the mind says it will not going -- it will not work on this. the unions are up in arms about obamacare. why not let it take effect and owve the natural constituencies rather than doing it with this kind of extraordinary act, which is a block that you cannot really deliver on. >> senator ted cruz says he would do everything necessary, possible topel -- defund obamacare. that includes a filibuster and anything else. >> he also says he is probably not going to succeed. you are a parent and you get sick of your kids and you say, go play in heavy traffic. heave a feeling this is what is doing. he is saying to those people, go play in traffic for a week and then the grunts will come in and save your life. >> there is a messianic fervor to this. i do not understand witchcraft and what they are doing. >--ear in this case is that will the president hold firm to this? will he veto any bill that comes to him that keeps obamacare? will he hold firm on the debt ceiling? if so, he prevails. if he waffles or engages in any kind of negotiations with the crazie

>> again, i do not know. there i do not really know.ow do i know better than people who live in these countries or go there more often than i do? it might. it might not. i cannot answer that question because i do not know the answer. >> what do you think? >> i think one can at least posit an answer in the sense. we in the united states forget our constitutional form of enforced by an independent court was unusual, was not followed in most of the from 1780 until 1948 in germany. people often look to the united states. what has happened around the world, increasingly in the post- second world war era, more and more countries turned to what i call the american system, a written charter of rights. why? not like the way parliament was working in germany, for one, and quite a few other places. when you begin to have models that are similar to the united states', you begin to look at the united states courts, but you also look at other courts. if you are in south africa or two english-speaking constitutional courts, they look at our opinions a

it is not a smart law. it was not supposed to take effect. they are holding economic progress hostage. that is the way things are these days. some people say they cannot walk into gum. >> one more piece of gum to throw in there. the farm bill came out of the house without food stamps. it is something your caucus was heavily propose to. do you see this moving through the house and the next month? ?s that going to get lost thehis is where you see how house of representatives is so .ummed up in it dysfunction you're talking about not funding the nutrition programs that so depend on.en i have a hard time believing that there are members of congress who are so gummed up they cannot walk into gum that we will allow a nutrition program that helps feed and let it children just languish because of politics. i cannot believe that. the dysfunction is big but i do not think is complete. i believe there are still some voices in the house that want to get things done. we will find out. we are supposed to get things done. we do not get elected to tell peopl

i do not think it is helpful for federal employees not to be working. do not think it is helpful for people who depend on services or who need visas and passports not to have them readily available, so we work awfully hard to keep the government operational. we are trying to make some changes to obamacare, and the ones we have got on the table right now are pretty modest. ofy mostly affect members congress, and they mostly give individual americans the right to decide whether or not they should be subjected to the mandates of this law. >> all right, congressman, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> countries neighboring serious say the number of refugees they are receiving is putting unbearable strain on their resources, and they are pleading for greater international support. in syria, the fighting goes unchecked. we reported on a horrific bomb attack in which many children received injury due to a napalm like a substance. they began their journey on a refugee camp on the turkish border, and there are disturbing images in their report. >> northern syr

we may not be able to win this, but that does not mean we should not fight, get some concessions that can slow the train down, i believe that can happen is that president slowed it down already, he understands this not ready for primetime, that employer mandate was not ready, almost 20 democratic senators up for reelection, are they not thinking? maybe it would be a good thing to be delayed one more year. >> do you think that is where this is going? they may not de fund it. >> if they were not out here planning flag saying this is where we want to go, we would be you know compromising on their turf that is the role it is not a popular role. >> i was looking ated to cruz, saying that was rick santorum a couple years okay, sort of the rodney dangeield of the party. little did they know. the mainstream seems to say we need another mainstream guy to win it. >> look at australia. australia had two elections where socialist won. and what the liberal party -- conservative party -- they are reverse. neil: water turns opposite way so do politics. >> liberal party in australia went along with i

it does not mean she is not beautiful or not nice. it means sometimes that some make me dream. summing we dream. >> inspiring you. >> yes. >> one thing that is very interesting in this exhibition if you have a section called urban jungle. you go and see it and it looks as though it is what you would typically say is taking animals and jungle and things i suppose from africa or perhaps india, but a lot of animals in it. as to get closer to the pieces, you realize that these are actually coutoure pieces. it is as though you have tamed the jungle. there is the extraordinary leopard dress that tells you where the coutoure are and how many hours of workmanship are in there. so when you pay the bill, perhaps it is justified. [laughter] there is one that was 1,032 hours of hand or again beating. they're very few designers i can think of in coutoure who would do something like that. we were used to seeing coutoure very much what i would call salon clothing, a very beautiful and very delicate, but not with the sentence animal, vegetable, natural being brought into coutoure. was doing co

