerie. >> you actually talk about the example of the bio -- biological weapons; right? >> right. >> so our decision not was viewed as a ruse by the former soviet union so they upped their efforts in that area. so i wo

is another norm of the modern world under threat of falling? >>> this came up earlier in conversation. there is one last thing before we go. one more note on this friday night and quite possibly one more norm of the civilized world that may be under threat. this is a big one. just as u.s. troops in south korea and japan have helped to keep the pacific rim for so many years. tonight there are nearly 35,000 americans in uniforms in germany and a deployment in germany that's a dependable feature for life in the u.s. army for decades from cold war to hot and back to warm. it is why there are so many american sons and daughters and veterans who were born in germany. the russians have always hated the presence of u.s. troops in germany as they hate nato which our president branded as obsolete. now comes this "washington post" report of the administration is removing our troops from germany. the article says this effort follows trump's expression of interest in removing the troops made during meetings earlier this year with white house and military ai

another break for us and coming up is another norm of the modern world under threat of fallen. first survivor of alzheimer's disease is out there. and the alzheimer's association is going to make it happen. but we won't get there without you. visit alz.org to join the fight. gives skin the moisture it needs and keeps it there longer with lock-in moisture technology skin is petal smooth after all, a cleanser's just a cleanser unless it's olay. >>> this came up earlier in conversation. there is one last thing before we go. one more note on this friday night and quite possibly one more norm of the civilized world that may be under threat. this is a big one. just as u.s. troops in south korea and japan have helped to keep the pacific rim for so many years. tonight there are nearly 35,000 americans in uniforms in germany and a deployment in germany that's a dependable feature for life in the u.s. army for decades from cold war to hot and back to warm. it is why there are so many american sons and daughters and veterans who were born in germany. the russians have always hated the pre

he said privacy is a social norm of the past. i thought, said privacy is a social norm of the past. god, said privacy is a social norm of the past. ithought, my god, man, what are you thinking? the world is not a safe place, it is not a k for everybody to know everything about you. before we get onto the issue that really annoyed you. -- it is not ok. do you think you were too soon? were you bringing something to the market that we weren't ready for? and that is why it wasn't a success ? for? and that is why it wasn't a success? maybe it was a small success. you success? maybe it was a small success. you were “ we were success? maybe it was a small success. you were -- we were quite successful. but you were not facebook. there was the bubble and the pop. we sold that company in 2001. the dot.com bubble happened. this is part of being an entrepreneurial. i am this is part of being an entrepreneurial. iam not this is part of being an entrepreneurial. i am not an engineer. ijust entrepreneurial. i am not an engineer. i just thought, entrepreneurial. i am not an engineer. ijust thought,

thanks, and welcome, norm. >> thank you. >> i would like to thank norm for his part and for some of my anxious phone calls. and you are retiring just in time for the beginning of the new fiscal year. so i just want to express my appreciation and i would like to welcome carmen chu to the board and hopefully she serves with integrity and commitment. thank you. >> thank you. >> why don't we go ahead and put close public comment. >> next item is item 17. >> anything from the board? any requests? no discussion? ok. seeing none, why don't we open up the public mment. no members of the public, we will close public comment. just for clarity sake again, this item is open a case you have any requests about anything yoyou'd like to see in future agendas or any concerns if you would like to bring it up. next item, please. >> item 18 is item abou retirement. >> can we take these at committee? >> yes. >> why don't we take this up for a public comment. are there any members i would like to address the commission? seeing that we will close public comment. >> at a motion to adjourn will be order >> ok.

. >> i think the norms have really changed in terms of what you can do to somebody against their will, how much you can crowd their space, make them miserable at work, where you don't have to physically assault somebody to make them, you know, uncomfortable at work or at home or in their other -- just walking around. that i think is good. >> so let's bring in new andy davis, a former white house special counsel for president clinton who is the author of -- and also cnn political commentators angela rye and ms. stewart. what do you think bill clinton -- what do you think of his comments? >> i think he was stumbling. don, i think the reality of it is the rules have changed and that is a good thing. i think it would have been great for bill clinton to be able to pull that sentence off distinctly and he didn't nail it. and i think the challenge is given his history is people are looking for m to say the wrong thin here. and frankly, this is not the right thing. as a father of a daughter, and the grandfather of a granddaughter he has to do better and quickly. he has to precise and right on

advice as knowledge i want to meet those woman back home who are bones by their duties and social norms and inform them of old dead basic rights my name is dave out of the home and i work at some them. this week on global three thousand we go to colombia many people there have no access to clean water but some new technology could help. in china previously is anything but a given we visit a country where total surveillance is rapidly becoming the norm. first though we go to iran where some determine.

