their work experience in north korea is deemed useless. friends have been moving on to other countries. [ speaking foreign language ] >> but she decided to stay, because one of her daughters also sought asylum in south korea. she began taking on new work, in addition to her work at home. such as selling scrap metal. her daughter married a south korean man and gave birth to a son last year. ♪ she gains motivation by reminding herself that if she works harder, at least she can buy her grandson some candy. [ speaking foreign language ] once she began working outside her home, she made many acquaintances. recently she's even made south korean friends who bring scrap metal for her to her house. many north koreian defectors face financial difficulties. this man who defected four years ago has had many job interviews to land a stable job, but now he's losing hope. [ speaking foreign language ] >> after arriving in south korea, defectors realize there's a vast gap between what they dreamed for, and reality. some flee to other countries, pretending

>> in the case of north korea then we're beginning to have discussions with north korea which didn't get anywhere about their miss missile program. we wanted to have a military option also. that's what i was referring to in that article and the same principal applyies today in the case of the negotiations with the iranians. we obviously prefer negotiated outcome but we have to protect ourselves. >> in the past day the supreme leader of iran said he's not optimistic there would be a deal and he wouldn't allow inspections. in the blue print that the united states provided those would have been a part of this deal. how big of a blow is that for you if there's no inspections of military sites? that gives you a big blind spot shs doesn't it? >> any agreement has to have verification provisions. >> of all sites? >> based on verification. these are ongoing and they have a few months to work these things out. any successful grem hasagreement has to have adequate provision. >> adequate would include military sites. >> absolutely. >> president obama has referred to isis as a j.v. team. how wou

with advice from north korea? >> i would say -- i wouldn't discount that as a possibility. >> so in addition to that, you've also noted that north korea continues to procure for its nuclear ballistic missiles program, and from the region and a network of individuals and enemies in the region, and as you know, that violates u.n. security council resolution 1718. in terms of the ability of member states to directly or indirectly supply to north korea these kinds of materials, and obviously, there are many u.n. resolutions that apply to iran as well. but so as i look at that testimony, what more can we do to isolate north korea in terms of those that are supplying the country of things we don't want them to have and are against u.n. resolution? and who do we need to be tougher on in the region in that regard? >> well, i think that primarily in terms of proliferation security, we have a proliferation security initiative that's global in nature, multinational. that's also an important key because we have to bring in, w

senator fischer: so that would improve defense against north korea, correct? general scaparrotti: yes. senator fischer: do you think that south korea and the united states would push against the chinese reaction to that? general scaparrotti: well, this is -- the decision process is underway right now. it is -- i can discuss on a military perspective but from a political and strategic perspective, i think both countries are taking that into consideration right now in terms of the other impacts that have to do with the deployment of fad on the peninsula. senator fischer: as you look at north korea and their missiles, are they looking away from more traditional conventional forces which they have -- what is it -- the fourth largest in the world? are they moving away from that? general scaparrotti: i would not say they are moving away, i think they have changed their strategy. it is the fourth-largest military in the world. it is a very large conventional sort -- force that is postured along the dnc. it is still a very present in dangerous threat. they are not reso

no country is like north korea. north korea is in its own category. but if you set that aside for a minute, i would say that the cases are not quite comparable, why? there is no china in the iran piece. north korea has china as a friend on its border which makes military action difficult and sanctions even more difficult. there is no equivalent to china in the iranian case here. there is no one to protect them in the region. if anything, search plaid at them. but i don't think that holds up. >> and in north korea's case, it certainly may have delayed them from getting nukes. is that what we're mostly hoping for here? >> the good thing about the framework that everyone seems to criticize is that it kept north korea from getting a bomb for ten years. stopped long-range missile test for ten years. i would love to have that deal today where they're not having missile tests and nuclear tests. if you don't have an agreement then the country is unconstrained and they can do whatever they want. it's better to have limit on them rather than leaving them free t

