but, other countries that are part of the north atlantic alliance are not in a hurry, as you say, with a decision regarding long-range missiles that could solve the issue of military facilities, airfields, military logistics on the territory of the russian federation, they still hope that russia where... will he stop there at the border with poland, having tested his weapons there in the same baltic countries or in moldova already after ukraine? well, you see, it is so complicated a great geopolitical solitaire and big players, they are trying to twist their interest here precisely from the point of view of geopolitics, no matter what, well, as far as i am concerned, i will not threaten nato states. there are, including the baltic countries, well, this is a fact, the russians might want to seize these states, return them to their sphere of influence, but they simply do not have the opportunity, and when you mentioned the amount of money that the estonian government is trying to spend in support of ukraine, so that we understand, the population of estonia is less than population of kyiv

alliance, and this will be the same as an attack on a country of the north atlantic alliance, severalt questions, firstly, whether to... efforts, the desire is there, of course, and threats come and go, but that's all, the main reason, two reasons, this is the first, this is what ukraine is pulling on itself, very serious russian forces, they simply have nothing to offer there, this is firstly, and secondly, sweden in combination with finland with nato forces, this is a completely different story for russia, the swedes pragmatically calculated it, and it is for us... a huge example, a neutral country that, like finland, was looking for some kind of solution, coexistence in the conditions between nato and the russian bloc, well, rather russia, than the whole bloc there, which is formally military in them, but sweden immediately accepted the decision is immediate, we need to unite, i 'll tell you more, sweden is already preparing to sign documents on the location of nato bases, in particular the us on its own. territories, that's it, the train has left, that is, there will be reinforcem

alliance, they are the most trained are those resources of the north atlantic alliance that are holdingack the russians, or could it happen that nato would take such actions , or make decisions that will allow us to win in the short term. well, i have no illusions about nato, that is, in fact , the alliance is still a structure that deals with the defense of its members, that is, the members of this organization, they count common defense, and this is the main essence of the alliance, they are very, i mean , the organization itself, very, very skeptical of any functions that go beyond this fifth article, well , that is, for example, to restore order outside nato or take responsibility for the development of the situation in some neighboring region. for example, the best example in this regard is the black sea. as much as we have told the united states individually, but also nato as an organization, please take more part in the development of the situation in black sea, take responsibility for the development of the situation in this small sea, but which is now fully under control. we sa

türkiye is still a member north atlantic alliance., it has its own obligations, it has its own negotiation processes with its allies in this alliance. this is turkey's sovereign decision. but what about the decision of the scandinavian countries? hello, i am boris sakimov, and i am oleg skepanov, and we are the creators of the russia 2062 project of the free thought headquarters. together with experts, we are discussing how we can develop the russia of the future. 40 years, see you in the future. investment rating, economics, through specific stories, we can reach people. we we often talk about money, the amounts are serious. in russia there is a clear and clear signal. is russian industry capable of replacing?

legislative body started today at 16:00 kyiv time, the question of sweden's accession to the north atlantice was 42nd on the agenda, but i was just looking at the news feeds and saw that... it was being considered, so the discussion drags on a bit. parliament probably, they say experts, will approve this law, and the president of turkey, recep tayyip erdoğan , is very likely to sign it later, as he has previously repeatedly spoken about his readiness to do so after the issue is ratified in the country's parliament. well , it is also interesting that there is only one left, if turkey. approves this application, there remains only one country that did not approve, and that, unfortunately, is uvorshchyna. this morning , the prime minister of this country, viktor orban , wrote a letter to the prime minister of sweden, ulf christerson and invited him to budapest in order to discuss some issues later. ulf kristerson, the head of the swedish government , immediately reacted to such a proposal by orbán and said. said that no, he will not come, because what is there to discuss, you either ratify or

