and again we're approaching 20,000 north korean defectors. and even in south korea, a whole book could be written on the -- and books have been written on the struggles that north koreans face in resettling in south korea. it has to be that much more difficult for the 100 that are here in the united states. and we don't have the formal assistance program that south korea has for resettlement. so there would be -- i think there would be a great deal of benefits to help north koreans resettle. now again, i don't want to -- i'll close by just pointing out that there are obstacles to cooperation. that there's still going to be a reluctance in washington and seoul if we move forward in the nuclear talks. there will be a temptation to step back or ease off of pressing north korea on human rights. unfortunately, that's just the reality that there's this -- often this false choice that i think seoul -- that north korea tries to force the u.s. and south korea to make this false choice. either you're going to focus on human rights issues and we need to focus on both at the sa

you are right, north korea does not have that. n part that is because of the staying power of the north korean regime, that even without foreign troop presence, they maintain their grip on power in the wake of the east germans did not. -- in a way that the east germans did not. but i am not sure what that really means. one indicator of what it has taken so much longer for the two koreas, but i am not sure what else we can draw from that. >> andrew shepard, state department. he said that you think a unified korea -- you said that you think a unified korea, you assume that it would be pro-u.s. and would maintain the troop presence there. i wonder why you feel that is so definitive. as part of that, if that were the case, then it would suggest that a unified korea with the u.s. troops moving up towards north korea would be something that would be harder for china to swallow. assuming that is the case, what would china be looking for in the reunification scenario that would make it easier for them to cooperate? >> a great question. the

several north korean radio stations broadcasting every day to north korea. they are at least a dozen ngos being run by north korean defectors focused on the north korean human rights. they are all living in very much hand to mouth, all of these ngos, even the big two are on the big in the relative sense that they have ten or 12 for a dozen people working but they are still very small organizations particularly in comparison to the largest in korea. so, south korean ngos are still toiling with an of security and with very limited budgets but finally we of the government in south korea that has attached greater priority to this issue. in the united states again we had the passage of the north korean human rights act in 2004 but congress and bush at administration often didn't put its money where its mouth was in terms of actually allocating the funds set aside in this bill. president bush talked a good game on human-rights but often didn't have -- wasn't able to marshal funds to actually act. fortunately we did see expansion in the service of the voice of ameri

but if you say that in its north korea and south korea, north korea doesn't have any major internationalsuperpower control. even china is not necessarily in control of north korea so i see that come the people in public discussing about using the german coming east german unification policy vashon. why would these issues mention that? i would like to know your opinion as well as. >> can i answer for christian? i don't know if you want to make any common-sense you were in germany. he's going to be modest and keep me in the spot but i was reading some things that christensen me that he had written. it's true that russian troops were present when east germany fell and things to gorbachev they very quickly and quietly and said the country. and you're right, north korea does not have that. in part that's a testament to the staying power of the north korean regime even without foreign troops presence that they maintain their grip on power in a way that the east germans and other east europeans could not. but i'm not really sure what that really means. it's obviously one of the differences and

stakeholders is to find ways to bring north korea back to the six party talks aimed at thenorh korea'ss current policy is based on reciprocity toward north korea, conforms to the goals of maintaining peace, developing corpand cooperation. it puts precedents on denuclearization of the north up. and has yet to induce the north and in negotiation. cooperation and consensus among the main stakeholders among the united nations, the u.s., korea, china, russia, and japan is essential. all of us must be prepared to work not only to avert nuclear crisis, but also as president obama has said, to offer north korea a different choice. in this endeavor, the u.s. alliance which had been a pillar of stability in that region will be a foundation in which to move forward. as well, peace and stability on the korean peninsula is a key interest to china. its role and active cooperation will continue to be important. if it[unintelligible] progress on the nuclear issue can come forward swiftly in safely. together, the university of north korean studies and woodrow wilson center have strived to bring great u

the divergent paths persued by north and south korea. nations that are fully engaged in that respect the fundamental rights of their citizens prosper and progress. those that choose isolation and oppression do not. i do not need to remind this distinguished group of the remarkable story of south korea's achievement over the last 60 years. from the ravages of war, poverty, and early years of authoritarian government, south korea emerged as a vibrant, democratic, increasingly proper suit -- prosperous country. from its membership to its upcoming role as the host of g- 20, it has taken its place as one of the core players in the global economy. from its and the piracy -- anti- piracy, it has moved to consumer security to provider of security. turning its back on the globalize world and the basic freedoms allowed its citizens, despite the open hand offered by south korea and that international community, and despite its start compared with the south, to date its citizens regularly face the ravages of hunger, fear, and disease. they put the m

