we should not only do that, they should be not only convicted but identified as criminals, not as warriors et cetera. in some other cases where they have been captured on the war field. i wonder, did you have reaction to that? >> senator, my only point would be this. i think at the and of the day, we need to have full confidence there may be situations where going to a court may be given the right position. i just want -- i think it is absolutely vital when we leave here at the end of the day, it's not because we believe what we have created is a second class system. we need to look at this that this can stand alone in the world and this can be judged by what we are putting together today. that's my only point. you ought to feel comfortable sending anybody to the process with these changes because we believe it is a fair and just position. joot ultimate test would be the subject to these procedures and consider them to be appropriate. >> yes, senator. thank you. i would conclude by saying what our bill does not address. one, we do not decide whether a person will be tried who is going to b

in court, we should not only do that, but they should be not only convicted, but also sort of identified as criminals, not as soldiers, warriors, et cetera. there are other cases where captured on the battlefield or because of practical considerations, the military tribunal will work. do you have reaction to that? >> senator, i guess my only point would be this is that, i think we need at the end of the day to have full faith and confidence that what we're creating in this bill is a fair and just process. i am sensitive that there may be situations where going to an article 3 court, going to federal court, may be the right decision given the facts and circumstances that exist in a case, but i just want -- i think it's absolutely vital when we leave here at the end of the day, it's not because we believe that what we've created a second-class legal system. we need to look at this that this can stand alone in the world and we are willing to be judged by what we're putting together today, and that's my only point is that you ought to feel very comfortable sending anybody to these commissions process with these changes because thi

as forgetful, they say. it is not just about the wounded warriors, the fight is about the families. for sara way, and has been a long and exhausting journey to capitol hill after losing an arm and suffering traumatic brain injury in iraq. it required some extremely have. -- extremem rehab -- extreme rehab. therefore, it came at the time and expense of his wife. it did not solve the bigger problem. >> we have met families that are facing the exact same problems we had 5.5 years ago. >> the wounded warrior project took up the cause. not just for the troops, but for their families. >> many have lost their jobs, health care, and the savings. >> her son requires round-the- clock care. that meant cindy, a single parent, had to quit work >> what happens a fight and up with cancer? >> this group is pushing congress for the creation of a caregiver program. it would mean monetary compensation for care givers, extend health benefits to those that have given up their jobs and offered a mental health support. for every wounded warrior, there is a family making its own difficult sacrifices. one o

not how we want to remember steve mcnair. but his time in baltimore, he was a warrior and champion and played football for this team. as a city they embraced him. >> thanks. and we have more on the seven-day forecast. travel, stress, eating on the run. diarrhea just stops me. (announcer) kao speeds to the source to shut down diarrhea and its discomfort. stop it fast with kaopectate. jody was always healthy. her pap was always normal. still, i recommended she also get the hpv test. her pap looked fine. the hpv test showed... she had the virus that could cause cervical cancer. (mamie) most hpv infections don't cause problems, but another exam confirmed she had cervical disease. but jodi's story has a happy ending. (jodie) we caught it before it became cancer. (mamie) so, if you're 30 or over make sure you get the hpv test along with your pap. (announcer) the digene hpv test from qiagen. take the test. not the risk. >> rain chances pretty skimpy until next weekend. ♪ normally i'd say you need a new o-ring for the accordion vent. but that's not the problem. it's something-- oh, there's your problem. luther! luther was the

as heartbreaking. >> the rst hacker to be a guy lookg for u.o.'s, who admitted to a computerisuse, without any waior. is not really a good examp, is it? -- without any of warrior - any lawyer. >> this was at a time when the u.s. was on a heightened state of ale following t 9/11 attack it was dage totaling more than $700,000. while admits hacking he says therwas no malicious attempt or the damage. >> i agree the punishmt should fit the cri. i am not trying to get ay from my punishment. theshould try in theu.k. >> ♪ >> supporters come from many arters, including celebrities whoelped make this a video, and they argue therocess is unfair despite the long history at today'sjudgment, this cse is not over yet. though gary mckinnhas almost n out of options,is lawyers pl to ve another appeal. >> politians, celebrities, and rievance. the ression cbinedith television and other contents, photojournalists are beming too expense. we have thistory. >> theyre among the most striking images of the 20th ntury, photographsf war and disaster, poticians and performers, artists and portsmen. therere 10 million of them a st archive, take by photographers for arench photograph agey.

