not finding fault, vladimir, as you answered, i immediately answered, no, but i thought that the norochanmbered that yes, it really was ahead of the occupation, so... i answered no, but the answer is yes, yes, yes, yes, you hacked our computer, you were able to answer again, how it happened, no, what button you pressed, i pressed no, you will finish me, no button, okay? everything is accepted, look how interesting it turns out, there really was a fishermen’s uprising, there was a narach in the lake, there is only one nuance, it was not arkady kulishov who wrote this, but maxim tank, it’s just that you didn’t pay any attention to the authorship, but the main catch was precisely this, the correct answer to our question is, no, the tenth question: is it really true that the conflicting parties turn to a third party, whose decision is binding - this is mediation, time. egor, how did you answer? i replied, no, why? because, well, as far as i remember, with mediation, the decision is non-binding, yeah, but there is a third party, all the same, and arbitration, as it is, arbitration is possible