it actually did a little bit more so in norman stein because socialism -- socialism was a viable idean 1912. now anyone who calls himself a socialist, he, you know, he would be considered evil actually, a nazi or whatever. >> or the recipient of a wall street bailout. >> or the recipient of a wall street bailout. so, yeah, i think there's a little bit more generational complacency then there was in his generation. maybe because we don't have to go to war. maybe because it was just a smaller world. you know, you could get access to the president. he knew reporters. it was just easier. >> it was smaller, but we now know, we now know things you don't want out, certainly have a tendency to get out. why isn't there in this highlyy educated, highly influencedÑ generation, of which you are a member, a higher level of social engagement in a way that we would recognize as a domain seemed level from the early part of the century? >> i've heard people say that there is more than, you know, more than meets the eye. i think that you can make the argument that if people are involved in kind of ke