>> ma'am, as you know, i'm here representing nsa. i can't speak -- i don't make policy decisions for the administration so i'd have to defer to the administration. >> next question. nsa received three years' worth of american's phone records that it was not legally authorized to receive. moreover, the cdr program was shut down for failure to produce useful intelligence. yet nsa is requesting reauthorization. can you explain that position? >> ma'am, i'd like to clarify. it's entirely possible i'm not being clear and i apologize. there was value in the program when it was substantiated. we did obtain value from an intelligence perspective. however, when we weigh that against the cost, we made the decision that the best step to take was to shut down the program. there have been issues with some of the data we received from the different telecommunication providers. i can go into those issues in detail. >> have the compliance problems been solved? and you're on the record. >> ma'am, the compliance problems associated with this particular

so in early 2018 the nsa, nsa analysts noted some technical irregularities in some of the data a were receiving from those telecommunication service providers. at a cackle into extensive detail on that. the privacy and civil liberties oversight board is including a review of this program and where doing a classification review. some more will become at which i think is probably very frustrating for our particular panel but the will be a lot more coming out on this. but suffice to say that some of information coming from the providers from that first hop was inaccurate. it did not accurately indicate phone number a was in contact with phone number b. because of this to hop in nature, that meant an affordable there's nothing on the record itself that would indicate this was inaccurate that meant when nsa to that record and went and got the second hop, if that phone number wasn't i could and got the second hop, those were records that in us it was not authorized to receive. it was on authorized to receive the two hop information but if there was an air for the first all those additional

i -- nsa hacking tool. i mean, how much of that is on the nsa? >> this is a big question. this tool called eternal blue, you know, it was leaked by these rogue hackers who somehow stole it from the nsa. but the nsa did actually do their best to try to respond to this. they told microsoft when the tool was stolen before it was actually leaked publicly. they tried to help microsoft put out a patch to help protect people. but it turns out patching is this kind of epidemiological problem where you have to convince, you know, millions of people to install the patch. and a lot of people don't. so then do you blame the nsa for the fact that their tool was taken and misused. nsa, it seemed, uses this tool almost exclusively for spying, which is what the nsa does. they just spy on this global, vast scale. occasionally, they're partners in this other -- their partners will use the same kind of hacking tools to disrupt something the way that sandworm does but only in the most targeted fashion. the nsa is, you know, pretty responsible with their use of this. but what you can kind of c

do you blame the nsa the tool was taken and misused? to use it almost exclusively but they just spy on a global scale but they will use the same hacking tools to disrupt the same way sand worm does. but what you can criticize them for before it was stolen and leaked. that's the theme of the book that the us government has its entire story to be so much more interested in these capabilities to push forward the arms race of cyberwar than trying to control these incredibly dangerous hackers and the ark of the book is how the us watched cyberwar. as sand worm turns out with thousands of ukrainian civilians even though ukraine is not nato to say that's not okay you don't do that to anyone especially was cyberwar crimes. >> so what do you think the red line should be? where would it be quex. >> it's probably never okay but that indiscriminate mass scale of the first of these quarter million ukrainian certainly that's not okay but when i put this both to obama and trump administration officials they both made the argument we want to be able to

that went to the nsa. the nsa deep state gave them the information it was rudy giuliani and others.at sound right to you? these are from reliable sources. >> my understanding is schiff did know who the numbers were of. why did at&t give them this? >> laura: they are not under obligation, right? no subpoena. >> when the nsa asks at&t says no. a powerful democratic congressman asks for this information and at&t has a lot to answer to. >> laura: they answered the call for information? >> and they knew one of those numbers was nunes's phone and they were providing this information to congress. they should have gone to the justice department or the fbi or a court before they provided that information. >> laura: the nsa, it goes back to i don't like this surveillance. you cannot like the surveillan surveillance. at&t was involved in this and they knew they were providing information to congress. >> laura: the "wall street journal" is reporting late tonight that the freak out about rudy giuliani talking to an omb-number might be wrong. that number ande other referencs in the report all cor

