well now we have another nation that's got 1200000000 people the norms are very different there and when you're talking ai because they have a larger base they're going to have more information more knowledge one of the advantage that china has is they've got people who are as good as people in the west in terms of innovation now in developing this technology ions patent and science and they don't want any point 2000000000 people to experiment on and whether or not you're willing to. doesn't consent doesn't matter does not matter so they're going to have a lot more of you know they're going to run is over and over and over again and they're norms are not going to be all norms and other autocratic nations are following their lead there's well this way so you think you need to ensure that i added and the c.e.o. of microsoft. if the c.e.o. of microsoft is putting together norms and habits and trying to basically correct these for the u.s. and perhaps the western market place are there firms that are not part of this normative structure that are able to get a scale and to compete where

of microsoft is putting together norms. and habits and trying to basically correct these for the u.s. in perhaps the western market place are there firms that are not part of this normative structure that are able to get a scale and to compete where he was simply have gravity operating very differently whether it's the internet or how we do health research how we look at crisper babies and i'm just wondering given essentially the way america which is still an incredibly strong economy is nonetheless relatively small or as as a share of the global economy whether or not our inability to wrestle china in and to these others to live with these sort of standards is a real problem i'm going to go to you with this because you live in a world where science and the norms of them you have lots of people who could choose to be very dangerous or who could choose you and these can become economic points of strategic competition you know we're seeing that a lot and you know because particularly science magazine itself is such a high pro

what are the norms? what are the rules of the road that are going to define how we maintain strategic stability when we are in a very new technological era? that requires dialogue and discussion even with some of the countries that challenge us the most. and i'm not suggesting that we will all agree on the set of norms and everybody will abide by it, but the value of doing the norm setting, you may be able to take certain catastrophic things off the table by mutual agreement, and where you disagree, if you get enough of the democracies, the countries that share a common set of values and interests on board with a set of norms, that becomes the basis for international action to hold those who violate those norms accountable. so i think there's value in that. the second thing i would highlight is that he was government is an amazing demonstration platform. one of the casualties of this presidency has been the word of the president, the word of the united states of america. we are going to have to take acti

i've been thinking about norms too. you see one every day norm of the senate being broken which is all 100 senators sitting there quietly in their seats at their desks listening atentatively. that's not what the senate usually looks like and it certainly signals that this is a very special occasion. but, you know, here we have this formal process that reflects our norms, that reflects our ideals, that is designed to make us think about the best we can be. think about fairness and justice and america and checks and balances and separation of powers and all of that. but the trial is of a president whose whole thing is breaking norms. in any way he possibly can, in the way he talks, in the way he tweets, in as chris matthews said the nicknames he gives to his political opponents. and so in a few hours, we will literally be able to say that the jury is out on whether -- on where we stand on those norms. you know, has this president and this presidency broken them in a way that will really be difficult if not impossible to r

about the technology norms and that bucket of norms that are woefully underdeveloped, but if part of-- if part of what is happening and going to continue to happen is going to get accelerated over time is to chip away at some of the belated realizations that the way a regime treats its own people is predictor of how they're likely to behave within their regions or as partners, i mean, china just fundamentally either doesn't accept that or doesn't care, right? because the ramifications of accepting that events that occur internally have broader ramifications implicate too much and now implicate a set of bedfellows of theirs. so if you are to guard against their desire to kind of turn back the clock, which kind of mirrors what trump tried to do domestically here, then it's about countries acting collectively to prevent that norm erosion and one reason they've been so -- i mean, we're fortunate that their ambition in the phase that coincides with trump's is nascent, and you know, i know there there's divergent views how ambitious they are to this effect. whether there's could he existen