you are not lying. you're not old anything back. what we have seen, and what i i want to make sure you promise us you are telling the truth. i am proud and perfectly willing to tell you everything i have said is the truth and based on the information as it has been presented to me. and based on my own experience in war, which i resolved to do if i was in a position to make any choices, fully vetted. i am comfortable with it. i would not make this recommendation if i were not. i believe we have vetted this. we have asked the intel people. we have even had a separate team created that had independence from the original team to totally vet, check all of the analysis. find out if it could have been the opposition. therery case i would say is a comfort level with this that is rare in this kind of situation. i would not have said you could prove this case if i did not believe it. >> apologize for the insulting question. >> i think it is an important question. we should ask more questions like that. i don't know how i would improve on my f

>> no, i do not think so. rouhani does that because iran has to put on a nice face, because the only other alternative would have been war. there is already war in syria. another front would have been too much. now they need time. >> how much leverage is the new, allegedly new administration in tehran actually going to exercise to de-escalate the g lobal and regional issues? >> i am not sure very much, but i think -- >> here's your coat. see you later. get the formalities right, but you know, forget, let's nevermind about the morales. -- moralities. >> is too easy to always criticize. >> they want to speed up negotiations. >> saying you want to destroy israel, everybody is like, we do not talk to iran. when he says, we want to talk. let's try it at least. >> they are making efforts. >> let them. >> the other question is an internal issue. it is a way to disarm the opposition, that it was -- ahmadinijad was never easy. now, is it like dismantling part of this young, educated people that at some point were askin

that is not true, is it? >> it is not sure and all.etimes that can become an excuse, not to be proactive. you cannot just expect a job to show up because you have a college degree. you have to be more creative, engaged in a jury finding a j like a full-time job and so you get one. gerri: a lot of students think that will i'll year i have this fancy degree and a market with a college services pleasant office. it is their job to lead me to a job. you say, you have to have your own brand. when you're 19 or 20 or 21, how do you establish a brand? >> it is very easy to do online. 1920-year-old son better establishing an online brand than older people because they're so technologically savvy. easy to start of work website where you are posting things that relate to your degree or area of interest. be careful what you put out there because a thing you facebook, tweet has updated permanence. you don't want your brand to be a party every night. gerri: that's exactly what i was going to say. a lot of students at pictures of that they should neve

not build it, he did not have it constructed. he bought it as-is, so he came to the building. the second is that, given the numerous opportunities to attend the project sponsor did not attend the neighborhood meeting. i don't know what went in and i know that the schedules are complicated and we are busy but if it were my client i would urge him to be there and in fact i have done that when i was been on the other side. >> many references to the building code and how the stories are counted and i just remind everyone that this is the planning commission and not the building commission. and the project starts 6 feet below the adjacent home, the dr requestor's home and rises to a level four feet above it so it is actually down the hill from the dr requestor's home. and which and it is still yet taller, at the end of the day. and lastly the planning code may be met. but the residential design guidelines have not been and we have laid it out clearly in our brief, we are here if you have questions. >> project sponsor you have a two-mi

i would not, could not in the rain. not in the dark, not on a train, not in a car, not in a tree.n a house, not in a box. not with a mouse, not you do not like green eggs and ham? i do not like them, sam i am. could you, would you with a goat? i would not, could not with a goat. would you, could you on a boat? i would not, could not on a boat. i will not, will not with a goat. i will not eat them in the rain, on a train, not in the dark or in a tree. not in a car you let me be. i do not like them in a box, with a fox, i will not eat them in a house. i do not like them with a mouse. i do not like them here or there. i do not like them anywhere. i do not like green eggs and ham. i do not like them, sam i am. you do not like them, so you say. try them, try them and you may. try them and you may, i say. sam, if you will let me be, i will try them. you will see. and this page, he's simply holding green eggs and ham on a fork, preparing to bite them. say, i like green eggs and ham. i do. i like them, sam i am. and i would eat them in a boat. and i would eat them with a goat. i will eat

showdowns,ns, not not cliffs, not chaos, not cartoons, which we get tonight, and which we have gotten every single night since this majority became the majority. when this government shutdown because of them, mr. speaker, americans are going to have to continue to pay their taxes. thespeaker pro tempore: time of the tournament has expired. the gentleman from kentucky. yield twoon: i minutes to the chairman of the appropriations subcommittee of the v.a.. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas is recognize for two minutes. >> thank you, mr. speaker. it is time to get a few things straight around here. we have in the house of representatives passed the defense department appropriations bill back in june. we passed a military construction v.a. appropriations bill, make sure our veterans are taking care of, back in june. we passed legislation to protect our homeland, department of homeland security, fully funded, everything be president asked for, everything the agencies asked for, passed out of the house early this summer. we passed the energy and water appropriations bill. the

