unfortunately, there is no fourth point on which we count on inviting ukraine to the north atlantic alliance well, taking into account the fact that the officials, nato and representatives of the countries, members of the north atlantic alliance, what they are articulating, does this mean that we will constantly be in the role of... wanted us to be accepted into the north atlantic alliance, to be given systems air defense to give us more weapons, although, well, they themselves say that the post-war world has passed to the pre-war one, and this should also be a certain sign for them, but there is a huge mistake in this, because the world is already in a state of war, so they slept through the beginning of this state of war and they slept through... i remember 2007 a year when putin actually very clearly carved out all his plans, which he is going to implement. after 2007, i don't want to take up time now, you remember how many events happened, starting with how british citizens were poisoned here by a strange coincidence on the territory of great britain, how cyber attacks happened on certai

because... given that nato officials and representatives of the countries, members of the north atlantic allianceat do they articulate, does this mean that we will constantly be in the role of petitioners to be accepted into the north atlantic alliance - the atlantic alliance, to give us anti-aircraft systems, to give us more weapons, although, well, they themselves say that the post-war world has passed to the pre-war one, and this should be certain for them too... well, that's the point a huge mistake, because in the world already in martial law, they overslept the beginning of this martial law and they overslept, let me remind you of 2007, when putin actually very clearly spelled out all his plans, which he is going to implement. after 2007, i don't want to take up time now, you will remember how many events. happened, starting with the way british citizens were poisoned here by a strange coincidence of circumstances on the territory of great britain, how cyberattacks took place on certain countries, how russia interfered in elections in certain countries, all this happened, and it is part of

condition, and the existing weapons, are they sufficient for ukraine to be a member of the north atlantic alliance ukraine was a member of nato, there would be no war. putin so far... at least, it does not dare to go to war with any member of the north atlantic alliance, if ukraine had not made a fatal mistake and declared its neutrality back in the 90s, if it had stubbornly joined nato since the 90s, like virtually all our neighbors, except for belarus and moldova, there was no war in ukraine, and this must be clearly understood, but now it is too late, so to speak, to wave one's hands, one must understand that now... there is already a war, russia has started a war with everyone neighbors who were not members of nato, well, that was the beginning the occupation of belarus in fact, and never started a war with those former members of the soviet bloc who managed to join nato. and with all this now, when we look at this history and predict the future, i can say for sure that, of course , now, while the hostilities continue, where is yure, where is yure, ukraine will not... receive an invitation, bu

the european union and the north atlantic alliance.alf a million hryvnias for himself, or to be evidence in the case. an ex-law enforcement officer from zhytomyr oblast was brought before the court during a search of a drug-trafficking suspect the policeman found the money, but did not deposit it or return it even after the court ordered the money to be returned to the owner, the state bureau of investigation said. he is currently dismissed from his position as such. the wage earner faces up to eight years in prison. and the security service of ukraine reported another suspicion of treason against kremlin propagandist mykhailo shpiri. currently, he is hiding in the temporarily occupied part of the kherson region. the man approved the detonation of the tower of the ukrainian mobile communications and broadcasting operators, when russians were fleeing from the right bank, and the russian general staff publicly called for missile strikes on ukraine's energy facilities. last year, the occupiers awarded him a medal before the full-scale inv

the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, jens stoltenberg, said this in an interview withish television. according to him, the provision of military aid for ukraine's fight against russian aggression should not only continue, but no. mr. stoltenberg believes that this activity should be strengthened, then a short quote from him and pass it on more, especially air defense systems. this is the end of the quote, but nato member countries will not and are not even going to send their military personnel to ukraine to participate in hostilities, says mr. secretary general. if the united states of america renounces its. obligations, it will have very serious consequences and impact on global security, according to the results of a two-day meeting with colleagues from nato member states in brussels, said united states secretary of state anthony blinken. for him words, everyone in the north atlantic alliance hopes that in the near future the house of representatives of the american congress will finally pass a bill on the allocation of additional aid to ukraine for... more than 60

says that it is obvious that ukraine is getting a road map for the future accession to the north atlantic allianceolodymyro gryzko assesses these statements, and the main thing is that ukraine should be accepted in the north atlantic. alliance as a full-fledged future full-fledged member of this organization, taking into account the experience that the armed forces of ukraine have in the fight against the russian occupiers. well, of course, there are a lot of statements these days about supporting ukraine in the fight against russia, as you know, dear friends, congress of the united states of america only on april 9. will begin to consider the issue of providing aid to ukraine, $61 billion has been suspended there since the end of 2023, and of course, both the north atlantic alliance and our western partners are convincing the ukrainians that they will help overcome this difficult period when there is no american aid and provide all the necessary assistance, nato, in particular, wants to provide assistance to ukraine in the amount of 100 billion dollars over the next five... years, will ukraine re