and they replace safe harbour with a new regime but the nsa still exists.t they will do less, i think it has got to be potentially the case that the advocate general will turn around and say i am not sure. where could this lead 7 around and say i am not sure. where could this lead? the advocate general today saying i'm not sure on the ecj general today saying i'm not sure on the ec] later ruling that things need to change again. that is more barriers going up isn't it? in the relationship between the eu and the us. this is one of the macro problems, the realpolitik problems, the business problem that you are trying to protect personal data and business needs to operate. there is a bunch of problems, a bunch of data going between america europe and everywhere else in the world. even if the advocate general advises this is unlawful and let's say the ec] agrees, which they usually do. most of the time they follow the advice of the time they follow the advice of the time they follow the advice of the expert reporter on the issue. i don't think we're going to fa

the nsa have been collecting phone records of every american. and that not only had they been doing that but the pfizer report had signed off on it for nearly a decade. a lot of people were shocked and saw that as an indication that the pfizer court was not fulfilling its role and providing effective oversight. and then evens go beyond that, men name members of congress, when the stories came out about this program, expressed outrage that they had not known about the program. and they hadn't known about the program even in years where they were asked about on whether to reauthorize section 215. and certainly from a public perspective, the public never had a robust debate on the phone record program, and the extent to which it would affect people's liberties and whether there were alternatives. and we were all essentially kept in the dark. and probably likely would have never known about it with no disclosures. and so goal for the freedom act was to really add dress this breakdown. to one, put in place a better mechanisms to make sure that there

snowden, the nsa itself was a fairly obscure agency unfamiliar to most americans. and as we kick off our 2019 conference we find that now even intelligence oversight is itself very much in public headlines. we have an impeachment preceding kick off in significant part by a report from the intelligence community inspector general. we have forthcoming next week i'll breathlessly awaited report on allegations of misuse of the foreign intelligence surveillance act during the 2016 presidential campaign. we have proceedings aired, actually would be from the house intelligence committees. even intelligence overseers are at the senate and the sense of our political discourse in a way the intelligence agencies itself began to be earlier in this cycle in a in a way that was unprecedented since the 1970s. we have a special focus this year on not just the intelligence agencies themselves but also the mechanisms in place to oversee them. one of the classic problems of intelligence and surveillance in a free society is how to balance the need for operations that are inherently s

when we launched this in the aftermath of disclosures about bulk nsa collection by foreman nsa contractor edward snowden, the nsa itself was a fairly obscure agency, unfamiliar to most americans. and as we kick off our 2019 conference, we find that now even intelligence oversight is itself very much in public headlines. we have an impeachment proceeding kicked off in significant part by a report from the, from the intelligence community's inspector general. we have forthcoming next week a breathlessly awaited report on allegations of misuse of the foreign intelligence surveillance act during the 2016 presidential campaign. we have proceedings aired in connection -- [inaudible] from the house intelligence committee. even intelligence overseers now are at the center, in a sense; of our political discourse in a way that the intelligence agencies themselves began to be earlier, earlier in the cycle in a way that was really unprecedented since the 1970s. so we have a special focus this year on not just the intelligence agencies themselves, but also the mechanisms in place to oversee them. one

i have a request in with the nsa to get underlying interviews that were done. the nsa published a small pamphlet on african-american code breaking, but mostly to do with their work after the war. but there were underlying interviews and documents that led to the publication of that pamphlet. i have a request to get more information. i don't know as much about the code breaking of the private sector. i would love to be able to answer those questions as well. >> ladies, to your far-right, near the front. >> two questions. one, did the army and navy exchange information from breaking codes. second, if you break a japanese code and can't read japanese, what good is it? ms. mundy: the navy and army were very competitive about code breaking and competed to recruit women. they got pissed at each other. i came upon a memo. the army said the navy was poaching their girls. they raced to break the purple system. once the purple system was broken, the navy had had some breakthroughs and the army had some and the division of labor was such that the navy got even days code b