it will not be whether or not we create just any old job.cess, and our it is absolutely the commitment we made to one another. the absolute measure of success of our ministration will be whether or not the middle class is growing, and the things that allow it to grow and allow it for security are able to be put in place again, providing real economic security and peace of mind, creating real jobs, jobs you can raise a middle-class that have jobs, jobs built this country. unlike any other country in the world, we are uniquely a product of having the largest middle class in the world. when the middle class does well, the wealthy do very well, and the poor have an opportunity. the president believes and has demonstrated that to grow the economy as you always have from the middle out, not from the top down, and he has acted on that believe. the president of the united states and i along with all of you understand, you have heard me say a number of times, and i will keep saying it. the middle-class is not a number. it is not $50,250. it is a valu

not vote, indians could not vote, and certainly blacks could not vote. host: it sounds like you do not believe in american exceptionalism. caller: i do not. if i were robbed the richest bank account and i've celebrated for being of the labyrinth that -- a philanthropist because i have money, is that exceptionalism deco host: next caller, what are your thoughts? caller: america, our freedom, makes us -- to do whatever we want. that last guy, both of them had some pretty good points. -- we justcan is have our freedoms, our choice to do. that is being an american exceptionalism. we care about our fellow man. other countries don't. and we do. we try to help out that social justice -- help out but social justice is american exceptionalism. the president is a socialist. and that doesn't work. capitalism works. host: when you say we care about does that mean you support -- caller: no, the president is going after his people because they don't believe what he believes. host: that is brian in salt lake city, utah. on our facebook page -- and on twitter -- there'l

but they do not have to enact any new changes? enactthey do not have to new changes?> it is a complete swindle. it is a drop in the bucket for the nfl. makes $3 billion a year. the plaintiff attorneys got a lot of money out of this. didnfl is insulated, and it it by exploiting the fact that these people are hurting and wanted a quick settlement, and it was threatening six or seven years of litigation. >> it also threatens the "frontline" documentary at the past. >> absolutely. upn has pulled out. we -- espn has pulled out. we will now have to see if it impacts contract. >> the judge did not have to buy it at iop will not. i am with you, throw it out. >> the story is not complete. >> 2-wood be the first ever to stand up to the nfl. >> -- he would be the first person to stand up to the nfl. >> last word. see you next week. ♪ >>> from washington, the mclaughlin group, the american original, for over three decades, the sharpest minds, best sources, hardest talk. >> issue one, labor pains. much of president obama's focus has been on the middle class and quote/unquote, bett

it is not about whether or not he would have tapered.endable down the line. he said he would communicate better than greenspan. dennis: the issue is not that summers was a hawk, it is that summers can be a jerk. >> i have seen the headline constantly throughout the media. it should be about companies forward guidance. it is economic -- this has got to stop. cheryl: the fear of it itself is the bigger problem. >> enough already. the markets have always, you know, recalibrated and adjusted. the short-term rate is what is key now. the fed will telegraph it. cheryl: charles, what bothers me about this is i thought the markets were finally adjusted to the idea. now, we see the markets up. they are hopeful again that the throttle back is not coming. charles: i think the fed, whatever they will do, more or less made up their mind. by the way, i happen to believe that they will start to taper. >> may be still continue to buy mortgage-backed securities. charles: i want to say so what. charles: the more they taper -- >> the economy really is bette

i would not, could not in the dark. i would not, could not in the rain. not on a train.ot in a car. not in a tree. i do not like them sam, you see? not in a box. not with a mouse or with a fox. i will not eat them here or there. i do not like them anywhere. you do not like green eggs and ham? i do not like them, sam i am. you, with aould goat? i would not, could not, with a goat. would you, could you, on a boat? not on aot, could boat. i will not with a goat. train.a rain -- not on a not in a tree. not in a car. let me be. i do not like them in a box. i do not like them with a fox. i will not eat them in a house. i do not like them here or there. i do not like them anywhere. i do not like green eggs and ham. i do not like them, sam i am. you do not like them, so you say. try them. try them and you may. try them and you may, i say. sam, if you will let me be, i will try them. you will see. this page, he is simply holding green eggs and ham on a four, preparing to bite. say, i like green eggs and ham. i do. i like them, sam i am. and i would eat them in a boat. and i would