alivense cooperation on north korea and south korea is very important. and how the u.s. and china can help for this alliance cooperation into a reality. and i have another question too later on. >> several issues here. the first is the ozone hole. the ozone is also a greenhouse gas. they're talking about when the ozone or the stress of ozone suspect completed, you cruise down the upper atmosphere, so it's an operative butt the problem is we are talking about the warming of the lower atmosphere as a result of long-wave radiation from the earth. so there's nothing to do with the ozone hole, with the climate change. and yes, industrial production is the major source of carbon emissions, and the people have actually tried to tease this out, what's the source of carbon from the industry, but also, we have to concede all other cascading effects. there's also transportation, which we can count as part of the production process while we can separate these. and what type of industry they are having, for example, in korea, they used to have a lot of heavy industry which use a lot

as far as i know there is no change on the ground. >> on north korea -- by the military broadcast thismorning they attended six party talks in new with united states wants north what is the position? >> i think if you go back to the discussion last month that ambassador stephen wadsworth and ambassador studentcam had in the john gone and both sides reaffirmed who the september september 2005 with a joint statement but if you go down the joint statement during number of elements outlined their. talks about the establishment of peace regime, normalization of relations among all of the parties concerned, an economic and energy cooperation. we've made clear is that we are -- if north korea says yes and comes back to the six party process, it makes a firm step toward normalization, then a wide range of other opportunities open up, but the first key here is that north korea has to come back to us, say yes and come back to the six preprocessor, start working on -- its obligations under the join communication statements and then when we're perfectly willing to have other talks. >> before the s

the enormous influence with north korea. are we seeing that influence? or is it sort of quiet?>> we are seeing more influence for our part. we have made it quite clear that we intend pursue our obligations to our allies and we will take that to the extent that we are not successful in irreversible denuclearization in north korea. we will enhance our ability do enforce our obligations. that is a condition that contributes to instability as any other scenario. >> my time has expired. >> the gentleman from washington, mr. larsen. >> thank you for coming. with regard to sunday's missile test. how would you respond to the notification china gave compared to what the u.s. does when we conduct a missile test or when russia conducts a missile test. >> i am not aware we received any notification. >> how does that differ from the ballistic missile test process? do we provide notification? >> the mariners noticed closer areas and various things. >> there was no indication at all of the international community about the missile test and its reasons and so on. at least as far as we know fro

because of the influence that china has with north korea.re we seeing that or sort of quiet notice? >> we are seeing influence. we are seeing the influence on our part and made it clear that we intend to fulfill all of our obligations to our allies and we will to the extent that we are not successful in achieving complete verifiable denuclearization. we will enhance those alliances and ability to enforce our alliance obligations. that is a condition. >> thank you. i see my time has expired. i yield back in two seconds. >> thank the gentlemen from washington. mr. larson. >> thank you, mr. chairman. gentlemen, thank you for coming today. in regards to monday's missile test, how would you characterize the notification china gave to the international community compared to the missile tests? >> i'm not aware we received notification until after the test. >> how would that differ largely with the ballistic missile test process? the u.s. undertakes for russia. do we provide notification? >> traditionally they noticed air men and various things, yes

north korea. wasn't sure what to make of it at first but it very clear the central bank, one of the central bankers said explicitly to the japanese mouthpiece for the regime that this is the plain and simple design of the wipeout market. and it's pretty clear that in the short term it will do that by basically bankrupting anyone that is holding large amounts of cash. but that didn't stop some commentators in korea and american in "the new york times" correspondent that is this the last gasp of a dying regime to have this reform it had to make continual adjustments. it's clear they didn't know what they were doing or what the repercussions would be. actually they knew what they returned they just weren't quite sure what the repercussions would be. and so they've had to have reports of people being confused and upset. it wasn't a region nomination. the denomination did not change. in fact, the paper looks almost identical. the paper print looks him is identical to the old currencies onshore there wa

in the case of north korea, it's worst. they are spending so much money on the military generally, including nuclear weapons. it's not clear, of course, if iran is even going to try to get nuclear weapons. they said they definitely do not want to get them if they are bombed by israel or something that might change. but it is a big expense. and places like qadhafi went through that for a while and decided it was just very expensive. the uranium program recently, they don't work. but the idea is what we are tieing to do is we're trying to do a favor to iran. don't waste your money on those stupid weapons. in some respect, i think that's a good thing. what i'm against is killing people to try to do a favor for them in some respects. you could make a case that spending a a lot of money to missiles as opposed to conventional weapons makes a country less safe because it's wasting a lot of money that it could spend on other weapons. even the case of israel, 10% of the budget spent on nuclear weapons. well, what good has it done? t

