>> no, nuth toog do with that. >> my apologies. >> that's fine. our community has serious concerns regarding the relocation. since the dda was approved by the board sev sl years ago, sirs it was determine we would only move once the land was cleaned bought and handed over as a single unit from the navvy. now we are city residence and we'll move back to to federal land and moves all these right because we are moving city jurisdiction back to federal jurisdiction and then on top of that we have the housing affordsability crisis which makes the relocation payments inadequate in the cernt time for most families. then we also have concerns in that we do not rights as a community to return to where we live today and that is distressing as a community. we would like the right to return to affordable housing that we have today and in the future when the island is redeveloped. ; so to summarize please we would like to see if you can provide temporary relocation as well as a right of return for the residence of [inaudible] to our island when it is redevelop

. >> again, rich -- >> again, it's something that has nuthing toothing to do with immigration. >> a question of incentives. if you incentivize bad behavior you'll get more of it. >> when you flout federal law, you know, you have to be cracked down upon. if we have sanctuary cities for income tax evaders, i personally support that one or child molesters or things like that you can't have that. >> not all sanctuaries are bad. i agree about texas. >> mexico outlaws illegal immigration. this is symptommatic of the fact that we have really bad border security. and, you know what we've done this before. washington, d.c. for example said to the states you don't raise the drinking age to 21 we will stop federal highway spending money coming your way. >> bruce, i thought you appreciated that federal law usually trumps state and local law, no? >> well no. i do. but i will say this the whole answer to this -- >> if you accept that then how can you accept the notion of sanctuary cities which have local law. >> okay. the sanctuary cities thing is you're not going to get any undocumented immigrants to com

. >> again, rich -- >> again, it's something that has nuthing othing to do with immigration. >> a question of incentives. if you incentivize bad behavior, you'll get more of it. >> when you flout federal law, you know, you have to be cracked down upon. if we have sanctuary cities for income tax evaders, i personally support that one or child molesters or things like that, you can't have that. >> not all sanctuaries are bad. i agree about texas. >> mexico outlaws illegal immigration. this is symptommatic of the fact that we have really bad border security. and, you know what, we've done this before. washington, d.c., for example, said to the states, you don't raise the drinking age to 21, we will stop federal highway spending money coming your way. >> bruce, i thought you appreciated that federal law usually trumps state and local law, no? >> well, no. i do. but i will say this, the whole answer to this -- >> if you accept that, then how can you accept the notion of sanctuary cities which have local law. >> okay. the sanctuary cities thing is you're not going to get any undocumented immigra

the president was at the site of one of the tests doing nuthing to stop them. how can anyone trust iran of doing peaceful cooperation? >> he was in the protest. he was marching with the protesters who were carrying those banners and the protesters were chanting death to america, death to israel. he was interviewed and they said, well, how about the nuclear agreement? he said well the nuclear agreement, the future looks very bright. it is certainly very bright and certainly very bright for hezbollah because iran said they're transferring 100,000 guidance systems for guided missiles to heszbollah. they also said the future looks very bright for hamas. they'll help hamas rebuild their 35 tunnels under israel and transfer to hamas new rockets. in this kind of an environment, you know we have got to understand that their interest is in not only having undetectable nuclear break out capability but also having the cash in hand that this agreement could give them so they could fund their terrorist activities all through the middle east and that is a very threatening si

, will read my speech. [ applause ] the governors here are present and the former governor of burr nuth seat. the center of the battle ground of boko haram. the governor of edal state. and the rest eof my team. the chairman of council in africa, mr. hayes. the corporate council of africa. our ambassador to the united states of america. and corporate personnel of are industry here present. i'm surprised to meet people here very close friend of my big friend. i'm referring to the chief executive to nabu. who is here. i wasn't surprised to meet him. but i was surprised to be meet his chief executive officer. the lady who was brought by the head of the bank. ladies and gentlemen, let me begin by saying how pleased i am to be here tonight. and to be treated to this elaborate dinner by the united states chamber of commerce and corporate council on africa. you done so many to help us here. it speaks well of the growing partnership between nigeria and the united states. i would like to commend the chamber for assembling leading united states companies whose top executives have taken me through

>> no, nuth toog do with that. >> my apologies. >> that's fine. our community has serious concerns regarding the relocation. since the dda was approved by the board sev sl years ago, sirs it was determine we would only move once the land was cleaned bought and handed over as a single unit from the navvy. now we are city residence and we'll move back to to federal land and moves all these right because we are moving city jurisdiction back to federal jurisdiction and then on top of that we have the housing affordsability crisis which makes the relocation payments inadequate in the cernt time for most families. then we also have concerns in that we do not rights as a community to return to where we live today and that is distressing as a community. we would like the right to return to affordable housing that we have today and in the future when the island is redeveloped. ; so to summarize please we would like to see if you can provide temporary relocation as well as a right of return for the residence of [inaudible] to our island when it is redevelop