so -- north korea. so that's kind of number one problem. >> okay. >> the second i think, is just insuring that the rebalance does what it needs to to insure that u.s. is properly positioned in the asia-pacific for the rest of this century. and under that fall a lot of things; insuring that the alliances are as strong as they can be, building new partnerships and in some cases insuring that the rise of china doesn't turn into a lucidities trap. >> when you look at the decision making process that kim jong un uses, and i don't know that the appropriate word is random, but would you say is there like a chain of command or a general structured way that decisions are made, or is it pretty much you're not usually certain as to which way something's going to go with him? >> yes sir, thank you. we don't know a lot about the decision making process inside of that regime. if you look at just the three years he's been the leader, he's changed his senior leadership more than his father and his grandfather put toget

north korea has sold iran enriched uranium and each year iran pays north korea somewhere between $1.5n to $2 billion for missiles, nukes and other weapons. jenna: that statistic was interesting because north korea is such a closed nation. iran has the money. could they actually be constructing a weapon of mass destruction in north korea rather than in iran? how realistic is that? >> because north korea is closed off and because we we don't have inspections we don't know what'ow there are a number of iranian and north korean personnel who fly over china and essentially means that iran has substantial operations in north korea. we don't know the full dimensions of that but there have been too many reports to suggest that this close cooperation to -- you know it's just so clear there's something going on there. jenna: china was part of the deal. not only talking about sanction because china is a big customer of iranian oil but talk to us about potentially china's role in iran's nuclear program and why we should watch that. >> china used pakistan as a surrogate to transfer nuclear weapons

i don't have to tell you we did not succeed in that objective. >> our policy was to stop north korea from acquiring a nuclear weapons program. it has done that and made weapons with ballistic missiles. >> the ambassador was the man who negotiated eyeball to eyeball with the north koreans. he argues william perry and ash carter were right when they said in a book they co-wrote in 1999 saying the -- >> it stopped a north korean nuclear weapons program for eight years. hundreds more weapons would be in north korea right now if that agreement had not been there. >>reporter: north korea cheated. u.s. intelligence detected the -- >> i'm not sure that there was any way to stop north korea from doing what it open did. >>reporter: the lesson for any future iran deal is distrust and verify. >> short term phrase for it is any time, any place inspections. that's important. no notice. anywhere we want to go. you can't take -- it's a military installation and take it off the list. you can't say you have to give us 30-day's notice. any place, any time. there are major differences between north korea

so a very big day here in north korea. >> thank you very much paula hang dock. r, who worked in the cia as deputy chief of the korea division. when i spoke to the defector this is someone who knew what it is like to live in north korea and fled north korea and had a reverence saying she is of our referation and an icon and in her appearing and her popularity? >> on one hand there are like that defector saying she is admired and a signal of reform but other defectors with access to friends still in north korea, will say there is recentment. -- resentment. saying she is wearing clothes that are more effective than several years of working. and when kim jong-un came to power there was indication was this a thought that kim jong-un would be different from his father. but the bloom is off that rose. we've seen that he's just as resistant to reform as his predecessor and just as bridge bridge -- belligerent to the neighbors. but with his father we never saw him with his wife. we don't see pictures but every few months. but she is so pretty and very well-dressed. >> jus

what is this latest visit going to do in terms of putting pressure on north korea and at the same timeg up support for it's a ally south korea? >> i think on the symbolic side we see ashton cart never his first asian trip going to two capitals tokyo and seoul. so it shows south korea is high up the list of u.s. priorities. he's also visiting the scene of an infamous naval attack that the north koreans sank a south korean ship five years ago. however, the one significant difference between the u.s. and the r.o.k. at the moment concerns visible defense as you mentioned, but that one area is off the agenda for the talks. so in that sense, i don't think north korea will be feeling anymore pressure. >> what about this latest police ballistic missile test that occurred this week. it is the first one in a couple of years but doesn't it tell us that whatever pressure international pressure is being put on north korea on this issue, doesn't seem to be working at this point. >> i think that's right. the u.s. is certainly worried about the long-term development of an intercontinental plastic miss