as sort of major conceptual enterprise, that not being undertaken. and john conyers deserveall the credit in the world, bute isind of a lone warrior in this enterprise. and unlesshere's a broader nsensus politically, i don't thwe're going to get a whole lot out of this. >> and if you studied the history of the cia, yocan see that at least frank church's forts brought the country ten years, maybe 15 years worth of relativeonesty out of an organization that had never be asked to provide a of that. back to ve here. cast ourories back there, e real motivation, the dn the road payoff for th republicans, if thwhole plan would have worked, if rove's plan would have worked was wt? >> well, the most dip taupic vision would have been one tha the inndence of the partment of justice would have beenomplety compromised, in which the mechanism of the adnistration of the prosecutoriafunction of the american government uld be brought holey within the purview of theresident of the united states andis staff and they would decide on a wh who to property and when. and th would be utterly, utterly un-american and corrosive to our entire system of justice. at a more sort o

as a sort major cnceptual enterprise, that's not being undertaken. anjohn conyers deserves all the credit the world, but he is kind of a lone warrior in is enterprise and unless there's a broar consensus politically, i don't ink we're going to get whole lot out of this. >> and ifou studie the histy of the cia, you can see that a least frank urch's efforts brought the country n years, maybe 15 years worth of lative honesty out of an organizati that had nevereen asked torovide any ofthat. back to rove here. cast our memories bac there, the realmotivaon, the down the road payofffor the reblicans, if the whoplan woulhave worked, if rove's plan would have worked was wha >> well, the most dip taupic vision would have been one tha the iependence he department of justice would ve been completely compromised, in which the mhanism of the administration of the prosecutorial function of the erican government would be brought holey with the purview of the predent of the united states d his staff and they would decide on a whi whoto proper and when and thatould be utterly, utterlyn-american and coosive to our entire system of justice. at a more sorof banal lel, what

the annual adaptive water sports festival and we are here talking with our wounded warriors as they learn to kayak or notstay with us. d(ú0ç@( if you're like a lot of people, you have high blood pressure... and you have high cholesterol. you've taken steps to try and lower both your numbers. but how close are you to your goals? there may be more you can do. only caduet combines two proven medicines... in a single pill to significantly lower... high blood pressure and high cholesterol. in a clinical study of patients... with slightly elevated blood pressure and cholesterol, caduet helped 48% reach both goals in just 4 weeks. caduet is one of many treatment options, in addition to diet and exercise... that you can discuss with your doctor. caduet is not for everyone. it's not for people with liver problems... and women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. to check for liver problems, you need simple blood tests. tell your doctor about any heart problems... and all other medications you are taking... or if you experience muscle pain or weakness, as they may be a sign of a rare but serious side

warrior. with people like franken on the hill, this country industry in deep trouble. check 2. as mentioned i was in switzerland last week and i did notitter on the street. let me repeat, i drove hundreds of miles. there was no litter anywhere. switzerland is the cleanest country in the world. i went there to look at the swiss environmental approach. the place is stunning. there are 7.5 -- there are 1.5 million people living in switzerland. 22% foreign born but apparently they are all green. according to the environmental performance index. switzerland is number one in the world and it shows. health care mandatory for the swiss but the government does not pay. and the worker, the company that he works for do. however, the poor receive subsidies from the government. can you choose your own doctor there. retirement is also funded by workers. not by the government. by law, retirement contributions are deducted from all paychecks. companies are required to pay into retirement accounts. if you want to become a swiss citizen they don't want you it takes 12 years or longer and you can be rejected without a reason. you sneak in there, they wi

not as busy as yesterday. >> but no rest for you today for the earnings warriors today. >> where are you going? >> been doing so well. >> thanks. >> on the calendar before the bell, we have things like coach. and coach is always interesting because you wonder how luxury goodmakers are doing. mcgraw-hill, we'll have that one. office depot, viacom which had a heck of a rebound recently and u.s. steel. a quieter day on the economic front except those bonds, at 9:00 ooeastern, the case-shille index. at 10, consumer confidence. the government auctioning off that 42 billion in two-year notes today. then we have a bunch of politicians on today which is cool. >> yeah. >> though, rendell is a democrat. he was form dnc guy. we have both sides. but you know we will hear about two hours of america's mayor. >> okay. >> he may say some things -- he may disagree with some policy initiatives of the obama administration -- >> but he might agree with some. >> you can listen. takes two sides. there's a big debate going on in congress. they can't even bring it out of committee at this point. there's debate. we are