so during this time of this signing ceremony, jen stoltenberg , the secretary general of the north atlantic said that while he does not see russia...preparing for any possible attack, he does not see a threat, but in the alliance, says jen sontlberg, jens stoltenberg is closely watching with each step, terrorist countries are preparing for a possible attack by russia, also in belarus, which is an ally of russia, as an allied state, and lithuania with poland. the governments of both countries agreed on the scale. military training at suvalsky university suval corridor, lithuanian president gitanas nauseda announced. the exercises can take place as early as april this year , at the same time, the lithuanian leader added, quote, but let's not forget that the suval corridor is also an integral part of nato's strategic plans, and there is definitely no one who would think that we are the only ones talking about the suval corridor and its defense, that is, he made it clear that there is a fifth article of the nato charter, and that poland and lithuania, in the event of a probable, if... god forbi

the disappearance of the north atlantic alliance will benefit the eu. the european parliament proposed to abolish nato. in belarus , up to -16 is expected with some icy conditions agai monitors streets and roads and recommends drivers to take increased safety measures. an important decision that determines the future of our country. head of state alexander lukashenko signed a law on a comprehensive adjustment of the law on the president of the republic of belarus. the document has been endorsed . people's peace and security. in addition, the status of the president of belarus who has ceased to exercise powers is determined. to give a fairy tale and faith in the christmas miracle, the palace of independence opened its doors again yesterday for the little ones, the series started new year's performances. the main characters - father frost, snow maiden, domavenok, ivan bogatyr, this year's symbol of the dragon, gathered on one stage to immerse children in real magic. the hall of ceremonies was completely transformed into a children 's playground; at the en

alliance, and it will be the same as an attack on a country of the north atlantic alliancefew important questions, first of all, is there a will, of course, and threats are coming and going, but that's it, the main reason, two reasons, this is the first, it's that ukraine is pulling on itself, very serious russian forces , they simply have nothing to offer there, that's the first thing. and secondly, sweden combined with finland with nato forces, this is a completely different story for russia. the swedes calculated it pragmatically, and this is a huge, well, example for us, a neutral country that, like finland was looking for some kind of solution, coexistence in the conditions between nato and the russian bloc, well, rather russia, than the entire bloc that they formally have. but sweden immediately made a decision, immediately, it is necessary to unite. i will tell you more, sweden is already preparing to sign documents on the location of nato bases, in particular the us, on its territory. that's it, the train has left. that is, there will be reinforcements there very qu

radio, though they would sink number of vessels in these the mediterranean or north atlantic.ey played a very much an auxiliary role compared to the germans, in part because germans confined them to that role role. you mentioned that the british concealed that cracked the german code. was there any significant consequences to that? yes. so there were a number of instances where key information essentially could not be acted upon for fear of of revealing that that the allies had cracked the. so give you one example. the british were so concerned that a lot of this key intelligence might be leaked that in one instance, an american very enthusiastic american captain, captured a german submarine in on the high seas, and he towed it in the harbor in in essentially declaring to the world, look what i did. you know, this is amazing. and the british were horrified because, of course, if there was any german observer present, they would know that a submarine had been captured intact with its enigma machine and they might essentially change their their or change their entire communicati

signing such agreements with ukraine, and whether this will allow ukraine, before joining the north atlanticnce, some way to solve some of its security issues, in particular regarding the supply of weapons. mr. igor, please, well, i think... that this agreement is absolutely, well, a precedent in the sense that it really opens up opportunities for signing similar agreements with other countries and shows that it will most likely be canada, because it is a british commonwealth country and i hope that other countries will also join it, well, will this agreement or similar agreements help us to stay, for example , there until we join nato, well, definitely, that's it. .. quite a significant strengthening of ukraine's capabilities, despite the fact that many provisions of this agreement, well , they are of such a general and vague nature, nevertheless, there are enough specifics, and these specifics, well, they touch on the issues that are for us relevant, starting with the training of our military and ending with the supply of the necessary military equipment that our, that our army will need e