from north korea's perspective a snub to china, which has been under harsh criticism of north korea.m russia's perspective, it would have been a signal to the united states that if you threaten us we can cozy up to north korea. perhaps there has been a recalculation about snubbing china in this way. also potentially there is some internal event in north korea that requires kim ki-jong's presence. also potentially something more prosaic prosaic. there would have been lots of other world leaders and media in the mix, so perhaps they thought it would have been too risky to make this first international visit in that fluid situation, certainly much less controlled than it would have been in authority korea. and one academic said that the kremlin would have been found it difficult to deal with north korea. it does seem the kremlin has found it too difficult to negotiate on this occasion. >> harry fawcett reporting there. >>> and good news to report in nepal. two people are pulled out alive, one including a teenage boy. go to aljazeera.com. >>> police in baltimore turn over their findings

a year later, north korea conducted cyber attacks on south korea's banks and broadcasting stations. and in 2014 they boldly projected their cyber capabilities against sony pictures in the united states in an effort to inflict economic damage and suppress free speech. this example represents a trend that is persistent across several north korean capabilities. my top concern is that we have little to no warning of a north korean provocation, which could start a cycle of action and counteraction leading to unintended escalation. this underscores the need for an alliance to maintain a high level of readiness and vigilance. last year, the alliance took significant steps in improving its capabilities and capacities to deter aggression and reduce its operational risk. but our work is not done. in 2015 we will maintain this momentum by focusing on my top priority sustaining and strength being the alliance with an emphasis on readiness. this includes improving isr capabilities and critical munitions. the return of sequestration would negatively impact these priorities reduce readiness and de

the iranians have been on sight for all three of north korea's designations of a nuclear device. century, and also there is reports, which i think are probably true that in october, 2012 the iranians went to work in north korea at a military base just south of the chinese border there have been sales of north korean uranium to iran. this is just a long series of cooperation probably two decades long. >> so that may be why you're writing about iran's breakout time. it may not be two to three months as u.s. officials say but one day being the flight time from pyongyang to tehran. what are the realistic capabilities at this moment? >> well you know we do have a limited ability to affect this largely because iran is so far close to a weapon. but i think there are a number of things that we could try to do, which is first of all to ring fence iran off of north korea and also i think we need to redouble our efforts to try to deal with north korea and we can do that in terms of sanctions and we certainly can do that in stopping north korea in shipping which has been carrying all these m

a year later, north korea conducted cyberattacks on south korea's banks and broadcasting stations. in 2015, they used their abilities against sony pictures in the united states to suppress free speech. this example represents a trend has persisted across several north korean asymmetric capabilities. my concern is that we will have a little to no warning of a north korean provocation that can start and -- that can cause a counter reaction that will start a cycle. last year, the alliance took significant steps in improving its capabilities and capacities to deter aggression and reduce operational risk. our work is not done. in 2015, we will maintain this momentum is focusing on my top priority, sustaining and strengthening the alliance, with an emphasis on combined readiness. this ensures a rapid flow of forces into korea in the face of situations. sequestration would negatively impact these priorities, reduce readiness, and not allow us to have the forces required to defend interests of the united states and the republic of korea. on the peninsula, this will result in more military a

>> well sadly, the woman who put together the deal in north korea, wendy sherman, is putting togetherin iran. we've been duped more times than you can imagine by the north koreans. by the way, the u.n. the iaea they all say that the north koreans have been lying. i think that we now have is a real credibility problem as the chinese pointed out because now not only are we just saying hey, they're lying but we weren't even paying attention. this is really getting to the point where i think where, you know the chinese in the past probably liked the fact that we weren't putting our thumb town on the north koreans and paying attention every week. well now we're having this warning from the chinese saying hey, look over here in asia we've got problems united states. >> we're worried about iran supposedly getting one, there are many who would argue that they're much more along than we suspect, now north korea has 20 of them maybe more. is it too late? >> look hopefully it's not too late. what we have to be able to do is have a credible policy. we clearly have the chinese that are willing to

