this is been a good trade treaty for north american agriculture from mexico to canada. we want to make sure that her voice is heard loud and clear that we don't want to harm the gains that we've had in it. the president of the united states is the my president to and is president of all the farmers and ranchers across the country who played a major role to get him more elected. and he promised to make treaties fair to those and it has been good for agriculture. >> and while there might be some concern there's also positive news for agriculture and the fact that it was very much singled out that agriculture was a shining example of how this success could work. i think back to the statement about do no harm, think we have to ensure that messages their loud and clear. i think in part that's why the three of us decided to quickly that we needed to make a statement to the negotiators that we have something that's working, don't do something in the negotiations is going to undermine that. that's going to undermine not only farmers and ranchers, but all of the jobs that are re

this has been a good trade treaty for north american agriculture, from mexico to canada. we want to make sure we have our voice heard loud and he -- and clear, that we do not want to harm the gains we have had. the president of the united states is my president, and president of all the farmers and ranchers across this country who played a major role in getting him elected. he promised not only to make trade treaties more fair for american people, but for all american people. i do not see him doing harm to this treaty that has been good for agriculture. on the statement, i would say that while there might be some concern, there was also positive news for agriculture in the fact that it was singled out that agriculture was a shining example of how the success could work. i think back to mr. dufault's statement of "do no harm." we have to ensure that that message is loud and clear. is why thepart that three of us decided very quickly that we needed to make a statement to the negotiators that we have something that is working. do not do something in the negotiations that is

this has been a good trade for north american agriculture from mexico to canada and we want to make sure we have that heard loud and clear, we don't want to harm gains we have had. he is my president and president of all the farmers and ranchers across the country who played a major role in getting him elected and he promised not only to make trade treaties more fair for american people but for all american people and i don't see him doing harm to this treaty that has been good for agriculture. >> on the statement, there might be some concern, positive news for agriculture in the fact that it was singled out that agriculture was a shining example of how the success could work and i think back to mister duval's statement of do no harm, we have to ensure that that message is there loud and clear and in part that is why the three of us decided very quickly that we needed to make a statement to the negotiators that we have something that works, don't do something in negotiations that will undermine that. that will undermine not only farmers and ranchers but all the jobs related to farmers an

this has been a good trade treaty for north american agriculture from mexico to canada. and we want to make sure that we have that -- our voice heard loud and clear. that we don't want to harm the gains that we have had in it. the president of the united states is my president too and he's president of all the ranchers and farmers who played a major role to get him elected and he promised to make trade treaties fair for all american people and i don't see him doing harm to this treaty that has been good for agriculture. >> just on that statement too, let's say -- while there may be some concern there were news in agriculture that it was singled out that agriculture was a shining example of how the success could work. and i think back to mr. duvall's statement of do no harm, i think we have to ensure that that message is there loud and clear. and i think in part, that is why the three of us decided very quickly that we needed to make a statement to the negotiators that we have got something that is working -- don't do something in the negotiations that is going to undermi

this has been a good trade treaty for north american agriculture, from mexico to canada, and we want to make sure we have that voice heard loud and clear, that we don't want to harm the gains that we have had in it. the president of the united states is my president, too, and is the president of the farmers and ranchers across the country, who played a major role in getting him elected. he promised not only to make trade treaties more fair for the american people, but all american people. i don't see him doing harm to this treaty that has been good for agriculture. >> just on that statement, too, while there might be some concern, there is also positive news for agriculture in the fact that it was very much singled out that agriculture was a shining example of how the success could work, and i think back to mr. duval's statement about do no harm. i think we have to ensure that that message is loud and clear. and i think, in part, that is why the three of us decided very quickly that we needed to make a statement to the negotiators that we have got something that is working. don't do

. >> this has been a good trade north american agriculture from mexico and canada and we will make sureve that voice heard loud and clear that we don't want to harm the game that we have had any. i don't see them doing harm to this treaty that has been good for agriculture. >> and i would point out to you liz many people don't know this but the nafta agreement must be ratified by congress so whatever they negotiate congress has to get behind it. there are a lot of farms out there and if they mess with them i don't think it gets approved. liz: you look like a norman rockwell painting out there, your green shirt with the grass in the corn. >> i am as old as norman rockwell but thank you. liz: thank you very much. i'm sure these negotiations will be going on for a long time. the closing bell, eight minutes away from hearing it with the dow up 20. just remember folks we were up 86-point but there has just been so much that has been thrown on the way between north korean fears deadly protests in virginia. the markets have had so many distractions this summer but now with the federal reserve

this has been a good trade treaty for north american agriculture from north america to mexico, to canada want to make sure we have our voice heard loud and clear and we have no harms in the gains in it. >> do no harm. we have to insure that message is there loud and clear. i think in part why the three of us decided very quickly that we needed to make a statement to the negotiators that we've got something that is working. reporter: trish, i leave you with this. that is, if you want to mess with the deficit, and there is a big trade deficit between the u.s. and mexico, it is almost all to do with autos. if it wasn't for autos we would have -- trish: i have a hard break. see you back here in two. don't let dust and allergens get between you and life's beautiful moments. switch to flonase allergy relief. flonase outperforms the #1 non-drowsy allergy pill. when we breathe in allergens, our bodies react by overproducing 6 key inflammatory substances that cause our symptoms. flonase helps block 6. most allergy pills only block one and 6 is greater than 1. with more complete relief you can enj

mexico. here c-span, let me show you what these agricultural representatives had to say about nafta. >> we do no harm. this has been a good trade treaty for north american mexico toe from canada. we want to have our voice loud clear. we don't want to harm the gains. the president of the united too, he'smy president president of all the farmers and ranchers across this country. who played a major role in elected.im he promised not only to make treaty more fair for americanpeople but all people. i don't see him doing harm for this treaty. >> just on that statement too, i would say, there maybe some of the, there was part news for agriculture in the fact that it was very much singled out. agriculture was a shining example of how the success could work. think back to mr. devalue's -- about do noement harm. messageto ensure that is heard loud and clear. , very quickly, we needed to make a statement to the negotiators. we got something that's working. don't do something in the that's going to undermine that. that's going to undermine not farmers and ranchers but also all of the jobs that are related to farmers and ranching countries.e >> randy who are these groups. these far