condition, and the weapons that are , are they sufficient for ukraine to be a member of the north atlantic alliance? if ukraine was a member of nato, there would be no war. so far, at least, putin does not dare to go to war with any member of the north atlantic alliance. if ukraine hadn't made a fatal mistake back in the 90s and... wailed its neutrality, if it had stubbornly joined nato since the 90s, as in fact all our neighbors, except for belarus and moldova, did, then there would be no war in ukraine, and this should be clearly understood, but it is too late now, if talk, wave your hands, you have to understand that now there is already a war, russia has started a war with all its neighbors who were not members of nato, and has actually started the occupation of belarus. and never started a war with those former members of the soviet bloc who managed to join nato, and with all that now, when we looking at this history and predicting the future, i can say for sure that, of course , now, as long as the hostilities continue , ukraine will not receive an invitation, but de facto it will be integrat

this is such an informal mechanism of ukraine's involvement in the north atlantic alliance.epeat, this is not a deura, but a de facto, which will obviously be tested in july this year, when the nato summit will take place. therefore, to sum it up like this, i would say that ukraine will receive a de facto invitation, but will not receive a deyura, and where yura will receive it when there is, well, at least a pause in hostilities between russia and ukraine, when it happens, well, for sure the coming year, but in any case, i think that we should all understand that if we want war not to come to ukraine again, then the only way for ukraine is with everyone, with all possible efforts, we must... strive for for ukraine to become a member of the north atlantic alliance, as our neighbors, who are not at war now, did at one time. well, by the way, by the time the anniversary washington summit takes place, which is july 9-11 this year, putin is obviously trying to catch up, or at least create such conditions to put our western partners, and ukraine. in such a situation, when our wes

valentin, anyway, let's go back to the july nato summit, can the north atlantic alliance give a clearnal, first of all to putin, that ukraine will be in nato, and maybe, maybe... er, this introduction, although delayed, will be in time, but the actions of moscow will depend on this signal, and the actions of the whole world will depend, yes, there should be and will be a signal, remember my words at the anniversary summit in washington, he it will be 705 years of nato, but it will not just be a signal, we are up to it, we are currently working with... our nato partners, in any case, i am one of those deputies of the verkhovna rada who work in this direction, we are working on not just the signal was sounded in july, and that all the achievements that are thanks to the armed forces to the forces of ukraine and our defenders, ukraine already has 32 countries with nato, with each country a member, even the last ones who joined, the swedes and sweden, well , just a week ago, we and the swedish delegation met both the government delegation and the analytical... centers, which precisely ser

75 years of the north atlantic alliance. how did nato get there? before such a life?aterials of our program. der attack of israel. the iranian embassy is under attack. what will be the consequences? when i took office as secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, i could not even receive the ambassador of any country in central or eastern europe in our staff quarters. our states were opponents. although the peoples did not share the feeling of hostility. 3 years later, we are all here at the same table, solemnly holding the founding meeting of the north atlantic cooperation council. if history has seen dramatic changes, this is one of the unique moments, not only of symbolic, but also of extremely practical significance. europe will never be the same after our meeting today. washington persuaded kiev not to be stubborn with the withdrawal of soviet nuclear weapons from ukrainian territory and promised the prospect of close relations with the alliance. a clearer intention was announced two years later. in mid-october 1994 , a meeting of the us national security

july nato, can the north atlantic alliance give a clear signal, first of all to putin about the fact that ukraine will be in nato, and maybe, maybe, this... entry, although it will be delayed in time, but the actions of moscow will depend on this signal and the actions of the whole world will depend on it, that is how it should be and will be a signal, remember my words at the anniversary summit in washington, it will be 75 years of nato, but it will not be just a signal, we are up to it, we are currently working with our nato partners. in any case , i am one of those deputies of the verkhovna rada who work in this direction, we are working to ensure that not only the signal is sounded in july, but that all those achievements that, thanks to the armed forces of ukraine and our defenders, ukraine already has with nato, with each member country of 32 countries, even the last ones who joined, the swedes and sweden, well, we from sweden literally a week ago met the government delegation and from analytical centers that precisely... serve their defense and security sector, every country i