that would be embarrassing or otherwise problematic for nsa. i won't bore you with the details, but the concern i have is if you let an agency, whether my former employer the central intelligence agency or any of the 17 agencies in the intelligence community dictate what you can say with respect to your conclusions, your recommendations and observations, respectfully i have to say i think it if this rates the boards ability to function properly. i'll echo what i think is sharon's clean, -- plea, you go back to the agency in question and say we will say something publicly to the effect that there is nothing to be concerned about or there may be some things to be concerned about and we have notified the communities of jurisdiction. can we get a pledge from you on that today? adam: i can say more than that. when we complete classified reports, those reports go to the hill, because there are people there who have the clearances to read them. they would receive the entire report in that case. zooming out a little bit, we are an administrative agency

>> i'm not a crypting to fer, but the people at the nsa think the solution is doable. bill gates has not said this is not a question of ability, it's a question of will. a number of governments have said, australia, united kingdom, united states, governments in europe, governments in other parts of the world have all said this is doable. >> two former nsa directors has said it isn't. >> let's talk about the systems that exist today, right? that exist today. facebook has a system today, right, that is not end-to-end encrypted. maybe it's not as safe as it will be with the end-to-end encryption. companies have made decisions for their own business reasons to maintain access to the information. if they can maintain access to sell advertising, why can't they do it? apple has a key where they can do the software updates for those funs. they have that key at apple. they have to protect that key. it would would be a huge security asset if they lose that key. all we're asking is that there be a key that we can get at for law enforcement. >> are you looking at a solution simila

it's the nsa id which is more independent. there's the civil liberties and privacy act of the nsa which has the policy creation role to be at the table when policy originated in oversight role. at the department of justice, there's a national security position. a quote that i like the says this is not a big oversight office comes from a former official who called them they go to get the west. other people disagree with that and say yes, it functions as an oversight office. oversight function at the department of dissent, there's the intelligence community office, it's the protection office which particularly has a role in 702 compliance work. there's the ot and i general counsel. that mission into creation, i think it is right. mission integration. again, it has some compliant oversight so it functions. presidents intelligence, board of intelligence oversight. exiting for my role here, others will talk much more about that. two more minutes, if i have that. the challenge of oversight internal oversight offices is simultaneousl

amy: world-fams nsa whisebebloweedwardrdnowden warns a growing war on journali at lastight's right liveliod awardin stocklm , swed, morehanix years after aring doments reveing how e unitedtates had buila systst of mass surveiance to collect every ca, text, and email every person on earth. snowden joined thehe awards ceremony via video from moscow, russia, where he has lived in exile since 2013. then we hear from another right livelihood award winner aminatou , haidar. she has resisted the mororoccan occupation of western sahara for more t than three decades. >> let's put an end to this injustice. the sowve a voice to i people.. let's then choose -- knowing amy: then, as medicare for all and free college have become key issues of the u.s. 2020 presidential race, we'll look at sweden's thriving welfare state -- which is supported by both the country's liberals and conservatives. all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. we are broadcasting from stockholm, sweden. the house judiciary committee held an eight and a half

it will be learned before three years ago when we discussed the expansion of the nsa under the obamadministration and how they allowed for basically spying on attorneys, spying on clergy, this is incredible. spying on privileged journalists -- because they didn't give a base other than the fact that it was national security related but remember these are counterintelligence investigations. expensive investigations in the obama administration did do more spying and more leaking investigations than any other -- unmasking of americans but now we are seeing adam schiff has taken us to the next level. we have never seen this before in congress and what he did is he took the phone records of rudy giuliani, he took the phone records and what he did was then expanded that. you put it out into the report and used all of the secondary contacts that he wanted exposed. >> laura: he got help from at&t and he got help from someone else in the government. >> obsolete. that is exactly what i've been hearing too for my sources and we have to get to the bottom of this. congress needs to investigate th

