right there's an established norm and expectation but, of course, norms that aren't broken long ago and they said let's ban one set of the world population. right, so we know that there's certain norms he doesn't care about and he can toring attorney general to open in criminal inreis to political components but that crucial moment held, the political culture animated by set of values those set of values include separated power, religious liberty, due process, freedom of expression, judicial review, right? and that political culture is animated by by millions of constitutional actors steeped in that culture animated by those values those include department of justice judges who are hearing argument people in the white house counsel office. the people in the streets outside the courts. all of those people are participating in sifng life through a prism of a shared political culture that is animated by those constitutional values. and to me the question then becomes -- about the health or lack of or the health of our current political culture. because political cultures can be healthy or

think about norms of ceo pay.in the 70s the idea of a ceo being paid 1000 times the wage of the average worker in this country would have been regarded with absolute horror and amazement. also, astonishing amounts of ceo pay in corporations, please the unrelated to stock market performance or shareholder returns. what changed? somehow it becomes okay to do these things and many told themselves the story of how we live in a meritocracy and it is a dog eat dog world and it is a natural inevitable result of crystal norms, most of these, there is no competitive process whatever, they're trying to cut out competition, stop it whenever possible. if you don't understand norms you can't explain what is going on. it is inextricable in economic terms and the same is true when you look at the uk, because the norm transferred in the uk and some of the same things are not as bad but you can run the same argument as well. just a little example of the benefit you get from seeing a new world in a smithian way. you have that idea.

are these activities not in violation of international counterterrorism norms? why have the officials face financiers of anti-iranian organization with a record of financing al qaeda, isis, and on the star, not only but supported and armed. if you want the world public to take your claim of fighting terrorism seriously it is imperative to start a joint global campaign to fight this scourge. irrespective of the victims or culprits. distinguished colleagues, in the same vein, from the very beginning of the crisis in syria, we have warned against any foreign intervention in the internal affairs of this country and the use of unlawful means including supporting extremist and terrorist groups in order to exert pressure on the government of syria. we have consistently emphasized that the crisis can only be resolved through intra-syrian dialogue. to the end, the presence of our military advisers in syria has been at the request of the syrian government and consistent with international law and has aimed at assisting the syrian government in combating extremist terroris

the president is day by day tearing down the norms that have built this country up. we've had the greatest norms, the greatest behavior of any nation ever. but it's declining now. because people of good will allow trump to do it without criticizing f criticizing him, and it's about time they did. it's about time they did. now, shifting focus back to events here in congress we have h to get back to reality and truth. and focus on treating the supreme court nomination debate the right way when all is said and done, this is about the nominees credibilityil and temperament. i've said it before, i say it again. there are many who say what happened when someone was 15 and 18 doesn't indicate their personality and what kind of person they are when they all 53. well, i believe dr. ford, and i believe what she said is really relevant. there are many who don't want to consider that but there's an issue that should matter even to them. and that is the credibility and temperament of judge kavanaugh. this is what he is at 53. if he can't tell the truth, about previous encounters

we talk about norms that he shattered. norms aren't permanent. norms change and move. he's changed the norms for a certain percentage of the population. this isn't normal. kids who are growing up who think this is normal. they think this is the way the president acts. >> do you get any sense in talking to him yesterday that his degree of concern around the khashoggi issue, that he sees any connection to this conversation or is he totally detached from the effect of his own words? >> about the way he speaks about the media? no, i don't think so. >> and the closeness with saudi arabia. they are his closest ally in the region. >> i think he was very impressed by saudi arabia in the way they treated him when he went over there, and that went a very far way with him. that really showed him that they cared about him and the relationship with him. >> flattered him. >> they flattered him. he felt the same way when he went to china. those things mean a lot to him in those relationships. is there a larger connection to the press here? i don't think so. >> is he offended and movi

the president is tearing down the norms that built this country up. we have the greatest behavior of any nation ever but it's declining now because people of good will allow them to do it without criticizing and it's about time they did. shifting focus back to the events here in congress we have to get back to the reality and truth and treating the supreme nomination the right way when all is said and done, this is about the credibility and temperament. i said it before and i will say it again i believe doctor ford and what she said is very relevant there are very many do not want to consider that there is an issue that should matter even to them and that is the credibility and temperament this is what he is at 53. if he can't tell the truth about previous encounters and engagements, behaviors and activities which we have found over and over again, he doesn't deserve to be on the bench. that's why they demand an fbi investigation because they want to get to the truth, because credibility of the justice on the court is a very important characteristic a