the question of norms is important. we had a pretty big debate about the strategic framework. and you recall in that it in the strategic framework agreement by the bush administration was a timeline. .. an agreement with a president irrespective of the party of the president was considered ideal on the incoming president. by that president himself, heretofore all having been meant. the point and try to make is i think we have a question, will have questions about that, progressive democrats on the question about that to resolve. in that specific case, within a series of other norms which is do we want to try to restore the respect, for example, the independence of permanent justice? do we want to have an attorney general who will restore the post-watergate view of independent of the attorney general? is not easy questions to resolve and there will be spirited debates. we should be very intentional about those questions. then the question about how to make best use the people in the best use of the time which is really your question being made. look, i think that the main thing

are going to embrace these norms and values. and i think that we're going to talk a little bit more about that as we go through it. that said, that the developments in a.i., the advantages that will be attained through a.i., can't be separated from the emerging strategic competition that we have and we've talked a lot about with china and russia. some of these challenges are just never going to go away abat least not in our lifetimes. but there's a browder geopolitical landscape and geo strategic land scape we need to talk about, and that is who are the friends and allies we need to cooperate with and what does that conversation need to look like in order to assure american positioning? our particular group within the commission was really looking at the united states' need to develop a holistic strategy to ensure long-term competitiveness in this emerging environment. i'm told i should reinforce the five initial judgments that were made by this particular group. the first one is the need to foster cooperation amongst the u.s. a

but it is probably the case that on the big unresolved normative questions where china has to be a part of the question that they the process will end up having to look something like -- i'm not saying -- i'm saying this it tentatively but it's kind of like a paris process where the p2 negotiation occurs as happened in the podesta process or whatever with president xi and then or but it could happen the other way where it's a democracy process that occurs where we are then the spokesperson on behalf of as large a coalition as possible giving us then more potency in what amounts to a subsequent p2 process but that's why i mention that in year one all of that brainstorming among democracies about how we handle this strategic juggernaut that is coming down the path. but i say that in contrast with the traditional un process where the u.s. is leaving behind and you can't get away with that anymore. that will not play itself out at the un. it should end up probably at that you and good we tried that in the obama years with those lean a set of cyber norms and i think from what i gather from t

from white as a normative and everything else in some way is not normal in the u.s. when the eastern european jewish people came to the united states they were not classified as white. they were classified as other. in overtime, because of u.s. politics around, eastern european jewish people had opportunity to observe privileges that came with whiteness. that was upward mobility like access to college education and bank loans and home loans and homes in the suburbs. but before that moment, for the most part, they're running from anti-semitism. so it was a way to protect themselves from being targeted as jewish people. in overtime u.s. racial politics invited folks from eastern europe, greece, armenia, turkey, italy, ireland to all fade into a whiteness while the u.s. community further separated itself from blackness. >> that's fascinating. we need to take a quick break your mosaic. >> good morning welcome back to mosaic. i am rabbi aaron weiss. we are in the middle of a wonderful conversation. there talking a lot about the complexity of race and color in the jewish c

you've got to strengthen the collective security but you cannot give an inch on the normative side. to continue to compete and ultimately we can be successful but i'm curious as to that and particular think sequencing, because if we go aggressively on the enormative side, i can see continued cipe for impasse. >> why don't we start with those two. backwards.ork you know, i'm not sure, suzanne, a level of abstraction exactly where to go with your question. absolutely right to point to the interplay and to the duality of all of that and and normative on but in order to defend against erosion, which is really more, maybe i'll say worried technology norms and that bucket of norms that are underdeveloped, but if part -- if part of what is appening and going to continue to happen is going to get over time, is to chip away at some of the belated realization that the way a is me treats its own people a predictor of how they are likely to behave within their as partners. i mean, china just fundamentally or er doesn't accept that doesn't care, right? of use the ramifications accepting that eve

norms. free trade system. so the other members try to ask china to share these kind of things. >> single point. that's a difficult question, but i think, like, bilateralism over the coordination that's worrysome for the g7 and g-20. the tensions escalate more like also like the trade of tensions between u.s. and the european countries got escalated more like them, also with japan. if these things dealt with more bilaterally, it could -- the forum could -- may lose some weight in terms of ensuring the free trade liberal older. that's the worrysomepoint. >> let me ask the audience if they'd like to ask questions. if you do, wait for the microphone, state your name, and then ask a short question if you would, and i'll take a couple of them. this gentleman in the third row, here. >>> thank you. i'm with a japanese newspaper. my question concerns the leadership in the united states and global institutions. although i believe it will continue to be in the interest of the united states to support the leadership roles