a pentagon official saying quote, we urge north korea to refrain from provocative actions that aggravates on fulfilling its international obligations and commitments. meanwhile, the north korean leader is setting his sights on personal indulgence. reinstating pleasure squads. a pro north korea newspaper said a tradition enjoyed by his father and grandfather, employing a group of young female kpanian handpicked based on good looks and measurements to be at their disposal right by their side for personal entertainment whether by synchronized swimming or a shower of affection. >> kim jong-il died in december of 2011. there is a mandatory period of mourning so it is possible that the son refrained from these practices in observance of those compulsory three years of mourning. now he's out of that period he may be in the process of rehesus resuscitateing these brigades. >> kim will take first country outside with leader with russian president vladimir putin in russia. his pleasure squad will not travel with him. erin? >> incredible story. thank you. >>> outfront next this suv just drove itsel

so north korea. so that's kind of number one problem. >> okay. >> the second is just, i think ensuring that the rebalance does what it needs to do ensure that u.s. is properly positioned in the asia pacific for the rest of this century. and under that fall a lot of things. ensuring the alliances are as strong as they can be. building new partnerships and in some cases ensuring that the rise of china doesn't turn into a lucidities trap. >> general scaparrotti, as you look at kim jong-un, the decision-making process that he uses, and i don't know if the appropriate word is random, but would you say there is like a chain of command or general structured way that decisions are made or is it pretty much you're not usually certain as to which way something is going to go with him? >> yes, sir, thank you. we don't know a lot about the decision-making process inside of that regime. if you look at just the three years he's been the leader, he's changed his senior leadership more than his father and his grandf

lou: with north korea at least it is understandable with laxalt -- lack of proximity but north korea's total dependence with the 20 warheads with the capacity to double that suggest clearly something is amiss is in the national security team for a very long time as we awaken to that reality of the emerging power of china. >> this is the utter futility with the failure of economic sanctions they could bring in the regime in a heartbeat with a lot of humanitarian assistance. this is the time. china should be very worried the north koreans will sell anything to anybody. and in 2007 to come back to iran. we don't know the extent but we should be very worried about it. lou: we are way over time but help us understand quickly why did china make this announcement today? >> they're very concerned about japan is out of control that we should have understood 20 years ago and this is an opportunity that i doubt the administration will take. lou: john bolton. votes in the poll tonight to do you believe the clintons make a good argument for those that oppose political dynasty in america? they're jo

system, which is designed to defend the republic of korea against air and missile threats from north koreakorea recently announced it plans to purchase patriot pac 3 missiles, which will enhance its capability to defend against the north korean ballistic missile threat. finally, let me say a few things about missile defense and russia. prior to the suspension of our dialogue on missile defense as a result of russia's illegal actions in ukraine, russia continued to demand that the united states provided legally behinding guarantees that our missile defenses will not harm or diminish the strategic nuclear deterrent. these guarantees would have been based on a criteria that would have limited our missile defenses and undermined our abilities to stay ahead of the ballistic missile threat. the ballistic missile defense review is quite clear on our policy. u.s. missile defense is not designed nor directed against russia and china's strategic nuclear forces. however, at the same time, we have also made it clear that we cannot and will not accept legally binding or other constraints that limit our

we absolutely cannot accept north korea's claims. >> japanese leaders say they'll keep pushing officialsn pyongyang to report on their investigation into the fate of the abductees. they say north korean agents kidnapped at least 17 japanese nationals in the 1970s and '80s. 12 of those abductees are still unaccounted for. in japan, the issue has caused much heartbreak. the families of those abducted have urged the japanese government to work for the return of their loved ones. they attended a meeting in tokyo. the relatives expressed concern over the lack of progress by north korea. >> translator: i wonder if our government's current approach is working or not. what we really want is our families back. we'll never give up on that goal. >> translator: i want government officials to think hard about how they can negotiate with their north korean counterparts on a human-to-human basis, and they need to take action. >> pyongyang formed a committee last july to investigate the fate of the abductees, but since then no headway has been made. the families believe north korea will not present an h