that is not -- really not that.the main problem for us, for teachers, i think, is that we, that is perhaps really surprising. we do not have enough time to do what we need to do with the basics. for example, in the primary school we know -- we now have to teach foreign language very early. but french teachers do not know how to teach a foreign language in primary school. they are not trained to do that. so you took a world where they used to teach french. now they have to teach english. they do not know how to teach english. so you do not teach english, and you teach less french, for example. >> so time becomes too short. you need more time, basically, a longer school year? >> not exactly. but we need to do the main things first. i think that is the problem. we want our school to do a lot of things. we want our school to do computer training. we wanted to do foreign languages. we want it to do a lot of things -- morals and ethics. sometimes we just forget that we have to teach them how to read, how to write, and we

this is not a question of whether or not you trust the president. i do trust the president of the united states. this is a question now of what kind of authorization the congress will give to the executive branch. >> how do you go forward in terms of changing it to make it more narrow so you and other members are more comfortable? >> a number of changes. one is a prohibition of american troops on the ground. i would argue that we should be limiting our action to use of our stand-off capability so that people aren't put in the line of fire, but to make this very clear language that american troops will not be on the ground. secondly, there has to be some expiration date in the legislation. you have to be careful because you want to be deterring the use of chemical weapons. that is the narrow purpose of this. so there should be some opportunity to take action that the assad regime would use again chemical weapons. but you can certainly deal with that situation. for example, you could say that after the initial strike, the only additional authorization

did not move the needle. either in support for a war that very few people support, and an act that few people see an ingame. he tried. >> of. >> guy untold we all should go to. higher education is the single most important investment. >> i am told you should go to college. >> olympic clothing must be made in america. why do people freeload? what you think you know, often is n so. myth and truth. that is our show. tonight. john: what you think you know, may not be so? we know what. we watch tv while good what we know not be so? our instincts are often wrong. when i was a consumer reporter i thought consumer regulation was the answer. rahm. it hurts america of more. i thought america was running out of fuel, overpopulation, made in america. wrong. >> majority leader harry reid is upset the usoc bought uniforms from china. >> they should be burned and start over again. john: people are desperate for jobs. isn't it outrageous we buy uniforms made overseas? no. in this stupid. let me bring in professional help. wh

this is not right. this is not fair. it is not just. madam speaker, the voters have spoken. the supreme court has ruled. the affordable care act is the rule of the land. it is constitutional. it is compassionate. it is what is right. .t is what is necessary so much progress has been made that young people can stay insured under their parents. more people will have coverage to help them see a doctor when they need to. coverage that covers. the american people are counting on us trade we must fulfill our constitutional responsibilities to fund the federal government. the prong -- the promise of health care to american people. we will not go back words. we have come too far and we cannot turn back. madam speaker, health care is a right. it is not a privilege for the oflthy grade every citizen the united states should be able to see a doctor when they need to. every single one. this is not the american way. it is not the america we believe in. we should care for each other. we should look out for one another. we are one family, one house, the american house, and we shall put the

absolutely not. you have one trend, the consumer side over 32 percent of americans either have no access are limited access to the banking system so 20 percent of americans with home-equity your mortgage relationships have been kicked out of the system. imagine 20% of baking accounts are in the shadow of the market that slows down to a snail's pace the what has caught up is the commercial lending market the junk-bond market that is out of control right now. i don't think the impact will be as prolific if you look bad-- severity issue of the housing industry but bubbles all over the place to the lending market in the bond market they will be problematic the biggest is how we weeder cells from low interest-rate environment. >> i don't know if you were offered the opportunity to follow-up with 60 minutes what would you like to say? >> my "60 minutes" interview was 90 minutes i think they aired three minutes of it. i don't have a control of their editing process but hopefully i have given some sense of w

not on a train, not in a treatment not in a car, sam, let me be. i would not, could not, in a box.ot, would not with a fox. i will not eat them to with a mouse. i would will not eat them in a house. i will not eat them here or there. i will not eat them anywhere. i do not like them, sam i am. sound familiar? the character sounds just like the republicans. i would not, could not support obamacare. not here or there or anywhere. back to the story. you do not like them so you say. try them, try them and you may. try them and you may, i say. try them. i believe that's president obama saying try obamacare. say, i like green eggs and ham. i do. i like them, sam i am. in the end, he likes green eggs and ham. so senator cruz, this story does apply to obamacare debate, but you got it all wrong. you were told to try it and never d did you think we wouldn't notice your green eggs and sham? karen finney is back with us. she's our resident dr. seuss expert. >> that's right. >> karen, the republicans won't even try green eggs and ham. >> you're so right. i think we have a new refrain for the rep

