alley," i'm morgan brennan, david faber carl has the morning off >> also with us this morning on set, nyu professor of marking an l 2 founder and "new york times" best selling author scott galoway. >> before we get to scott, let's go to bob pasani the s&p turning negative. >> we got some problems, david, rates are only one of them four problems, in fact, let me show you what we're dealing with it's coming into view in the heart of earnings season number one, earnings are good, they're strong there is a debate as to whether or not they're priced into the market number two, rates are generally higher number three with we have consumer staple stocks hitting new lows finally, bank stocks are weak. earnings guidance full screen, i want to show you this you have great guidance from lily and lockheed martin and caterpillar, whirlpool, affirm, united tech and masco afirpd williams were a little iffy overall. the important thing is if you just look at this, you can see pretty good numbers. take a look at coca cola and united technology. caterpillar, modest numbers. lockheed had great numbers it's

liz: over at the nyu stern school of business, thank you very much the book is called global vision. good luck to you. thank you so much. when we come back we're still watch a big rally here, dow is up 254 points, we've got a lot more ahead including more on wells fargo stock dropping on a new probe. today, we're out here with some surprising facts about type 2 diabetes. so you have type 2 diabetes, right? yeah. yes i do. okay so you diet, you exercise, you manage your a1c? that's the plan. what about your heart? what do you mean my heart? the truth is, type 2 diabetes can make you twice as likely to die from a cardiovascular event, like a heart attack or stroke. and with heart disease, your risk is even higher. but wait, there's good news for adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease. jardiance is the only type 2 diabetes pill with a lifesaving cardiovascular benefit. jardiance is proven to both significantly reduce the chance of dying from a cardiovascular event in adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease alower your a1c. jardiance can cause serious side effects in

at nyu, i had 90 students in the first year of spring. taught for 25ays years a seminar called readings and legal thought, which meets once a month for three months in the fall, three in the spring. read agn a book, they book, write a short paper, read each other other's papers, and we have a two-hour book club discussion, and that's a great exercise. you use your own personal stories from your career on the bench -- mr. watson: do you use your own personal stories from your career on the bench? judge ginsburg: i would often have a case that was relevant to what we were discussing, so i would throw something in. estrogen would say, some people are modest for good reason, right? much to be modest about. would say, some people are modest for good reason. mr. watson: do you have something that stands out as a high point, either in terms of a complex or challenging case for an opinion you are particularly proud of? united states: versus jones, which went on to the supreme court. policestion was if needed a warrant in order to attach a gps dev

. >> depending on an nyu graduate school for analysis we don't know the methodology we're just taking their final analysis and incorporating it to their own? >> we don't have the data you are looking for supervisor. >> then how are we proposing where to land on what's the most appropriate time. there's a difference between anecdotes evidence and facts. i'm just looking for what the facts are. that's an element i'm uncomfortable with. i know you did were best to answer. i appreciate it. thank you, madame chair, thank you. >> thank you supervisor cohen. supervisor ronen. >> through the chair to commissioner chu and maybe this say question for the city attorney. in all the independent expenditures i've seen are to support or oppose a particular candidate. you mentioned we were through the major donor financial disclosures before us tonight that if were it to be passed we'd find out what the business interests of the individual making the contribution but wouldn't know who it's going to. i don't think that's accurate because the independent expend you're itself is formed specifically to s

. - and nyu for graduate school. - yes. - you worked other internships. you mentioned the washington post. - washington post, seattle times. i did a paper in botswana 'cause i had an eight month period where i was gonna not leave africa ever. i was gonna not leave africa ever. then my mom came and told me i have to graduate college. - come on back, yeah. and your first job was on the beached whale and cat in tree beat at newsday, as you said. and then you went to usa today where you were a breaking news reporter. and then it was there that you covered ferguson and trayvon martin. and then you went to the new york times in 2015, and now to the newshour. and you knew you wanted to be a journalist the whole time? - i knew i wanted to be a writer since i was probably three. - [evan] why? - it just naturally came to me. - not the family business. - it's not the family business. my mom has a phd in french literature and social work and is a social worker in miami, school social worker. my dad runs a large non-profit in haiti for disabled people, he's blind. so