seeing the way the norms have been shredded, especially in the senate, what i expect is even more normsto go. thatu want to write-wrong have occurred in the past, you will blow up even further than the norms that existed, so i don't see a brighter future in the short run. thanvery much engaged with willing to be involved with groups that want to change the rules. i would love to change the rules to make them better, but if we think that will work better and till we get a different party dynamic, and i can say there is blame on both sides. the democrat have that forty-year majority. the way the subcommittee chairs and chairs acted in committee where there would have proxies and basically blow off any real, strong republican ideas. that was wrong. thehe last 10 to 15 years burden for shredding the norms falls more heavily on mitch mcconnell and some of his allies. years, we hade 45 northern democrats and republicans, and endangered species, a moderate to liberal republicans willing to work together. in a way we had three parties. that is the way we analyzed them. i would like to shift thi

still, people travel, and many countries support international norms and the rule of law. we provide them the opportunity to answer for this. we can't always apprehend suspects easily or quickly, but we will keep at it. the justice department has a long memory and a responsibility to the victims. we wouldn't be here today without the courage and cooperation of the victims. we encourage all of them to report suspected intrusions to their local offices, so we can raise the cost of this kind of behavior. we understand you may be reluctant, but we strive to minimize the destruction to their daily activities and to safeguard their privacy. we don't want victims to feel re-victimized by the investigation. suffering in silence doesn't serve anyone. we want to thank our international partners. today is a victory of cooperation and information sharing. the royal canadian mounted police for their strong support and coordination between the investigations, here and there. the u.k. national security intelligence agencies for their untiring support. the netherlands defense intelligence

you talk about norms that he's shattered. norms change. they move. he has changed the norms, at least for a certain percentage of the population. when we talk about this isn't normal, there are people, kids who are growing up who think this is normal. >> do you get a sense in talking to him yesterday that his degree of concern around the khashoggi issue, that he sees any connection to this conversation or is he totally detached from the effect of his own words? >> about the way he speaks about the media? >> speaks about journalists and the closeness of saudi arabia. they're not just any ally. they're his closest ally in the region. >> i think he was very impressed by saudi arabia and the way they treated him when he went over there. that really showed him that they cared about him and the relationship with him. >> they flattered him. >> he felt the same way when he went to china. those two things mean a lot to him in those relationships. is there a larger connection to the press here? i don't think so. >> is he offended and is he moving on khashoggi

of those norms. how solid can they become? if we think of other elements as outside day-to-day functioning, how do you substantiate norms? haveep going, those might to concrete at times and we cannot rely on them. john: gene? to focus on the first point is that what has not kept us going was the superbus over rules but nonconstitutional advantages. we tend to think the constitution is the reason that we enjoyed the benefit and posterity and freedom that we do. that may not be the case. among similarly situated developed countries, whether you look at economic freedom of the world index that ranks countries and there are index like freedom house that focus on political and civil rights. if you look at these rankings, you see plenty of countries with parliamentary systems doing as well or better than the united .tates on these indicators just look at the northern neighbor of which between the beats the united states in economic freedom and in the freedom house rankings. magic about the system that we h

norms of behavior are critical. we have norms of behavior in every domain that are well-known.e have norms of behavior on the use of weapons and what are they are written or not. we lack that in space because for decades space was classified. we did not want to talk about limits in our capability. to the fact that we don't know what our space doctrine is. we are not sure what we should and should not tell. this ise a huge part of to develop doctrine that can shape the norms that advantage the united states and our allies. i think degree causing weapons inis a terrible thing. we haven't promulgated a norm like that in the same way we have promulgated norms about landmines. it is easy enough to do. we would be seen as a leader instead of playing the defense. again as we did before. >> i would look at this differently in saying that while we look at space as we looked at , more likend defense the i.t. industry. it is globalizing at a rate that we cannot control. whether or not we like it, countries are being active and leading in certain areas. why is the world on an i.t. standard

