that nsr thought to prevent the creation of a third unit on the ground floor. that's not what was done. this is relocated the second unit to the ground floor or shrinking the second unit or only the ground floor. it was not creating an additional unit which would have been prohibited and about its own terms that nsr expired and became nul and void if the planning code became less restrictive with regard to units in the direct which happened since the nsr was recorded. even if it allied, it no longer applied at the time. >> and references to the building for which no permits were issues. can you provide why that was done? >> yes. the plan sheet a2.2 show in the back rear corner a very small area as a second floor and on the next sheet the same small area on the third floor filled in as part of that project. mr. roddick believed all the permits had been obtained. we don't know why there's not a permit covering that area. it's unrelated to the unit's merger complaint but because the planners noted the difference in the review of the project, we agreed to add that