law shifted so the nsa wasn't holding onto that information, the phone companies are.do in the vast majority of cases tend to comply with subpoenas. >> although this request would stick out like a sore thumb i would think. >> asking the question from a highly regulated company, does not smell like extortion? it smells like cronyism if nothing else. >> new fallout after a hot mike cott canadian prime minister justin trudeau talking about president trump with fellow world leaders. with the president is saying about the state of their relationship. plus hillary clinton once again fueling rule tell mike rumors of a 2020 bid. what her latest comments on the howard stern show could mean. with va mortgage rates near record lows, i want to tell as many veterans as possible about newday's va streamline refi. it's the closest thing to automatic savings that we've ever offered. at newday, veterans can refinance their mortgage with no income verification, no appraisal and no out of pocket expenses. and we've extended our call center hours so that every veteran can take advantage o

or otherwise problematic for nsa.not going to bore you with the details but the k i have is if you let an agency, whether it's my former employer, the central gentlemen generals agency or other 17 agency, dick tate no you what -- dictate to you what you can say with respect to your observations and conclusions. i have to say it visualates the board's ability to function probably. i'll echo what i think is sharon's plea here which is that you go back to that agency in question and say, we are going to say something publicly at least to the effect that either there's nothing to be concerned about here, or that there may be some things to be concern but here and we have notified the committees jurisdiction to that effect. can we get a pledge on that from you today. >> i can say more than that when we complete classified oversight reports. those reports go to the hill. because there are people there who have the clearances and the facilities to receive them and read them. so they would receive the entire report in that ca

this indicated agencies like nsa, fbi, cia, but as often happens the cutting edge attack that is used by nsa consumer devices for local authorities down the road, facial recognition, something worth paying attention to freddie mac is talk about their new guide of using facial recognition in their backyard. >> thanks for having us here today. across the country, primarily what we have been finding is all the police department have access to this technology we are finding it a new and surprising place. we want to address that, where you should be looking in your own backyard, where are those things you would not think to overturn the silver dollars so that is what we are talking about today and thanks for having us here. i am freddie martinez, the government is a nonpartisan coalition that works to strengthen democracy by empowering the public and promoting policies, so i am a policy analyst, 51/2 years, 5 years. this is an issue i worked on closing for a great number of years. i wanted to start with chris, and officer at a county in oregon, in his free time he decided to roll out of fa

legislation in the united states american companies are required to provide information back to the nsat through by donald trump when he was breaking the budget deadlock a little over a year ago. so the sort of rules do exist, the question is how much do you expect the government to trust the privacy of its citizens? that is the fundamental question. unfortunately we do not have enough time for it. thank you, mike weston, for coming in to the business briefing. the us is preparing tariffs on $2.1; billion worth of french exports as retaliation against the country's new digital services tax. the top us trade official said the new tax, which france approved injuly, unfairly targets american tech giants and us action would deter other countries from taking similar steps. from san francisco, here's dave le. since the biggest tech companies in the western world are mostly created in silicon valley, wasn't and feels that these digital tasks unfairly targets american success stories. it is now proposing that if france goes ahead and imposes a 3% levy on the reve nu es of ahead and imposes a 3%

performance including developing stellar performance, including developing a software system that the nsa uses for communications and eavesdropping and things like that. this stellar scientist, lost his security clearance forcing him to retire. he was of retirement age. not the biggest body blow but he was humiliated. he was accused of disloyalty. he had a lot of ties, friends and neighbors who were asked many times if he was a spy for china. he is a chinese-american individual, and he suffered a great deal as a result of this. the end of the story is that essentially ultimately the pentagon decided he was not a spy and was innocent of their suspicions. it is kind of a sad story. carol: this individual -- the question is and this goes to how you kicked it off, are we overreacting? is this an isolated incident? being targeted in the wrong way, or is a lot of this happening? peter: the distrust level and that is the keyword -- the level of distrust of chinese americans has soared in recent years and a colleague in the bloomberg data analytics department, andre tartare, did an enormous job o