it came to be known as not only was pearl harbor attacked, there was carnage in the north atlantic. great britain had held on by the skin of its teeth. the japanese were conquering bases. american and british and dutch bases throughout the far west about the throughout east asia and the vermont. the german army had reached the gates of moscow, and if they had succeeded in taking the soviet union out of the war, it would have taken a tremendous counterweight to hitler and the and the german army out of europe, which would have been very bad news. on top of it, making it even more poignant for roosevelt and churchill. when churchill came the first time in that august off the coast of newfoundland, he arranged. a very bright but solemn anglican service on the deck of hms prince of wales. roosevelt and churchill were both anglicans. roosevelt belonged to the episcopal church. churchill, the church of england. the episcopal church had split off from the church of england after the american revolution. but the liturgy and the hands are very similar. so they had this very emotional service

periphery in terms of its governmental, economic and diplomatic decisions, in order to undermine the north atlantic treaty organization of nato, and to reshape european and middle eastern security and economic structures in its favor. the very name of the concept contains three potential opponents of the united. states, china, russia, iran, what they talk about openly. a here field leadership means preparation for protracted combat operations with a large front line. it is clear that the field must be on enemy territory. starting from world war ii, nato documents changed approximately once every 10 years. the second strategic concept, for example, approved the placement of defense elements as close as possible to the iron curtain. already in fifty-four, a document appeared called. fixed retaliation, third concept. the essence is extremely peace-loving, a limited war with the ussr can be lost, so it is necessary to use absolutely all types of weapons available to the north atlantic bloc. bridge to the present, in all documents the nato countries assured that moscow would go to war against us. only o

the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance noted that the russian...utin has lost ukraine forever and even despite great military efforts, russia will not be able to achieve its goals in ukraine, and after two years of war, ukraine is closer to nato and the eu than ever. the year 2023 was quite difficult for ukraine, because we sought to receive an invitation to join the north atlantic alliance. in july , the summit of the north atlantic alliance was held in vilnius. we were told that they see us in the future in nato, but we did not receive an invitation, in december we received approval from the leaders of the european union that we can start negotiations with the member countries of the european union, how do you assess the foreign policy successes this year 2023, could we get much more? than we have, i'm mr. serhiy, i'll start with this quote that you have on your screen right now, and it's true, russia will no longer achieve the goals it dreamed of, it will never defeat ukraine, and this is an obvious fact. the only thing that i would like much mo

in july , the summit of the north atlantic alliance was held in vilnius, we were told that they see us in the future in nato, but we did not receive an invitation. in december, we received the go-ahead from the leaders of the european union. on the fact that we can start negotiations with the member countries of the european union, how do you assess the foreign policy successes this year 2023, could we get much more than we have? i, mr. serhiy, will start with this quote that is on your screen right now, and it is true, russia... will no longer achieve the goals it dreamed of, it will never defeat ukraine, and this is an obvious fact, the only thing i would much more like mr. stoltenberg or other european and american politicians to formulate this opinion in a slightly different way, that ukraine should achieve the goals it has set for itself, and these are the goals we just talked about. .. when the russian troops will be thrown out, knocked out of ukrainian land, when they compensate us for the damage caused to us, when russia will be punished, punished and specifically for those who

the baltic countries do not exist by themselves, they are part of the north atlantic alliance, there are troops of other western countries, how will it look in practice? well, the troops of other western countries are there, they are very small, and i believe that putin's calculation, it is very simple, and one throw, and then it stops, and then inside the block. the conversation begins , what to do about it, start a nuclear war, or just not recognize the occupation of the baltic countries, just as it was not recognized there for the previous 50 years, during the soviet era, and i believe that there will be many countries, like germany, like france, well, as i will say, what kind of nuclear war are you talking about here, and it will simply be the end of the bloc. that's exactly what nato is for, i think it's a calculation on putin's part, and there may be an even simpler option, capture of the suvalkyi corridor under the banner of the unification of the territory with kaliningrad, the protection of the mountain pass that connects belarus with kaliningrad, it is generally a local act

