nuclear corp upright senescent in-situ lecture anyone esle in situ leaks is a method that's never been approved in any other o.e.c.d. country and the company there till the time it's real oil and discharging all they rejected non-biased directly to gram would play dumb play it one was their relative legacy directly to graham without any rehabilitation and under a legal system without any law ability to actually have exemptions from leave our protection act itself a study of a key metaphor the essay given to answer of where the mission of a few running was exceptionally from protection act. said the strain iranian using nuclear reactors produce plutonium half of the world's plutonium has been produced in civilian perry actors. so it is complicit essentially in the but the reactor risk in the us production but also an accumulation put on the miranda will. they find a use any use for some of the material try and continue the public that they are in strays is demonstrated to be harmless. the conventional disposable smoke detectors contain memory seem which is a bargain a byproduct of the n

corps. something very interesting happens. after world war ii anyone who was qualified to speak argues nuclear-weapons change everything. you cannot have anotherytvehore amphibious landing again.the the army uses that as the argument to abolish the marine corps. marine corp they fight back and win. argue e in 1947 they start arguing the bid for withare y go nuclear-weapons will not have been. how will you keep stability in value have that can atomize people? you need humanitarian relief, peacekeeping, disast relief, and smalldo a lot stability operations. the late they start arguing 47 by wha 1956 they argue explicitly in the war with the soviet union will not have been. you need capable non-nuclear forces to ride immediately. we are that jack of all trades. by early fifties their building the marine air ground task force's.orces today at all times there are several thousand marines floating on navy ships their own planes, tanks, engineers, su pplies, water making machines, they're ready to land on any foreign shore between 94 and 96 hours. once there they can help the existing government bourse bailout to combat????

nuclear weapons. the army used that to radically reduce the marine corp.. they fight back and win. in 1947, they argue the big war in nuclear weapons is probably not going to happen.? they? say, how are you going to keep stability in? the cold war if all you have something is? that can atomize people?? you need peace keeping, disaste? relief, small stability? operations. they argue this in 1947, and by? 1956, the height of the cold?? war, arguing explicitly the war? with the soviet union will not? happen. you need capable non-nuclear? forces to? arrive immediately ? do a lot of things.?? we are that service. by the late 40s and 50s, they?? are building what are called the marine air ground task forces .???????????????? >> host: was there a strong come -- commander who pushed it in the change? >> guest: the argument of the underdogs is the marine's service culture is an under studied factor in all changes. in the mission changes, public relation successes, and their political lobbying which is really a fascinating story. the main argument here is the way

he can't move them from ship to shore without nuclear weapons in the army uses this as an argument to radically reduce or perhaps even abolish the marine corps. the marines fight back and they went. as early? as 1947, they start? arguing that the? big word wit? nuclear weapons is probably not? going to happen. they say, how are you going to? keep stability in the cold war? periphery if all you have to something that can add nice??? people.??????? no, you need forces that can do? a wide ?range of famous???? humanitarian release,?????? peacekeeping, disaster movies, small stability? operations.? they start arguing and 47.??? by 56, the height of the cold?? war they argue explicitly.?? where the soviet union was goin? to happen. you need capable? nonnuclear?? forces that arrive immediately and do lots of things th?at we? are that jack of all trades??? service. so by the late 40s, early 50s, they are building what are called the marine air ground task force, which is today called it amphibious force of readiness. today at all times, there are several thousand marines floating around the world on navy ships wi

corps, really in the 1950s until something really interesting happens here. after world war ii, all the other services and the president and anyone who's qualified to speak on national defense argues nuclear weapons has changed everything. will never again have another amphibious landing. the canvas man from ship to shore and the army uses this as an argument to radically reduce or perhaps even abolish the marine corps. the marines fight back and they? win. and as early? as 1947, they st? arguing that the good war was?? nuclear weapons was probably not ?ing to happen.???? they say, how are you going to? keep stability in the cold war periphery if all you have???? something is something that can? atomize people?????? no, you need forces that can do a wide range o?f things.???? humanitarian or they've come th? peacekeeping, disaster relief comic and a small stability??? operations.???????? they start arguing that some 47? by 56, the height of the cold?? war, they argue explicitly??? ?ward the soviet union will not happen. you need very? capable, nonnuclear forces that can arrive? immediately and do lot? of things. we are that jack of all trades? service

america's nuclear power plants at least three nuclear reactors have been shut down and the nation's oldest facility in new jersey is on rare alert exelon corp's forty three year old oyster creek plant was put on alert after water levels at the plant rose more than six and a half feet above normal potentially affecting the water intake structure that pumps cooling water through the plant and the concern is that if the cool water is not maintained the used your radium rods in the pool could cause the water to boil experts say in an extreme scenario the rods could overheat risking the eventual release of radiation that concerns over the status of oyster creek has caused some to draw parallels to the fears surrounding last year's fukushima disaster in japan that helicopters and fire hoses were enlisted to ensure the pools remain filled with fresh water according to the nuclear regulatory commission the general electric designed nuclear reactors involved in the fukushima emergency are very similar to twenty three of the key design reactors in the u.s. as of tuesday afternoon the u.s. federal emergency management agency says there is no imminent th

corps in republic circles that mr. romney might alter his position about face-to-face talks with the iranians over nuclear program.aign saying over and over we don't know what he is going to say but he has always been consistent diplomacy and peace you never take the military position off the table. got to be careful how that is answered tonight. >> bill: how about you, henry, what about barack obama? has he got anything new? what's he going to be doing? >> let me give you color. he decided to hang out with marty and ron. kicked out axelrod. they went to have a meal without the president. the president for a second debate in the row i told you last time he had steak and potatoes with his wife. did the same tonight. maybe he thinks good luck charm. i know you don't like that combination of starch and meat. the president likes it. he thinks he is going to do well. in terms of the approach, they are gaming this out that they think mitt romney is going to come into this debate in the words of this advisor to the president, hug the president and not be slash and burn because mitt romney has done well into the first two