so we build on a dude norm that says me will count on the end of externalities. and me will end up with a new game plan that says we can track where arms come from it anything beyond the minimus level has to be either stopped or paid for in a systematic way that's the new norm for other categories in that society gathering in 1974 this conversation i might as well be smoking a pipe so you would be smoking cigarettes there would be clouds of smoke and that was the norm. we didn't have clarity on the degree of health risk but today we are very clear if you light up a cigarette today the norms have fundamentally changed is not just a bad call headed's unacceptable with regard to pollution but to be seen as an acceptable way to do business. one of the things we need is moral clarity on the idea that causing harm to others is no longer acceptable in the pollution context to extract sources whether cut from public lands water extracted from shared rivers or any number of things also has to be paid for we cannot up people to take things for their own private benefit fro

china needs to follow international norms and laws. and also i need to share the universal values like democracy, human rights, norms, free-trade system. so the other members trying to ask china to share these kind of things. >> okay. hyundai sensei? >> a single point of worry at this point, it's a difficult question but i think like bilateral, bilateralism away or -- that would be very worrisome for a g7 and g20. it like china, u.s. has rivalry and also issues estimate more. like also the trade tension between u.s. and european countries could escalate more, also with japan, like if these things are dealt with more like bilateral, like multilateral forum may lose some like weight in terms of ensuring the free trade liberal order. that's a worrisome point. >> let me ask the audience if they would like to ask questions. if you do have a question wait for the microphone, state your name and then ask a short question if you would and take the -- a couple of them. >> thank you. i am with a japanese newspaper. my question concerns the leade

the norm has been for us to be worried about an attack on a synagogue. the norm has been for us to be, should we actually walk around with a visible side of our jewishness or should we put our jewish star necklace inside our short? it's only to say i never thought about those things when i was growing up. that in and of itself is just an unbelievable departure and perhaps will get into this whata departure that's a something unique about what america can be at its very best. and so i think what we are living through now is i kind of this orienting almost nauseating feeling that the world that we inherited, certainly the world that i inherited and the world, parents i think i spent their lives living and is s no longer the world that i think would be the reality for the rest of our lives. that has to do not just with the jewish-american experience but, frankly, with the direction of where this country is going, at least at this moment. those things are deeply, deeply interconnected. >> you also said something that had all bit of an ominous ring to it. tha

political norms or trugsal norms.ow a president like donald trump to reshape without changing laws. >> that's correct. first, the presidency is not a static institution. the institution that we think of today as the presidency looks relatively little like the institution that congress interacted with in the 1790s when presidents didn't have staff. there weren't agencies in the sense that we understand them now. and the powers of the presidency were gravely limited by things like geography and communications. so we shouldn't think of the presidency as an institution that doesn't change. it does change. and the presidential powers as they're articulated in the constitution, can give rise to many different iterations. for example, the president is obliged to give us the information to congress on the state of the union periodically. that can mean a written communication as it did through most of the 19th century. it can mean the modern state of the union address as we think of it now. and i suppose it could also mean a t

then japan made a great contribution to formulate one important international norm.that is this is constant, this is a concept securing all of the people from any threat, any kind of threat. so it became accepted and became the international norm by the general assembly and united nations. this idea fits japanese diplomacy and it is, and it became a very important component of japanese diplomacy. and in 1999, japan establish a trust fund for the to translate a concept into the human initiative project. then this idea is active. now, let me talk about the roles and challenges in the major two, two major gift organs and united nations, the general assembly. and security council. in the change of the international environment, discussions in the general assembly is very important because general assembly is the most democratic in the u.n. because 193 u.n. members call the voting right equally. so in the general assembly, most generally, i mean, the global interest are discussed. the 74th meeting last year, the prime minister address the importance of multilateralism and