i think that good lawyers should cite to those norms that are supported including the right, but i dothink we all know who practice law and that teach my students this. it's good to know the national norms but what will persuade a judge should i make a decision is persuading your adjudicator on u.s. law. so use it, it's great to really find the arguments that are anchored in u.s. law. >> i'm an accredited representative and a practice in pennsylvania. my question is, i have two questions for panelists. have you personally ever met or spoke with an asylum seeker in detention? and given the outcome of matter of a-b and given your advocate a strong for the outcome that happened, , so i would assume yr family with the 700 pages of conditions can reference, won't you do if you were a woman that was being made to be harmed by has been entered know what you grind your children, i'd switch and of what you recommend we do business with you to our clients that they can't stay here. what do you see as an alternative to come to abuse and seeking asylum if you're not being protected by the governm

particularly in cases. >> i think that good lawyers should know how to use those norms and those normsi only mentioned it briefly in passing, that the u.n. high commission for refugees has given guidance to look at international human rights norms in defining who was a refugee, what is persecution in interpreting particular social groups. so i think that good lawyers should cite to those norms that are supported including, but i do think we all know who practice law and i teach my students this. it's good to know the international laws, but what will persuade your judge to make a decision as persuading your adjudicator on u.s. law. since you say, it's great, or really find the arguments anchored in u.s. law. >> thanks, karen. >> hi, i practice in pennsylvania. my question is i have two questions. one, have you personally ever met or spoke with an asylum seeker in detention and two, given the outcome of matter a.b. and given that you've advocated strongly for the outcome so i would assume you're familiar with the pages of conditions that karen reference, what would she do if you do if y

the president isn't the only figure on the stage in those constitutional norms that are meant to protect our liberties. instability in the politics and the harassment officials and the intolerance of the expression of ideas with which we disagree and the cultivation of the memories of historic shame our projects on which it could have a monopoly and we must be vigilant. the weakening of the institutions and the conference and then we'll have a profound consequence for world order which is the subject of the chapter that i've contributed in public. the national cohesion and self-confidence looks like external threats. the threats need not necessarily bring ruane as they once put it they may be the grid with which the oyster as its shell. the constitution written and unwritten is constructed to enable us to carry out the project of the declaration that expresses the liberal ethos and tolerance and social mobility based on the talent and effort derived from the consent and that the constitution provides the mechanism to determine the future how and whether we will realize is in our hands. i

the european union is a set of norms. you take off the norms. it is not territory. it's not a nation. it's a set of norms that the member state states have accepted. we can't change the norms. for the sake of the uk. we have always pitted to the uk. the second problems is the negotiation of themselves. it reminds me as a poor french diplomat. i was with the americans. so you have this process. usually you are waiting with the reserves of the process. and in the end the americans are arriving with that. and they say it was too tough to negotiate. we are spending weeks and months fighting and negotiating. after that they tend to please don't do that. the agreements in the negotiations between that uk and the eu. the closer you get to the dateline. doors will be slammed. that is part of the negotiation. but i really do believe at the end of the day we will have an agreement. that we will have an agreement. as you know. the best point is irish border. and it will be comfortable with that fight. when the uk was in the eu. it was quite possible simply not to have the bord

if the norms have been broken, fine.brett kavanaugh is not the only person at the federalist society that the federalist society blessed to be on the supreme court that donald trump could have chosen from. the head of the federalist society was on cbs before he was nominated. he was asked who on your list do you think is the best. he said they're all great. throw a dart at any one and they will be fine. he's not the only person that can sit on the supreme court. given all the controversy surrounding him whether you think he deserved it or not, he did come out and he did say there's a left wing conspiracy against me. it's clintons revenge and he did make it clear to a lot of americans that he is not on their side. when you talk about the republican side, a lot of americans will look at him forever and see a guy who is a republican. not a guy who is a supreme court justice and given that, my question to ben and to you is, wouldn't it be worth it for our country if everybody said, listen, let's find somebody else? >> well,

barack obama changed the norm.ow you speak to the voters and what you believe in is different than before. the white house yesterday, with kanye, was different than before. kevin: i am a fan, i am not going there. e. o'brien: there is no norm. kevin: 25 days left to -- left. how is is going to break down? e. o'brien: we pick up in the senate and barely hold the house. jeanne: the democrats take the house and the republicans hold the senate. kevin: you covered it all. kanye, taylor. [laughter] shery: thank you very much, jeanne zaino and e. o'brien murray. we are seeing a slight rebound. .3% and the s&p 500 still hoping that -- still holding that losing streak. this is "bloomberg." ♪ kevin: this is bloomberg balance of power. i am kevin cirilli. shery: i'm shery anh. lower todayc despite an earnings beat and weaker loan growth. joining us more -- with more is taylor riggs. what happened with the shares? a top banking analyst at morgan stanley said she is confirmed about non-interest expenses and weaker loan growth.