insist on holding there emergency meeting of the north atlantic alliance.equest that a meeting of the ukraine-nato council should be held this week. can ukraine count on the fact that the countries of the north atlantic alliance will at least help us, at least with anti-aircraft defense to the west. borders of ukraine, because if this missile flew into the territory of poland, well, it is very strange, if there is no air defense system there, this missile went 40 km deep, that is, if there is air defense, why do they not shoot down these missiles? i do not is a military expert, so i won't comment on why they didn't shoot them down, but politically, let's be honest, neither poland nor romania is going to go to war with the russian federation, nor any other nato member country. it is true, they are preparing, many of them understood, especially the baltic countries, the scandinavian countries, those who feel this foul breath of this empire on them, they feel the threat and they are preparing, but they themselves will not enter any war, this is a fact , and yo

according to him, lately the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, jens stoltenberg. quiteen makes incorrect statements about the peaceful policy of the celestial empire, although in fact, says the representative of the chinese ministry of defense, it is nato that is trying to expand and is leading expansionist policy, and then utsyan's quote: as a regional military organization, the north atlantic alliance, since its creation, has always and everywhere initiated wars and participated in them. well, it is also interesting that this was a reaction, an official reaction of the ministry of defense of china to the words of stoltenberg, jens stoltenberg, the secretary general of nato, that china should refrain from actively conducting patrols in the taiwan strait. a little more about nato, the north atlantic alliance intends to prove its readiness to russia. to self-defense, but no seeks to provoke an armed conflict with it. assistant secretary of defense of the united states of america for international security celeste wallender said this on wednesday at a seminar at the washi

signing such agreements with ukraine, and whether this will allow ukraine, before joining the north atlanticlliance, to solve some of its security issues, in particular, regarding the supply weapons mr. igor, please. well, i think it's an absolute deal. well , it's a precedent in that it really opens up opportunities for other countries to sign similar agreements, and it's indicative that it will most likely be canada, because it's a british commonwealth country, and i hope that other countries will also follow suit, well will such an agreement or similar agreements help us to hold back, for example, until the time we join nato, well , of course, this is quite a significant strengthening. of ukraine, despite the fact that many provisions of this agreements, well, they are of such a general and vague nature, nevertheless there are quite a lot of specifics, and these specifics, well, they touch on those issues that are relevant for us, starting from the training of our military and ending with the supply of the necessary military equipment, which our , which our army will need, even after we w

mykhailo, the european countries and the new members of the north atlantic alliance , the baltic countriesunderstand exactly what russia is and know what the boot of a soviet soldier is, and finland knows it, and other countries, as well as poland, but further there the countries of spain and portugal, perhaps they do not perceive this whole story that is unfolding in the same way now. on the territory of the ukrainian state, do they also need a repetition of the 39th redistribution there. of europe and new spheres of influence, whether in the 24th year, in spite of everything, the north atlantic alliance will make the right accents and the right choices, i mean from the point of view of strengthening the power of ukraine and the perception of ukraine as the eastern outpost of the north atlantic alliance, therefore that president zelensky is correct today said while in estonia that our armed forces of ukraine. are powerful, they are fighting with nato weapons, they are the most trained, they are the resources of the nato that are holding back the russians, or is it possible that nato will

can ukraine count on the fact that the countries of the north atlantic, well , at least they will helpus at least with air defense on the western borders of ukraine, because if this missile flew into the territory of poland, well, it is very strange, if there is no ppu there, they are 40 km in the depth this missile went, that is, if there are anti-aircraft defenses, why not them shoot down those missiles? i'm not a military expert, so i won't comment on why they didn't shoot them down, but politically, let 's be honest, neither poland nor romania is going to join. war with the russian federation, nor any other nato member country. it's true. they are preparing, many of them understood, especially the baltic countries, the scandinavian countries, those who feel this stinking rise of this empire on themselves, they feel the threat and they are preparing, but they themselves will not start any war, this is a fact, it's just necessary to understand and not hope that now for... a rocket somewhere, and then , even if this rocket didn't just fly, or hit something, unfortunately, i don't thin