it is the norm my colleague calls strategic disenfranchisement. we are using this is a way of gaining political power. and it is utilized in a partisan way. it is not going to be perfectly linear. however, we do see progress. >> if i can add something, a lot of these positive reforms are happening in so-called blue states, whether it's cities or blue states entirely, we have to americas into voting systems. one a lot more expansive in democratic areas, and one more restrictive where republicans control. that is what you are seeing from a descriptive perspective. but the answer is also no. there are some of these positive reforms that we are seeing adopted in both red and blue places, because they are good governance aspects. felony enfranchise mint, people from all political perspectives are seeing the moral imperative have not disenfranchising people after they see their time. you see that in places like alabama, and kentucky, where we just had an executive order. you also see the nuts and bolts of administration issues also being promoted, espec

woman back home full of bones and social norms and inform them about the basic rights my name is the amount of people home and i work at the gym. welcome to news from the world of culture is what's coming up on today's edition. germany's most expensive and most successful t.v. series of all time is back to series 3 of babylon berlin starts this week. and untouched nature but this is digital and these worlds do not exist a new exhibition examines are yearning for perfect. we begin though with the ends funds music prize one of the most prestigious in the classical music world it all as a performer a composer or musicologist the winner receives a whopping 250000 euros in prize money this year it goes to the viola player to be of similar has been dubbed the queen of the viola she is also a professor of music and the award is for her commitment to helping young musicians to she spoke to d.w. after hearing the news and about the great love of her life music. and how would it be if it faded like a piano call it turns out that over the 2 pots circle. she's a stickler for detail and she's lon

not at all the norm. you know, very grateful to be from here and to be from a place that just lives up to the things that everyone wrote about this community and the aftermath of the massacre. they were just true. the fact that they were true was a testament to the work that so many leaders and i'm seeing rabbi jamie and so many faces of people that have put in the kind of effort that was really showcased to the world. that did not come out of nowhere. those relationships do not blossom overnight. they are the result of incredibly hard work and relationship building and trust building. that is a work of people in this room that i am indebted to and grateful for. >> the idea that your life has been a blessing comes through very purely in the book. you describe your own experiences and as you described the lessons that you learned from your grandparents and your parents. you also say, though, and you have this ability to use the english language in ways that are compellingly memorable. you say that in some

incredibly destructive to the norms and sort of divisions and respect for the press that have existed under past administrations and i think what we're learning is that these kinds of norms that uphold our democracy that make it possible for citizens to get impartial information make us able to vote fairly that these norms can are only as good as the people we elect into public office unfortunately of our producers tell me we're out of time. but somewhat it's fascinating talking with your appreciate you coming in to share your insights tonight and we'll look forward to your new book as well thank you so much frank pleasure thank you for the day he's always done the conversation continues online to find us on twitter at news you can follow me you don't need to use the hash tag the day and remember whatever happens between now and then tomorrow is another day we'll see the numbers but. the conflicts are right from a system respect to the bill nigeria's government sponsored by the international community of serious human rights abuses i guess this week here in london is climate how many

i'm not going to give you examples all these norms and regulations but they are not as well those who they are not for feeling and the resolution about a lot of other a thing demanded it's required that investigators were reporting to the security council we didn't have a single report from them. and investigation and reports for and. with ukraine australia along the netherlands belgium allies malaysia. point was actually shut down no one you put it and cited them to join they were invited you here later said not to participate in the criminal investigation which is true but only to participate in the technical investigation. and when we asked why you used with number to put things in like well if there were complaints against us they could have sounds to us to join the group but they didn't want to see a very but we kept you operating with them and everything that we were asked to provide at certain bits they die and that's the advice of the investigators of these joint investigation the grid of those and so we feel that although we haven't had. almost. designing the. day that that o