let us be free we will not be anyone's colony again the latest in a no apparently norms. of hits to the pin yachts of the dollar system the impregnable tender since world war two and guess whose currency correctors these ousting it for. after trump threatened anyone dealing with iran brussels drops a bombshell on its old us charm in iran trade e.u. simply ditching the dollar e.u. member state will set up a legal entity to facilitate legitimate financial transactions with iran and this will allow european companies to continue to trade we had done in accordance with european union low and could be open to other partners in the world. russia's backing brussels for them a pittance already talking dollar trade with major allies adding washington's just shot itself in the foot americans keep but if you're not american partners are making a colossal strategic mistake undermining the credibility of the dollar is universal and essentially the only reserve currency undermining trust in it they can sing the branch they're sitting on this is a typical mistake of any empire when peop

overall routing routing the norm norm and visitors read right by needed water is many many do we do we sometimes it's it'll build around the army to teach. the government has invested million dollar dollar revamping island installed on roads and and it was it was as them. among young engines is four hundred dollars hotel restaurant around. because these don't don't new environmental rules and no more than one a night i was out for a day day allowed by. look on the beach each. it's not son donald is ms ways whitley katie hello hello again. of course and that is the ongoing international. as a manager is not easy to john john john john sure she'll be discussing from the national not not. about as vessels. has had a great. dot dot dot also in the desert because it has a huge number number like high. the killing them also extrusion her address israe. ray ray is yes sure sure that's fast imagine if it. doesn't doesn't highlighted the hotel shuzhen's from the k.. and and and like like to treat more morgan forward. in an instant. yet there are al so does. on the call conference in delegation

you'll provide leadership where you can and influencing those international norms and responsible behavior. that's to everyone's benefit. and then a lot of cost -- world class rnd and a lot of integration collaboration with the united states. you can see defense on the left. that's probably what most people think about immediately like defending the satellite system. but there's also things like reconstitution. so now we're getting to the point where it's some system is comprised, you could have one, if it's cheap enough, on the shelf and launch it up again. that's a deterrence affect. on the resilience side, you know, disaggravation, proliferation, distribution. don't put up one big one. put up a bunch of cheaper ones so it's not as easy to take out the capability. working with allies. things like that we're tacking on here if we're going to be soon at a point where go up and the system is damaged and we can repair it, why wouldn't we do it. we're getting into this capability as a force. we're going through an analysis of thanks for the direction on, you know, defend and protect. this is

this is so out of the norm for taylor swift who until now has avoided any comment about politics, even taking out a post to encourage people to vote. she made it clear to her 112 million followers on instagram and the world where she stands. taylor swift is known for belting out ballads of heartbreak. ♪ you love the game >> reporter: and girl power anthems. ♪ shake it off but this morning, she's using her voice in a whole new way, writing on an instagram post overnight, in the past i've been reluctant to publicly voice my political opinions, but due to several events in my life and in the world the past two years, i feel very differently about that now. swift, who stayed silent during the 2016 presidential election, now coming forward to endorse two democrats running for office in her home state of tennessee. swift saying she cannot support gop senate candidate marsha blackburn because her voting record in congress appalls and terrifies me. the superstar writing, i cannot vote for someone who will not be willing to fight for dignity for all americans, no matter their

>> good lawyers should know how to use those norms. we are on high commission for refugees to look at international human rights norms is defining the refugee persecution in determining social groups. i think that good lawyers should get those norms but i do think we all know who practices law and it is good to know what will persuade your judge to actually make a decision is persuading your educator on u.s. law. use it, it's great, but i really find the arguments anchored in u.s. law. >> think you. >> my question is, i have two questions for palace, one, have you personally ever met or spoken with us in asylum speaker in detention and given the outcome of youth advocates knowing the outcome that happened, i would assume you are familiar with the conditions , what would you do if you were a woman who is being seek out and mentally harmed by her ex- husband and you had nowhere to go so i just want to know what you recommend because we have to tell our clients to be here, what you see as an alternative and not being protected by the gove