>> yes. >> also, he will have an interview with the north korean defectors and south korea? >> yes. >> and also he will have an interview with the north korean defectors in south korea? are you concerned that this airstrike and the recent announcement of the construction of new neighborhood in east jerusalem will somehow limit your efforts to relaunch negotiations? >> as the secretary talked about in your media at daily short time ago we obviously are always concerned about the dynamic on the ground in the region, and the impact that that can have that any particular time on our efforts to get in negotiations started and move aggressively towards peace in the middle east, so yes absolutely. any violence in the region has potential as it has in the past due debris of the process. that is why george mitchell is going out first to consult in europe but then in the region and why we have the kinds of meetings here at the state department we have today, to try to assess where the parties are, refine our ideas, evaluate steps that we can take and others can take to move the parties

the down side to the north korea story, we have the trade paula to north korea for the two chicks becausenow, kim jong-il fancies himself a broadway singer ♪ give my regards to broadway . >> they say she's the only judge sympathetic enough to tell him he has a future. >> you're one of the kind. >> that's how we got the girls out of there. we trade paula to pyongyang. >> you never know what lives anybody. >> it's an mcchain stevenson hello larry move. >> i remember valerie harper had rota and another show called valerie. it was called valerie for god's sake ♪ >> she asked for too much money the next week i'm watching valerie, sandy duncan is playing valerie. you know, at some point you've got to tuck your ego away and take the chuck and thank god you've got a lucky life. it's cold out there if i quibble with you too much, next week it's penelope ann miller time. >> i feel ridiculous! >> all right, i get it. >> is she available? >> coming up, miller sounds off on north korean dictator kim jong-il and press secretary robert gibbs. >> i'm watching the daily press conference, an eye patch, a b

north korea, you can read what i have to say about north korea in the paper. might encounter with the beltway consensus on north korea has been that the images and assumptions people have get in the way of securing out a policy that might have an impact on that regime. on any given day, it looks like an opera. research and my career that we have under estimate of the north koreans at your peril. that happened when douglas macarthur says that you can turn backe the country with one hand behind your back. he said that they had better formations and the japanese did. its stars from there and it just goes on. -- it starts from there. if you have an army of a million men. you have some 50,000 underground security chambers or facility. also a leadership that believes that the soviets and the chinese have screwed them. you can begin to appreciate what the regime has not collapsed. -- why the regime has not collapsed. please read my last section where i "frederick nietzsche on metaphor and the way in which we human beings have a wonderful and a terrible tendency to th

it was her address in north korea. if chaos broke out again and the family was separated -- my in- laws were dating, but were separated and if by chance there were taken to refugee -- and were taken again to a refugee center and got married. but assuming that is what happened to them, their assumption was that they would meet again not in seoul, south korea, but in the north. there is a generational quality to this. given that south korea is still 65 years later struggling with japanese colonials, who is a traitor and who is not, they are still in 2010 figuring out who's land needs to be taken away for collaborating with the japanese. it is mind-boggling to america, who has no sense of history -- [laughter] -- that they would be obsessing about this bill. i have no doubt that this will be another pandora's box that will inevitably be opened. there will be millions of south koreans and north koreans holding property deeds for land in north korea. my mother-in-law was born in orchards, you know, a wealthy landowner, and

bill: bill clinton and north korea. >> this is a great story. good for him for going over there because it is a crazy land. you know kim jong-il is crazy when he is that rich and he still does the indoor of his palace in astroturf. clinton handled himself with class. he went over and he took the bumper sticker off the rear of the plane. this was all business and i admire him. bill: john bolton said, look, if you are going to do this and legitimize this dictator who kidnapped these women, they will keep doing it, escalating it. what say you to that? >> nobody can touch us except -- accurately, the parents, the families, the girls. it is easy to say that, but you are missing the point. you get your kid home. the only person who feels bad in this whole thing is biden. they have him playing fredo, sending a mountain to the backyard because he can open a beer bottle with his teeth. clinton gets to be errol flynn. i do not see anybody having a beef with it. bill: clash fort -- cash for clunkers. it looks like the auto industry got a bump on this. what