not once, not twice, not three times, but multiple times. we will estimate in the teens and the opposition estimates is more than that. now we have this most recent use of weapons of mass destruction in contravention of nearly 100 years of a prohibition against their use. >> i don't think that's the dispute. the dispute is not that the correlation in intelligence. >> the dispute is what are you going to do about it. >> the military to influence the reality on the ground. >> the dispute is what are you prepared to do about it. if you believe by doing nothing you are going to stand up for the norm and somehow reduce the threat of the use at some future of time, that's you're right to believe that but i think and the president believes deeply and everybody at this tabletable believes that flies against all common sense and human behavior. >> let employee ask the question about iran because i think it's very important. and a compelling narrative. let me ask you this the circumstances can are very different. not to trivialize what has happened in

i will not. as a representative of this city and of people that i think are represented on this thing, i would rather just go there and express myself as a commissioner. we are on television. and i will not do this another 10 minutes. as i said, this kind of work, this kind of work is not -- it's not generally done. i've never seen it done at a commission. we are attempting to do more than just a statement. we are attempting to write a resolution which is something i said i did not want to do. and i have sat here and labored while we tried to put something together. but it's very clear to me at this very second that there are a bunch of sentiments that we cannot appropriately articulate and should not be in this meeting trying to do that. so, unless you can make a general statement, general motion about this, then, you know, i have to call a question that we are now creating a resolution. i can't do this. i will not do this. so, this is not work that's to be done at the commission nor have i ever

it is not that you have of bundling america. you're not going to have any at all. i think to your points, that is really critical because these are the two most important arab countries. they're going to decide the future of the region. and spectacularly and completely this interested in how this plays out. we could be faulted for making mistakes. but the fact that we don't see any role for us or any sense of urgency as to whether egypt will find a critical economic program with the imf or the fact that syria could be, you know, could be stabilized, a threat to israel, ultimately spread to the gulf. that is actually quite baffling. i think in my opinion it is a colossal strategic mistake on the part of the united states. this you cannot blame on the military or on the officials. it is a conscious decision is being made to downgrade the middle east as a strategic focus the president goes to the region and does not deem. a constant. neither up nor down. it is not where the real center of the issues are. he went time them are for a six hour visit to reward the ruler f

it's not exact live what -- not exclusively what happened. i think the -- hindsight 2020 but it's hard not to see that setting the red lines is not the best strategy and probably later on kind of trying to go to the congress under the situation where there's no technical or legal need to do it is something that you will have to consider once again and ultimately finding yourself in an unplanned situation of negotiation. it's not a perfect way to deal with it and the syrians especially or with the russians to a certain extent will find ways to dilute the kind of clarity that was there when kerry said okay, twler in seven days, give us within six months we'll destroy it all. and from a syrian point of view it's a great, great achievement. basically it's a victory for the next half year. i think that assad cannot remain in power the. the fact that you don't have a simple way to execute it now doesn't mean that you have to lose sight of what is the nature of what he had done or went through and what should be the consequences. he cannot -- there

this is not a bluff. the idea that some of the people will call in and say he is bluffing and week, they are crazy. the strength comes from peace, not war. war is the final action, but, yes, ma'am, i do believe in his approach. host: so from the beginning he supported the president on military strike. caller: i didn't say a support the military strike. him, butng i support his approach -- the military strike as the previous caller was saying, did not come from him. it came from the right- wing of those chicken hawks who have never gone to war before, the defense contractors who always see profit in anything we do militarily. i said i support barack obama, and in particular, his decision to go back to the united nations, go back to the world, yes, ma'am, i think that nato and the united nations as well as the arab league should get over there and into that conflict, not us. host: gary, republican caller. what are your thoughts? caller: good morning. obama laid outnt for doing whatever he decides to do with

or not reviewed here is how you can reach out to us -- or not.ere is how you can reach out to us. @cspanwj on twitter. facebook.com/cspan. and you can send us e-mail, journal@c-span.org. newspapers highlight will happen over the next couple of days. from the front page of "the post " -- joining us to give us a sense of what could happen, the leadership editor of "roll call." thank you for joining us this morning. let's start with the house. s speakere boehner has regarding the short- term funding bill. guest: republicans are scheduled to meet at noon today. i think that is going to be a pretty important meeting. they have to decide as a behind ae, do they get specific alternative to send back to the senate? they have some choices here. they could just take up the senate bill, put it on the house floor, and it would probably pass with mostly democratic support. a lot of republicans would not vote for it because it doesn't the fund -- doesn't defund obamacare. or they could polut on a rifle shot, something smaller like a delay. there are things tha