75 years of expansion, aggression and russophobia, the north atlantic alliance celebrates its anniversary direct investment in the security of nato itself, so the alliance will not stop. it was formed in 1949 as an instrument of opposition to the ussr; in fact, no one in the west hid this, but even after the collapse of the soviet union, the russophobic essence of nato did not change, moreover, it even became obvious. russia, which the nato leadership now calls the main threat, says in plain text: for the security of the alliance it is necessary to have combat. actions in ukraine continued. these are the words of agent nato jens stoltenberg, spoken at a meeting with the head of the ukrainian foreign ministry dmitry kuleba. supplying weapons to you is an investment in our security, stoltenberg said , recalling that nato wants to put the supply of weapons to ukraine on a planned basis, that is , a mandatory basis for all countries of the alliance, in contrast to the voluntary transfer that is in effect now. how exactly this will be done , whether everyone will agree, has not yet been decide

it poland, hungary, slovakia, or romania, if these are countries that are members of the north atlantic allianced the north atlantic alliance can respond to russia. to this strike, i think that putin in this situation is counting on the fact that nato countries will also take a long time to decide on a response, as was the case, for example, just a few days ago, when a russian missile flew into the territory of the polish state for 39 seconds , and poles pondered whether you need to shoot down this rocket in your space. is it not necessary to escalate the situation, which is already so tense, and this story with this missile once again demonstrates to putin the indecisiveness of western countries, in particular poland, and therefore he says that if you bring these planes to the border of ukraine , and from there ukrainian pilots will take off on f-16s, we will strike at these airfields, knowing putin, you can even have no doubt that he will... try to do this, the only question is whether he will receive in the question is whether he will receive a decent response from the countries of the north

for 25 years since the start of the bombing of belgrade. the north atlantic alliance have not undergone has a geopolitical interest in strengthening its position in the region and minimizing russian influence. despite the fact that there are still sparks between serbia and kosovo, it seems that belgrade's position has changed somewhat over the years and has become a little softer. last summer , a joint exercise between serbian troops and the north atlantic alliance took place, called platinum wolf. experts they wondered whether this means that belgrade has forgiven nato and now wants to become part of this organization. but despite negotiations with representatives of the alliance, vucic publicly denies the need for the country to join the military-political bloc. to legitimize the taking away of kosovo in order to show that the annexation of crimea to russia was supposedly illegal, in fact, the opposite. russia did everything legally, held a referendum, and complied with international law. in kosovo and metohija, the albanian national minority, as a minority, did not have the right to

valentine, when it comes the moment when the moment will come when the north atlantic alliance and ourwestern allies will say: "listen, well, russia must be defeated, there is no need, as they say, there is no need to support ukraine so that it does not suffer defeat, that is, not to talk about that ukraine can or cannot be defeated, and that we must... destroy putin's russia, because it threatens not only ukraine, but the whole world. mr. serhiy, let's decipher stoltenberg's words. in fact, the nato secretary general says absolutely in ten, yes? the only thing is behind it, yes, well, let's go in order, yes, in order, first, he says about a possible quick offensive, this quick offensive, which can really take place at the end of may, at the beginning of che. it depends on the results of china's negotiations with the french, with the germans, that's the situation, but maybe, but it won't be ready. i am absolutely convinced that the personnel and equipment will be completely inadequate, or rather, will not be fully prepared for a successful strategic offensive operation, but russia is b

it hungary, be it slovakia, or romania, if these are countries that... are members of the north atlantic allianceand the north atlantic the alliance can respond to russia for this strike, i think that putin in this situation is counting on the fact that the nato countries will also take a very long time to decide on a response, as was the case, for example, just a few days ago, when a russian missile flew for 39 seconds on the territory... of poland states and the poles were thinking about whether or not it was necessary to shoot down this missile in their space, or whether to escalate the situation, which is already so tense, and this story with this missile once again demonstrates to putin the indecision of western states, in particular and poland, and therefore he says that if you bring these planes to the border of ukraine, there will be ukrainian pilots. take off on the f-16, we will hit these airfields, knowing putin, there is no doubt that he will try to do it, the only question is whether he will to receive in return, whether he will receive a decent response from the countries of the nor

last summer, a joint exercise between serbian troops and the north atlantic alliance took place, calledther this means that belgrade has forgiven nato and now wants to become part of it... but despite negotiations with representatives of the alliance, vucic publicly denies the need for the country to join the military-political bloc. mr. janich, today we hear more and more often. and not only in kosovo and metohija, but in others territories of the former yugoslavia, nato is looking for a reason to intervene to occupy the territories of the freedom-loving serbian people, who have been fighting for their freedom for centuries. in order to return crimea to its state structure and constitutional legal order, in kosovo and metohija, the albanian national minority, as a minority, did not have the right to secede, did not hold a referendum, but illegally voted for a declaration of independence, that is, everything was done through violence against international law, the balkans have always been there for the last 200 years and will continue to be a certain number of years, tens or hundreds of