. >> and the norms, the global norms. >> the global norms, yes. but the link. america was built as a sort of rebeginning of europe. this is the spirit of america. the spirit of america, the founding feathathers is based oe idea the values which made europe are going and replanted in another earth in order to bloom in a more beautiful and more brilliant way. this is the strongest and the most beautiful america. okay? mr. trump thinks other way. america will last longer than mr. trump. >> thank you very much for joining me. that's it for our program tonight. two guests with two messages of hope. join us tomorrow night to see how europe will respond to this unprecedented trump trade war. the eu trade commissioner will join me. good-bye and thanks for watching amanpour. katty: you're watching "beyond 100 days." industrialized nations meet in canada this week but china isn't in this bloc and the u.s. doesn't seem to want to be. christian: in the age of trump, is the g7 still relevant? the u.s. protectionist president is challenging decades of western unity. katty: a

it takes just as much strategy and thought with social norms as it does to do these other things and to give you a flavor of why some of the many movements have been so good at this i want to share a couple of social media ads to show you have a think about changing hearts and minds and i can think of no one better than the tobacco control movement. wenk tobacco control realized they were up against eight powerful industry and up against a powerful social norm, so they had to have equally powerful messages. we will queue this up from a truth initiative, and anti- teen smoking initiative. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> thank you. all right, so what did you notice about that ad? it's funny. what else do you notice? doesn't tell you not to smoke. no adults telling you smoking is bad for you. when i first assad's ad i came across it come and not because of any serious research i was doing, but i was driving with my kids on the way to camp in the summer of 2016 and i was telling them about the book i was starting to work on i said it's about how change happens and movement and i'm like smoking, everyone used t

when leaders abandon institutional norms and hierarchy in favor of their own ad hoc judgments. and when the bishop of the department and the -- and when the leadership of the department and the fbi are not able to speak with one another for the good of the institutions. not -- nineakes recommendations. the fbi and justice department remain true to their foundational principles and values. that concludes my statement and i will be happy to answer questions. wray?istopher wray: i appreciate this opportunity to discuss the fbi's response to the report by the justice department's office of inspector general about the doj and fbi activities in the run-up to the 2016 election. i take this report very seriously and we accept its findings as that and recommendations. -- its findings and recommendations. we are already implementing recommendations and are ready to come out from this better and wiser. our mission at the fbi is to protect the american people and uphold the constitution. ,nd to carry out that mission we are entrusted with significant authority. our actions are subject to o

following our processes, following guidelines, following our long-established norms. sen. hatch: i want to thank inspector general horwitz and you, fbi director wray for today to helpre answer that question. i want to focus on two issues identified in the report. the first is improper disclosures to the media. the second is the political bias of evidence in text messages between fbi employees. the fbi has a policy that strictly limits the employees who are authorized to speak to the media. this is appropriate for any organization that quietly investigates with an eye toward prosecution in a court of law, rather than the court of public opinion. thatnspector general found this policy was widely ignored by employees at all levels of the fbi. the report goes so far to describe a culture of unauthorized media contacts, including instances where fbi employees improperly received tickets, golf outings, drinks, and other benefits from reporters. this is totally inappropriate. director wray attachments to the report identified more than 50 fbi employees who apparently had unauthor

long as we can for the unknowns that policy regimes and norms and regimes and norms you reach out toyour allies and adversaries through treaties and other venues to have a conversation. i will use as an example the new start treaty, for all of its warts, the preamble talks about conventional that looks like strategic defenses versus pure offense. a venue by which both sides concern looking at this area and giving you a heads up so if you don't like it you can say something about it. we can talk about attributes of that system, we may listen to you or not but we will have a conversation. we may elect regimes to not go down that path even though it may see a perceived advanta to you. it is robust but still voluntary. >> you talk about the example of biological weapons so it is our decision -- used as a ruse, their efforts in that area. i agree we should be pursuing all potential paths towards awareness of unintended consequences and medication strategies but we need to understand again that technological superiority does not equal national security, nor does development of treaties and

can for the unknowns down at policy regimes and norms. it's regimes and norms that you reach out to your allies and your adversaries in other venues to have conversation. for all s an example its wart the me amble talks about conventional that looks like strategic, defenses versus pure, it's a venue by which both sides can say to you, i'm looking in this area. i'm giving you a heads up so if d't like it you can say something about it. we can talk about attributes of that system at some point. we may listen to you or we may not, but at least we'll have a conversation. we may elect in norms and regimes to not go down that way at all. even though it may receive some perceived advantage to you. it's robust but it's still voluntary. >> my problem -- go ahead. >> you talk about the example of the buy yow -- biological weapons. our decision was used to release. they up their efforts in that area. so i would just -- i agree we should pursuing all potential paths toward awareness of unintended consequences and mitigation strategies for them. but i

decent person to see him chuckle about something a violation of a norm.mall norm, not a huge deal but the kind of thing that president obama has done it. larry would be. it's part of a pattern and good for him the more it gets normalized, all the old rules and one of the things and all the norm breaking does kind of reinforce itself, i guess, if that's the right way to say it. and 30 years railing against tariffs and against anything with max protectionism. there are some republicans, at least who are criticizing the president on the question and a lot of questions the critics raise and paul ryan who has called it out. i disagree with the decision. orrin hatch, will have damaging consequences. representative kevin brady. hitting the wrong target. and then saying this is dumb. al, my friend, what do we make a republican party that has bowed down in front of donald trump on almost everything but this one issue, suddenly, not gone against him as crystal points out, legislatively and don't know what that will end up with but publicly, there's more resistance