stand out and you could argue she's making a political statement generally against these conservative norms that dominate her country and as we saw tara had a lot of fans almost three million but she had a huge amount of detractors as well and she received the enormous amount of height online and very sadly last day while she was driving through baghdad in her car she was shot dead ok so hers was one of a number of killings that have raised suspicions what are authorities saying well basically when you look at them all together it does look like something's amiss here and the prime minister of baghdad has asked the interior ministry to investigate now what we can do now is look at the other people who've very sadly recently lost their lives firstly to other prominent figures in iraq who knew tara their names are. really. on that were killed in the spice of just one week in baghdad back in olga's they were in the same social circle and last week two dies before far as was killed a human rights activist named so waddle ali was shot dead in the city of basra she was a prominent campaign a full

we can us of the justice system the questions of the tribes you know what are called the tribes and norms and traditions has been you know over. the rule of law. the status of women becoming more and down not in the advance one that we have really worked for that let me ask you specifically about one of those challenges because i know you're very proud about this problem entry quotas but i also heard people say that they do not represent a genuine political change there are people who complain that those many of those seats in parliament go to essentially figure have women from influential families rather than january and real grassroots political activists do you agree with that . yes because not only women even the men you know been selected through their ethnicity or their you know part is loyalty or because they are a sectarian sectarian way so women defaulted for woman issues or for women's rights for equality some of them you will find some of them in these rounds of these elected women because of the leadership of the political parties in iraq they don't believe of course rights or

against corruption but we also have norms against appearance of corruption and the idea is look we're going to be over inclusive here we don't even want to get near the area where we think a government official might be exploiting his or her office for private gain so appearance of corruption is a very important. it's easy to see trump is unprecedented a break from the past but since the one nine hundred eighty s. growing sums of money of flooded politics shaping many american sense that the entire system is corrupt. trump capitalized on the feeling to get to power as he reminded republican politicians last spring but they had this expression drain the swamp. and i hated it i thought it was so hokey i said that is the hokies give me a break i'm a virus. and i was in florida with twenty five thousand people going wild. and they said we will drain the swamp the place went crazy in washington someone running for office often takes campaign contributions from say the pharmaceutical lobby or the gun lobby which are funded by manufacturers of those products they very often support legislati

as the south, which is closer to the seasonal norm. and wales but this weather system will bring some wetter, windier, cloudy conditions to northern ireland and scotland. initially into northern ireland and in the rain will pep up across much of scotland through the course of the day along with that strong breeze. a little bit of sunshine but england and wales staying largely dry, and lovely spells of sunshine through the day. temperatures 12 to 18 degrees across the south—east, so a touch warmer on thursday. a quick peek into the weekend and high—pressure dominate the scene for england and wales. largely fine and dry and wet and cloudy across the north. this is the business briefing. i'm sally bundock. netflix's subcriber success — the streaming service's billion—dollar bet on original content is paying off after nearly 7 million new users joined the site. canada's cannabis countdown ends — marajuana is now legal and growers are looking to get high on the potential profits. and on the markets: well, a very different picture in japan.

against corruption but we also have norms against appearance of corruption and the idea is look we're going to be over inclusive here we don't even want to get near the area where we think a government official might be exploiting his or her office for private gain so appearance of corruption is a very important. it's easy to see trump is unprecedented a break from the past but since the one nine hundred eighty s. growing sums of money of flooded politics shipping many american sense that the entire system is corrupt. trumped capitalized on the feeling to get to power as he reminded republican politicians last spring but they had this expression drain the swamp. and i hated it and i thought it was so hokey i said that is the hokies give me a break i'm embarrassed. and i was in florida with twenty five thousand people going wild. and i said we will drain the swamp the place went crazy in washington someone running for office often takes campaign contributions from say the pharmaceutical lobby or the gun lobby which are funded by manufacturers of those products they very often support l

norm, what are your reflections after a week like this.ersonally, to you. >> it does, wolf. all of the attacks on cnn colleagues, the pipe bombs, many of my friends, former bosses and colleagues on that list. the devastating attack in the synagogue, which we all experience in the jewish community. i was? synagogue at the same time. we heard of the danger. we all experienced, as the loss of our brothers and sisters. and the kroger's attack is no different. an attack on -- a murderous attack on people of color. the biggest reflection for me is that the tone that has become pervasive in our country. and it's asymmetrical. both sides have said things they shouldn't, but it's so imbalanced towards what the president and his enablers have done. that tone of hate, when targeting anybody whose different, wolf, any minority, anybody who doesn't look like president trump, when he targets them, it has a spillover effect on everyone. in my book, i write about a hundred years of these assaults on democracy. and his words of hatred and of violence, his