in the 25 years since the start of the bombing of belgrade, targets the north atlantic alliance haveo still has a geopolitical interest in strengthening its position in the region and minimizing russian influence. despite the fact that there are still sparks between serbia and kosovo, it seems that belgrade’s position has changed somewhat, and has become a little softer over the years. last summer, joint exercises between the serbian troops and the north atlantic alliance took place, which they call: the last 200 years and there will be some more years, tens or hundreds of years, a powder keg of europe, as venston churchel correctly called the balkans, but on the one hand, this is true on the one hand, on the other hand, in all countries, territories, all peoples that survived a bloody war, there is an inoculation of war, there is an inoculation of blood, people who shed blood know. the price of peace, they know the value of a simple, calm human life, for this reason i believe that this explosive danger will smolder for a long time, if not always, in bosnia and herzegovina, where the

75 years of the north atlantic alliance. how did nato get to this point? materials of our program. hold. secretary of the north atlantic alliance, he could not even receive the ambassador in our staff apartment any country central or eastern when i took office as general of europe. our states were opponents, although the peoples did not share the feeling of desire. 3 and a half years later, we are all here at one table solemnly holding the founding meeting. not only symbolic, but also of extremely practical significance: europe will never be the same after our meeting today. nato secretary general, german manfred werner, at a meeting on december 20 , 1991, the ussr formally remained in existence for 5 days. werner died 30 years ago. he probably would have shuddered if he had known what that unique moment would lead to. the north atlantic treaty organization is celebrating its seventy-fifth anniversary with discussions about the possibility of direct participation in intensive military operations against a nuclear superpower. mostly, however, they deny it, but not everyone, and most

poland is an ally in the north atlantic alliance, we also have an obligation in this regard, that is,e simply implementing a common policy. their general policy is clear, but if we talk about the deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory of the eu, nato, quite a lot have been deployed, while they constantly accuse us of allegedly having... stationed them, they are afraid, or what happening? well, look, nato countries have adopted a concept called nuclear sharing, that is, the exchange of nuclear weapons. essentially, today, within the framework of this, this program, there are five bases where about, well, according to various sources, from 150 to 200 different warheads are located. the fact is that if we look at poland in general at how it is fighting in a militaristic frenzy,... receive that card that will ensure the security of their country, but they must understand that the presence of nuclear weapons there will immediately cause an armed conflict with the use of such weapons, which today is spelled out in the concept of national security of belarus regarding nuclear weapons

why was she silent about the peoples of syria and iraq, who were mercilessly bombing the north atlantic allianceand moving around the european union, doesn’t he go out into the streets in support of palestine? or is it something else? azetov’s posters at gubopik’s to drive out the devil from such fanatics? i have a very high degree of fairness, this sometimes really bothers me, that is, i like people to treat me according to their conscience. and in good faith with people, if we act from the point of view of the law, then i need a composition, i i need sides, objective and subjective, so that i understand why i am being punished. actually, meriya’s lawyer, anna zamataeva , tried to do everything to convince the investigation and journalists that her ward understood everything, but it didn’t work out very well. not only that, anna zamotaeva, trying to pull the singer out from behind the walls of the vault, cut off all the phones, calling with a request to record it faster. i also asked for questions for approval in order to prepare my ward, but i couldn’t prepare them, i had to work theatrical pr

erdogan lost the municipal elections. 75 years of the north atlantic alliance, how nato came to this ials from our program. israeli attack, iranian embassy under attack, what will be the consequences? when i took office as secretary general of the north atlantic alliance. who could not even receive at our headquarters the ambassador of any central or eastern country europe. our states were opponents, although the peoples did not share the feeling of hostility. later, we are all here at one table solemnly holding the founding meeting of the north atlantic cooperation council, if history has seen dramatic reversals, this is one of the unique moments, not only of symbolic, but also of extremely practical significance, europe will never be the same after our meeting today. nato secretary general, german manfred werner, at a meeting on december 20 , 1991, the ussr remained formally. exist for 5 days. werner died 30 years ago. he probably would have shuddered if he had known what that unique moment would lead to. the north atlantic treaty organization is celebrating its seventy-fifth annive