the work we have done together so far to uncover north korea's history has been an ongoing success, throwinge all of you will find that today's proceedings are informative and stimulating. thank you for your attention. [applause] >> thank you very much, dr. park. my pleasure now to introduce the morning's keynote speaker, the u.s. deputy secretary of state, james steinberg. one year ago today, secretary of state hillary clinton swore him in as her deputy. at which time he took up one of the largest, most important, and most challenging portfolios in our government. happy anniversary to you after one year. i'm not sure this is exactly the best way to celebrate. it is one way to celebrate. jim is an experienced, dedicated, and very able public servant. prior to his appointment by president obama, he served with distinction as the lyndon johnson school of public affairs in austin, texas from which he

what about the north korea situation?> well, back in the campaign, there was this tense exchange between president obama and his now secretary of state hillary clinton on the question of engaging dictators and engaging space and certainly one of the people that was at the center of this exchange was kim jong-il. the president made a commitment to engage dictators that's exactly what he's done. i don't think he's done it very successfully. what we've soon is a series, not just one, a series of provocation from north korea, one after another after another and a series of overtures of the obama administration sometime as if they're in concert with one another, a culmination of back and forth that ended with this final meeting just in recent weeks, the u.s. envoy, steven bossworth meeting with his counterpart bilateral meeting, which i think was a tremendous boost to the legitimacy of a corrupt regime. if you had to judge after the first year, korea is winning the first round of diplomacy. >> raising the pandemic alert to the

and how do you deal with iran or north korea or venezuela for that matter? thank you. >> concession is what you have an initial positioning in a bargaining and whatever you renounce is a concession that you make to the other side. usually the other side tries to minimize -- you try to the concession and the other side is trying to minimize the significance of it and that's part of concession and part of bargaining. so concession is obviously part of the vocabulary of compromises. i don't use it that extensively, but it's there. now, the case -- i mean, the gain, what to do in particular cases as i said -- there we should really be very careful about the facts and just more rhetoric can be dangerous as it was in the case of iraq. namely blinds us from what actually happens. for example, iran is not just mahmoud ahmadinejad. it's a very complex society. and i won't define the rules of the mullahs in iran. as an inhuman regime. i don't believe that's true. i think it's -- i mean, it's too trivial to say that i'm against it. but i don't -- that's in my vocabular

ironically, we are now seeing with iran and pakistan and north korea, the prospect of a world because of proliferation where you're going to have a whole bunch of countries who have these weapons, who already have them, but the proliferating them, at least north korea's case, where the iranians if they get it, there wasn't anybody over there doing that kind of thinking. and did you get in the mideast as a result of the iranian nuclear weapon, you could easily get saudi calling up islamabad saying would you guys like to sell if you? none of these countries i waited, both united states and russians the better part of 20 years to do, which was think through these things, learn from some experiences and with the cautions instinct of kennedy and khrushchev and khrushchev had to restrain castro who is ready for nuclear war even if his arms were up literate. we are entering into a world that is closer to midnight -- nightmare. congratulations to. >> thank you for correcting my misidentification of your uncle. >> that's all right. >> i'm glad to begin with the word caveat. >> i knew herman fo

i'd like to ask about the north korea.hy no grade was given for north korea even though the recommendation was in the report? and proliferations of the north korea wmd continues to be the problem. last year, you know, the aircraft of north korean plane was seized. >> our recommendation in the world at risk was that neither north korea nor iran should be allowed to continue with its nuclear weapons program. we felt that 14 months was too short a period of time. a new administration with new people dealing with this issue to accomplish that objective of denying them the weaponized nuclear weapons. we are -- we continue to give that a very high priority. and we hope that over the next period of time that we will see that goal recognized but we felt the appropriate grade for this first year was an incomplete. >> mart with global security news wire. i have two questions for you, gentlemen. first is this a consensus document this report card that you released today and then secondly the center for arms control nonproliferation r

to syria, iran, north korea. everyone has some presence on the internet, and their relationship for their country is with icann. we have to stay very neutral and focus on security of the domain name system through and with our partners. it is a tricky game we have to play of staying in the middle. >> there are computer viruses and other types of computer attacks which are nothing new. they have existed since the beginning of the internet. it seems like they are getting more sophisticated and growing exponentially. what is your current assessment of the state of where things are right now in terms of the level of cyber illegal activity attacks, and the ability of the good guys to fight against that? obviously it is an up and down situation, but what is your sense of the current situation, and how serious is this for using the internet as we know it? >> it is a very serious issue, as you point out. in the short term, things have been getting worse. the trend line in the last 24 months has been many more viruses, mo