where we built a skit, this is public knowledge, $75 million, we put 26 nsa employees in the skip, we invited them in their those employees and with mathematicians and engineers to write a specific algorithm to swift big data. the story started there but did not in there. what we saw after that, a knock at the door in 17 other federal agencies dod being one and energy being another. then we saw them knock on the door and the private sector saying we want to put people in this model and to date they have provided 30 - 35 solutions for the federal government. in addition to the algorithm they are still trained to write, when he had a problem in syria word recreational drones were dropping explosives and he saw that as the number one threat to his troops, he did not go to darpa or the dod and said find a solution, he knew the arctic architects cannot produce it. he went to the lab and said find me a solution in 90 days that a solution in syria completely eliminated the risk of recreational drugs. >> advocate copy for virginia. >> we cannot take that example and exercise where we make saf

nsa? >> it would include agencies that could have been involved in this.ut we are getting a lot of cooperation from those agencies. you have to remember on something like this, you know, part of the reason you do something like this is to deal with some of the various theories that have been thrown out and show one way or another whether they are valid or not. so the fact that you are looking into certain allegations does not necessarily mean you give him credence. and the media understood that when bob mueller was doing his work, and they should bear that in mind when they are watching durham. >> martha: just as we are watching this, there is a report that is coming out to that says that john durham has asked the cia for john brennan's communications record, and wants to compare his private discussions with public comments on the steele dossier and the intel assessment on russian interference. that is me reporting this evening from "the new york times," we will continue to look at that. up next, more of my interview with attorney general william barr. ♪ ♪

cybercommand, which for a long time was part of nsa and has co-operated at nsa, how they will go outtors who are out there that we are aware of their operations and activities. just like the cia director did in the run-up to the 2016 election. only he called the director of the fsb personally. this time, we're going to do it through cybermeans. >> cyber com in the 2018 midterm elections, they used e-mails, pop-up, text messages to target trolls who were doing things and interfering in the election. how do you think about that? one of the issues with cybercrime is unlike nuclear weaponry, we have ways of knowing that's a nuclear weapon. that's a government of north korea or the government of iran. with -- with troll factories and third parties, how do you figure that out? you could figure out where it's coming from. do we have the ability to say, and the research center in st. petersburg is run by the russian government? >> well, we have the capacity to do that. we certainly working with our nato allies, identified the actual individuals as they were coming to work and logging in on t

recruited by the cia began operation cross fire hurricane, worked with james comey, worked with the nsao entrap individuals like mike flynn, papadopoulos and used the most powerful intelligence community in the world as a political weapon. these leaks that are coming out prior to the final results of the durham investigation, they are coming from a guilty man, and he is very worried, and he should be because he's at the center of the firestorm. these leaks are an attempt to shape a narrative, but it is very telling that attorney general barr just said in an interview the u.s. attorney for connecticut has -- [inaudible] -- for larger than the inspector general. he is looking at not and the fbi, doj but the whole intelligence community but also at private individuals. that's why we're seeing the leaks. that's proof that john brennan is in big big trouble. lou: thank you very much, i appreciate it. good to see you and see you soon. >> merry christmas. lou: merry christmas, happy new year and happy holidays. follow me on instagram, twitter, lou dobbs. like me on facebook and instagram at lo

of the george mason university law school national security institute was asked to discuss how the nsas protecting america's privacy and surveillance of their phone calls. here is what he had to say. [video clip] >> listen to what we are talking about. the records of phone calls, the to, nodialed, from and content whatsoever. we are talking about only phone calls made from a terrorist identified, potentially terrorist identified number. that is all. billions billions of of records we keep talking about, hundreds of billions of phone calls annually in the united states. a huge number,s it is a tiny number relative to the overall collection potentially available and needed to identify potential threat. so we are talking about not a few him amount. it is tiny compared to the volume of calls that take place in the united states today. host: we want to know what you think about government surveillance. are you concerned about government surveillance in the united states? up ouroing to open regional lines for this conversation. if you are in the eastern or central signed zone -- time zone we