for a long time we have observed the involvement of other countries, primarily the euro-atlantic alliance, the northes nato already. borders with russia and belarus, military spending of nato countries is generally increasing, and military exercises of the north atlantic alliance are now being held these days, unprecedented in scale since the cold war. the other day turkey accepted it. the decision to withdraw from the treaty, which on the one hand is interpreted by experts in an extremely belligerent manner, saying that they planned something in ankara, can now uncontrollably build up weapons in the border regions near the caucasus and the black sea, and oh, how this will strengthen erdoganan’s friendship with nato. but let's honestly, after the withdrawal of nato and russia, it has long been clear to everyone that their hands are already untied, and no one is playing by the rules anymore. the changing situation is probably caused by the overall degradation of the security system in... europe, and this requires joint dialogue to develop new regimes and a new common worldview in the field of securit

last summer, a joint exercise between serbian troops and the north atlantic alliance took place, calledis organization, but not. despite negotiations with representatives of the alliance, vučić publicly denies the need to join countries into a military-political bloc. mr. janjic, today we are increasingly hearing assertions and statements regarding the feasibility of a new war for kosovo. this is what you think, is there really such a risk and what ways of resolving this conflict do you see at the moment. a quarter of a century has passed since. russia did everything legally, held a referendum, complied with international law in order to return crimea to its state structure and constitutional and legal order, in kosovo and metohija the albanian national minority, as a minority, did not have the right to secede, did not hold a referendum, but illegally voted for the declaration of independence, that is, everything was done. number of years, tens or hundreds of years, the powder keg of europe, as venston charchel correctly called the balkans, but on the one hand, this is true on the one h

one nor the other has announced a dialogue with russia, and the newly minted members of the north atlantic alliance already poking at this unspoken rhetoric. we currently do not have any political dialogue with russia, and i do not think that we can or should have one . i believe the bitter truth is that... representatives of the liberal opposition, who would not hesitate to send slovak battalions into ukraine. i would not be surprised if the european commission solely on political reasons and because of the results of the presidential elections, suspended payments to us from eu funds. in fact, the forecasts of journalists and political scientists are gloomy; they are already comparing the new slovak president with the prime minister of hungary, who also openly, in contrast to brussels, advocates peace and not escalation. for this, the european commission has already punished him for the frost. subsidies for budapest, when hungary nevertheless approved the tranche to kiev, the money remained in belgium, allegedly due to bureaucratic and judicial problems. what russian troops are successfully destro

8, why was she silent about the peoples of syria and iraq, which were mercilessly bombed north atlantic allianceorgia and moving around the european union, does he not go out into the streets in support of palestine? this is different. azetov’s posters are at gubopik’s to drive out the devil from such fanatics. i have a very high degree of justice. this sometimes really bothers me. that is, i love people to treat me according to their conscience, and i like to treat people according to their conscience. if we act from the point of view of the law, then i need a composition, i need sides, objective, subjective, so that i understand why i am being punished. actually, meriya's lawyer, anna zamataeva, tried to do everything to convince the investigation and the journal. i no longer want to react emotionally to the information flow, to the information flow, i don’t want to take part in unauthorized events. and i would like to add something here, me, because i understand that there is some kind of unfinished phrase, no, because it seemed to me that i just said it before, but since i didn’t finish it,

poland is an ally in the north atlantic alliance, and we also have an obligation in this regard.t is, we are simply implementing a general policy. their general policy is clear, but if we talk about placement. nuclear weapons on the territory of the eu, nato, because there are quite a lot of them stationed, while they constantly accuse us of what we supposedly stationed here, are they afraid or what is happening? well, look, the nato countries have adopted a concept called nuclear sharing, that is, the exchange of nuclear weapons. in essence, today, within the framework of this, this program, there are five bases where about, well, according to various sources, from 150 to 200 different ones are located. the fact is that if we look at poland in general, as she fights in a militaristic frenzy, you know, most likely she has very great difficulties with her own defense. countries , in all likelihood, the concept that they have chosen does not satisfy the military-political leadership of this country today, they clearly understand that the world can change very strongly and clearly,

insult if there are american weapons on the territory of poland, what does this give to the north atlantic alliance, what does this give to ukraine and how can it be perceived in moscow? it seems to me that this is... a logical answer to what moscow did in belarus, that is, let's not forget that russia demonstratively, brazenly, placed its nuclear, weapons on the territory of belarus, and for some reason she thought that the west would dig it up just like that. by the way, today i read already such a confused, aggressive reaction of the ministry of foreign affairs, of moscow to this event, well, but the reaction is traditional, they began and ended with the fact that poland will pay for this, because in the event of the deployment of i... them american armed forces forces on the territory of poland, it will become an object for a russian attack, well, it's not even interesting anymore, because it's already been repeated 1500 times and nothing but, well, you know that except that it doesn't make anyone smile anymore, i am completely on the side of president duda, it would be adequate and the right s