he's a distinguish professor of engineering at nyu. i bought your book a week ago.rabbed me because you attacked the intellectuals and powers that be that continuously make dumb mistakes. you talk about a cab driver or pizza maker, they make those mistakes because there is no repercussions for them. here in the studio you have technicians. you can tell if a technician knows what he or she will be doing. the people of macro economics and policy making who not only don't pay the cost of the error, but at the same time they don't learn because they don't have any cost. the problem has been swelling since the 60s. and now it's culminated and we are paying the price. people making decisions without skin in the game. charles: one of the things you talk about in the book is the invasion of iraq and how it was chapel beyond by bill kristol on the right, friedman on the left, two individuals who had nothing to do, and here we are on the cusp of increasing our presence in the middle east again. >> the same people. all these people calling for intervention in syria. all these

that is when they got results today, at nyu professor saying this is changing, the survival rate pickstruct combined with chemotherapy. and credit analysts are saying if it goes well, they could get 32 5% of the market. republicans states their hopes on tax reform. >> might be is if we can't sell this to american people, who should go another line of work. people will value and appreciate them but obviously it requires us continued discussion with the american people. we are going to be doing that all through the year. david: four months later, howard tax cuts going for voters? i want to bring in our national political reporter sahil kapur. do they need to look for in other light of work? bag, thea mixed election is looking rough for republicans, and the incumbent party loses seats in midterm elections. there are hawks this tax cut will be more popular from a tough election, but has become modestly more popular since it was in the down in the dumps in the passage of law, but it is not a defining issue. most voters say they don't care about taxes as a top issue. david: is it early going

marc siegel from nyu and a fox news medical correspondent. welcome. >> how, rick. >> rick: dr. sally, your reaction to this rare advisory. >> i think it's a good idea. many people are overdosing. 42,000 last year. many can be revived and go on to therapy and recover and be productive and functional and happy people. they need to have that opportunity. >> dr. seagle, we've heard encouragement of citizens. is this the same principle? most people are not doctors and you're asking them to administer a drug here. >> rick a great point here. the first thing is to get people to understand what an emergency looks like. if you come on someone on the ground and they're not breathing or mental status has changed or in this case they have pinpoint pupils, how do you recognize a opioid overdose? do you know cpr? we need to teach more people. you have two million people out there that have opioid addiction problems. our hospital is discharging people now who have opioid overdoses with these devices. you're looking at something where if i push on the bottom, i spray the drug out the top. you

stephen cohen is a professor at nyu and princeton, one of the most famous professors and he joins usoming on. how worrisome do you follow the relationship -- how worrisome is it in this moment? >> i'm more worried than i have ever been for nearly 50 years of participating in u.s.-russian english she don't relations. you were taught in school and for my children, the cuban missile crisis of 1962, a moment when we came closest ever to nuclear war with russia and the lesson was supposed to be we should never get there again and we are very close and here's wh why. if trump or somebody sends these muscles against syria, there are russian soldiers invented in almost all syrian environments. i know this because moscow has said so, if russian's diet, if damascus is attacked, the capital of syria, russia will retaliate with its excellent weapons every bit as good as ours, some people say in some regards, missile technology better, russia will strike, americans in syria will die and we will be where we have never, ever ever been with russia, killing each other, bearing in mind that both natio

marc siegel from nyu langone medical center.hanks for coming in. >> good to see you. >> julie: this is so sad. she's 92 but she has so much life left in her. she's made a decision that taking dramatic care to treat what she has is -- are heart failure and obstructive pulmonary disease. she wants to stop all treatments. what do you think? >> this is ground breaking that we decide this. we tend to think of comfort care for cancer. you have terminal cancer. it's not getting better or responding to treatment. you can draw care. for years now, we've known with severe heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, she's had multiple hospitalizations, she wears oxygen, we know from studies that there's a time when you withdraw care there and you don't put a patient on ays -- respirator. >> julie: when you talk about aggressive treatment like her, 92 years old, with her health history, what kind of aggressive treatments and how much more time could it give her? >> could give somebody months. we're talking about ventilators and