in north korea, officials said they are holding an american who illegally enred the country. he is believed to be christian missionary robert park who crossed the border from china on christmas day. friends at park's church in arizona have been holding vigils and praying for his safety. the vatican is investigating security after pope benedict the 16th was attacked at a christmas eve mass. a woman jumped a barrier at st. peter's basilica and knocked down the 82-year-old pope before guards dragged her away. the same woman had tried to attack benedict at last year's christmas eve mass. benedict was not injured and kept to his busy holiday schedule, celebrating mass, delivering the traditional christmas day message, and visiting a soup kitchen. benedict delivered presents and shared a meal of lasagna with some of rome's homeless. now, weark the beginning of 2010 with our annual look ahead at religion news on the horizon. bob abernethy was joined by a panel of journalists to talk about the coming year. >> abernethy: we take our look ahead now to the stories we expect to cover in

. >> and he played a pivotal role in getting the two journalists released from north korea. >> we expresstitude to president clinton. >> sarah palin's resignation from the governorship of alaska. >> best counter attack? palin, again with a best-selling book. facts? who needs them. >> really brilliant because she invigorated the republican party in a way i've never seen it ever. it was like this revolution. >> a great visceral vitality about sarah palin. >> i think she's just an amazing populist. from a purely tv standpoint sarah palin is gold because she says whatever she wants to say and winds up blaming liberal media. >> she's a dynamic, exciting woman, but as president when life and death decisions for the entire world are involved i would be quite frightened of having her there. but quite frankly, i'm frightened of having mr. obama there, too. >> as to family matters, worst almost in law, levi johnston who fathered a palin grandchild and dropped his pants in the pages of "playgirl." >> levi let it all hang out johnston. he's a genius. >> worst bad girl, meghan mccain who posted a late

he's committed significant time and energy and resources against iran, north korea and in the pakistanreat assessment of 14 months ago stands to today. one is it is more likely than not under the current circumstances and without decisive and urgent commitment that there will be a weapon of mass destruction used by a terrorist organization some place on earth between now and if the end of 2013. what that says is the accused more than 20% of the time available to us to better prepare to prevent or respond to that attack and with mixed results in terms of how well we have used those 14 months. we found second it is more likely the form of attack will be a biological rather than nuclear attack. there is an article in today's "washington post" which discusses a report issued by one of america's eminent intelligence officers, mr. larson who was with the cia and headed the unit at the department of energy and is now at the kennedy school making exactly the point that our greatest threat today is a biological weapon in the hands of a terrorist. we also found in december 2008 that in spite of

it would be hard to deny that north korea was economically much poorer than south korea.but their leader is still an power and developing nuclear weapons. regimes which are infinitely poorer than as a year managed to keep going for decades longer than they they deserve to. over the long term it is true that market economies with all their problems turned out to be more efficient than the command economies. but if we consider the longer-term reasons for regime change it was not only the relative areas, some of their success is also contrary to the. education, for example, was a success story. but the more educated people were and especially the larger and higher education sector the more dissatisfied they were with the and the more dissatisfied they were with their lack of upper chantey to travel abroad in the same way as their professional counterparts in the west could do. fidel castro described it as the greatest newspaper in the world. something to the fact that fidel doesn't read russian. for education depressions founded an inadequate source of information. in the so

if you achieve that mutually, as i said earlier, if iran is what matters, north korea matters, are you able to have bothered leverage where china is actually doing anything to help you achieve -- are you able to actually have leverage with china is actually helping you achieve things? i think obama and his team are siphoning off too many of these problems and are not playing their hand well enough to demonstrate the ability to move simultaneously as they need to do. i believe that george w. bush's father operated under these terms, i think george w. was trying to do that at the end. if you go back, to some degree, i am sympathetic to this notion. i often hear, you are not giving obama enough time. if you look at the first year of every president except ford, since dwight eisenhower, each one of them had either some left curve thrown at them or they may decisive decisions early in the administration that shaped them and were so keep. the notion that barack obama has not had enough time to not stand the test of scrutiny of other presidencies. i want him to do well. i really want barack o