said today about what priorities he sets and what help he expects from the members of the north atlantic alliance need seven more patriot or similar air defense systems, and that's the minimum they can protect. many lives and truly change situation, secondly, we have been talking about about a million ammunition for ukraine for a long time, and they should finally be delivered to the battlefield, thirdly, our capabilities for long-range impact, the battlefield really needs missiles, long-range impact and artillery , the fourth is aviation. we need the right number of planes to defeat the russian one. will they hear zelensky, have they heard zelensky, and will everything be as dynamic as it was? the president of ukraine wants it, as we all want it, well, i really hope that tomorrow will be for we have a positive day, positive news, our soldiers are waiting for them, our bodyguards are waiting for them, we all together throughout ukraine are waiting for this help, it is really now the most necessary of all problems. thank you, mr. viktor. for the conversation, it was victor shlinchak, chairman of t

russian president putin is preparing for war against the north atlantic alliance. russian federation openly threatens the countries that are members of nato in order to restrain the event and creates informational conditions to justify the expected long-term geopolitical confrontation with the west. the institute for the study of war writes about it. the statement by the russian foreign ministry on april 5 followed several months of threats by the kremlin against armenia, in response to armenia's ongoing efforts to gain new western powers. security and attempts to blame armenia for the deterioration of russian-armenian relations. the russian foreign ministry also continued to threaten finland and claimed that finland had lost its independence in foreign policy decision-making after joining nato, a narrative that the kremlin regularly uses it to falsely claim that nato controls ukraine and uses ukraine to threaten russia. the lieutenant colonel of the swedish army, joakim paasikivi , said that russia would take great risks if it believed. the west is weak. at the sa

said today what priorities he sets, and what kind of help he expects from the members of the north atlantic alliancen more patriot systems or similar air defense systems, and this is a minimal amount, they can protect many lives and really make a difference, secondly, we have been talking about about a million ammunition for ukraine for a long time, and they should finally be delivered to the battlefield . third, our long-range capabilities really need long-range missiles. and artillery on the fourth aviation. we need the right number of planes to defeat the russian air fleet, and fifth is speed, we can't wait for a solution this year. will zelensky be heard, or have they been heard zelenskyi, and will everything be as dynamic as the president of ukraine wants, as we all want? well, i really hope that tomorrow will be a positive day for us. positive news, our military is waiting for it, our rearguards are waiting for it, we all together throughout ukraine are waiting for this help, it really is now the most necessary of all problems. thank you, mr. viktor, for the conversation, it was viktor shlinch

we are an ally of the north atlantic alliance and bear obligations in this regard as well, that is, we simply conduct. common policy - said the president of poland, i.e. putin, who tried so hard to blackmail the whole world with nuclear weapons in december 21st, all these the ultimatum that he put forward, that regarding the expansion of nato and regarding the spheres of influence in general, in this situation, he gets another badass if there are american...weapons on the territory of poland, what does it give to the north atlantic alliance, what does it give to ukraine and how can it be received in moscow? it seems to me that this is a logical response to what moscow has done in belarus, that is, let's not forget that russia demonstratively, brazenly placed its nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, and for some reason it thought that... the west will swallow it just like that. by the way, today i i have already read such a confused and aggressive reaction of the ministry of foreign affairs and moscow to this event. well, but the reaction is traditional, they began and ended wit

of america, will it be a year. a marker for other states, for the european union, for the north atlantic alliance, for countries, for germany, including, for them to give us taurus already after atakams, because we see that great britain has already announced a huge an aid package of 500 million pounds sterling, whether other countries will follow the british and americans, and whether we will get enough weapons, and whether the west in... is speaking at all now about what is with russia, in that in the form in which it is, something needs to be done, and done promptly, and you know, always when certain decisions are made regarding important issues for ukraine, of course, the united states of america, as a leader, who helps us in this struggle of ours with russian aggression, we always expect and it will be easier to negotiate with our... partners from the european union, with great britain, and even when we talk about both financial aid and specific types of weapons, it is clearly appropriate thus affects decision-making already in the european continent. i remember several meetings, in particul

that stoltenberg came to inform zelensky that ukraine does not receive an invitation to the north atlantic allianceay they talked about what ukraine will receive in the next five years. 100 billion dollars of aid, is it? an adequate answer in the current situation, is this enough, or does ukraine still need to insist on the status of a special partner of nato, various countries outside nato, or rather, a special partnership with the united states, with great britain, or after all, in the current situation, ukrainian diplomacy should do your best efforts so that we receive a positive signal at the anniversary summit in washington. the first and most important thing is that the situation in the world is changing so dynamically and quickly that no general secretary of the toltenberg, neither all 32 leaders of nato member countries, nor you and i can hardly predict what will happen in this matter tomorrow, because it is still before the 13th. april, no one could even think that part of nato would stand up for israel, when iran attacked israel on the night of april 13-14. especially when in power in the