commissioner was a fellow at the american enterprise institute and a clinical assistant professor at the nyu school of medicine where he also practice as a hospitalist. i would like to share with you two fun fact you may not know about him. the commissioner was born in new jersey. anyone else from new jersey? anyone else here from new jersey? new jersey is the garden state, which makes him uniquely qualified to oversee the safety of fresh produce. second, he raises chickens in his backyard. my understanding is that those chickens provide eggs to his family. jersey? new jersey is the garden state, however, i'm going to warn the commissioner that if he decides one day to slaughter and sell his chickens, secretary purdue might want to talk to him. the concern was that he would focus only on drug and medical products, and neglect food. these concerns, however, were unfounded. in just his first year, he has shown he is a vigorous supporter of implementation, a passionate proponent of the important role nutrition plays and help, nts committed to improving the effectiveness of food recalls. before

eyes but also more serious effects, from coughing and wheezing to asthma attacks this allergist at nyus seasonal allergies are getting more severement. >> climate change is a big reason for that. because our carbon dioxide levels are higher, the pollen is more potent and the plants are almost producing super pollen. >> reporter: allergy medicines are a big business for the pharmaceutical industry. that's just for over-the-counter products like zurtec, flonase and clairiton. the costs can add up but for jessica fuentes, going without allergy medicines is not an option. >>ly i will be a waterfall of boogers all over the place >> we tend to think of allergies as a nuisance, but they can be serious, they can trigger asthma attacks and be more serious. >> i think the viewers know from my voice, i feel like i could take my skull off, scoop it out. did she say waterfall of boogers? >> she did >> 5:43 in the morning, we already said waterfall of boogers. >> it's going to be a great day. >> could be a river of snot. >> yes yes. >> stick around. if you're not busy enough, you will get real busy

he has taught at numerous prestigious universities, including nyu, colombia, and the university of chicago and is a professor at new york --versity's scalia lawsuit law school and he is also a judge. just last year, judge ginsburg traveled to europe, melbourne, australia, and china. he has been teaching judges about the american model of , regulation, and sensible antitrust laws. in china, they only had antitrust laws the last 10 years. he told me these countries do not have the same understanding competition, and he says of american companies are taking a real beating around the world. for example, china and the european union have find google about $1 billion for conduct that our ftc examined and found was not anti-competitive. the newest and most incredibly exciting project he is working on the three-part series u.s. constitution and it is called "freedom: if you can keep to fill meer serious, judge ginsburg has been traveling and doing research and filming in montpelier, independence hall, gettysburg, sturbridge village, and winter harbor, maine, where he spoke to lobstermen about the

army veteran former nyu. p.d.ounderer and chairman of the group and policy advisory with americans, for a free syria, welcome good morning to all of you let mi put it to you did we do enough, with this strike? >> well i think it was necessary i don't want to say we did enough but there is a surgical strike on three locations, the target was chemical weapons we're not looking for regime change however, we think that it is necessary for us to posture unlike red line set in 2012 by president trump we look in vladimir putin noted we mean business chemical weapons have no place on a battlefield, you know as a prior officer yourself pete we trained endless hours with suits this presents a serious problem for citizens that are attacked that are not willing -- >> sure, the calculation russia respond did we do enough to send a message to moscow? that there tenuous in support of assad? >> well in the past we've always notified moscow when having action we gave them time they moved ships out of the harbor moved their plane e

elizabeth phelps who discoveries motion at nyu.first death from something line this makes the headlines? she mediciade an important poin >> we don't hear about car accidents, you know? we don't hear about everyday car accidents that often but they happen all the time. they are not in our minds because it's a part of driving and it's a part of everyday life. once we realize that humans and machines can have mistakes even though there will be mistakes and less often than human error, we will get more comfortable with it. >> i want to bring in alex who is a senior associate editor at "wire" magazine. your take on what she said there. should we be alarmed about these kind of crashes or do we put them in perspective in sense that there are so many thousands that occur every year with human drivers? >> i think we certainly need to look at these accidents, but not to be alarmed, but rather to use them as learning opportunities, especially with the tesla crash and the uber crash. it's an investigator's job to look at this and say what went

joined by l 2 founder and "new york times" author nyu professor gallagher.ing to you. >> good morning. >> what do you think ryan roberts' game is here? he said we don't have to have sky, but it's kind of convenient this isn't the beginning of some broader international strategy clearly investors are worried about comcast spending a whole lot of money the stock has been down on that. is he signaling that this -- he isn't willing to play some bidding game here? >> well, i think i am on the side of skeptics of the value of sky, but as between disney and comcast, i come down on the side that this is more valuable to comcast than it is to disney i think both are looking at it as the asset that it might become, meaning its value in creating global content streaming services, particularly in europe, versus the asset it is, which is a deteriorating satellite platform as we've seen here in the united states with dish, a satellite platform that's lost about 50% of its value in the last year. sky is not far behind on those deterioration dynamics >> more valuable to com