they're not going to want to go back. these folks are not conservatives.tell you something. for someone to be libertarian and conservative and talk about staying out of bedrooms, we ought to get government out of our bedrooms. now you got them looking up some woman's crotch. >> uncle sam. >> of all. he's either a gynecologist or a pervert. >> but how can you disrespect the country like that? thank you for being here tonight, joe madison, joy reid. thank you for your time as always. and we should note we reached out to the koch brothers to join us. they directed us to the group they support which put out these uncle sam ads. >>> coming up, we'll introduce you to congressman phil gindry who's whining about his six-figure salary. that's next. >>> big news tonight. we have a new member of the complainer caucus. congratulations to georgia congressman phil gingrey. the national review reports he was in a closed door meeting whining about how capitol hill aides can go lobby and make $500,000 a year. then said quote, i'm stuck here making $172,000 a year. oh, booh

she's not undercover. the agency would not let her speak.t the end of the day, the american public has been trillions of dollars on this since 9/11. the hunt for osama bin laden is a huge success story. why not talk about it? >> it was interesting. we began shortly after. i got the rights to peter's book. it was a wall before we started filming. at the time we are starting to film, all the controversy over the "zero dark 30" was breaking. the door started closing quite rapidly at the white house, at the cia in particular. the irony is we can talk what we want but the documentary is where we really wanted to just let people tell their story. that is where he faced a lot of roadblocks because of the cooperation with the movie. >> in both intelligent work and in intelligence related journalism, we are in a post- snowden era. what do you predict will be the effect of snowden's leaks when we ask for interviews and information? >> i do not think it will be a problem. in some cases it might be. people ultimately always want to tell their story. i h

not. here's what he told me. >> every one of those people who were killed were the nicest people that you could know. they were great co-workers and would never harm a fly. and they were responsible, great people. government workers and contractors. and i just cannot believe that they were subjected to that violent, horrible death that they had. and that's the most devastating part. for me, you know, i got away. that's no problem. i got lucky. it was my birthday, and i consider myself the second luckiest person on that day because my friend was the first luckiest person. but all those other people, they did not deserve that death to die like that. and it was horrible. that's all i have to say about that. >> john weaver also told me he wants know how the navy yard killer got his security clearance to begin with and then held onto it despite repeated run-ins with the police and alarming signs his mind was to say the least extremely troubled. many people wondering the same thing tonight. at t

it is not now.ill collins says he wishes it was the case now. >> it certainly is not very look look at where these two guys are coming from. vladimir putin deals of his country in a rather cold manner. as you know from past experiences, if he doesn't like you, people disappear and go to jail. he is dealing with our president was a community organizer, at best, were not even sure how great of a community organizer uis. he doesn't have any reason whatsoever to talk to obama about anything. neil: welcome he wasn't so great on immigration crackdown, so he's not exactly that. but having said that come i'm wondering where this goes for the two big leaders of the two big powers who don't talk to each other. they clearly don't like each other. but what does that mean? >> well, there is a lot of bad things that could happen if we do strike. i'm not saying that we should or shouldn't. but if we do, one of the testimonies of people yesterday, one of them said that we need to be prepared for foreign casualty. m

saudi arabia not qatar not russia not the united states going against. her i'm going to guess. what i'm just again you are against war and so i would like to hear i would like to hear your views about dust pot who launches chemical weapons and scud missiles. what is your is making its way do you think i'm going to see. where and say anything and i add what you're going to get my go ahead give your opinions has only do you jump in who so you're going to question what time and i'm going to let me go. garrett. ok i'd like to just pose this this problem that we are looking at in syria. of historical precedents i'm old enough to remember vietnam know vietnam is a case where. or you had a regime you know that was in power supported by foreign foreign forces i.e. the united states for decades had built up a very formidable military apparatus military machine very much modernized trained by the united states and so forth and yet it was impossible to get rid of that regime except through a process of combined military force by another regime in the same country t