south korea is -- has an immediate proximate stake in preventing missile strikes from north korea. we worked closely with south korea to assure as an liance wealliance we can maintain the capacity to do that. one thing we bring to south korea, batteries to defend our forces deployed there and south korean forces. but south korea is also taking steps to enhance its own missile and air defense including sea and land based sensors, upgrading the patriot missiles and also pursuing its own indigenous korean capability. u.s. and australia long cooperation, partnership on missile defense research and development. most notably with regard to sensors. in the middle east we have a robust missile defense presence including land and sea-based assets deployed there. that is in addition to our efforts to work with allies to build their own capabilities to defend themselves. strong -- we have a strong relationship with israel on missile defense. i was the action officer in 1986, 6, for the very first agreement we had with israel on cooperative missile defense for research and development. it has a

north korea doing what north korea does. the new york arm north korea destabilizing the entire region and a japan that has been weak quickcally for quite some time. and japan quite in terms of the security. i've done a lot of reporting and research on this here. the japan japan is only tasked with defending the japanese islands. itthere are some 40,000 american troops that have been in japan at various air bases marine bases. you heard of the controversial one in okinawa. you heard of where they're thinking of moving to guam because of local concerns of the behavior and growing noise there. but it has come to the head over the islands that is nothing more than a pile of rocks the japanese call them the season can you could you islands. --they call them the senkaku islands, and japan will defend them if it comes to a fight with china. that has many on edge. this is a huge deal in japan. this legacy has lasted 70 years since 1945, since the end of the war. since the united states largely defeated japan and since the hiroshima

>> he said the failure in north korea. obviously because there was nuclear detonation, the north korean effort under clinton failed. under wenty tydy sherman, it failed. >> how would you assess his negotiations in terms of iran? >> he claims to have -- in the case, he talks about the iran reactor, about having no weapons grade plutonium. on that point, as a guy that represented the south side of chicago where nuclear power was invented i'd say it is all weapons grade. >> does the report that russia is going to -- >> it was a stab in the back. by selling the s300 to iran means that we have a substantial air defense issue against the s300. that israel and the united states will have to really take that into account. >> as it relates to the negotiations? >> i would say the bush administration did manage to halt that transfer of technology quite well. the russians knew just how bad it would be to turn. you see major portions of the negotiation, where they were relying on the russians to take custody of some of the missile mater

with advice from north korea? >> i would say -- i wouldn't discount that as a possibility. >> so in addition to that, you've also noted that north korea continues to procure for its nuclear ballistic missiles program, and from the region and a network of individuals and enemies in the region, and as you know, that violates u.n. security council resolution 1718. in terms of the ability of member states to directly or indirectly supply to north korea these kinds of materials, and obviously, there are many u.n. resolutions that apply to iran as well. but so as i look at that testimony, what more can we do to isolate north korea in terms of those that are supplying the country of things we don't want them to have and are against u.n. resolution? and who do we need to be tougher on in the region in that regard? >> well, i think that primarily in terms of proliferation security, we have a proliferation security initiative that's global in nature multinational. that's also an important key because we have to bring in, we

says it learned its lesson with north korea, which is why the nuclear deal they're negotiate, iran would have much tougher inspections of their nuclear facilities. to ensure the iranians don't cheat like the north koreans did. cnn, washington. >>> it was a five-month battle, but the u.s. senate finally confirmed the president obama's nomination for u.s. attorney general loretta lynch. >> in this vote, the yeas were 56 and the nays were 43. the nomination is confirmed. >> that 56-43 vote makes lynch the first avenue can american female attorney general in u.s. history. lawmakers in the republican-led senate refused to vote on her nomination until democrats cut a deal on abortion language used in a different bill. that legislation passed on wednesday, endsing what has been a bitter standoff. >>> a reminder to tune into cnn later today to see a ground breaking debate hoeftded by christian amanpour. she's brought together a panel of officials. what makes this distinct is you'll see reaction from the studio office. that debate is tonight. >>> in indiana, a high school musical performance came