america, will this decision be a marker for other states, for the european union, for of the north atlantic alliance, for the countries, for germany, including, for them to give us the taurus already after atakams, because we see that great britain has already announced a huge aid package in a few days. for 500 million pounds of barrels, whether other countries will follow the british and americans, and whether we will get enough weapons, and whether the west is generally speaking now that something needs to be done with russia in the form it is, and it must be done quickly, yes, you know, always when one or the other is accepted decisions on important issues for ukraine , of course, the united states of america, as a leader... whoever helps us in this fight against russian aggression, we always expect and it will be easier to negotiate with our partners from the european union, with great britain, and even when we are talking about both financial aid and specific types of weapons, it definitely has a corresponding effect on decision-making in the future. the european continent. i remember several m

stoltenberg to kyiv, because today was an unannounced visit of the general secretary of the north atlantic alliance zelensky to the summit of the alliance in washington, but expressed doubts that ukraine would receive there a request to join this organization, let's listen to what stoltenberg said, i really believe that ukraine has a rightful place in nato , and we will do everything to ensure that ukraine becomes a member of this alliance. in order for this decision to be made, we need all members of the alliance to agree to it, we need a consensus, not a majority, but that all... two the members of the alliance agreed, i do not expect that we will be able to reach such an agreement at the summit in july, but i think that we will be able to demonstrate that we are bringing ukraine closer to membership, and that the day will come as soon as possible when ukraine will become a full member of our alliance . roman petrovich, i understand that stoltenberg came to inform. about the fact that ukraine does not receive an invitation to the north atlantic alliance, today they talked about the fact that ukra

ukraine will not receive an invitation to the july nato summit to be held in washington. to the north atlantic allianced, in general, how the north atlantic alliance together with europe is preparing for a possible war with russia, we will talk about this with roman immortal, of course, in the context of the latest decisions of the congress of the united states of america and the senate, regarding the allocation of 61 billion dollars to ukraine, because we see that after this decision , great britain also announced the provision of aid to ukraine in the amount of 500 million pounds, and of course, with eugene dykym will discuss in detail the situation on the eastern and southern fronts, how the russians are trying to strengthen now and what to expect in may and june, as predicted by ukrainian intelligence. in the second program, the part of the program that will start at 21:15, i will traditionally, like every monday, summarize the past week, i will... tell you about the most important things that happened, and with my comments, my explanations of what to expect from the next decisions and the next eve

which ones he priorities. deploys and what kind of help is expected from the members of the north atlantic allianceseven more patriot or similar air defense systems, and that's the minimum number. they can save many lives and make a real difference. secondly, we have been talking about about a million ammunition for ukraine for a long time. and they must finally be delivered to the battlefield. thirdly, ours. our long-range capabilities, the battle really needs missiles, long- range and artillery, fourthly aviation. we need the right number of planes to defeat the russian air fleet, and fifthly, the speed of this year, we cannot wait for a decision, whether they will hear zelensky, whether zelensky was heard and whether everything will be as dynamic as that president wants. well, i really hope that tomorrow will be a positive day for us, positive news, our military is expecting them. our bodies are waiting for them, we all together throughout ukraine are waiting for this help, it really is now the most necessary of all problems. thank you, mr. viktor, for the conversation, it was viktor shlinchak,

in brussels, said that ukraine can receive seven air defense systems from partners in the north atlantic alliance, in particular, one of them has already been allocated by germany. let's listen to scholz. the alliance has made it clear that systems available in nato countries can be transferred to allow ukraine to better defend itself against multiple russian attacks. taking this opportunity, i want to emphasize this call once again: we heard that there should be seven systems, one of them ours, and we hope that the remaining six will be found in the context of nato. in all these statements, mr. viktor, lack one thing, that scholz and stoltenberg and others, well, stoltenberg, the secretary general of nato, but that other leaders of the western countries talk about what we want, that putin... play and that the russian federation lost, but there are no such appeals and no such statements, why? well, i really hope that during the voting there , in some documents, in some projects , there is this, from the forces to the fact that russia must lose, and this means that politically, politically, this m

