the money is going to nrcs. so it is srfs so it is capital for new technology, new treatment facilities, identified sources, consolidating, it does include planning and design. but to the point i made with respect to the lead, it doesn't include identifying the problem. so it's capital investment after you've already identified the problem. but it doesn't include the, you know, finding, you know, doing, maybe, the more sophisticated, innovative technology to find the problems. so that's just a consideration. clearly, the big real cost, at the big cost, is on the infrastructure investment. and that's what the money is dedicated to. because that's how the srfs, that's what they're intended for. but again we're dealing with some of these newer issues, like the emerging contaminants, or, frankly, the old issues, where we've got people being exposed to that and drinking water for years and years and years and years. we may want to consider some expanded eligibility. again, not for the bulk of it, but just for some of

the nrc, the nrc, the rnc, they're happy with joe biden going out and talking about the contrast betweenlicans and biden administration because blica joe biden is just going to talk about how they're terrible and he may say you're not blackc ,you don't believe in his policies and republicans have plans to offer in swing states, especially when it comes to these issues that you justhe listed off.y going and we've gone from republicans looking like they're going to takese the house to looking like they're going to take the house and the senate. you said a year sen ago that the senate would have been a really tough draw. well, it's looking more and m more that republicans are goingt to take it based on being focused on those issues. well,se the white house continut to be in o this bubble where they're sending the president th to talk about things n that people quite frankly aren't really interestedeall whn it comesth to theory and all that kind of stuff. they want to talk abouts issues that affect their daily. he but even beyond the issues, judge, i don't know how they convince themselves t

i've been watching this morning the dutch newspaper nrc., writes with reference to data from the world health organization. more than 100 hospitals have crossed the line here . in ukraine, it was damaged by shelling, which means that during this entire military campaign in early january. in general, they say first of january. me and what does dutch say or is it? i established that russian troops damaged 100 of these same medical institutions. who, world organization. hello, i go to the who website, there is really news that what, well, is done separately, link, boss, they don’t investigate who bombed, who destroyed, that is, they are included there. uh, all absolutely medical facilities, damaged during shelling and in the first place. these, of course, are the same yasinovatsky gorlovka donetsk hospitals, which are constantly being beaten ukrainian warriors, of course. well, you see, the dutch newspaper calmly writes 103 russian attacks on these same ones and that's all, and there , of course, the truth hospital will be counted into this st

there is has the nrcs has funding and a requirement for source water protection. and i think as it relates to ground water sources, both in wyoming and arizona and senator kelly, i'm an n.a.u. graduate the road in flagstaff. we are ready and have been doing some of that all along. as it relates to the emerging contaminants that portion of the source water protection program is looking at potential contaminants and mitigation efforts regarding that. so i think the funding that's available within the infrastructure bill for emerging contaminants can probably be expanded and combined, hopefully, with some of the f.s.a. and nrcs money and can help to address the pfas issues quicker. with more breadth. thank you. senator duckworth: thank you. ms. bodine: may i follow up on what mr. pepper just said. when senator kelly was talking about emerging contaminants and pfas i went to the implementation guide to refresh my recollection. the money is going through the s.r.s. it is capital investment for the new treatment technology, new treatment facilities, identify new sources

cad meet issued a -- academy issued a report which we used in 2016, the national research council, nrc. had these projections changed? that's why we went back to the literature after 2016 and presented it. this was the strategy documented. essentially captures the treasure island abdication strategy that, given the projection trend that was utilized by the project at that time, when will there need to be abdications made to the perimeter of the island itself. at that time, we envisioned two steps in the sense the first phase of the project was going to be built up to a level that matches this 39 inches, 36 inches is what is shown here, so the plan at that time was build the perimeter for the phase i areas to an elevation that will accommodate three feet of sea level rise. once that three feet of sea level rise was approaching, this is the timeline at the bottom, at that point when it's about 30 inches of sea level rise that has been observed, at that point, the community would go ahead and build one abdication and we saw many of the add tigs and schematic theres and they would raise th

closed and everyone shut their mouths and mcconnell went to mar-a-lago and it was back to normal and the nrc whatever it was the freedom award or whatever. it was so quick. it didn't take a month. so, yeah. >> the door didn't close. they closed it. the republicans had the opportunity to purge trump from the party and they blinked. they balked. >> i think they realized that's not where the voters were and i think the door was closed for them. >> i think kevin mccarthy closed it. >> to jonathan's point. this brings synergy to my theory, nicolle, about how he was genuine. on january 6th and february 13th, mitch mcconnell and his team thought that they could achieve both objectives. they thought they could get rid of trump which they want to do and they thought trump by making his mistakes in january gave them the opportunity to do so. so, while he might have been genuine, he was being politically expedient. what he realized quickly in the coming weeks to jonathan's point, the voters felt differently. so that is why he begins to change his tune. he puts the game above all else. winning the game

i would ascii -- ask your deferment to work with nrc to keep those power plants and are fleet online to provide the carbon free electricity for the nation. there is a lot of different policies that affect that. one will be waste. we will have to have some sort of policy on the waste. whether it is advanced -- nuclear or the current nuclear fleet. my time is up i will submit another question for the record and allowed -- ask you to apply. reply. >> chair recognizes the jolynn from vermont for -- the gentleman from vermont for five minutes. >> thank you very much. i appreciate the good work you and your team are doing. i will focus on or -- four areas that are of interest to you. performance contracting is something that a lot of us have been working on for a very long time. there have been snags along the way. as you know has been very effective. my basic question, where are we on performance contracting and can you confirm that doe will continue to leverage the infrastructure funds through performance contracts? jennifer: absolutely it is an incredibly important and smart way to make

cad meet issued a -- academy issued a report which we used in 2016, the national research council, nrc. had these projections changed? that's why we went back to the literature after 2016 and presented it. this was the strategy documented. essentially captures the treasure island abdication strategy that, given the projection trend that was utilized by the project at that time, when will there need to be abdications made to the perimeter of the island itself. at that time, we envisioned two steps in the sense the first phase of the project was going to be built up to a level that matches this 39 inches, 36 inches is what is shown here, so the plan at that time was build the perimeter for the phase i areas to an elevation that will accommodate three feet of sea level rise. once that three feet of sea level rise was approaching, this is the timeline at the bottom, at that point when it's about 30 inches of sea level rise that has been observed, at that point, the community would go ahead and build one abdication and we saw many of the add tigs and schematic theres and they would raise th