>> yes, keep an idea that around this is all north korea. >> reporter: so it's all north korea, whereare is one safe spot but this is all mined as well, right? >> there's approximately, i'm assuming, 1,000 mines in this area. >> reporter: north korea is on the other side. there's actually a cement wall to prevent defectors from coming over from the south. it's called the bridge of no return. 60 years after the cease-fire, it's still a lonely place. >> that was cnn's erin burnett reporting from the dmz. >>> now, the fbi is investigating a california sheriff's department after video surfaced showing deputies punching a suspect nearly 40 times. federal investigators are looking into whether the man's civil rights were violated in a chase that also injured three deputies. stephanie elam reports. >> here's your pursue. >> reporter: it's a police chase that looks like something out of the old west. the 30-year-old attempting to outrun law enforcement on the back of a horse in california. the horse bucks the suspect. >> suspect being tased. >> reporter: and sheriff's deputies attempt to tase

the situation was worse than north korea at least those of us in the west are aware of the horrors of the north korean regime where we never hear about eritrea. >> it is a country that has been a one-party state since 1993, when it became independent. there's no independent judiciary. there's no independent legislature. no media freedom. no civil society that's allowed to function in the country. so i think it qualifies as a highly repressive regime. >> i've read quotes from eritrea, the repression is so bad, you're afraid to speak to your own family, open prison and pervasive control to describe life there. why has this regime managed to hold onto power under those circumstances for as long as it has? >> well, it's managed in part through a sort of a revolutionary identity, there's underlying a lot of patriotism among eritreans and a national solidarity that the government works on in ways that indicates anyone who expresses dissent anyone who balks at conscription for life is considered to be a tray or the. so theretraitor. there is indefinite detention combined with conformity, pat

assessment that north korea has succeeded in miniaturizing a warhead to put on there? >> we assess that they have the ability to do that, yes, sir. >> now, we have not seen them do that we haven't seen them test that, but i don't think the american people want us to -- you know, there's some things they want us to make sure we edge on the side of conservatism to make sure we get right. >> is that what it is in an over abundance of caution, as opposed to any evidence that they have the ability to do? >> it's a prudent decision on my assessment. it's a prudent decision. >> relatively new? >> i'm going to have to get back to you on that. the intel community made the assessment. >> when you came, in you came into an assessment that said we believe that they -- north korea has the capability to miniaturize a warhead and put it on the knoa? >> that's correct. when that decision -- was that last year two years ago, i have to get. >> yes, in the back. >> the chinese are now developing the new capability -- being launched -- to what extent are you concerned about the chinese ca

so it is very likely that north korea may not have the resources themselves to do this type of attack, but there are people are available to be able to actually hire them, and bring them in, and have them do the attack. >> so we are talking about the sony hack. the united states should first find out the exact reasons for the attacks and why sony was targeted, and lisa as a right people are now alleging because of the movie "the interview." we are still waiting to find out, and check out my screen here, what makes i.t. breeches successful. 100% of organizations surveyed had a significant attack in the last two years, 87% of organizations felt impacted by privileged misuse, attackers use privilege, and 67% of tax, and three main way gain access. compromised a privilege user's workstation, two, stoled a users credentials, and that's what this saying happened in the sony hack, and three through a pass a hash the attack. and lisa you found this website, the world's biggest data breeches selected losses greaten than 30,000, this is 145 million on ebay. adobe, 152, look at these names, chas

north korea will freeze and dismantle the nuclear programs. th korea and other allies will be protected and entire will be safer as we slow the spread of north carolina. >> the united states will monitor north korea. and only when it does so will they rejoin. >> north korea did a first nuclear test in 2006. it bought us a decade with north korea. >> and so the same thing for iran. >> exact same thing. and guess who did that deal. wendy sherman. and she did that one and the iran deal. >> we'll see what the details are as they come together. and the role of the un moving forward. thank you so much. >> and good news if you are planning a summer vacation am and why triple a said gas prices will go down this summer. and the historic drought. and some foejs left off and others pay a fair-- left off the hook and others pay a fair price. and comes in a pen. victoza is proven to lower blood sugar and a1c. it's taken once a day, any time. and the needle is thin. victoza is not for weight loss but it may help you lose some weight. victoza is an injectable