that are at environmental norms the climate norms that are now emerging and strengthening so those are going to be the main what britain wants is a tariff free x. is quota free access to the european market bought that they are going to have. pay a price for that in the sense they have to stick to european rules and that is going to be war at the negotiating table interesting and you have to wonder about what's going to happen inside the u.k. we have to remind ourselves that in that breaks at referendum a majority of scottish voters voted to stay in the european union so how much of a threat does break now pose to the unity of the united kingdom. it's a big threat and all contractors here if you look at the british papers are quite unified in that they say that this is now beginning to emerge in northern ireland has voted had voted against bracks it opinion and wales has completely shifted in a majority now is against breaks it because people are going to fear the consequences and particularly as you mentioned scotland there was a tussle for instance about the scottish parliament keepi

, so far outside of international norms, so far from the how we expect an american president to behave that lack of understanding extends to washington, his own administration, his own secretary of state, his own defence secretary. he is genuinely a loose cannon secretary. he is genuinely a loose cannon and that is to me the most concerning thing about that situation. and the stakes are so high in everything he said he didn't wa nt high in everything he said he didn't want america to be involved in. he ran all the way to the white house on this, not putting troops in danger, concentrating on america economically, looking after themselves on their own soil, now this. the times, we will kill uk tubes —— troops, once a round. british troops could be collateral damage of american targets are struck. we have got british troops in the middle east, in this part of the world, helping iraq to fight isis and training their soldiers. horrible. for the supreme leader, the ayatollah, his decision, the dilemma, he has to be seen to react otherwise he will lose face in his own country but it is measu

also back with us norm ornstein.nt to stipulate at the beginning i'm just stunned that a senator from new york can now give press conferences outside of penn station. there's no heckling, it sounds like the quietest street in the state of new york. i worked with a senator from new york. we wouldn't have dared to try that. i guess it's the seriousness of the moment. we're faced with how many republicans will actually fulfill the role that the founders hoped they would in this situation. norm's guess or estimating there could be as many as nine republicans who favor witnesses. >> as i listen to the tv commentary and i hear a lot of frustration, some people even sounding a little disheartened. and i think what i want to say to people like that and building on what norm said, first everyone knew we were coming to this moment. when the decision was made to pursue impeachment it was made knowing these odds. secondly watching people engaged in politics watching the show, this is a very dynamic situation, very unpredictable.

we really this kind of ecological role model that we belief all day long and face facts given the normative standards that be accepted on the international level in terms of climate law in terms of biodiversity law we have to admit we are still among the countries with the highest ecological per capita footprint in the world so we are no role models by now but of course ok let me let me jump in there and he and let me jump in there and say germany should be a role model but what do you want to do to get there to get to this bio economy. the overall idea has to be free to cut down 4 fossil fuels to 0 in about 2 decades to address the reduced emissions from let's talk pro diet etc etc because given the normative standards from for instance the paris climate agreement or the un by. invention we need that because these convention produce an obligation for all states and delegate scale to come to a for instance greenhouse gas emissions case ok. if it's got. 3 guys instruments we need for instance instruments to go through our fossil fuels in about 2 decades ok does that mean raising on a drastic

he should have been tried he should have been brought to justice there's at some point would be a norm for trial you would do that unilaterally taking a decision to take out a sitting off a shell of another country goes beyond the norms secondly. you have to say he's implementing state policy in iraq it's wrong decision that they're going to protect us that it's it's right now president putin's decision to support massacre is in is it so somebody in the take carrying putin orders is given get 2 pilots and generals to implement and somehow i don't see us talking about the russians carrying out ethnic cleansing in syria the russians that iranians are partners they see president putin seems that he's pretending that it could force is a normal army in iran which it is not to this isn't a form of terrorist that is specifically designed to wreak havoc outside of iran to claim that what he was doing in syria those activities of training and arming militias for ethnic cleansing campaigns yes let's call it what it is no it's not and i want i got i want to go to another how do you see things tod