you had the cia involved, you had the nsa involved. what's going on today? the coup cabal that was perpetrating these criminal activities to try to remove the president for asking questions about the ukraine's involvement in the nightmare we are talking about. lou: we have an inspector general who should be a countervailing influence within the justice department and the fbi who should be bringing accountability to this corrupt cabal of agents and officials of both the fbi and the justice department instead what we have got here in 434 pages without exception, is a white wash. >> what's troubling is how he gives an out and protects the leadership of the fbi and doj, those who signed on for both the obama and trump administrations suggesting they weren't told all the full details or didn't know about the corruption behind the application. the applications on their face werface -- were were def were. the dossier is garbage. there is no excuse -- the i.g. provides the excuse. i hope barr sees through this. but past is prologue and i don't expect much. >> the at

every day lives, and this is part of the deal with technology, as you know, and the capacity of the nsa, and other government agencies, but let's just focus on the nsa, since they are devoted to this activity, and the kinds of revelations that edward snowden made, with respect to the gathering, a dragging, really, that encompassed all americans that had moved through, that still enlist google and facebook and the rest, to monitor our conversations, our internet visits, and there is a long list. we all know about this. people have, and what makes me worry that there is a new, if not a new paradigm, there is a new public mentality, is the number of people i know, and especially, not only younger people, but often younger people, who say why should i care if all of my data is out there? first of all, i've done nothing wrong. and secondly, i can't do anything about it anyway. if a phone company already knows these things about me, why should i care if the government knows these things about me? well, the problem is if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear approach is that nobod

a judge ruling the nsa leaker violated federal secrecy agreements and did not get clearance.le in russia to avoid prosecution in the us and classified documents in 2013. house speaker nancy pelosi responding to donald trump's gazing letter about the impeachment hearings before she has even read it. >> your reaction to the president's letter? >> the reaction? why not? >> i have seen the essence of it and it is really sick. heather: carly shimkus of serious xm 115 here with the pushback she's receiving on social media. all eyes are on this gazing letter the president wrote. nancy pelosi slamming the impeachment effort, the president saying the importance of this. you are the ones interfering in america's election, you're the ones perverting america's democracy. you heard nancy pelosi's reaction. let's get to some conservative saying this on social media, brad writes what a second ridiculous is she said that's right after she admitted -- another twitter user says it was heartfelt and spot on. responses to the, these people have no sense of awareness and this twitter user says i'

the nsa told the washington examiner he doesn't work for that allegation. >> this case may end up beforefederal judge to decide if ann will be extradited. they say that u.s. and britain had a treaty for more than 100 years and they say it is rayer -- rare to deny an extra decision request. let's bring in our legal guys. >> hi. >> and a criminal defense torn. to you further, they are starteding the proceedings but the u.s. and the state department release, it is very unlikely they will extradite her. what are the circumstances here? how is it how is this that they can protect her? >> i think you have a situation here where the united states and the uk and parties are parties to the convention. they are obligated to comply with extradition. the difficulty here is that there is a process, protective services, prosecution services, the home office, goes to the prime minister, and robert o'neil who is head of the national security agency said that it is not going to be cooperating, so at the end of the day, diplomacy should be required and the way the original deal was put is they actually pu

ag bar and investigated term are going to be starting to look at those doing the investigation, the nsand you will start seeing a lot of pressure put on them, you will see indictments being brought forward and the american people are going to see what has taken place in the last three years of this sham investigation of the president to bring down a duly elected president. >> >> three very rich candidates, michael bluebird and tom stier spent a combined $200 million on political ads which is mind blowing but with that in mind do you think it is fair because they can reach in their back pocket and spend money whenever they want whereas the other candidates like pete buttigieg and elizabeth lauren and even joe biden can't. >> money isn't everything but it certainly helps. if you look at the polls stier spent all this money and nobody knows who tom stier is even in a democrat primary. elizabeth warren has far better name recognition regardless how much money he spent but when you bloomberg spending that money but then the ceo of new york city for two terms he has a track record to run on.

