. >> as to say, notuch has come fromhe approaches so far. the sittion in ian is complicated. is txpectation much more will come from the scks >> the speechhat hillary clinn gave today, she gave for a number of reason it sirected tohe washington elite. as f -- this was r washington policymakers. she has been injuredor the past nth. she brokeer elbow. thiss her coming back oo the scene. i do nothink it was designed to lay do specific licy markers. i think, s much the american domestic consption is designed to remind people she back, the oma administration has as stro policy vision. they ll leverage america's smart power, as they'd like to call it these days. they wish to ore up the obama ministration's foriegn policy at this. >> more top storie for you fm around the wld. french offials ar sing two people were killed in an plosion in the east of the country. this i a chemicals plant. several others were injured in the blast. the causis not yet clear the ant mes material such as polystyre. officialsin mexico say 12 people have been found tortured and shot de. 11 men d one wan wer

>> notuch, kickg a few around. how about you? >>aller: got your book, "real money"ing it. >> you a the best. w in paperback. >>aller: how about sallie mae? >> sallie mae -- let me tell you someing -- when i wasaway on vacation, one of thr days of the year that i take vacaon on, i saw sallie mae go toten. and people were e-mailing me, calling me, should i take it in sallie mae. i did noall them communists. i simply said, no. and now tt the stock has pued back, i want you to pull e triggeragain. i think sallie mae is a winner. i this ihe phillies are winners. i say, stick with cram! >>> the lightning round is sponsored by td ameritrade. >>> i'm talking abou china. look at thatuy on theey the, huh? they are not ont then, then- i'd be happy to repeal e whole bill of rights in a second. ylish for me. "m money" will be right back. >>> this a bad idea? th tie? same color as the shirt. i got it at costco. got this tie for 12.99. to me, it los good. >> boyah fromhe jery shore, jim. >> where are you hangingut? which beach? >> my beautiful

. >> re: if you say "notuch," at's an interesting respons >> but letmedescribe the tension that existed at thend of last yea the gap between w much the economy could produce and how ch it was producg amounts to about of g.d.p.. th's about a trillion dollars a year. again, projectio that it might go on for more than a yearor two. so that would suggest recovery act that was $1 to $2 tllion size in terms of macroecomic necessity. onhe other hand, you start lining up all of the specific policies that spend out immediately and that he high bang for theiruck, yomay have $200 to $300 billion package. so thenou have this tradeoff. do you try to meet me of the macroenomic necessity even acknowledging some of t things you're put in pla don't spend out as rapidly as you'd like or that have less bg for the buck tn you'd like when they do spend out. and you start blding up the package to include tax cuts-- which are partially saved rather than spent--nd other provisns that spend out re slowly than a six-month period, for example. we wou upith a $700 to $800 billio package, balancing that sort of spe