as well. the business said it would give half of the proceeds on a select dated to make wash. the charity said not taking it. feeling the situation was exploitative. with us now the culture warriorst huddy in for gretchen carlson and margaret hoover. make-a-wish foundation very good charity. kids dying and they want to do something while they are still healthy enough to do it. this charity pays for their wish. these people want to give the money no cash other than washing the car in the bikini would you take it or not. >> not no strings attached but they want an affiliation. they want pr bump. they want to say we're affiliated with the make-a-wish foundation, a wholesome foundation giving kids a wonderful experience. and these ladies are basically scantily clad, washing cars and the guy who runs it actually has an online poker hostess company. bill: what does that have to do with it. >> good for him. >> certainly within their right to consider the affiliation and the collaborative relationship. bill: you wouldn't take the money. >> if you want to give money to make-a-wish foundation, you can give money. do you have to have the -- just deny where you are getting the money. bill: y

as a warrior. his sense of being a warrior was not just about battlefield.he liked to have fights about everything that he believed in. he was a warrior fighting to save wild america. the title kind of came naturally. the subtitle has the word " crusade" in it. to confront roosevelt on wanting to save the grand canyon, mesa verde, or the bird refuges in florida, it was an act of -- you better be strong. i do not know any president that was as bold as roosevelt. nothing infuriates me more worried and people say that bill clinton was like theodore roosevelt. he is nothing like him. george bush was nothing like him. he was a deep, introspective writer. he never lied. >> we did not have time to talk about your bob dylan interview order book on concrete. we will have to do that later. host[captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2009] >> presidential domestic policy advisers that worked from president nixon to president bush talk about the present -- talked about the lessons they learned while serv

as governor, her major achievement was increase in the payout, major increase on taxes to oil companies. in alaska like everywhere, democrats also like higher taxes and more government payouts, she was not a culture warrior's the message she's going to try to take as she positions herself in republican politics in the lower 48. that's very damaging message for the republican party. i'm not even sure it works in alaska, but it sure is not going to work in the rest of america. >> it's interesting you talk about what works and what doesn't work. this is what got the biggest applause. it was a dig at what seems to be her favorite target, which is the media. >> you represent what could and should be a respected honest profession that could and should be a corner stone of our democracy, and that is why -- that's why our troops are willing to die for you. so how about in honor of the american soldier you quit making things up. >> does that work? >> well, the secret of sarah palin's post election success is her ability to turn her personal grievances and resentments and make them expressions and grievances felt by other people. but you don't win elections in america on a platform of grievance and resentment. ele

i am not saying that i can't conceive of a situation in a rich the military commission would be appropriate. i don't see these terrorists with the alleged terrorists as being warriorsnals and thugs that are mindlessly in heedlessly in iraq war crimes. and prosecute them as come most. >> what i heard there was and i want to make sure i am here what you are saying and that is in this situation the commission is not necessarily the best idea but you do not rule out another complex in the future a commission may not be a bad idea then why not just set it up now? >> well, -- >> year earlier argument was we have gone down this path and zero cannot and i you have said it that it is ok maybe in the future that may not be determined so why not set it up, let's just do it. >> i didn't want to get into that because it's not a bad argument, once i set it up i would use it unless we're talking about at the. >> i guess my thought on this is an i listened to the chairman explain to this in a variety of ways and most recently in in one of our committee meetings. i am convinced him that is used to be a logical approach so i am struggling. of your rationale why isn't in this situati

not the case in court -- i think we should have the case in court. i think they should be convicted and identified as criminals instead of soldiers or warriors. there are other cases where the military tribunal will work because a practical considerations. admiral macdonald, do you have a reaction to that? >> my only point is this. at the end of the day, we need to have full faith and confidence that what we are creating in the military and in this bill is a fair and just process. i am sensitive to the fact that there may be situations where going to federal court may be the right decision given the facts and circumstances that exist in a case. i think it is absolutely vital that when we leave. the end of the day, it is not because we believe that what we have created is that second- class legal system. we need to look at this and know that this can stand alone in the world. we must be willing to be judged by what we're putting together today. you ought to feel very comfortable sending anybody to these commissions with these processes and changes. it should be because we believe it is a fair and just system. >> if people are subject to these