rada of ukraine finally decided that something needs to be done for ukraine's membership in the north atlanticnce, but the initiative he announced in his interview to create a committee with issues of nato, this is definitely not a meaningful proposal, and this is another pr move. which will not give the result that should bring us closer to membership in the alliance. in my opinion, today we have a committee on national security and defense, which should continue to work accordingly on the reform of the defense and security sector, as provided by other strategic documents, including the law on national security, including the strategic defense bulletin, as well as. .. finally , the verkhovna rada of ukraine of the ninth convocation, under these same laws and ballots , would have to separate, and instead of what she did, which she did, which she combined intelligence, and attached it to this committee on national security and defense, separate the intelligence committee into a separate committee, like this works in all democratic states of the world, then we will really have the competence of

the studio discussed plans for the north atlantic alliance and the deployment of large-scale exercisesng the borders of belarus and russia. the regional defense plan adopted at the nato summit in vilnius last year changed its traditional approach, moving from localized defense to comprehensive preventive defense aimed at active ... this happened with ukraine as soon as it faltered from a military-political point of view leadership, as soon as it became possible to buy them for little money, the whole country immediately began to break away too. we see the same thing now in moldova, they have the same plans for belarus, they also consider it as a strategic asset, from the point of view of logistics, movement, from the point of view of citizens, a powerful industrial base, they really want to make it weak, they really want make a revolution, install a weak pro-western leader there, how us foreign policy can become a trigger for the destruction of the hegemon, why some ukrainian soldiers dream of having their leg blown off. americans about cheap chicken eggs , why did european farmers tak

would also be somehow fixed, it would also be desirable with the date when ukraine can join the north atlantic alliance, the real international guarantor of ukrainian security. but along with shared infrastructure, obviously the countries with whom we sign these security agreements should have as well. a common vision with us about what to do next, what to do next with russia, well, that is, if there is a clause on the demilitarization of russia, you can write this clause, because russia threatens all countries that want to conclude agreements with us, well i'm not saying that everyone there will sign deputization, but this is what is valuable for us, yes, that is, deputization, demilitarization, mr. viktor, do all those countries with which we... sign agreements and those that declare support for us, do everyone understand that the victory of ukraine - is putin's defeat and russia's defeat? this is a very interesting question, because actually a lot of formulations were heard during the last year, and they these formulations changed from, starting from the fact that... we will support ukraine

in 2016, when the presidential campaign began, trump called the north atlantic alliance an outdated coldrganization that should operate on a commercial basis. basis. he demanded that alliance members increase funding for their defense budgets to 2% of gdp, and threatened those who disagreed with the voivode of american troops. one day , trump even decided to raise rates, saying that... europe should pay 4% of gdp. by the way, the allies, rejecting the threats, began to gradually increase their defense budgets. if by 2017 the level of 2% of gdp was provided by only 5 nato countries, then by 2020 it will already be nine. however, according to european commissioner briton, in 2020 at a meeting with the chairman of the european commission ursula vonderleigen, trump said that nato. is dead, and if europe is attacked, the us will not come to its aid. perhaps that is why the us congress adopted a special provision that makes the country's withdrawal from nato virtually impossible without the approval of congressmen. trump's current campaign website states that he is in favor of a fundamental re

government economic and diplomatic decisions in order to undermine the organization from the north atlantico... the very name of the concept contains three potential adversaries of the united states - china, russia, iran, what are they about? they say openly, but field leadership means preparing for protracted combat operations with a large front line. it is clear that the field must be on enemy territory. starting from the second world and further nato documents me... on defense, when in february of the twenty-second year russia unleashed a harsh and unprovoked war against ukraine, the countries of the north atlantic alliance decided to reconfigure nato deterrence and defense for a longer term. and here it is defense: the pentagon gained access to 35 military facilities in finland, sweden and denmark. simply put, all bases come under the control of washington, the closest one is only 137 km from russia. nato has adopted a number of strategic documents, which defines them generally as a global player. it is no longer just the atlantic and the european continent. the americans are now forcin