proceeds from edward snowden's new book will go to the government, a judge ruling the nsa weaker violatedecy agreement and did not get clearance to publish his memoir, permanent record. snowden has been living in a file to avoid prosecution, faces that he and i charges after leaking classified documents in 2013. >> the gift that keeps on giving over time. best stocks to give this holiday season, cbs market analyst. merry christmas to you. you look festive with your shoes and tie. >> the point of giving a gift of stock is to look at something that is not going to be a quick hit. something to have long-term value, gift that keeps on giving. when i was a kid and use to get a us savings bond. might as well have gotten cold at that point. and investment over time. >> what are the best stocks for stocking stuffers. >> there is not going to be any huge surprise because you want to look at something with real long-term value. i would say to begin with, amazon, the company has changed the world, don't think it is going anywhere, great company to own in the future. disney, mickey and company, you c

we honor that with nsa on how it's covered the -- and essay on how it covered the decade.here's a 1979 cover about the death of equities, that for a couple years after looked really good, but in hindsight didn't look so good. but it's an amazing accomplishment this magazine has been around this long while being the authoritative voice on business. jason: interesting talking to the people that put together that essay. their combined tenure is almost 90 years. joel: we don't go all the way back to 1929, when they first started, ready for the crash, but collectively, the people who worked on this essay can trace their lineage back to those who worked back then. in the course of three people writing the essay, we can spend the generation. jason: one of the things they point out in their essay, these seminal moments and how businessweek tracked what was going on, the zeitgeist in, economics, the board room, so many things. carol: women. that's still an issue. joel: black business. when you look at how we covered it, it shows not only the evolution of the magazine, but the evolu

the fbi and the nsa agents can get away with whatever they want.at mike horowitz did was the first time in 40 years that fisa has been examined and exposed. steve: the judge has a great op-ed, you can catch his show at liberty file on fox nation at fox nation.com. brian: get the op-ed on foxnews.com. >> that's right. ainsley: carley has headlines for us. >> where is carley? carley: here i am. 911 calls from the deadly police shootout in miami. one witness describing a bullet going through his child's car seat. >> are you injured? >> no. thank god. the bullet crossed all the way through my daughter's car seat but she wasn't here thank god. carley: that terrifying call from a driver caught in the crossfire. political science and two robbery suspects shooting near a highway intersection after a wild chase with a hijacked u.p.s. truck. the suspect's u.p.s. driver innocent bystander died. heart-stopping moments when a small plane falls out of the sky. watch as the jet hits at least six parked cars while making emergency landing in phoenix. it also knock

. >> a former nsa attorney and bloomberg on. thanks to both of you.n has bypassed that whole part with lindsey graham and decided to cover a myriad of other things. cnn is completely alone in deciding not to cover it. is that why the network is suffering from its lowest ratings in prime name three years? joining me now former george bush senior advisor, brad blakeman. they have doubled down on this trump stuff to the point where it' getting embarrassing for them. they are ignoring news on a news network. >> their ratings are in the toilet. you can fool some of the people some of the time. but not enough of the people this time. they promised for years they had impeachable offenses against trump. it started with the russia investigation. he was cleared. now you have an impeachment that is basically an inquisition. cnn promos democratic hearings. they have a clock that sits at the bottom of their screen timing down when schiff or others are going to make opening statements. but when the republicans hold an important hearing on the whole inquisition of d

so, here you are becoming a writer, you think, getting the qualifications in acquiring and nsa or degreeurnalism. do you already know what you're going to write about? >> guest: dot apple. taking a course on writing in my second three semester program. the teachers assignment was just to write anything you want to write about but take a position and argued forcefully so i was listening and really reading a lot at the time. why is this culture that i'm so immersed in right now so much richer than what i thought i had access to when i was growing up so i wrote a piece those are giving bloothat wasarguing blood hip-hop era is black street culture like a street identity that has a very narrow access and she read the assignment and said that this is good i think this could actually be published somewhere. the beautiful thing about going to these graduate programs is that your professor actually knows somebody. i sent it to "the new york times." it generates an enormous amount of comments and i said i would love to expand on that with about 800 words and so then my professor introduced me to b