. >> some compare eritrea to north korea. the north korean government. is that a compare comparison? >> it is definitely a comparable country compared to north korea. first, most of the reports coming out from different independent institutions compared to north korea. north korea is a closed country. it is ruled by one man who would like to be worshiped and the same is the case in eritrea. he does not accept any kind of criticism, even in his own circle. this is why today the prisoners are estimated to be over 15,000-- >> political prisoners. >> political prisoners including many of them high-ranking officials from within the regime including ambassadors who served in different countries of the regime are now behind bars simply because they raised some concerns about the way the status of the country and so on. >> you say a closed country like north korea yet people are able to leave. we hear of migrants from eritrea making it into europe as well. >> these are people who are fleeing the country. these are not exceptions. they are fleeing first of all be

it is important day in north korea. with saying lots of heavy snaps from kim junk un and first lady. worth pointing out. the first lady seen in public this year. what are we to make of senate. >> well you know interesting, no other country on earth where the journalists would focus quite so carefully on exactly when a first lady was seen or when ape leader was seen as we saw. he had a disappearance last year. it shows how isolated this country is. the fact thament the receive sold shoe wasn't seen since 17th. that is making news and generating interest among observers. we saw her on september 17. the anniversary of kim junk un's father. his death. that of course we do see her just ahead of this very important day. commemoration of the birth date of the founder of north korea. she is being brought out for the main event. when it comes to members of the elite. when they go, disappear for weeks, on end, or months on end. or not noted. mentioned in state run media. that's noticed because observers the way you find out they

we saw the same deal with north korea. saw the same inspections are, and they have bombs and now we can't do a thing about the the people they murder because they have rendered immune because of their nuclear weapons. >> that's what you're very good at. but there are a lot of facts to discuss. it's parameters. we don't know if we can sign this by the end of june. it reduces the iraq program. you take 10,000 kilograms and bring it down to 300 kilograms and you have very intrusive inspection processes. and all by itself without anything else makes it much harder for them to get atomic weapons. >> that's right there. that's what i i want you to respond to. the president says iran will not have weapons grade plutonium. what about the facts? forget the behavior. there's all differences about terrorism and everything. i'm talking about saving the world here. a country will not get a nuclear weapon. what about the facts? did you hear anything today to give you any hope we are headed in the right direction? >> i first want to than

olivia: north korea could double its exports. north korea may have 20 nuclear exports -- warheads.wlett-packard chief executive will formally declare her campaign online on may 4. ben carson and mike huckabee also plan to enter the gop fray. baseball's home run king is no longer a felon. barry bonds appeared before a grand jury investigating steroid just review should. the verdict was his only conviction. tom: earnings coming out. and number of blue chips. we will be looking at revenue dynamics. congress. we will have a nice international relations track on congress. we look to iran. this is wonderful. this may be my book of the summer. disruption. that was the nerd word turned overused clichÉ for 2013 and in the last year. it is a surveillance -- simple is the new disruption. "simple rules" is the new nerd must-read. where did this come from? it seems too easy. >> it came from when kathy and i started studying companies in the mix of the dotcom bubble. we were trying to differentiate what separated simple and complex companies. they would apply a handful of simple rules to a criti

now, whenever we look at north korea it's always a challenge isn't it, to try to glean what exactly isnside that country. it isn't called the hermit nation for nothing. what can we -- what should we be looking for in this particular session, do you think? >> well, there are two things, one we'll be watching on a policy level to see if any announcements are made, you know last year, the rah regime announced that it was going to be launching a series of special economic zones and also trying to attract more tourists and then they shutdown the country last fall for more months because of fears y bowl actual it will be interesting to see if they make any statements about their plans for economic -- special economic zones. and also are also on a personnel level as you mentioned in the outset will there be new appointments to the national defense commission and in particular will kim jong un's sister have any new titles come is out of these meetings. >> this is more should be looked at in terms of kim jong un shoring up his support and putting in the people that he wants that he knows are go