at the same time, jen stoltenberg, the head of the north atlantic alliance, clearly says that this isind, it is on the contrary, money, investments. to safety, and rightly so. the authorities of the united states of america have already, to their great regret, felt the consequences of the termination of the military aid that washington provided to ukraine. during the meeting i have already mentioned with nato secretary general jens stoltenberg, the head of the us state department, antony blinken, said about this, according to him, without the approval of funding in the future, everything that ukraine has been seeking since the beginning of hostilities , will be under threat, and therefore this issue needs to be resolved as soon as possible, it was he who addressed the american congressmen like that, and he once again emphasized that ukraine will definitely be accepted into nato, however, he did not say when exactly, he did not specify. i would very much like this invitation to be heard precisely at the nato summit in washington, which is scheduled for... july this year, but it is also

according to him, the north atlantic alliance has not fulfilled what it promised to ukraine issues ofthe block. and at the same time. boris johnson added a short quote: our collective, ambiguous position, which has been maintained for so long, the eternal attempts to sit on two chairs, immediately proved fatal, because putin decided: yes, they are, this is not serious. what's more, boris johnson emphasized that now in the world democracy is retreating and autocracy is getting its way, however, he still hopes that the russian war in ukraine has shown that the country is also coming to an end. russia will resolutely repulse the event, and i want to, the war is coming to an end, it’s very , well, in principle, everything is coming to an end , the question is, how much more is left to this end, well, that’s a question, but for this we need help from the west and we don’t need those stupid statements from hungary , most recently from slovakia. japan, in spite of everything , will strive to conclude a peace treaty with russia and resolve everything with it. and territorial disputes, and thi

how it affects putin, that is, does it mean that putin, without receiving seriously from the north atlanticnce of weapons that may be in ukraine, that he believes that he can continue to destroy ukraine, that he can continue to kill ukrainians and go further to the western border, and from there take some positions regarding negotiations with nato and to threaten them with the western border of ukraine. and already to to reach some negotiating point, well, serhiy, this is the second time you are talking about the fact that they will reach the western border, go to the border with nato, they will not leave, they will not leave, because ukrainians live here, this is the ukrainian state, we are armed, but we have a question, the question is that we do not have enough weapons to throw them out of the territory of ukraine, to hold these borders. if we ourselves start to plan a little, manage the situation, use the resources we have, make the right fortifications there, we can , we will hold these lines, they won’t get anywhere, then it’s just a question of what this war is going to, so you know,

german defense minister boris pistorius once again warned europe and the countries of the north atlanticssion of russia in a few years. in an interview with the tager spiegel newspaper, he stated that he wanted to wake up german society with this warning, and also demanded that the bundeswehr was ready for war. i will quote the minister of defense of germany. we must take into account that vladimir putin may one day even attack one of the nato countries. of course, we are obliged to come up with worst-case scenarios, if only to know where and what we will lack in the event of an emergency. and where we need to prepare better. our experts expect that this will become possible in 5-8 years. mr. yevgeny, can russia, given its state and capabilities of the military-industrial complex and sanctions policy, in 5-8 years to reach some level corresponding to the one that the north atlantic alliance has now. so there are two answers here: well, first of all, this is now being decided in ukraine, and it completely depends on how the war will end in our country. in the case of a russian victory, i

the north atlantic bloc does not hide the fact that during the exercise they will practice tasks on howow to counter the russian threat. that the alliance is preparing for a conflict with russia stated. chairman of its military committee, admiral rob bauer. similar comments were also repeatedly heard from the leadership of nato countries. thus, the alliance is trying to justify both, in fact, its existence in the eyes of millions of european-americans, and the line of containment of russia and justify the insane increase in military spending, and of course, one way or another, to divert public opinion and the attention of the audience from - they stated again we confirm that there are no plans to attack nato countries. moreover, in they know the alliance very well. the other day, this was clearly confirmed by the secretary general of the north atlantic bloc, stoltenberg. according to him, russia does not pose a direct, some kind of direct quote, direct threat to the member countries of the alliance. question: if there are two management representatives. it was a live broadcast. official

