dzvenislava, thank you for finding the opportunity to come to us and talk about oleksa novakivskyi.ill start with one phrase that resonates with me terribly. this is the phrase of taras luzynskyi, an icon painter from lviv , to a collector, a collector who said the following: i hate the expression novakivskyi is talented a ukrainian artist, he is a world -class artist, no one will put him on a pedestal, except for us. i think that this can be said not only about nobakivskyi, but also about many ukrainian artists who are misunderstood and under-seen by us, yes. er, tell me, please, what is the uniqueness and value of novakivsky and why is he still not on the pedestal, in your opinion? huh, i think the first one will be easier, the second one will be more difficult, uh, why these, what's the value? well, we know all the world names, it's klimt, monet, van gogh, and these are the people who essentially helped the world civilization, world art to move. from such monochrome photographic art, which was more about photographing reality, to move to a completely different world, where there

michael's cathedral, that is, this is the son of oleks novakivskyi, this is the son of oleks novakivskyihen with... and then your father is the grandson of oleks novakivskyi, yes , as a grandson, he, ta, he as a grandson, when he became a director of the national museum, then he began to make contact with the students and give back, that is, through him i understood what the school was and who its students were, uh, well, actually, it was precisely because of him that i began to somehow, well, touch on this and research it, but unfortunately, his story with the national museum ended very sadly, i would say that he had very bad habits, if... there was a story, we won't go into it much now, but due to the failure to fulfill a certain party wish, a case was opened against him , he won the court, but i didn't want to go back to the museum, and in fact , these are exactly those years, what a year it is, well, it's not actually the beginning of independence, but we know from the beginning of independence, as well as the fate of chornovol, we understand that... that the appearance a person who

novakivska, the great-granddaughter of oleks novakivskyi and the founder of novakivskyi space, was myks for being with us, these are proper names, i 'll see you in a week. thank you. watch this week's judicial control with tatyana shustrova in the program. the most outrageous judges-offenders, how to keep their position. after all, they continue to be judges and receive a considerable salary. but why does the vrp weakly consider complaints against the servant of themis? the supreme council of justice acts to preserve the status quo, not to clean up the renewal of the judiciary . congratulations, this is judicial control, a program to ensure declarative and real the rule of law in ukraine. the foundation for the further development of our state is, in particular, high-quality judicial reform. ukraine's chance depends on it. for joining the eu. today we will talk about those who bring this introduction closer for us, and those who, on the contrary, distance it. but first to the news. the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office sent an indictment to the court against the acting h

, did sheptytskyi give it to novakivskyi?true, my god, such a beautiful story, many, many myths, well, first of all, i don’t say, don’t support, i wouldn’t say, i wouldn’t support, i would finance from the point of view, yes, the villa itself, just this villa, indeed, it was bought by sheptytskyi, but also donated, but not to novakivskyi, but donated to the ukrainian national museum, which he created. yes, of course, novakivskyi also paid for the school, well, that is, for this school premises, and for the accommodation that was next to him, he paid, he paid with his paintings, and this was one of the reasons why he and the museum had a very close relationship, and he never had a personal exhibition in lviv in his life, not once, because actually it was svintsitsky who was invited by sheptytsky to be... director of the museum, he tried, well, as an enterprising man, he tried to constantly lower the price of paintings, and since novakivskyi knew that he was for it, well, that is, it was his opportunity to keep the price and li

novakivskyi based a large part of his, his works, he actually just too, on the revival and very... there are a lot of symbols of the revival, very actually there are a lot of reinterpreted myths that he transferred, which are, well, let's say, for the average of a person in soviet times, it was very harmful, well , it was not possible to bring it into the world context at all, that was it, it was dangerous, it was dangerous, and that is precisely why, if we are talking about him, one of the reasons is the fact that he was prokrastino. it led to the fact that they cut off everything they could from him and left such a scrap that , well, how at one time we had a scrap of shevchenko, and as a singer of the poor people, well, this was a scrap of a man who could actually paint peasants, and that is, this ethnography is what left the only thing, as it could be in... inscribed at least somehow in the socialist realist if life and if as some certain as some certain element at the same time as the same taras luzynskyi he said there is a big problem with us art critics precisely because, well, in

thank you for finding the opportunity to come to us and talk about oleks novakivskyi.ne phrase that resonates terribly with me, it is a phrase of taras luzynskyi, an icon painter from lviv , a collector who said yes, i hate novakivskyi's expression and... he is a world-class artist, no one will put him on a pedestal, except us themselves i think that it is possible not only about nobakivskyi to say, yes, about many ukrainian artists who are misunderstood and unappreciated by us, right? tell me, please, what is novakivskyi's uniqueness and value, and why is he still not on the pedestal, in your opinion? i think the first one will be simple. with the second, it is more difficult, why these, why the value, well, we know all the world names, this is klimt, monet, van gogh, and these are the people who essentially helped world civilization, world art, to move from such monochrome, photographic art, which was more about photographing reality, to move to a completely different world, where there is... understanding of oneself in this life through art, and this is how various