joining us this morning with the insights, the dean evaluations and finance professor at nyu and early spotify investor and partner, good to see you both. fascinating day. overall, what do you make of the process they have chosen at the exchange >> yeah, so i think the direct listing actually signals a lot of strength by the management team and confidence in the balance sheet, growth prospect, the fact they decided not to go out and raise a bunch of capital in a traditional ipo but rather they got the cash flow, they got the revenue forecast, growth and balance sheet to support the targets. i think it says a lot about their, you know, confidence in ability to grow without taking dollars in >> do you expect a lot of exits? we heard through various reporting that the co-founders won't but still 90% is a lot >> yeah, it's a lot of shares coming through over the last year, the vast majority of shareholders have actually been offered to sell their stock at probably around $125 a share so i think the hat's been passed around to everybody in terms of would you like to sell this is the price w

it still stands right on the nyu campus. they were performing shows in the church gymnasium, church basement, and the understanding was, the church had this relationship with the theater company, and the understanding was, you can say whatever you do, whatever you can do, you can be as naked or as clothed or as transgress sieve as you want to be and the church can never censure you or tell you that you have to not perform this, you can do whatever you want so there was this real emphasis on artistic freedom that became increasingly popular downtown and then groups like bread and puppet which were more about like adapting with puppet and communing with audiences, but as this begins to develop, a variety of different approaches to making theater also start becoming really popular downtown. right? so again, the off-off-broadway theater movement is technically all over manhattan but concentrated in chief available spaces in greenwich village and the east village, which is why it remains where it is today but all of these differe

stanford at number 1 followed by harvard, nyu, princeton and ucla. u.c.keley was number 9 on the list. the biggest concern for students and parents is debt. so for more, we are joined by the princeton review's editor in chief. is this the first we are seeing about debt? >> it's not. actually, our biggest concern about debt has been for 5 years and this is 11,000 college- bound students and their parents who were involved in the survey. i would think that for a few years before that as well. >> reporter: absolutely. looking at the numbers, i saw that it was about $25,000 for a 4-year degree at a public university. is it worth getting the degree with that kind of debt? >> good question. the average student is graduating just shy of $30,000 and that's between public and private schools. i think the parents figure the amount of debt is loftier than that. but $25,000 for one year of public housing, that means $4,000 for 4 -- $47,000 for public. students are making $2 million more than students without an undergraduate degree. they are more nimble and have far

the future of facebook and how to value the company, let's bring in the dean evaluation finance at nyu great to see you again. >> good to see you, too. >> you actually bought facebook yourself back on the 3rd of april. so i guess you say that it's valued at what >> i mean, my value was about 180, but i really think that this is going to have consequences for facebook. it would be unrealistic to expect it not to but i think the consequences are being overstated i don't think you're going to destroy this company's business model. i think ultimately this is a company that trades a free social media site for information about it it's hypocritical to claim that your data is being invaded when you give that data to the company for free you're getting something in return so i think the business model will endure with restrictions because thosery strikzs will cost facebook in terms of higher expenses every year. >> when you think about evaluation and what facebook has tradedate before versus what it should trade in the future, how do you discount that prior evaluation to reflect the new restri

there are a lot of people, scott galloway, professor at nyu has been very vocal about this. europe has all the downside of big tech. they have all the people complaining, and none of the upside which are bragging rights to numbers like this. he is one of the more vocal people that said, listen these companies may face more regulatory pressure than investors are pricing in right now. david: in deference to my friend deirdre, can i jump in here? we have a profit jump of 73%, 73% in first three months of the year. this extraordinary jump in profits. >> liz, reconcile those two things. when you hear about that kind of profit, you hear about what a target google has on its back? >> first of all, as far as the profits are concerned i think we have to take a step back and look at the fact there were several accounting changes in this quarter. for one thing they may have written up and flowed through the income statement an increase in the uber investment which is a pretty big number. that could be billions. david: good point. >> and there were couple other things too. fyi, i'm not