however, the promotion of the north atlantic alliance in the asia-pacific region does not meet with supportting this. earlier , french president emmanuel macron publicly opposed the creation of a nato liaison office in japan, emphasizing that the alliance's charter clearly limits its geographic scope to the north atlantic, and japan is clearly not there. vadim, in your opinion, how will relations with beijing and washington be built? 2024 raises concerns among many regarding instability, but destabilization. situation in the south china sea, and do you think that the russian federation and the republic of belarus are reliable partners for the people's republic of china today? well, of course, we are reliable partners, this is at the level chairman sidinzin and vladimir putin, alexander lukashenko has not only been repeatedly stated, but also confirmed by specific actions during the voting of the united nations, during economic cooperation, etc. china, it... was not so easy for him, but having calculated all the geopolitical threats and economic risks, he decided to make maximum efforts to r

member of nato with all the ensuing obligations and , so to speak, those guidelines that the north atlantic but as for. action and the fact that erdogan specifically emphasized that the americans apparently want to turn this red sea into a bloody sea, and that is, this shows the degree of negativity that exists in turkish society regarding the actions of the united states, it’s just another question that turkey expresses this with restraint and more carefully than it does in relation. but the turkish role is undoubtedly special in the region, firstly, because 100 years ago it was the ottoman empire, which extended including the territory of israel, yes, let me remind you that israel is quite, well, let’s just say jerusalem was ottoman for quite a long time city, and of course, turkey feels some kind of on the one hand, its special responsibility , on the other hand... it feels the special opportunities that arise from this, which it tries to take advantage of, and if you like, this gives rise to certain imperial ambitions, which undoubtedly collide here with the interests and ambitions of b

belarus forced nato to hear itself as an instrument that is very clear to this north atlantic aggressorproaches about the deployment of russian tactical nuclear weapons in our country is absurd, we are simply learning diplomatic, so -called etiquette from those who made the language of force a global trend. we have a new political line for the first campaign: only supporters of the state line should get into parliament, only those for whom the words belarus, unity, sovereignty, family and peace are defining. meaning, step aside and don’t interfere, no one is forcing you to do anything, for one simple reason, we are already the absolute majority. propaganda project, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. we know exactly how to start the morning correctly. pasta with mussels and peas, but this is just a wonderful start to the day, it seems to me that anyone who has breakfast this way will feel great. we’re happy, we’ll prepare a delicious breakfast with you. nastya, today you are in command in the kitchen, so give me instructions. we girls won't cry, that's for sure. this is true. and i love gar

the north atlantic alliance is playing with exaggeration.

roman, is it possible to wait at the washington nato summit, at least to invite ukraine to the north atlanticlliance? my conviction, a firm conviction, was and remains that this event itself was transferred from... vilnius to washington, the only thing that makes me a bit pessimistic - prospects, is this beginning of the signing of agreements on security and guarantees. ah, mr. sergey, here is an interesting thing, m, as if it were an international agreement, but it is not submitted for ratification. parliament and if it was limited to a two-year term, and all this leads me to think that a... as a result of the complex signing of these agreements, which have not been ratified by the ukrainian parliament and the parliaments of the countries with which they are signed, they can prepare for us, well , let's say , an intermediate answer, i am trying to speak as correctly as possible now, because such agreements, which are not submitted for ratification by parliaments, have a very clear, very clear name, and i i would recommend now to those who lead this process, to those who are working on it, to