reinforce this behavior is not acceptable and violates international norms, as well as u.s. criminal laws. these charges further lay out some of the basis for the u.s. government's prior searches that the government was responsible for other cyber intrusions and attacks. it is her mind or the fbi does not tolerate criminal activity, even conducted at the behest of nationstates. we believe the officers are located in russia and not immediately able to get the charges. many countries support international wars -- norms and the rule of law operated we provide them the opportunity to answer for this. can't always apprehend suspects easily or quickly, but we will keep at it. we wouldn't be here today without the courage and cooperation of the victims. we encourage all of them to report suspected intrusions to their local offices so we can raise the cost of this kind of behavior. we understand you may be reluctant, but we strive to minimize the destruction to their daily activities and safeguard their privacy. we don't want victims to feel re-victimized by the investigation. suffe

you realize that fixing a norm busting policy by busting your own norms adds to the damage being done to institutions and processes. you really have got to be careful. this is probably not going to help him. with tv cameras rolling but i think dan coats is been quite masterful over the last six to eight months. he doesn't pick a fight, doesn't beat his chest but he answers questions about geostrategic issues and a very straightforward, honest way and it seems to be fairly indifferent whether or not he is on the same page as the hymnal or not as the folks down to the joint chiefs and the secretary, i think their response to the transgender van tweet by the president was about as close to the edge as you can get. and there the issue was the president tweeted from the residence one morning when he was scheduled to give a long briefing on his options regard to transgender troops, right, 80 tweeted it's over, they are done, they are not going to be in the military. and the problem for the chiefs was that they may or may not have had a different view three, four, five years ago by transgend

against corruption but we also have norms against appearance of corruption and the idea is look we're going to be over inclusive here we don't even want to get near the area where we think a government official might be exploiting his or her office for private gain so appearance of corruption is a very important. it's easy to see trump is unprecedented a break from the past but since the one nine hundred eighty s. growing sums of money of flooded politics shipping many american sense that the entire system is corrupt. trump capitalized on the feeling to get to power as he reminded republican politicians last spring but they had this expression drain the swamp. and i hated it and i thought it was so hokey i said that is the hokies give me a break i'm embarrassed. that i was in florida with twenty five thousand people going wild. and they said we will drain the swamp the place went crazy in washington someone running for office often takes campaign contributions from say the pharmaceutical lobby or the gun lobby which are funded by manufacturers of those products they very often support

against corruption but we also have norms against appearance of corruption and the idea is look we're going to be over inclusive here we don't even want to get near the area where we think a government official might be exploiting his or her office for private gain so appearance of corruption is a very important. it's easy to see trump is unprecedented a break from the past but since the one nine hundred eighty s. growing sums of money of flooded politics shipping many american sense that the entire system is corrupt. trumped capitalized on the feeling to get to power as he reminded republican politicians last spring but they had this expression drain the swamp. and i hated it and i thought it was so hokey i said that is the hokies give me a break i'm embarrassed. and i was in florida with twenty five thousand people going wild. and i said we will drain the swamp the place went crazy in washington someone running for office often takes campaign contributions from the pharmaceutical lobby or the gun lobby which are funded by manufacturers of those products they very often support legis

norms of behavior are critical.ave norms of behavior in every domain that are well known, whether they are written in law or not. we have norms of behavior on the use of certain kinds of weapons in every domain, whether they are written in law or not. we like that for space for many reasons, most of which, for decades space was classified. we didn't want to talk about limits in our space capabilities. a lot of that traces back to the fact that we don't know what our space doctrine is. if we don't know what our space doctrine is, we don't know we should tell and what we shouldn't tell. i believe a huge part of the space force is to develop doctrine that can shape the norms that would be advantage of the united states and our allies in space. we have written several things on this, i think the international outcry when the chinese shot down the weber satellite was enough to make them stop doing it ever again. when we haven't promulgated a norm like that and the way we have promulgated doctrine about landmines, we woul

but in the last 10-15 years, the burden for shredding the norms falls heavily on mitch mcconnell and some of his allies. >> during the 45 years, we had a dixie cross, northern democrats and we had republicans , endangered species a moderate to liberal republicans willing to work together, we had three parties and that's how we analyzed them during the period. i would like to shifts this and ask how do we get cooperation, we have had some cooperation, we have had some reaching out and working with each other, certainly when there is a clear, external threat to the united states like 9/11. but when ryan became speaker, he passed 28 bills during that period that all needed democratic votes. reaching out and working on the budget, working on the amendments to elementary and secondary education, a variety of policies that some would say had groups on the outside giving them protection on the inside. but ultimately, the far right caucus in the house of representatives criticized the speaker and he couldn't continue that. how do we bring that back? >> i would say first of all, he did have s