we're trying to explain to the reader how you would go about trying to encode and embed social norms that we care about into our rhythms themselves . now, a couple preparatory remarks . we got a review on an early draft of the book that basically said i think your title is a conundrum or possibly even an oxymoron. what do you mean an ethical algorithm? how can an algorithm be more ethical than a hammer? this reviewer pointed out that algorithm like a hammer is a tool . the human design artifacts for particular purposes and while it's possible to make unethical use of a hammer, for instance i might decide to hit you on the hand, nobody would make the mistake of ascribing any unethical behavior or immoral activity to the hammer itself. if i you on hand with a hammer would blame me for it and you and i both know that real arm had come to you the cause of my hitting you on the hand with a hammer so this review basically said i don't see why these same arguments apply to our rhythms. we thought about this for a while and we decided we disagree. we think that algorithms are different even

lisa 2 months ago i stood up and she goes no this was for you to seclude me to not someone were the norm i knew someone was not a lot of the. seed you could look at as i understand it was quick and it was in unison on the model the water on. the sea is brother john was not. a mosque with more than a. building a car costs at least $3000000.00 rubles or $45000.00 tires alone cost at least $10000.00 each season when you drift at that speed each tire loss for just one race . getting expert alexandra de mint throwing coke can see no point in practicing on ice during the winter to maintain his driving skills he goes to the drifting birthplace japan because as we move from washington. a career in the going rate i don't want. to be honest you know i wish york. well you believe that you know some of the c.g. road or shortly. are. using and you don't think if it's in this huge distance was louis's gibraltar which is fortunate you this is smarter than we were and that would mean almost. on the share in you'll get who's best to be for sale of the opposite of what you just listed me what you think th

the clinton impeachment set new norms that shaped today's environment. private indiscretions have become political liabilities. impeachment continued to be framed as a partisan tool in the aftermath of clinton's administration. notably, every president since clinton has endured heightened scrutiny of their personal lives, as well as calls for impeachment by political rivals. but this partisan legacy of what is famously referred to as the politics of personal destruction, is now used to distract from the central question that should be at the core of the impeachment today. the central question that was at the core of investigations into watergate and nixon's administration. that is, has president trump disregarded the law and will congress allow this to happen? i think the key lesson here to learn from nixon and clinton is that congress does have a responsibility to determine what constitutes morally and ethically dubious behavior, and perhaps something voters should be evaluating when they go to the polls, and what is illegal and unconstitutional? it nee

and the answer, and you address this at length, it's really just by norms.se presidents have chosen to act a certain way. and if a president chooses to act in a different way, a way that many seem to see as kr crossing the line, there's not much to stop them. >> the american executive is an astonishingly powerful office. it really is the most powerful office in the democratic world. not just because we're the united states of america, but because we have a more empowered executive than other countries do. and they way we place constraints, those are quite broad. what we do is expect presidents to behave a certain way, to observe particular norms in order to have -- in order to be perceived as legitimate. in order to avoid getting impeached. in order to convince courts to sign off on what they do. one thing we've seen again and again with this president, he doesn't appear all that interested in actually doing the job of the president, the kind of ordinary management and policy functions that normal presidents want to do. instead because his sort of vision of

these elaborate norms have grown up in order to allow for independent law enforcement.president who's weaponizing, you know, weaponizing law enforcement against the public, and one thing that really is concerning is that donald trump has demolished those norms. he appears to have gotten away with it. and that raises serious questions about the next president that might come in after him. that president might get away with firing their fbi director, saying they want their own person in office. it would be very hard to argue with them, but this is a case in which we really want to see norms being reestablished. >> the book is untitled, "unmaking the presidency: donald trump's war on the world's most powerful office," the author susan hennessey, and benjamin wittus, thank you very much for coming in and talking about it, important book indeed. >> no standing, no talking, no texting, strict rules on what senators can and can't do during president trump's senate impeachment trial. only pay for what you need... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty.