joining us is scott galloway, marketing professor at nyu's stern school of business, and author of "thehidden dna of amazon, apple, facebook, google." what should we accept from lawmakers? will they have better residence for mark zuckerberg? -- better questions for mark zuckerberg? tt: they will likely be more aggressive because the narrative out of yesterday is that it was a big nothingberger, and he got off really easily. the thing that is remarkable about yesterday is how unremarkable it was -- vonnie: ok, scott, i'm afraid we have to break in. speaker paul ryan is about to address the nation. rep. ryan: you also know that this is a job that is not last forever. you realize that you hold the for just a small part of our history, so you better make the most of it. it is fleeting. and that inspires you to do big things. on that score, i think we have achieved a heck of a lot. you all know that i did not seek this job. i took it reluctantly. but i have given this job everything that i have. and i have no regrets whatsoever for having accepted this responsibility. this has been one of th

many of them are trotsky-esque in their outlook in the 1930's and are going to college at nyu and elsewhere. and they came up through the democratic party. but i think that they became disenchanted on two things. number one, foreign policy. they felt america was not prosecuting the cold war as aggressively as it ought to have. and concerned about some of the racial quotas and those kinds of things that were emerging in the late 1960's and early 1970's. and so they began to move more towards the conservative point of view, national view during -- point of view. the national review during that time, i think it was 1972, had an editorial welcoming them to the movement and the headline was, "come on in, the water is fine." so they became very significant. my view is that they became more significant than we want them to be in terms of their foreign-policy views today. host: our last call is from grand prairie, texas, harold. you get the final question. please be brief. caller: yes, in 1968, lyndon johnson was upset that richard nixon sabotaged the peace talks. in october of 1968, had johnson co

way, professor of psychology at nyu.randy, to you first, because the incel community was quick to praise him, calling him a hero. who are these people? >> thousands of very lonely sad confused sometimes violent young men who gather and congregate online to talk about their woes. >> but there's a huge difference between being a sad young boy and there are so many of them and turning violent and hateful. >> right. >> so what happens is there's usually sort of a trend. when someone enters in, they're googling how to pick up girls. they might find the pickup artist industry. they mind p might find this particular group of incels. they say me too. what comes from that is several posts later it's these women are to blame and several posts later it's the men that they date, the attractive men, the sometimes men of other races. like everyone else is to blame. so what that does is it starts growing this hatred. it turns from south loatelf-loa outward hatred. that's where they all congregate and cheer lead each other and say you s

were far on the left, many of them trotskyist on their outlook in the 1930's and going to college at nyu and elsewhere. they came up through the democratic party. but i think they become disenchanted on two things. foreign policy, they felt that america was in prosecuting the cold war as it should. the racial about quotas and those things that are emerging in the late 1960's and 1970's. so they began to move towards a conservative point of view, national view. i think it was 1972. i had an editorial welcoming them to the movement. the headline was come on in, the water is fine. they became significant. they became maybe more significant than we want them to be in terms of their foreign policy. steve: our last call is from grand prairie, texas. harold, you get the final question. caller: in 1968 lyndon johnson was upset richard nixon sabotaged the peace talks in 1968, and lyndon johnson had come forward and spoke out about richard nixon, what result was that have had? johnson could have played more in that role. steve: thank you. matthew: my view is that is more ambiguous and a lot of his

i recently read a book by jonathan hite he was a uva professor now at nyu.i heard nadine strossen who was a former president at aclu who speak your time recently. mentioned what, there is an organization the heterodox academy and essentially it was, my understanding is what jonathan, professor liberal and nadine, also professor has said is that from the '60s in academic world, two out of three professors would be classified as to the left. today at somewhere around 20 to one. their concern is the ability of students to engage in critical discussion and free speech and what the effect has been on the academic community and wanted to get the thoughts of the panel on that. >> i actually don't think the students are facing many barriers to critical discussion of freedom of speech. i think by large universities face problems on the edges by large, in classrooms and and student groups, students are engaging in really fundamentally they conversations in universities. i think that's a bit of a red herring, but i do agree that universities have changed substantially.