issues such as north korea and iran cannot be successfully addressed without intensive and sustained involvement by china. to date, we've been encouraged to cooperate. although there's a lot of work to be done. we obviously do not see eye to eye with the chinese on every issue. for example, on taiwan, the united states remains committed to our one-china policy based on the three joint communiques and the taiwan communications act. we believe the policy has contributed greatly to the peace and stability. and we remain committed to that framework. we welcome the improvement in cross relations over the past year. at the same time, we have voiced our concerns about china's rapid modernization program as it remitted to taiwan. the continued military build up across the taiwan strait despite the improvements raised many questions about beijing's commitment to a peaceful solution to the cross strait issue. similarly, they have differences on the human rights. human rights is central element of american foreign policy as the president has said it is a part of who we are as a people. presiden

whether we are negotiating or not is that the chinese are not willing to but the kind of pressure on north koreahich would lead to the regime to change its policies because it could actually result with a collapse. regime collapsed in korea would be unmanageable and very difficult for china. finally, i want to end on one issue which are treated differently in my piece and that is iran. if they get nuclear weapons it could be extremely problematic. iran would not have a second strike capabilities, so they might take ani israeli attack -- take an israeli attack. . . one challenge is whether or not it gets russian and chinese cooperation in terms of bringing additional pressure on iran. this pressure could be sanctioned. that is obviously mentioned. there's also the possibility of a naval blockade. i think there is no real chance of a military attack from the united states or israel, but there are real possibilities for altering iranian policies. those possibilities will depend how adept the united states is in dealing with china and russia. up to now, the record does not look great, but if we are

to other european partners to syria, iran, north korea, everyone has some presence on the internet and their relationship for their country code domains is with icann. so we effectively work with everyone in the world. we have to stay very neutral and we have to focus on supporting security of the domain name system through and with our partners. so it's a tricky game we have to play stand in the middle. >> host: chris rhoades. >> the computer viruses and other types of computer attacks of course are nothing new. they've existed since the beginning of the internet. but it seems like they are getting more sophisticated by the minute and just the power of these things, growing exponentially. what's your current assessment of the state of where things are right now in terms of the level of this cyber at dvd, illegal activity, or tax, and the ability of the good guys to fight against that? obviously, it's an up-and-down situation, but what's your sense of the current situation and how serious is this for -- before using the internet as we know it? >> guest: sure, well, it's a very serious

. >> after the convention was over, she still he didn't really understand why there was a north korealarly saying that saddam hussein had been behind 9/11, and literally the next day her son was about to ship off to iraq, and when they asked her who her son was going to fight, she couldn't explain that. >> this book is a page turner. this is a new book by john heilm oo n ann and mark halperin. this is damaging to democrats. is that of great value to republicans to underline things and lay this out there. >> i think they were bipartisan in their criticism that they lay at the feet of a lot of failed candidates. i think so much of that book was based on interviews with consultants, and consultants and handlers of some of the failed candidates who are in effect -- >> the revenge of the failed campaign? >> that's right. they're trying to justify and get back to the trough in future campaigns. it's called staff infection. candidates sometimes lose, consultants always win and come back and feed on the next one. i thought what was really fascinating to me in this book -- let's face it, picki

. >> can i ask you about north korea? in north korea, the foreign minister again suggested yesterday to start the peace treaty discussion first, and it was suggested by doing that we can build a trust between countries and a six-party talk. what is your response to that. >> i didn't completely understand the whole question. if you could just start again. >> actually, north korea foreign ministry again suggested yesterday to have peace treaty discussions between countries. and they also suggested that we can build trust by starting the discussion between the countries. what's your response to that? >> first off, we think the appropriate next step is for north korea to return to the six-party talks. and to resume deliberations in this context. and within that context, it's possible to have bilateral interactions and other discussions. not just with the united states but with other countries. we think it's important that north korea make clear that they're prepared to abide by previous agreements in 2005 and 2007. and the u.

if it's true what steve schmidt said about sarah palin not knowing why there's a north and south koreation of putting her up as our vice president was an irresponsible choice. in the same way the edwards cam pane and john edwards' decision to stay in the race notwithstanding his brewing scandal that had his staffers worried rt a short-sided unwise political decision, so it seems that if there's one big picture thought or big picture theme in this book it's really we need to start thinking about how and why the folks making decisions on our behalf do that and what it motivating them. >> i'm also curious about the strategists. seems like sometimes you can't control the people you're advising at all. we're going to talk a little bit more about that. i want to get good dirt on that. the real elizabeth edwards, too. is there a big gap between what her image is and how some say she was behaving during the campaign? we're going to get more of that after the break. how about all of the above? the eight passenger buick enclave. may the best car win. tools are uncomplicated. nothing complicated