norms in space. is part of what we can do to collaborate, doesn't cost a dime, other than you can travel a little bit to go to the right forums. >> i would say any avenue that's open to you, i know in our context, if the five eyes approach makes sense, that's what we're going to try to explode. if it's a bilateral exchange, that's quicker or more advantageous, we'll look at that. if it's exploding the innovation that industry is providing, we'll try to exploit that, the briefings i guess from industry with their innovative ideas, definitely informs my thought and i try to pass that into our strategies and objectives, so whatever's open to you, space, the nature of space, drives a level of collaboration that is in all of our interest to share lessons learned and to keep it available to everybody. >> if i could also add. one of the things that smaller nations that don't have huge budgets can bring, is a greater sense of innovation. because they have to, so if i take a look at where some of the greatest

we've got norm eisen and mark smith.nks for being here. >> if we look at this on non-traditional litigation, you would go first. give me a quick take on why you think a president can do this. we'll deal with should later. >> sure. bear in mind that no one is suggesting that president trump can amend the 14th amendment by himself, but the president of the united states has a seat at the constitutional table. the president, members of congress, the supreme court all swear an oath to uphold the u.s. constitution, and i think what the president is doing here is essentially saying we are going to start the legal process with this executive order he says he's going to sign and that legal process we know is going to go to the courts and eve eventually chris, it will go to the u.s. supreme court and while the president by himself cannot change the meaning of the constitution, certainly we know the supreme court can change the meaning of the constitution as to how it's applied because the supreme court sprangly dofrankl all the t

norm does that really. push your. nose only decore will devote their yahweh theory to even your remote only shots or more to see more and know what to do or who should i did. that you see with your corporate if it's even more. cos the pot luck the second best city. where your support for us is equal to the crees and all put to fit on a vanity fair we call if you needed the men don't get enough. divorce. sick i'm behind look sad to self worth. so for the decisions. that are they defy me design the genius of that system in a one sided hodgy. inform that if they started on i look and survivalists. because he's on sunday. said we're fairness and i see. possibility in that it up to the city since it is to our kids what is economy. to a large meal c.d.c. but it's how could such a sale be concluded outcome the inaction of the political class in this case be explained did an aggressive acquisition by americans and the loss of a whole strategic sector really take place right under the noses of france's m.p.'s not really just t

that norm does and they really. put your. nose only peace predicably when they devote all your weather to even your remote. or more to see more norm was to also be indicted you see with yoko for it if it's even more when to look at this he did of course the pot luck to him on the second best cd and. floss is equal to please. and all put to fit on the vanity fair we call a few men don't get enough. and boy. sick i'm behind excited. to self-worth they are so fond of. the toy they defy me design their genius that stuff in a little. form that if. i look. good he's on sunday. on this you now see. possibility in a very busy. dizzied economy. but it's how could such a sale be concluded out of the inaction of the political class in this case be explained did an aggressive acquisition by americans and the loss of a whole strategic sector really take place right under the noses of france's m.p.'s not really just two weeks after the scandal broke former deputy mayor. called for a commission of inquiry commission look at. it in this is h

insisted on by the ultra conservatives and i want to ask you specifically about these social norms if it's something that is embedded within the iraqi society or is it something new that people try to impose on your country under the venier of really just piety. i don't i don't think that they would it isn't new in the country there were maybe they're more dead word is something new but because the girl she was so you know. just to speak about herself in the in the social media where she said i want to live my life as i am as i am of her is not as the other people they want to do when chika suppose they assaulting sexual assault she has got to from religious man or she even she made you know a very simple. commentary about her principle in their lives in very open way she didn't you know attack religious or she didn't attack our house traditions but i think this is just execute against her and this is what has the people to say what's happened not only the teller but the questions of so on what is happening why. yes city and a few if you are so active and she was a doctor when did it