. >> one side note, getting back to europe and new rules go in place, nyu professor scott galloway spokeis. he says a shock across the bow breaking up u.s. tech companies comes from europe. he is public about this argument. europe has all of the downside and none of the upside. they can't brag these companies started on their shores but facing all the angst with consumers feeling, rightly or wrongly, their privacy has been invaded. >> they care about it more there. they culturally care. charles: remember you can opt out, the opt-out law? >> i think the market might be underappreciating level of risk coming from europe. that will trickle across the globe. charles: real quick, folks, something really important. video coming in of the royal baby. >> do we have a name about that? charles: not sure. thinking about connell. >> looks like a connell. looks like a charles. we have good contenders. charles: has there ever been a royal named chris? >> bring my name into the mix. charles: i don't know. deirdre, you look like you love this kind of stuff. >> who doesn't like the joy? connell what do y

alley," i'm morgan brennan, david faber carl has the morning off >> also with us this morning on set, nyussor of marking an l 2 founder and "new york times" best selling author scott galoway. >> before we get to scott, let's

nyu law professor erin murphy says when people use genealogy websites, they're sharing information aboutot just themselves but ancestors. >> they say if you didn't want anyone looking at your dna, you shouldn't have put it on the website. fair enough, but what about their child's children and their children? >> reporter: the same can't be said. >> the reality is the searches are going on. i think we need an accounts of how much, how intrusive, is that okay with us. >> and get this. in order to use gedmatch they clicked on a box saying dna was theirs or obtained authorization to use it. if the judge determines that was what happened, the case could be thrown out. >> i did a ton of ancestry for my book and there are a host of ethical questions. >> it's balance between convenience, privacy, security, and what we prioritize. we obviously want to catch -- >> -- a serial killer. thank you, tony. >>> only six people out of a million a year are diagnosed with eye cancer. how did these friends all become victim? researchers try stofl this medical mystery. >> we invite you to watch our cbs ipod on

the deal, joining us now, don, former chief of staff and legal adviser at fcc, and nick, professor at nyutern school of business gentlemen, good afternoon to you both starting with you, don, to begin with, if i may do you believe ultimately this deal leads to lower prices for consumers over the long term >> well, this deal comes in a very interesting time. first of all, it comes at a time when the trump doctrine on anti-trust and sort of merger enforcement is evolving. secondly, it comes at a time when the market, the wireless market has matured, and it's robust enough to sustain three very big providers, and then, third, i think it comes in a time when the fcc has laid down a marker that its open to these kinds of combinations, and so while there's some regulatory hurdles to be overcome, i think it's the right time, and it has, as you point out, been a long time coming. >> nick, do you agree with that? the market right now has sprint shares down -- t-mobile down 6.5%, sprint down 14%, and there seems to be expectations that the deal does not get done what do you think? >> i think the mar

an allergist at nyu says seasonal allergies are getting more severe. >> climate change is a big reason are higher and the pollen is much more potent and the plants are producing superpollen and the seasons are much longer. >> reporter: allergy medicines draw more than $2.6 billion in revenue in the last year that's just for over-the-counter products like zyrec, flonase and claritin the cost for consumers can add up but for 26-year-old student and waitress jessica, going without argue medications is not an option. >> i'm going to be a waterfall of boogers all over the place, i guess. it's just an uncomfortable feeling. >> reporter: guys, i think we can all relate to that more of us may start to suffer from allergies as more people are developing them because of changes in our microbioms so this is a growing business and will continue to get bigger. >> yeah, thank you, meg. >>> coming up next, we'll get another check on today's sell-off and the headlines making news after hours. >>> and former massachusetts governor william weld will tell us what's next f torhe cannabis industry we're ba

speak of a personal story, i am finishing up an economics degree at nyu wagner. i put in a personal story and she shot back at me, miss rivera, your personal story is great but please do not put it in this policy paper, you need to talk about economics and health, i say that because i think that we sometimes think about the words, pass a law or to talk about a statistic without actually understanding the mechanisms that are happening within our states, that's what our fellow speakers were talking about. we represent 100,000 workers across the country, a lot of them women. they work in chicken factories, distribution centers. one of the largest spaces is retail. we have maybe 30,000 to 40,000 in the retail section, in new york, 25,000. vee have stores like h and m r -- we have stores like h and m. retail workers get a bad rap in terms of how they are categorized. they talk about it being low skilled. a lot of turn over and you know, lower wages, they are transient. because of that space, they are already put in a box that their stories do not really matter because