the possibility of promptly responding to the actions of aviation from the countries of the north atlantic alliance's allies will chip in to provide the transfer to ukraine six patriot air defense systems. in particular , germany promises to transfer the complex. the dates and the number of missiles are not specified. meanwhile, there is one like that. the complexes cost more than a billion dollars, one salb is about 5 million. western politicians are actively campaigning to transfer new shipments of weapons to kiev. the head of european diplomacy calls for this. cooking. let me remind you that the water is still undrinkable and in recent days rusty water has been coming out of the tap in the residential area. residents sent us these pictures. as stated in the minsk regional executive committee, it was created a special headquarters to solve the problem, consisting of employees of government agencies, but it must be eliminated by the private organization development, which serves the quarter. at minsk vodokanal our correspondents were assured that in nearby areas. borders these neighborhoods, the w

therefore, says the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, the decision of the house of representatives of the congress. of the united states of america on unlocking the provision of additional financing, in particular to ukraine for more than 60 billion dollars, is extremely important, but what else? said nato secretary general, let's listen to jens stoltenberg in direct speech. nato allies welcome this decision, because it is very important that ukraine receives the necessary military support. and the aid package from the us will help it shoot down russian missiles, defend itself along the front line, and also deliver deep strikes on russian military potential, so this is very important. and this decision also demonstrates a duality. this is a really important decision and it was interesting to watch on facebook, how are friends reacting, my friends, after all, you must have been watching the same way, when this vote took place in the house of representatives on saturday night sometime after 8:00 pm and when it took place and when the vote was taken, what was being done in advance on

years, why was she silent about the peoples of syria, iraq, who mercilessly smoothed out the north atlantic allianceeing in georgia and moving around the european union, he does not take to the streets in support of palestine. or is it something else? azetov's posters for... scumbags to drive out the devil from such fanatics? i have a very high degree of justice, this sometimes really bothers me, that is, i like people to treat me according to their conscience, and i like to treat people according to their conscience, if we act from the point of view of the law, then we don’t need a composition, i need sides, objective, subjective so that i understand why i am being punished, the mayor’s lawyer, anna zamataeva, tried to do everything to convince the investigation and journalists that her ward... understands, but it didn’t work out very well, not only that anna zamotaeva, trying to pull the singer out from behind the walls of the volodarka, cut off all the phones, calling with a request to quickly record mary, she also asked for questions for approval so that i had to prepare my ward, but i couldn’t

yesterday , the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, jens stoltenberg, paid an unannounced visit to kyiv, and together with zelenskyi, they talked about ukraine's prospects in this alliance. the jubilee summit of nato is taking place in july, but apparently, ukraine will not receive an invitation to the north atlantic alliance. at least, judging by the words that volodymyr zelenskyi said, ukraine will be in nato only after victory, after the end of the war, in what way and under the current conditions ukraine without nato can protect itself from the russians and from the fact that the russian dictator wants to destroy ukraine, we will talk about this with our guests, besides, the law on mobilization and return is among the topics. ukrainians to ukraine who are abroad, as far as possible, under what conditions, and whether the majority of men who are conscripted. who are outside of ukraine, whether they will be registered in the tsc online or in the tsnaps, the question is still open, but the question is also debatable. in the second part of our program we will have people's

that, according to non-russian, western experts, over the 75 years of the existence of the north atlantic allianceut, at a minimum, according to the most conservative estimates, 22 dozen military operations abroad, that called, beyond its own responsibility, none of these operations were defensive, nato is the only bloc that consistently, the only one in the history of mankind that consistently goes beyond its borders beyond its own competence, we see that recently nato secretaries general have made statements, including that they bear some special responsibility, say, for the climate agenda, that they must ensure their presence in the arctic the same, in antarctica, i don’t know where else, so to say that it is north atlantic, that it is defensive, well, it is absolutely not necessary, when 25 years ago, this whole story was just beginning, you said that it was somehow not marked for us i don’t agree with you about any other decisive events other than the plane’s own turn, yes, indeed, at that time russia was not yet strong enough to respond militarily to what was happening, well, there was a wel

but - says the new deputy secretary general of the north atlantic alliance. the $60 billion aid package approved by the house of representatives on april 20 will help ukraine's armed forces gain an advantage on the battlefield. and this is great, the main thing is not to delay sending weapons and ammunition to her in ukraine. another, western, heavy landing to china. state secretary of the united states of america anthony blinken plans to visit. sky from april 24 to 26, this was first reported by the press service of the us state department, and today it was confirmed by the chinese ministry of foreign affairs. one of the main topics that will be discussed during the visit is russia and the war it is aggressively waging against ukraine, in particular, also russian-chinese cooperation. at the same time, the journalists of the financial times reported with reference to their sources that antoni blinken is ahead. at least intends to warn china that washington is ready to introduce sanctions against chinese financial institutions immediately if beijing does not stop supplying russia with go