still practice you will know this will force you to see that it is we did not so when we were the norm i knew someone was not a lot of the. seed you could be secure as i understand the one click at what's been going on on the model boat on. the sea as brother john was not. a mosque with more good in it. building a car costs at least $3000000.00 rubles or $45000.00 tires alone cost at least $10000.00 each season when you drift at that speed each tire loss for just one race . getting expert alexandra de mint throwing coke can see no point in practicing on ice during the winter to maintain his driving skills he goes to the drifting birthplace japan because as we move from you should have. a career in the going to do want. to be noticed you know with york. where you believe that you know it's already a r.c.t. road ocean. on. using the medium obviously if it's in the city's financial solutions gibraltar which is fortunate you this is smarter than we were and that would mean almost. on a share in you'll get used to the ordeal of those additional but you are just wasting what you think they a

source and source to the news of the talk about you so he feels ok when you want it you give up on the norm not the no thanks i. didn't die you might respond need that's got to be a lot they have to might be. more joy than just guides or lead to thoughts in the guise that if. i. want the little. in your belief i am not going to fight evil thing if you are going to be useful. here here then i'm a television camera from the b.b.c. we simply need to moscow i like your glasses you will know this before but you need to see to me to not someone were the norm i knew someone was in a lot of the. see you could look at it as i'm listening to what is quick and what who knows not on the model what on when you do sue to see it brother john was not. i'm left with more than a. building a car costs at least $3000000.00 rubles or $45000.00 tires alone cost at least $10000.00 each season when you drift at that speed each tire loss for just one race . getting expert alexandra de mint throwing coke can see no point in practicing on ice during the winter to maintain his driving skills he goes to the drifting bi

allison: i want it to be the norm.and reading so writing so many articles about it is. important but i do hope that one day that is the norm and it's not shocking or impressive that 25% ofgrade up of more than men to win elections. but it's about getting those women in the first place to run. that people don't run is because they don't -- they'ven there. so for me, it is incredibly important to see a woman be at the top of a ticket. just becausepeople whether it be myself or i want other people my generation to have that chance i'm in saying you know i could do that to one -- too one day. soledad: when you think that we're looking at the one -- 100th 234if6rs for the 19th amend, how do you view this story? allison: it speaks to what our nation speaks to. i reflect on how can we do better. because i think that's what gets lost in a lot of the millennial conversation, that we're angry and we just want to radicalize the system and we recognize what came before us but we absolutely believe that we can do better and we will

6 another meeting of west and east unthinkable for the best parts of 3 decades now it's simply the norm in football as in life in public and throughout germany. my snuff it affected us the most our city was divided this was about people's freedom we were happy you could feel it man but it made bell in a better place as i knew it was just great to see the way we came together again based on. personal drama competition marketing numbers hotness here powered by intuition love hate money cash millionaire crimes but stamps and found all. ultimately. do you speak dislike of. this music theory because i. mean feeling. and does this take your heart racing. you come to the right place. to do the maximum. the world's 1st black superstar. josephine baker. downs turmoil to frame and became an icon of liberation. that. make or refuse to tolerate racism over. so she left her homeland the united states . josephine baker in 75 minutes monty w. . oh boy oh. boy. my 1st boss i was a sewing machine. where i come from women are balanced by this motion towards the middle of something as simple as learning h

there was no interest by the power companies and nor interest by the government to enforce these new norms. dirty coal plants are a problem familiar to other parts of the world india has another particularly distinct. of pollution challenge. the fumes from millions of firecrackers set off during the hindu festival of the valley. it's the single largest sore all on the atmosphere of delhi nearly 2.5 percent of the new pollution is caused by those 3 days of cobalt shank on the line and is a senior supreme court advocates who joined other parents in filing a petition for clean air on behalf of that toddlers my middle child was having serious broken issues because of the amount of pollutants we had in the school to the sniffling and coughing tossing and turning at night the toddler skis move the supreme court to fast ban the sale of firecrackers and lead to allow them with strict conditions but despite this millions of firecrackers was set off. and it's this kind of ignorance that has brought children outside the environment ministry to ask for more government action on pollution will not be r