nyu professor of business and a critic of amazon, even though he is a shareholder of amazon.ove amazon as a consumer and investor in the time to be good for the economy and middle-class and plan it. stuart: the planet, come on. i'm not going to be sidetracked by that. so the president is going after them. what can the administration actually do to break them up? is it antitrust, that's always got? >> not a lot. there's a difference between being right and effect is. the president's actions have have effectively immunize the amazon from regulation because he's turned it into a partisan issue. it's now seen as a personal attack between bathos in a post which will take people including bernie sanders who raised concerns around big tech and raise them in front. to be blunt, i think he has blown it. the doj is commissioners appointed by the president that can't reboot -- be removed by the president. doj is a set of antitrust laws. and i trust be rewritten by congress to ftc is commissioners who can be removed by the president. if he was serious about the come he would have made th

. >> dagen: joining me now is professor of marketing at nyu sterns global business, author of the four, your take on zuckerberg's performance yesterday? >> it's remarkable on how unremarkable it was. he didn't screw up. there was a couple good sound bites there. there was no real moment. d.c.'s the big looser. you think 55 adults would have gotten in a room and said we can't do anything in four or five minutes each. who knows technologies, raise your hand. three or four people would have raised their hand out of the 55. why don't we give each of you more than five minutes so you can drill it down. it was the format that made this a useless exercise. >> that's a good point. >> i agree, 200%. it was remarkably unremarkable. most of them knew that going in. but it was the opportunity to get five minutes on tv. that's all it was about. and nothing's going to come out of this, other than zuckerberg's going to say well, i'm highly concerned about this whole screening out conservative stuff. we will take that under advisement. >> what does mark zuckerberg do after two days of testimony in fro

over 600 patients in the trial, including nyu combined with standard therapy. causes the immune system to recognize cancer as foreign invader. cancer is clever. has molecule that tells the immune system, we are okay, we are the same as regular cells, but by deactivating that molecule, the protein on the service of the cancer, immune system says, wait a minute, this is abnormal cell, this is an invader, i'm going get you and start to attack it. when you combieb it with regular chemotherapy which is poisoning the cancer cell you get a breakthrough. stuart: that's terrific stuff. >> this is the beginning of major, major changes in how we treat cancer. stuart: now, i do want to switch gears and talk about barbara bush, family and friends are remembering her, she died at the age of 92 late yesterday but you have been talking about the importance of what you call comfort care, what she called comfort care in the last couple of days of her life. what is comfort care? >> comfort care varies depending on the patient and diagnosis, she's been a pioneer before as you know

were far on the left, many of them trotskyist on their outlook in the 1930's and going to college at nyund elsewhere. they came up through the democratic party. but i think they become disenchanted on two things. foreign policy, they felt that america was in prosecuting the cold war as it should. the racial about quotas and those things that are emerging in the late 1960's and 1970's. so they began to move towards a conservative point of view, national view. i think it was 1972. i had an editorial welcoming them to the movement. the headline was come on in, the water is fine. they became significant. they became maybe more significant than we want them to be in terms of their foreign policy. steve: our last call is from grand prairie, texas. harold, you get the final question. caller: in 1968 lyndon johnson was upset richard nixon sabotaged the peace talks in 1968, and lyndon johnson had come forward and spoke out about richard nixon, what result was that have had? johnson could have played more in that role. steve: thank you. matthew: my view is that is more ambiguous and a lot of histo

brian: we are going to call a professor at nyu and he is going to leak it. janice: if yoit.n't know someone came across her in the hallway and said i hate this weather. and she said. janice: how about good morning? brian: people write in and get it, can we confirm it? janice: no. my lips are sealed. ainsley: it was brian. [laughter] steve: meanwhile, one democrat in the senate backing secretary of state. are the democrats playing politics with our national security and jeopardizing talks with north korea. we will talk about that. brian: geraldo rivera is here. he went to law school. tomi lahren didn't but could have. newt gingrich will be here. he has got opinions. ♪ your brain changes as you get older. but prevagen helps your brain with an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to improve short-term memory. prevagen. the name to remember. but as it grew bigger and bigger,ness. it took a whole lot more. that's why i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i b