nancy stoner an epa regulator who used to work for nrdc. she wrote her former colleagues. >> you can't directly ask me to meet with you, but if you ask somebody else and have a few people there then i can meet with you. >> the epa is supposed to be independent. >> they are very close aren't they? >> they are sleeping with each other. >> figuratively. nancy stoner leads nrdc goes to epa and immediately is involved in the decision to kill this mine when that's one of the top priorities of nrdc. >> nancy stoner did not respond to our question. she has now left the government and works for another environmental group. >> this mine would destroy 90 miles of streams. >> bob dean speaks for the nrdc. >> your people are working for the epa now and epa people come to work for the nrdc coning with big liberal legislators. >> they are the source and sometimes they take advantage of that. >> this is the beautiful bay they are worried about. i assume pebble mine was right next to the bay. no. it turns out it is 90 miles away, the distance between baltim

nancy stoner an epa regulator who used to work for nrdc. she wrote her former colleagues. >> you can't directly ask me to meet with you, but if you ask somebody else and have a few people there then i can meet with you. >> the epa is supposed to be independent. >> they are very close aren't they? >> they are sleeping with each other. >> figuratively. nancy stoner leads nrdc, goes to epa and immediately is involved in the decision to kill this mine when that's one of the top priorities of nrdc. >> nancy stoner did not respond to our question. she has now left the government and works for another environmental group. >> this mine would destroy 90 miles of streams. >> bob dean speaks for the nrdc. >> your people are working for the epa now and epa people come to work for the nrdc coning with big liberal legislators. >> they are the source and sometimes they take advantage of that. >> this is the beautiful bay they are worried about. i assume pebble mine was right next to the bay. no. it turns out it is 90 miles away, the distance between balti

. >> other solutions the nrdc is pro posing, wider spray and more restrictions how the pesticide is applieday in the bay area today. prospects for next weekend to be significantly warmer. the next few days look like pretty much today. low clouds along the shoreline and sun in the afternoon. as we look out live over sfo the numbers right now, concord, 57, all in the middle 50s in the bay area, 52 at santa rosa. beautiful time lapse though that was taken over san jose at city hall. demonstrating the fact that there is more sun down in san jose. as the sun goes into the west you will see mostly clear conditions down south and the numbers tomorrow will be near 80 degrees around san jose. back here we will be looking for temperatures in the all important back to work forecast. tomorrow morning there will be fog along the shoreline and the temperatures, 54 degrees as we start out monday morning around the bay and inland, middle 50s will do. it low clouds around the morning as you will see. a flow continuing in a fairly static pattern out in the pacific. so static and high pressure t is sitting th

in general, we at nrdc view the clean water rule as a major step forward. we're grateful to the obama administration and the people in the agencies, like ken and craig, who not only have to wade through a mountain of scientific and public input on the rule, but also whether baseless claims of being power mad, bureaucrat, bent on controlling and destroying the american economy. given that our review. evidence leads us to conclude all sorts of water resources are important to the overall integrity of the aquatic system. as a result, we're strongly supportive of the aspects of the rule that guarantee protections, to those waters the science shows are critical mainly tributaries and nearby waters. we hoped for more certain protection for other water bodies but the rule leaves many of those to later evaluation of watershed levels to impacts of downstream water resources. we believe the proper application of this analysis will eventually lead to waters protection, but we think it will require our significant engagement to be sure. on the other hand, we were disap

in general, we at nrdc view the clean water rule as a major step forward and we're grateful to the obama administration and the people in the agencies like ken and craig who not only had to wade through a mountain of scientific and public input on the rule but also whether baseless claims of being power mad, burro cats bent on controlling the american economy. i imagine most folks here would be able to predict my reaction to specific parts of rule given that my view is that the supreme court did not mandate anything close to a major entrenchment on the scope of the clean water act and give than our review of the evidence leads us to conclude that all sorts of water resources are important to the overall integrity of the aquatic system. we're supportive of the aspects of the rule that guarantee protections the that the science shows are critical, transcribe tarries and most nearby waters. we had hoped for more certain protection for other water bodies but the rule leaves many of those decisions to a later evalwigsuation of the watershed level of the i'm packs to down stream resources. we

in general, we at nrdc view the clean water rule as a major step forward and we're grateful to the obamadministration and the people in the agencies like ken and craig who not only had to wade through a mountain of scientific and public input on the rule but also whether baseless claims of being power mad, bureaucrats and bent on destroying the american economy. i imagine most folks here would be able to predict my reaction to specific parts of rule given that my view is that the supreme court did not mandate anything close to a major entrenchment on the scope of the clean water act and give than our review of the evidence leads us to conclude that all sorts of water resources are important to the overall integrity of the aquatic system. we're supportive of the aspects of the rule that guarantee protections the that the science shows are critical, transcribe tarries and most nearby waters. we had hoped for more certain protection for other water bodies but the rule leaves many of those decisions to a later evaluation of the watershed level of the i'm packs to down stream resources. we be

nrdc has had an offer us in china for nearly 20 years we've had a great presence there, and we're workinggovernment there and china's making progress. i mean let's remember. china is doing something no country has done in the history of the world. they're moving hundreds of billions of people to a poverty to a global middle class. we understand the costs that come with it. but we are out there trying to do everything we can to minimize those costs and we're going to see big changes in china but it's going to take time. >> yeah. try two decades in china. you're a great sport. you guys lost one today. maybe some food for thought. everyone wants clean air, but it does come at a cost. up here next, isis terrorists killed 38 in tanesha. so how can you defend defensive that kind of attack? we'll try to explain next [dad]i wear a dozen different hats doing small gigs,side gigs...gig gigs. quickbooks self-employed helps me get ready for tax time. to separate expenses,i just swipe. it's one hat i don't mind wearing. [passenger] i work for me. and so does quickbooks. it estimates my taxes,so i know

my view, i will share it personally but i speak for the nrdc. we do not see this as a blue or red issue. we speak for everyone across the country. there was a time for most of history, importantly, the history of this country when that is the way it has been seen. teddy roosevelt, a republican president, is the greatest conservation is to ever inhabit the white house. dwight d. eisenhower set-aside the national wildlife refuge. richard nixon set up the epa. ronald reagan helped us to get led out of our gasoline. george h.w. bush strengthened the clean air act. the republican party has a long history of responsible environmental stewardship. what is happened in the past few years is the party has become your captive of the fossil fuel industry in a way that is great for the shareholders of the fossil fuel industry and horrible for the rest of us. it needs to change. we are about trying to restore the bipartisan majority for the environment for the good of the country so we have better jobs, and a healthier future for our children. that is our age