so, i would ask for the key port on the nsr, yes, i’ll remind you right away.ted to you. uh when u was reporting that we want to take our business out of busan. there, in fact, they bring fish to korea to busan vanya antey and gidrostroy are going to process fish here, they directly invest money in ensuring that all this is done in the korsakov port, that is, everything is ripe for now make a deepening by the port and correct the amount of hydro-discharge is small. so we have completed the project. here we are requesting for the next year or two, the amount of 6.5 billion. this is not much money, but it solves a very important state task. this is fundamental. so that's an important question. please support letter compliance prepared aware of this program. all of them fell asleep, uh. and savelyev and the chairman to put in order the education system. well, generally pale. ah, such a base. uh, let's just say the material is very weak, i say again that everything support. well, we just figured out what to speed up. login take copies of these documents with my bac

e, at least within the framework of e projects, the nsr of the northern sea route is the atomic heartf our new universal icebreakers. e, the arctic of siberia ural uh, yakutia is on the way, they are all awful. here are these meat environments. and what else is important to emphasize only the design service life of these reactors is 60 years. well, obviously, they can be extended, therefore, taking into account the construction. we are now talking about the centenary project, that is, we are for a century, at least forming the agenda for the technological development of myanmar and the agenda of our predicament, together with the government , together with the people. is it possible now to talk about some potential places, and sites, taking into account the specifics and seismology unusual for the region and climate, let's say. we are not afraid of either the climate or the region. we have the widest scope for the application of our technologies in connection with and with seismic and temperature deviations, probably, the choice is the following: there is a land- based variant of a sm

i'm okay with the nsr restlikzs, number 3 i don't like setting a height to something theles could chink in the future if we set it to the neighboring's property if than i change their fence this obgetting to change their fence sight. i'm okay with 1 expect 2 but 3 does in the make sense. those are my comments, commissioner koppel. >> this could be seconded or not a motion to approve with the ns restrictions 1 and 2. i will second this. >> call on commissioner diamond. that question for the sponsor. is your cline opposed or supportive of the second unit. >> they are opposed would not suit their family needs they have 4 kids. why i'm having a problem with the staff's suggestion we add a second unit it feels it is an rh2 i get this. butt decision to require people to meet a minimum density is a big policy decision approximate one we should have with the housing element and them ip uncomfortable in impetz thanksgiving requirement and one off base i. in certain projects that come before us men not aural of them. and that i believe it is worthy of -- further study and we should be looking at