these storms roll through so head to the app store now and download it you know you talk about the nsa's the headache, how the cat. >>tunnel doing some work so caltrans is closing part of the caldecott each different night to doing maintenance and that could impact your commute. tomorrow morning earlier this morning they wrapped up their work. onboard number one they're doing their annual fire extinguisher inspections. so they did bore one eastbound. then comes bore 2 eastbound that will be closed tonight. bor 3 westbound closes tomorrow night and for 4 westbound closes wednesday night and you can explain delays during these tunnel closures every morning until they reopen them. >>early commuters, you know what really affects you. but like for like a mere like me like 9 in the morning, a second the as bad and i'm just thankful they have. >>for more yes, some will will be affected by that in the evening. the way back from san francisco. >>each tunnel opens up at 4.30 the following morning after the closure and by the way if it's raining too hard they're going to to postpone this whole thin

in addition, healthcare providers and insurance companies can no longer operate like the nsa and cia.ust divulge what they are charging and what they are paying each other so we can finally see the level of immoral collusion they've been hooked blinking us with for decades. health insurance has become a cycle of mysterious expenditures and once you provide transparency, then you can give individuals an appropriate tax-free mechanism to pay for deductibles and services without getting soaked by uncle sam's heartless hose. healthcare savings accounts aren't some utopia unicorn. they would make savings and paying for the health care use evidence and much easier. and finally, we all know the key to unlocking and elevating treatment is elevation. to me doctors and clinics are hamstrung with barriers to acquire certificates of need, which are control tools used by heartless bureaucrats that do harm by withholding cooled to new technology. lords of nose a propeller head single-handedly single-handedly decides who deserves what's in appealing these backwards decisions can run desperate respon

that treatment of a british ally coming because gchq with a counterpart for nsa relies on the goodwillnd the good intentions of the people at fort meade. what you've got to date is a treaty, every one of those nations wondering what the heck. >> laura: what does that do? i think that is a good point. >> it is terribly disheartening to the american people and it should be. it'd there is also frightening what we rely on. we don't have enough antennas in the air to pick up everything. and what these guys did. i'm talking specifically about comey and brennan, i wouldn't trust those guys if they told me the sun was going to rise in the east in the morning. chris is absolutely right. this will not stop at some lower-level person. this has to be taking these guys. >> laura: oliver is right, there has to be consequences later. the leaking of brett kavanaugh, nothing happened. every time there is abuse of power, there has to be repercussions, but you don't see it. >> i believe that mr. durham and mr. barr's statement gives a forte that we hope the beginning of accountability. i will say one thi

the nsa told the washington examiner he doesn't work for that agency.he diplomatic tension in this case was made much worse by a meeting in october that president trump had with harry dunn's family at the white house. when the president walked in the room, he surprised the family by saying he had ann in the next room according to sources who spoke to cnn. he offered to have family meet her. the family and their representative turned the president down cold and said it wasn't appropriate they would meet on their terms and only if she went back to great britain and they were told that would never happen. >> we'll stay on top of this story. >>> coming up, democrats in the white house are actively preparing for president trump's impeachment trial. we have now details. we'll be right back. with retirement planning and advice for what you need today and tomorrow. because when you're with fidelity, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. because when you're with fidelity, wean air force veteran made of doing what's right,. not what's easy. so when a h

station is the number of drug arrests over the last week that they treated at photos of these nine men nsa they had made the arrest working alongside the narcotics unit as part of dearest, they seized more than $3600 they also did nearly a dozen bundles of heroin, cocaine and fentanyl off the streets. >>> lawmakers considering legislation for vehicles belonging to all drunk drivers. center cherry hill mothers against drunk driving and san francisco held a news conference to support the bill. ignition interlocks and breathalyzers that provide driver to have a clear. >> they work 100% of the time. they are a game changer in the fight to stop the result revolving door of repeat dui offenders. >> they recruit require repeat dui offenders and certain first- offenders to install ignition loss in their vehicles. >>> transit agencies providing free residue make this a safer holiday for people who were out partying new year's eve. surfaces go would be free from 8:00 pm to 5:00 a.m., thursday. you can also get rewrites on couching, a suggested, and samtrans buses doing that same house. is still requ