the sense that conflict as we talked about would be sort of a norm. i think part of the intention was for there to be this negotiation or conflict overtime. it is hard to come up with an optimal quantum of separation of powers because -- even of madison. he changed his mind on these questions over the course of his life. something that is very important to keep in mind is the dual sense one could have of separation of powers. this is often something we talk about. but, there is the separation idea, that each one should be hermetically sealed in its own article of the constitution, doing its function in some of the great supreme court cases. we have justices talking about this saying, the executive does executive things. the legislature makes laws, and there's this idea that there is a formal boundary separation. at other moments, and this could occur on the floor of the supreme court, and other places the checks and balances idea is more in the forefront. the branches come into conflict and as economists would tell us, in defending this marginal borde

norm does that they really. have to put your. nose of you on a piece predictably will devote all your weather to even your remote. or more to see more norm was to also be should i did that you see with yoko for it if it's even more the sue when to look at least at this he did of course the pot luck to him on the second best cd and. yes of course russ is equal to please. and all put to fit on a vanity fair we call if you needed the men don't get enough. sick i'm behind look sad to say we're fair share. of the tar they defy me design the genius that stood in. danger from that if they started to look and survive. because he's on sunday. and this you now see. possibility invented that ties on the cities to our diseased economy. but it's how could such a sale be concluded auchan the inaction of the political class in this case be explained did an aggressive acquisition by americans and the loss of a whole strategic sector really take place right under the noses of france's m.p.'s not really just two weeks after the scandal broke forme

>> it is a huge violation of a norm. it is terrible for the president to weigh in there. >> if we're going to say every day he is violating the norms, america elected a president who is a violation of the norms. so we need to stop talking about that. >> but the fed is independent. i think that so many of the norms he has violated, lock her up chants, but this is a specific thing that not a lot of people know about when ron was talking about how monetary and fiscal policy were cross purposes, do you think most even know the difference between -- >> but there are presidents in the past that have complained about interest rates going up. they just don't like it. >> remember when janet yellen back i think in 2016 said that interest -- she alluded to interest rates rising when hillary clinton was running against trump, but she didn't put that into effect. i think that was because it would be unpopular on her reign. >> i think that -- >> but she alluded to it. >> i think it is one thing for yellen to allude, it is another thin

my question is how international legal norms search as the principle of nonreforment and the idea of family unit which is found not only in the geneva convention and the human rights can be used to advocate for asylum claims in the u.s. particularly in cases such as the matter of a.b.? >>. >> i think that good lawyers should know that, you know, how it use those norms and i only mentioned it briefly inning and the uven high commissioner in refugees has given guidance to look at international human rights norms in defining who is a refugee and what is persecution in contributing social groups and good lawyers should have social groups and we all know who practice law and i teach my students this and it's good to know, what will persuade the judge to make a decision is persuading your adjudeicator on u.s. law. so use it, it's great, but really find the arguments that are anchored in u.s. law. please. >> hi, my name is cara, i'm an accredited representative and i practice in pennsylvania. my question is i have two questions for the panelist christopher. one, have you ever met or spoke w

. >> alice, after all the norms have that been broken, this is the moment, right? like john avalon have been warning us for two years, be careful, the norms are being broken here and will this be permanent or is it that the breakingle norms only apply to trump, so do we have the same standards for corruption as a republican or have they been thrown out the window? >> as we all have come to learn, a lot of those standards do not apply to this president for whatever reason. we all can recognize and joe and john know that landfills across the country are filled with research that never has seen the light of day and it was flushed down the toilet because it was never needed and we would not be hearing about the "hamilton" ticket if it was not needed. mayor gillum has done a great job. the last cnn debate he made a very convincing case, and certainly resinated with the people of florida, and if he was not doing as well we would not be talking about the "hamilton" tickets. but at the end of the day, having worked in the governor's office, everything is scrutinized and yo

i worry about tribal identity politics becoming the new norm of out politics is waged as conservatives we thought this was sort of a left wing thing. unfortunately the right practices that as well. it's the day and age, technology and everything else, identity politics which is now being pack practiced on both sides of the aisle is unfortunately working and i think we as leaders we got to figure out how do we make inclusive aspirational politics strategically valuable again. >> dickerson: you've talked about inclusive politics, does president trump practice? >> sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn't. >> dickerson: but i mean, come on, honestly -- >> on economic growth and tax reform getting military, helping veterans, those are things that he has led us to that have really brought people together. 'talks about these, that is inclusive. >> dickerson: you talk about tribalism. here is the thing, you leave office you say to members like congresswoman who have -- got to deal with this tribalism isn't the most effective way to deal with tribalism -- president trump has been very effective