very few people in north korea have any internet access at all and those that do, they can only go toouple of websites in the country. china had taken a more open approach where they say, we see value in the internet and giving our citizens internet access, but on a limited basis simply because they want to maintain their power and maintain their economic growth without having any -- kind of popular revolts or democratic distractions. host: cnet news wrote a piece friday or thursday about google's peers mulling their options. what are other considerations -- like microsoft, even now hope to a limited extent, what our other businesses considering now in the wake of this conflict? guest: i think a lot of people raised the issue of microsoft where it came out clearly saying it does not support google's actions and will stay in the market. the bing search engine that is not caught on venerable and china, i think google open-door for bing and it will make a heavy surge to be the number two behind baidu. i think issue for most american companies is not so much about what they sell and the c

and we found this as well, north korea calling for lasting peace on its peninsula. today, it said it was committed to a nuclear-free peninsula. how is the administration likely to react to this? guest: with distrust and disbelief and probably see it as some kind of rhetorical trick. i have great difficulty trusting the north koreans with something like that. however, if i were the assistant secretary dealing with north korea, what i would do is grab it and try to run with it and say, ok, you are all saying this. let's get to the table. let's see if we can get you back to the nuclear nonproliferation regime, let's see if we can get you to agree to certain restrictions. look, put your money where your mouth is. that being said, i do not trust this as a great breakthrough, but more of a rhetorical move, the end of which i am uncertain. but i would still use it for a way to try to get more cooperation. host: the reason climate change meeting tell you anything about diplomacy? guest: a message there is that it is very difficult to get all the nations of the world to agre

on north korea, does the president make any list of north korea speaks at one wartime. >> does the presidentany decision to release north korea as terrorist country. >> has the president made a decision? our posture on that has not changed. today marks one year exactly since the president nominated don johnson to be the office. does he plan to renominate her in any other, more broadly speaking how does he respond to criticism from liberal organizations that he hasn't put enough muscle behind getting his judicial and executive nominees confirmed? >> i don't know what decisions have been made about nominees that have, as a result of being, having passed the year, need to be renominated. i can serve a check on that. i would say that we are proud of our record of hitting individuals into government, though disappointed at the pace in the senate and working through things both executive branch and judicial branches. >> thank you, robert. you said earlier that the president had full confidence in admiral blair and the director, correct or does he have the same confidence in secretary napolitano? >

that's why north korea now faces increased isolation and stronger sanctions, sanctions that are being vigorously enforced. that's why the international community is more united and the islamic republic of iran is more isolated and as iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt they too will face growing consequences. that is a promise. that's the leadership we are providing, engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. we're working through the g-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery, we're working with muslim communities around the world to promote science and education and innovation. we have gone from a bistandard to a leader in climate change. we're helping developing countries to feed themselves and continuing the fight against hiv-aids. and we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bioterrorism or infectious disease, a plan that will counter threats at home and strengthen public health abroad. as we have for over 60 years, america takes these actions

stain on the topic of state-concert terrorism, why isn't north korea on the list?is not a lot of air traffic allowed through north korea. it is a good question. if you will use that list, then use it. host: fla., on the line. caller: ok, i would like to know -- i'm not trying to be funny, but are you really educated to understand that cuba is on a list because of all the other non-compliance with what the u.s. once? because the u.s. gets what they want. i am a terrorist and all u.s. citizens are terrorists. are you there? guest: i am here. what was pointing to is the political nature of this. i lived in miami for a long time. the administration decided to go the safe route an ad cuba. host: what is the difference between our watch list and a no- fly list? why wouldn't they just put everyone on the watch list on the no-fly list? guest: good question. there has been a lot of examination of exactly what the different lists include. the way the government explains it is that there is a larger data base with 550,000 names on it. and some are aliases. some the government

north korea is the champion of the most depressed economy. where north carolina was number one, north korea is going swhar fofe -- checking into the mostly free. if you are there, go to any place in south korea. and then study north korea. you can't actually, a private citizen like myself or yourself were i mean, it's just night and day in some respects. and 59 and 523. those two cups are not high up on the economic scale. but the ndamukong suh is -- the >> the dominican republic has a corrupt government and it's a more open economy. you can start businesses and engage in economic commerce with less interference from the government. and that makes a difference, too, as we know from satellite photography, if you're taking a picture with that on the left-hand side and haiti on the right-harned side. you'll see more lights from the right-hand side and trees. haiti is almost bereft of trees and at night it's a very dark case. >> so in north and south cri -- you see less difference between free and less free economics. host: good morning. caller: g

