are there plans at ntia to put some of that out? >> well i would say that i don't see it any differently than the other bands that we've been discussing. it's a matter of collaboration and discussion in terms of how can we share as appropriate. when you get higher and higher in frequency, theoretically and technically it makes it easier to share spectrum among multiple users and potentially the systems. so i think it's a matter of discussion, collaboration and defining a path forward which we would do in collaboration with the commission industry and the agency. >> actually let me use that question to make one point that i meant to make earlier, which we talked a lot about spectrum frontiers, that was a set of rules done this summer. the fcc now has spectrum frontiers part two that's teed up an additional number of these millimeter wave bands going up pretty high. so this is an active ongoing fcc proceeding. just as a side note, this is about as bipartisan as things get i think on these issues where everyone is in agreement we want

are there plans at ntia to put some of that out? >> well i would say that i don't see it any differently than the other bands that we've been discussing. it's a matter of collaboration and discussion in terms of how can we share as appropriate. when you get higher and higher in frequency, theoretically and technically it makes it easier to share spectrum among multiple users and potentially the systems. so i think it's a matter of discussion, collaboration and defining a path forward which we would do in collaboration with the commission industry and the agency. >> actually let me use that question to make one point that i meant to make earlier, which we talked a lot about spectrum frontiers, that was a set of rules done this summer. the fcc now has spectrum frontiers part two that's teed up an additional number of these millimeter wave bands going up pretty high. so this is an active ongoing fcc proceeding. just as a side note, this is about as bipartisan as things get i think on these issues where everyone is in agreement we want

are there plans that ntia to open some of that up? >> i would say that i don't see it any differently than the other dance we've been discussing. it's a matter of collaboration and discussion in terms of how can we share as appropriate? when you get higher and higher in frequency, theoretically and technically it makes it easier to share among multiple users and potentially systems. i think it's a matter of discussion, collaboration and defining a path forward which we would do in collaboration with the commission, industry and the agency. .. >> we want to make progress on these, so the administration change is happening, but this' one going to definitely keep going, would be my guess. issues like that, they are teed up in active commission proceeding, and actually to the gentleman's question from before, when you get that high, the provocation gets real small. [laughter] and what is the most sensible approach for a spectrum that whatever anybody says around the ability to use certain directional technologies, you know, you're never g

are there plans at ntia to put some of that out?ration and discussion in terms of how can we share as appropriate. when you get higher and higher in frequency, theoretically and technically it makes it easier to share spectrum among multiple users and potentially the systems. so i think it's a matter of discussion, collaboration and defining a path forward which we would do in collaboration with the commission industry and the agency. >> actually let me use that question to make one point that i meant to make earlier, which we talked a lot about spectrum frontiers, that was a set of rules done this summer. the fcc now has spectrum frontiers part two that's teed up an additional number of these millimeter wave bands going up pretty high. so this is an active ongoing fcc proceeding. just as a side note, this is about as bipartisan as things get i think on these issues where everyone is in agreement we want to make progress on these. there's an administration happening but that one is going to keep going, be my guess. issues like that

are there plans at ntia to put some of that out?on and discussion in terms of how can we share as appropriate. when you get higher and higher in frequency, theoretically and technically it makes it easier to share spectrum among multiple users and potentially the systems. so i think it's a matter of discussion, collaboration and defining a path forward which we would do in collaboration with the commission industry and the agency. >> actually let me use that question to make one point that i meant to make earlier, which we talked a lot about spectrum frontiers, that was a set of rules done this summer. the fcc now has spectrum frontiers part two that's teed up an additional number of these millimeter wave bands going up pretty high. so this is an active ongoing fcc proceeding. just as a side note, this is about as bipartisan as things get i think on these issues where everyone is in agreement we want to make progress on these. there's an administration happening but that one is going to keep going, be my guess. issues like that are

there was an inspector general report in 2013 that said 33% ntia employees didn't understand their role. and even more outrageous in that report, 80% of the documents reviewed because it's classified. how many classification there are. but could you comment on that? >> is better than it was three years ago. maybe it was a flawed report. are you familiar with the report? >> i would suspect it's not the report. i think a stun my experience that's rather typical. it is a reflection of as much as we spend tax dollars to investigate people, to establish secure i.t. and then things along those lines, we do not spend a comparable amount of money in terms of trying to train people in the basics. one of my concerns is that we make a distinction between original classification and derivative classification. my experience has been that people have classified information they are actually classifying information on current instinct more than anything else >> any other comments? by the way, unless i'm doing the arithmetic, for that you could hire two -- that's how much we are spending. 200,000 peopl