would not talk about. we had a first lady comfortable talking about abortion. the public had changed. she could not do it. >> she never dreamed she would be first lady. betty ford. there were extraordinary circumstances. she said the your self. -- the your self. yourself. on the one hand there are tensions between the east and west wing. sometimes it is overtly ill. hostile. majority thought she was stepping over the line, and they .ere in for a surprise had a huge following, particularly among women and when and issues. men's issues. barbara bush really did seem to say so what. >> it works better in the white house than anywhere. there was a quote, i dressed fine. i just don't look so good. chuckled. many feel a kinship. manyas a first lady considered stylish. they were very different women. >> barbara bush came across as the first grandmother. she helped create that image. she is implying interest of our spouse. >> she got burned like abigail adams. >> it did not turn out to be as well received as she ha

match or is not right for our community. because they have raised about 2 feet up. and also, the back wall has been extended to about 4 feet. added a bathroom. so it is a very obvious changes, so it will make a disturbance or making, you know, very difference and look for the community. the reason they bought this, is because due to the health of the owner... but according to the plans that they have submitted, in order to get to the bedroom upstairs they have to climb stairs from the main building. from what i believe is just two parties support for this. actually it is support me, support my doing. the two of the people. however, in the document only mentioned one, the other one was not being mentioned. the project owner who gets the support if those people is not within the 100 feet of our community. even though according to the letter that was being drafted by the home owner's association. in that particular letter indicated that they are only making very small and minor changes. however, in the reality, the actual proje

if i'mcf not getting something done, not only the constituents not happy, i as a member of congress is fulfilling what i set out to do. host: he writes the millennials are less ideological than baby boom parents. polls show they are less prone to negative judgment on interracial marriage, unmarried couples living together and mothers and young children working outside the home while parents and grandparent work alone, young americans are team oriented. with these characteristics, what do that mean for crafting legislation? guest: i think it means that it's clear that there are many different subjects and topics and issue areas where there is more opportunity to find common ground and actually come up with solutions to problems. we were talking earlier about addressing the infrastructure need in our country. when you really take a moment to just elevate the conversation aboved partisan rhetoric that dominate so many of the conversations in this town and go back to the things we're hearing. people are not talking about why the democrats, why the republicans are talking about our roads ar

it is not. the shell contract is 4%, less than 4% of the energy that will end up being provided under clean power sf after the next decade goes by. the shell contract is just priming the water pump, if you remember the old water pumps. and the idea here is that we need to use the renewable energy credits to make it cheap enough to compete with pg&e, to get that first small 30 megawatts out of the eventual hundreds of megawatts that we're going to build locally so that we can kick start the program successfully and still compete with pg&e. >> what was your type of concluding thought around? >>> so, here's the deal. ms. malcolm is getting us half of the goal. the thing that's going to get us to the green new deal and make sure that it happens right away is to show that the vision that you all saw from local power of about a billion dollar project over the next 10 years, that's what brings us the green new deal and the union jobs, so show that that can happen. sfpuc is making great progress and is

i think it's not because the failure is not permanent. it's something that is happening now because we have not changed the whole society. all we did is change what women want, and now we have to change what men want, and now we have to change what society is willing to do for a family so, for instance, universal day care. we have to make this world completely different for ourselves, and then -- >> i think that's such an important point. one of the things that makes me so sad is that we were really close, that 1971 thing that walter mondale pushed that was bipartisan, comprehensive child care -- where they were going to have universal, you know, preschool and day care like they do, and in scandinavian countries, and nixon vetoed that saying we don't want the vast moral authority of a vast government between a nontraditional family structure which made a messy life, unconventional, what was written about, and that would have changed so much, still would, i think, that that would change so much. >> well, just paid maternity leave. >> of si

they will not go to conference. they will not negotiate. and typical of them, they say we will not go to conference to negotiate to reconcile the difference between the house and senate bills, which are quite different. then they say the president will not negotiate. the president is always negotiating. bravo for him for declaring that the full faith of the united states is not negotiable. but everything else is a normal discussion that you have. i think you see what is happening here. they cannot even come forward - what they say in the morning does not exist in the evening. they cannot even negotiate with themselves much less anyone outside because there's not a talking point. really, let's clear the air with this. we have a responsibility to pay our bills. a large part of the deficit that is being subjected to the debt limit increase was amassed during the bush years. find me, please, one statement that any of these people made about the deficit and its rapid growth under the bush administration and the change from when president clinton

this is not iraq and this is not afghanistan. this is a limited proportional step that will send a clear message not only to the assad regime but also to other countries that may be interested in testing some of these international norms, that there are consequences. >> rose: the attorneys relation committee heard testimony today from secretary of state john kerry, chuck hagel and martin dempsey. >> we now have learned that the hair and blood samples from first responders in east damascus has tested positive for signatures of sarin. so my colleagues, we know what happened. for all the lawyers, for all the former prosecutors, for all those who have sat on a jury, i can tell you that we know these things beyond a reasonable doubt that is the standard by which we send people to jail for the rest of their lives. some have tried to suggest that the debate we're having today is about president obama's red line. i could not more forcefully state that is just plain and simply wrong. this debate is about the world's red line. it's about h