use of major lenders -- making enemies of major lenders and turning to governments like iran and north koreae is dealing with problems of debt to an inflation and i think he is not bright enough frankly to get himself out of of the fix he has put himself then. but also i would have to say that there are a number of countries in latin america that do not share chavez be used, ideas for the united states with the rest of the world. certainly the government of peru, the government of mexico doesn't and while in brazil under this has to deal with venezuela because it is close by i certainly think that actually this dilva is a very wonderful president of brazil. i think he has put his country on a path that is leading it to becoming one of the great powers of the future. other questions? >> i was wondering, in our opinion, you believe that guantanamo is strategically important to our military today. >> now, not right now. since the 1970's and 80's guantanamo has become primarily a coast guard facility and there also is a place is no longer call immigration and naturalization but csis i guess it i

there was a proliferation threat that was potentially growing, because we had in iran, we have north koreaad iraq obviously. but with a lot of emphasis on a.q. khan activities. my fear was and i would say i hoped this will be stronger today than i did back then as a result of what iran particularly today is doing. my fear is that states that are highly repressive or failed, the danger of a wmd link is that they become porous, they construct all sorts of different alliances with people and yet it's true we did not have evidence that saddam was, for example, behind the september 11th attacks and part of the difference between ourselves and the americans was the always said we don't accept that. it is interesting and this is referred to in the butler report however. that actually zarqawi did go into iraq, in fact prior to the invasion. now when i look at because i spent a lot of time obviously out of the region today. when i look at the way iran today links up with terror groups and this is a different topic for a different day, but i would say that a large part of duty stabilization in the m

. >> hackers supported in russia, china and north korea, for example, many times launched their attacks at home by using a worldwide web of personal computers they have infected with viruses without the knowledge of the computer's owner. >> they will infiltrate someone's computer to use that as a launch point to get into another computer to make it more difficult for law enforcement to track them back. >> reporter: even when u.s. authorities are successful in following the trail and finding the cyberterrorists, pushing them is another obstacle. fewer than 30 countries criminalized cybercrime, leaving the u.s. agents on their own to do batt in cyberspace. in los angeles, adam housley, fox news. >>> from tackling cybercrime to tackling the new year's resolutions. >> we have the strategies to help you shed the holiday pounds and keep them off for good. >>> later, we'll introduce you to the twins born in different years and oh, so close together. stay with us.  three people started 2010 a million dollars richer. they had the winning numbers in the virginia looter's million

north korea, 100,000 braving the cold to support the new year's message.coming 2010, the year the marks the anniversary of the ruling korean working party and lig ration of korea -- liberation of korea from japanese occupation. japan, the everyo emperor and r family greeting thousands of well-wisher ins tokia, welcoming a new year and new decade. the leader speaking behind bullet proof glass expressing hopes of happiness for the nation and the world. it's an annual tradition every january 2. and that's a wrap on this fox trip around the world in 80 seconds. bizarre kidnapping case involving an 8-month-old boy. multi-state search tonight. now underway for this child. but wait until you hear who is accused of kidnapping him and why authorities fear this little boy might be in danger. plus, an unusual high-speed chase with a lot of fizz. you're probably wondering why in the world is that driver hauling a vending machine behind him. we'll explain and tell you how he finally got canned next. >> julie: a young arizona woman is behind bars accused of kidnapping h

. >> reporter: hackers supported by governments in russia and north korea many times launch their attacks at home by using a worldwide web at home without the knowledge of the computer's owner. >> they will use that as a launch point to get into another computer to make it more difficult for law enforcement to track them back. >> reporter: even when u.s. authorities are successful in following the trail and finding cyber terrorists, punishing them is yet another obstacle. fewer than 30 countries have actually criminalized cyber crime, leaving u.s. as pretty much on their own to do battle in cyberspace. in los angeles, adam housely, fox news. >> here are some of the stories expected to make headlines in the week ahead. welcome home mr. president. the obamas return from their hole day in hawaii tomorrow. first up on the agenda, terrorism and healthcare. >>> google gadget. the search engine giant is set to unveil nexus1 on tuesday. tech analysts say the mobile set rivals the iphone. >>> 3-d thursday. directv will officially announce plans for the nation's first 3-d channel. the satellite pro