therefore, iran , which is a member of the npt , should also have access to it, but it has been included in the jcpoa. exception and they said that only iran in the world these laws are implemented and in the case of others, it is not very interesting, for example, iran must be subject to extensive conditions and restrictions, as mentioned, which have been embedded by iran's enemies in america and the west , there are various and exceptional surveillances in addition to those surveillances that work. the agency is foreseen, that is, for example, suppose the international atomic energy agency, the board of governors and the united nations security council, the joint commission of the purchase working group appointed by the joint commission of the countries that export dual -purpose films and free reform, which means that the lesson is only about iran, on the other hand, in addition to security monitoring again, the protocol and extra-protocol surveillances , the additional protocol, and this is also interesting, the protocol, i mean access to even sensitive military centers and our milita

field of international relations and actually, what does it mean because he is not a member of the npt and in at the same time , he is one of those who is not actually a member, but with it can also have its own standard, for example, the standard of germany is fixed, i can not accept it, but the release of active water substances anywhere in the world is an invitation to call this issue, but again , behind the scenes, this is a political trend and savings for convulsions. it is coming in the region that this will happen, the mammal can not be accepted by the people from the chinese government , what practical action can be taken, besides , there is no practical action about not dropping a letter into the ocean, a deterrent to prevent food production in the future or at least in polluted waters of the north coast of at it does, but the food that is expelled and a special situation is done is the lie of china's complaint in international forums . we discussed the news with you about the fact that the deputy minister of economic diplomacy of the ministry of foreign affairs is going to or

of the islamic council , what would be your opinion about the jcpoa, according to article 4 of the npt treaty, any country can have the right to use peaceful nuclear energy, and iran is also a member. pt should be available but it came to the agreement, but it has included some points for this and many points that are considered as points for mp members are ignored here for iran as an exception and they said that only iran in the world implements these rules and in the case of others is not as interesting as this, for example, iran must be subject to extensive conditions and restrictions that have been mentioned by iran's enemies to america and the west, there are various and exceptional surveillances in addition to those surveillances that are the work of the agency, i.e. for example , suppose the international atomic energy agency board of governors and the united nations security council, the joint commission of the purchase working group appointed by the joint commission of the countries that export dual-purpose and so-called free films, that is, pain only in the case of iran, on t

if treated differently because it was in the npt and cheated within it. and then you have iran, which has a nuclear threshold state. we don't live in a world where there are 30 or 40 nuclear weapons states. and that wasn't over that assumption wasn't always the in the 1950s. there were studies by the rand corporation in 1962, president gave a speech at the u.n. general assembly. he talked about a world of 30 or 40 nuclear weapon states. that led to the negotiation as the culminated the nuclear inoperative nation treaty. we don't live in that world and one of the major reasons why we don't and there's an established literature on this is the us extended deterrence commitment why germany doesn't think it needs its own nuclear weapon. japan doesn't. south korea doesn't. the nuclear umbrella. the national security adviser, jake sullivan, talked about the hardware and, the software of extended deterrence. so the during the ukraine war the united states naito argument did its dual use nuclear capable aircraft in in europe. there are questions about northeast as

joined with north korea became nuclear weapon state 2006 treated differently because it was in the nptave the wrong which a nuclear threshold state we don't live in a world where there are 30 or 40 nuclear weapon states that wasn't that assumption wasn't always the case in the 1950s there were studies 96about the rand corporation 1952 president kennedy gave a speech at the un general assembly he talked about a world of 30 or 40 nuclear weapon states that led to negotiations that culminated nuclear nonproliferation treaty one of the major reason and there's establish literature on this is the u.s. extended deterrent whcommitment. why germany doesn't think it needs its own nuclear weapon japan doesn't south korea doesn't the nuclear umbrella. the national security advisor jake sullivan talk about the hardware and the software of extended deterrents. so during the ukraine war the united states nato augmented its dual use nuclear capable aircraft in europe the questions about north east asia were united states and russia and then soviet union withdrew tactical nuclear weapons from the kore

as signatories of npt, they could go to china or france tomorrow and ask them to set up a civil nuclear program and to allow for domestic enrichment. they could do that tomorrow if they want to do. the question i ask myself is if the u.s. is involved in this, what will that mean 10, 20, 30 years down the road? and what is the alternative? geoff: it sounds like you are not against it, certainly, and that is not necessarily the policy of the israeli government over the last few decades. there has been a long tradition opposing nuclear expansion in the region named after a prime minister who bombed an iraqi nuclear reactor to prove his doctrine. does this israeli government believed it no longer applies? quick no, it definitely applies. you have countries in the region that can have civilian nuclear power. that is a different story. saudi arabia joining the nuclear club would produce a widening of nuclear proliferation in the region and other countries would work to acquire uranium enrichment capabilities in their own territory, so what does israel want in exchange for that? >> we are not

if treated differently because it was in the npt and cheated within it. and then you have iran, which has a nuclear threshold state. we don't live in a world where there are 30 or 40 nuclear weapons states. and that wasn't over that assumption wasn't always the in the 1950s. there were studies by the rand corporation in 1962, president gave a speech at the u.n. general assembly. he talked about a world of 30 or 40 nuclear weapon states. that led to the negotiation as the culminated the nuclear inoperative nation treaty. we don't live in that world and one of the major reasons why we don't and there's an established literature on this is the us extended deterrence commitment why germany doesn't think it needs its own nuclear weapon. japan doesn't. south korea doesn't. the nuclear umbrella. the national security adviser, jake sullivan, talked about the hardware and, the software of extended deterrence. so the during the ukraine war the united states naito argument did its dual use nuclear capable aircraft in in europe. there are questions about northeast as