volodymyr, you have already mentioned the north atlantic alliance, these maneuvers that have now begunat the same time , we see ukraine signing. agreements on security guarantees or on cooperation , they are called, doesn't this mean that until the country, ukraine, is not in nato, and it is not known how much, how much, what path we have ahead of us, that these agreements will be in effect, and if possible, what is the status of these interstate agreements, if they are interstate, then obviously, they must undergo ratification in the verkhovna rada, and, accordingly, in the parliaments of those countries. on whose behalf prime ministers or presidents sign there, are there any conflicts regarding the status of these agreements as international, because according to our constitution, all international agreements must be ratified in the verkhovna rada, well, mr. sergey, regarding the essence of these agreements , well let's talk now about the agreement with great britain, it's really unique and i think it's a very good example of how formalize the issues of interaction , cooperation in t

situation, can nato, together with the ukrainian leadership, consider any options for helping the north atlantic alliance in a situation when, for example, western ukraine is being shelled. when the patriot systems are exactly on the border with ukraine, meaning on the territory of poland , is it time to convene a council of ukraine and nato in order to nevertheless activate the north atlantic alliance, but without the broad participation of the alliance, but to receive help from them, because these situations are repeated with missiles that fly into the territory of poland, sneakers that fly into the territory of romania, and, well, at least these countries definitely understand that sooner or later they can be attacked, just like us. and, mr. sergey, there is one question for me, to which i do not know the answer, i do not ready to give you absolutely clear what actions can be taken here, i will say what is the problem, the fact is that the anti-missile defense system of europe about ... cs, it is in automatic mode, and the numbers that are being called now, they are sufficient for that the au

the city of minsk, maroz zdae pasіtsyi ў minsk region. below zero, on thursday the influx of north atlanticir masses will continue, but with the displacement of low-active atmospheric fronts, in many areas there will be light precipitation in the form... what is the frost, they tore up the ice a lot, for fishing with fresh frozen pakrytsti adpraўlyayutstsa zhikhary minsk region, it is good to commiserate with the supracounik asvod. ice the paste collects unsafe pasture, above 7 centimeters, so you also want unsafe pasture. working with schoolchildren, starting new patrols, regular training routines , christmas theater shows for the inspectors , traffic policemen in uniform are waiting for a missing raid these are the rules that set the test form, the task is to reduce to a minimum the level of dtz at the nodes of young pedestrians. flickers are needed to cross the road and prevent you from being hit by a car at night. the best thing should i use flickers, jol, lemon or silver? inspectors remind children about the peculiarities of behavior in compliance with traffic rules in winter, about th

are talking about collective defense in the event of an attack on one of the countries of the north atlantic alliance. total in exercises 90,000 soldiers will take part. the majority will be british - 20 thousand people, poles - 15,000, and germans - 10. the maneuvers are planned on land and water and will last until the end of may. the europeans have not forgotten about regional exercises, for example, in mid-february they will begin at the borders of belarus, russia in germany, poland, and the baltic states. there the troops will, of course, prepare to repel aggression externally. flocks tear off some weak individuals who are lagging behind, cannot run together, do not defend themselves, they are simply relatively speaking, there eat, as they are trying to do with the post-soviet space, this happened with ukraine, as soon as it wavered from the point of view of the military-political leadership, as soon as it became possible to buy them for little money, the whole country immediately begins to break away, we see the same thing now moldova, they have the same plans for belarus, but they als

roman, is it possible to wait for the washington nato summit to at least invite ukraine to the north atlantic my belief, my firm belief, was and remains that this event was actually transmitted from vilnius to washington. the only thing that now leads me to... a little pessimistic prospects - this is the beginning of the signing of agreements on security guarantees. mr. serhiy, here is an interesting thing, as if there is an international agreement, but it is not submitted for ratification by the parliament, and if it is limited to a two-year period, and all this leads me to think that as a result of the complex signing of these agreements. the code not ratified by the ukrainian parliament and the parliaments of the countries with which they sign, they can prepare for us, let's say, an intermediate answer. i am trying to speak as correctly as possible now, because such agreements are not submitted for ratification by the parliament, they have, well , a very clear, very clear name, i take... i recommended now to those who lead this process, to those who work on it, to think about what i just s