the propaganda balloons infuriate north korea.outh fired back several months ago and they can't be stopped as they are civilians and this is freedom of speech. residents who live near the border disagree. last october, they physically intervened to stop activists sending these balloons and angry that they were being put in the line of fire which is why lee says he flies his balloons at night and does not usually invite media. i want my people to know the truth, he says that is when revolutions happen. if you tell the truth in north korea, you die. but by sending balloons from here i can tell the truth in safety and in secret. lee doesn't know for sure who, if anyone will see this movie but he says he knows he has to try. lee sent more than 80,000 dvds of "the interview" in this batch. it's his fourth launch. he assumes the more he sends, the greatest the chance that kim jong-un's image will be shattered. wolf? >>> russian hackers broke into sensitive information, including the president's movements and calls. how did they get in?

because north korea has a few number of nuclear bombs. israel has about 400 nuclear bombs. therefore, they both are the same. they have nuclear bombs. there is a big difference between iran and israel. they really belong to two different wars on nonproliferation. karen is member of the nonproliferation treaty and israel has never been ready to accept it. there is no evidence in the iranian nuclear program. iran does not have nuclear bomb. israel has about 400 nuclear bombs. during the last 10 years, iran has given more than 7000 inspections international atomic energy agency, the iaea. it is completely unprecedented during the history of iaea, no other country in the world has given access to iaea, the international atomic energy agency, like iran during the last decade. during the last 50, 60 years has not given even one inspection to the iaea. therefore, i believe the international community and the world, they should judge who is wrong, who is right. iran does not have nuclear bomb. iran has accepted every level of inspection, transpar

north korea and cuba we've been sanctioning them to death. they don't have a pile of oil and gas to live on off to support the regime. once you got that scenario, the sanctions are never in the long run going to change anything over there. i would suggest getting rid of all the sanctions and replace it with tariffs. tariffs make money for america unlike sanctions which stop economic anything. they let an industry develop if a country. that industry puts pressure on their government to get the tariffs removed. you can move tariffs around like we do in china. there is no industry in iran. if you had companies exporting rugs to america all of a sud sen, we don't like what you are doing. we had 100% tariff and the rug companies are calling up the crazy people saying chill out. we want to sell rugs. it would be better for everybody to go more in a free market with tariff penalties in place when necessary. >> that is not on the table. john, what do you think? they sponsor terrorism. they support our enemies. they call for death to america, the elim

applause then from the rest of the audience as they say made up of among other people defectors from north koreae u.s. ambassador after the north korean had left said i will say it must be chilling for those subjected to the terror of the regime to be confronted with bullying and destruction in the kind of behavior that you have seen here today. >> thank you, james. there at the united nations. the european union has been in does niya for talks on the crisis. many of those people to governments one in the capitol tripoli the other hundreds of miles away in the port of that brook. the u.n. has given the two governments until sunday to come one a political agreement to try and solve the crisis. our reportner libya. they come from different countries. one of a long journey that took them from long journeys. each had strong hopes for the future. but for judy, it all ended in a detention center. she had decided to leave after her husband died. >> they cut me in the dessert. soy came -- i came here. before this burden, they caught me. one week here like two week -- i want to leave this place. >> these

there is the continued instability and worry exactly what north korea is going to do a nuclear powered country inscrutable to western powers. secretary kerry and his japanese counterparts has met in new york. and here's how secretary kerry described it. >> the guidelines we have worked on and have been announced today will enhance japan's security to terror threats and continue to peace and stability. the united states and japan stand together in calling for disputes in the region to be resolved peacefully. >> also, talk now of relocating the controversial marine air base on okinawa. for years the japanese, particularly okinawans have complained about the noise and behavior of american service people stationed there. this comes on the eve of a state visit of japan's prime minister beginning here tomorrow in washington at the white house. >> one more question. as japan increases it's military posture, does this mean that a reduced role for the u.s.? perhaps some troops coming home? even as they build this new base will it mean the closure of some other u.s. facilities in japan? >> well,