not [speaker not understood], not privatized. city college serves a diverse range of demographics. not only for those who transfer, but newcomers who don't yet know english. my mom is one great example. not only -- also those who are trying to get certificates to enhance their careers. i won't be able to complete my geographic information system certificate at city college closes because i have to take pre-requisites for classes at state ~. so, basically, my mom took esl classes three times in her life when she was in san francisco. she'll be starting her third round of esl classes in the fall. and she wants to master english in order to have a better life in america, and she won't be able to do that if city college closes. my brother is also starting city college in the fall and won't be able to if city college closes, won't be able to achieve what he wants to do, and he wants to study law. i've been humbled by my experiences at city college and it's nothing like what my high school teachers and media have told me. i regret [speaker not understood] many of my [speaker not understo

because the news of the world just is not this funny i'm not like damnit i'm not. ok. you guys talk to the jokes well handled. critique three. three. three. three. two three. three. three. breaking news this hour in. syria says it's willing to put its chemical arsenal nations control a proposal put forward by russia's foreign minister to avoid a u.s. military strike. while the blame game over last month. in syria continues our. close to the conflict say rebel fighters are now planning a chemical. israel. this potential. elected for. opposition. refuses to concede defeat his supporters right now and. rally in the center of moscow.

an action is simply not an option. at the same time there are those who are charged with protecting the public that have been very clear that they need to retain some sort of discretion and order to do their job. after many days and hours of difficult conversations, while i am proposing to bring to the table of this board is an outcome of those deliberations debating and creative thinking to bring together our jointly stated commitment against unjust racial profiling, deportation, and keeping our community safe. like all compromises, there are aspects that we are introducing, but does not make [speaker not understood], but i believe that our overall objective which is taking a stand against scom, while helping our public safety officials do the work they would like to do will be put in place with this very, very limited carve out. the amendments that i'm introducing i've handed out copies to all members of the board will be to establish the two-part analysis for law enforcement to use to make sure that their public saf

this is not a trivial matter >> no. not at all.y former activist is now the leading hawk of the obama team it is clear they make it up as they go along. you said you heard a lot that you saw hegel and the chairman be did not hear much when senator corker said white nobody is authorized from the president john kerry and chuck hegel waffle they said the opposition has broadened the authorization would support the resistance but in fact, the objective is do deter assad from using chemical weapons to send a message to other terrorists then they went on to say it is a limited time and scope and duration to include ivory and and all the others there will not be boots on the ground. >> can get we have heard the speaker of the house and eric cantor the majority leader both men could not wait to rush to make their statements in front of the cameras where is the opposition? >> there is no skipjacks and the closest you have is frank wolf could have been pleading for a special committee to investigate benghazi. guess what has been swept under

we will not. and to think we can is not rational. >> he's saying you're not rational, congressman. >> well, i would just point out, jake, there were a lot of republicans just two weeks ago who said we were going to go to war with syria and today we're not. so look, when the american people get engaged, they have a way of making elected officials see the light, find the lord and do the right thing. this bill's the right thing. it funds the government, i don't see the democrats introducing a bill that funds the government. this bill funds the government and more importantly, it delays and stops a law everyone in the country, everyone knows is bad including the president who has delayed parts of it for big business, including james hopper, who called this thing a law that's going to harm working americans, change the work week. everyone knows this is bad. >> congressman, it's just not accurate to say that everyone knows it's bad. i think the latest polling that cnn has, 42% or so of the american peop

not only can you not sit down and not stop talking, you can't lean on anything. you can't touch your desk which you're standing right next to. nobody else can touch you. you cannot have anything to eat. you cannot have anything to drink, meaning you can't have a sip of water. but still, senator wendy davis stood there for 13 hours and in so doing, she won. what she did worked. and she wasn't just standing there talking for 13 straight hours, because she had 13 hours of stuff she wanted to get off her chest. she was doing a specific tactical thing. she was trying to run out the clock so texas republicans couldn't take the vote they wanted to take on their new radical anti-abortion bill. so very specific tactical goal. and she was talking for a reason. if the republicans couldn't come up with some procedural way to get her to stop talking before the clock struck midnight, they wouldn't get to take their vote. and then that bill would not pass and it would not become law. and she did it. she won. they tried to stop her from talking. they pulled out of a hat every pr