nuclear program. a reporter tried to ask romney about the story before a flag football game between his staff and traveling press corps. >> as president, would you be open to one-on-one talks with iran? >> reporter: romney may also try to press the president on a u.s. consulate attack in libya, as he did at the last debate. >> i want to make sure we get that for the record. it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in benghazi an act of terror. >> get the transcript. >> reporter: after that moment did not go as planned for romney, he dropped that line of attack from his stump speech. >> the obama campaign has become the incredible shrinking campaign. >> this is the moment when the rise of the oceans begin to flow and our planet began to heal. >> reporter: the romney campaign released a web video teasing his comments to russian president dmitry medvedev. >> this is my last election. >> reporter: but the obama campaign says it's ready for that, noting one what romney told cnn earlier this year -- >> this is without question our number one geopolitical foe. >> reporter: now, as for the president's -- perh

institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] >> the thing about eisenhower is he would never tell anybody if he would use nuclear weapons. why is this important? in the 1950's when nuclear weapons were pretty new and we threatened to use them at various stages, but nobody ever knew whether he was serious or not. whether he meant it. of course, to be credible as a deterrent, ike never told anybody. i was fascinated by that notion. talk about the loneliness of command. the use of nuclear weapons -- what could be a greater command decision than that? this is a guy who liberated europe. now he is president and he has an even greater level of responsibility at a time when nuclear weapons are new. the soviets have been getting them. we've got them. much as one or two. we have a whole arsenal. h-bombs. are we going to use these things or not? ike used to these things as a tool. he used it basically to avoid any war. > comments on "ike's bluff" tonight on q&a on c-span. >> tributes have been pouring in for arlen specter who died today. president obama called him a fighter and offered thoughts and prayers to his wife and

corp. 2012] >> in his final address to the u.n. general assembly, iranian president mahmoud ahmadinejad called for a new world order not dominated by the west. he made no reference to his country's's nuclear program. iran is currently under sanctions by the u.n. and other western countries by not complying with demands to stop its nuclear enrichment program. this is 35 minutes. >> i have the honor to welcome to the united nations his excellency mahmoud ahmadinejad, president of the islamic republic of iran and to invite him to address the assembly. [applause] >> in the name of god, the compassionate, the merciful, all plays belong suit allah, the lord of the world, and made peace and blessings be upon he and his progeny. god, and hasten the emergence of your chosen. grant in good health and victory. make as his best companions. mr. president, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, i thank the almighty god for having given us the chance to purchase a bit in this meeting. we have gathered here to ponder and work together for building a better life for the entire human community and for our nations. from iran, the land of glory and beauty, the lack of knowledge, culture, wisdom, and morality, t

corp. 2012] . . . we concluded, simply that heightened expectation of instability and supply disruptions triggered by the consequences of a nucleariran would cause the price of oil to go much higher and to remain high for a sustained duration of time. significantly impacting the united states economy. the price and economic impact would be much greater if these occurred. we hope that this paper which is a departure from the focus of most papers on the consequences of a nuclear iran or a nuclear capable iran will trigger a new discussion and enable an expanded debate on the topic. i would like to introduce michael, the foreign policy director of the bpc, a former oil analyst to boot. he directed this effort and will review some of the key findings. he will introduce our very distinguished panel. mike. >> thank you, senator. thank you everyone for coming. as the senator said, the purpose of this report is really to trigger a debate. we are not suggesting that we have all of the answers, but we wanted to introduce a new dimension to the debate about iran about preventing a nuclear iran. we are not focusing on the economics, we are n

[captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] >> the thing about eisenhower is that he would never tell anybody whether he was going to use nuclearweapons. why is this important? in the 1950's, nuclear-weapons were pretty new comment and we threatened to use them at various stages. nobody ever knew whether he was serious or not. of course, it to be credible as a deterrent, and you have to be credible, and ike never told anybody. talk about loneliness of command. the use of nuclear weapons, what could be a greater demand -- command decisions and that? now he is president and he has an even greater level of responsibility at a time when nuclear-weapons are new. not just one or two, but we're building a whole arsenal. are we going to use these things or not? ike use them as a tool. basically to avoid any more. >> evan thomas on "ike's bluff." >> and this government has promised and maintain the closest surveillance of the soviet's military buildup on the island of cuba. within the past week, unmistakable evidence has established the fact that a series of offensive missile sites is now in preparation on that imprisoned island. the pu

nuclear. freeport trading down after frading up. there's a gloomy prism. so many people are saying, revenues aren't that great. we're picking apart everything we used to say. vf corpeing the example. i'm looking, that looks good. i had eric weisman on, and this was better than i was looking for. the stock was down 7%. did people finish reading? t i'm sorry fog doing a lot of homework. that was stupid. >> weisman is on this morning at 11:00 on "squawk on the street" and we'll talk to him about north face and 4q slowdown -- >> now you'll hear people say, the expectations got too high. weisman said they would do "x." we're getting so granular that the -- it's not enough of an upside surprise. >> it's hard to -- we looked at friday at google and then a host of tech are coming in, things are not that good. sevener, where you see the enterprise willing to spend money and it doesn't seem to be there. >> the thing that's most frustrating to investors, a sense no one can figure out where we are in the cycle. equities versus credit. friday, you had a huge breakdown in equities and but credit held up well. the credit boom may surpass what we saw in the middle, so where are w