professor of business at the nyu stern school of business.e is the author of "the sharing economy." coming up, mcdonald's announcing another executive departure today after the ceo was fired. we will discuss that next. this is bloomberg. ♪ ousted ceodonald's steve easterbrook after this consensual ceo with an employee materialized. us right now from washington with more on what is going on, bloomberg opinion columnist sarah. your column basically says, keep calm and carry on. easterbrook, by most accounts, was a successful leader for this company over the last 4.5 years. why shouldn't i be worried if i am an investor? basicallycessor offers more of the same. he is the most safe and logical choice. he has been right by his side through these initiatives such as the big restaurant remodeling program and revamping the menu. he has been integrally involved with those decisions. more of a passing of the baton. joe: what specifically is working at mcdonald's, in terms of the next leg of decisions, the strategic moves? atthe next leg is winning digi

sterling and i got together talking about his latest film and his ride from that old nyu stomping grounduse years ago when you were in school and watching everybody. and now everybody is watching you. >> it is kind of crazy. >> it has been kind of crazy for sterling k. brown since the premier three years ago of the hit nbc's show, "this is us." >> can i hug you? >> i will be like yeah, i am down for the hug and we just squeeze it and sometimes they hold on. all right. and then they let go. >> we are perfectly imperfect. >> what do you think about "this is us" that has so connected with people? >> i think it has because we are disconnected. i think folks feel collectively they get to enjoy the experience with the pearsons. we deal with so many different topics that people see themselves in one or all of us in one degree. >> sister ring k. broterling ko. >> last year, becoming the first african-american actor to win a golden globe for best performance in a drama series. >> i am being seen for who i am and appreciated for who i am. >> do you stop and think about that as part of your legacy

nyu w professor. >> thanks for having me. >> thank you very much. let's start with president trump tweeting in right in the middle of marie yovanovitch's testimony on capitol hill yesterday. democrats as you know calling this witness tampering, witness intimidation. is it? >> well, the federal statute says that witness intimidation or tampering is to knowingly influence or intimidate a witness so that you influence her testimony. so it may not necessarily be about intimidating marie yovanovitch but subsequent witnesses who might come down the line letting them know this is what happens when you go against the president. >> since she was testifying and might not have seen it maybe not tampering with her in particular but tampering with the overall system. >> exactly. >> you noted quickly he didn't do this when there were men testifying against him on wednesday. >> no, he was very restrained with george kent and bill taylor, but it was unusual that he did this with marie yovanovitch. but not necessarily surprising and what is interesting is this is an

and next is professor josh tucker who is a professor of the nyu social media and political participation laboratory and co-director of the nyu social center for political and social behavior, and he emphasizes public voting and the use of social media in facilitating all forms of political participation. and he is a co-editor of the "monkey cage" which is a blog that appears in the washington post. our final host is josh billigire who for the past 15 years has worked with the congressional offices to streamline operations and develop new technologies. and before he worked full-time with the operational offices, he worked with startups and he was ceo of fireside that he co-founded. the witnesses are reminded that the oral testimony is limited to five minutes and without objection, the written statements will be part of the record. dr. glassman, you are recognized for five minutes to give a oral presentation of your testimony. >> chairman, and members of the select committee, thank you for allowing know testify. i'm matt glassman and senior fellow at georgetown university. my portfolio inc

doctor tepper is the coprincipal investigator in the wind like so laboratories, codirector of the nyu center for social and political behavior. doctor tucker specializes in comparative politics with an emphasis on elections and voting and public opinion formation and the use of social media and facility all forms of participation. coeditor also of the monkey cage and award winning and politics log which appears in the washington post. final witnesses josh billy meyer, doing the right. who for the past 15 years has worked with congressional offices and streamlined the cmm operations and leverage new technologies. prior to focusing on software solutions for congressional offices full-time for josh worked for several meters patients testing services and attorney 18 began ceo of congressionally office that he cofounded. >> five minutes for all of you. that went out objection your written statement will be part of the record. >> ( keller, vice chairman and members of the select monday. thank you for the opportunity to sit testify today. i'm senior fellow at darshan university. lamented con

cancer that we have not even begun to really deal with because i know i have been on the faculty at nyu for going on 26 years and i have not seen curricular changes, the way that one would expect. in the 1960s that what all of those college protests were about. the faculty of color, the lack of curriculum that addressed the history of race in this country, that presented a more realistic take of america so that white america could understand its complicity and the continually inequality and the continuing racial injustice. and until that happens, that is not why -- i'm optimistic it can be done unles unless optimisticr the will to do it. >> the other amazing part of this book that is a little bit separate from the industry is really about these three fields, academia, journalism and entertainment. and what came across to me so strongly that i e-mailed her like 11:00 o'clock p.m., it's like these are the fields that are representing the world. he read. . . . so it doesn't follow. these men are telling us our stories and the same is true and much worse for people of color because academia

nyu film majors have debt four times greater than their salary, on average.n, this year's highest paying major is having rich parents! good choice! well done! look at you! in all seriousness, though, why do we have to use money as a way to measure success? why don't we measure success by friends or love or grammy nominations? i'm just saying! i'm just saying! ( play laughing ) ( applause ) let's move on to an airport police chase unlike any you've ever seen. >> to the wild police says chase across an airport runway caught on camera. the suspected teen burglar trying to escape an arrest after landing in oklahoma. >> take a look at the united flight just landed an a 16-year-old squeezes between the jetway and aircraft and jumps on to the active runway and starts running. the 16-year-old got into a mechanical room, into the terminal, and watch as he dwops drops, you can see from a distance, from the roof of the terminal at his pursuers arrive. he broke bones in his legs, taken to the hospital. he's in custody. he still faces the charge, guys. >> trevor: goddam!

. >> you're now the host of a podcast, stay ted with preet and a professor at nyu law school and author. impeachment. alk to you about >> shocking. >> do you think there is enough evidence at this point that president trump could be impeached for abuse of power? >> i do. >> wt are the offenses ofis abuse of power? >> look, there is a long history of things that he's de that ha documented in the mueller report but put that all aside because the is a newew narrative that started developing a few weeks ago with respect to the crane scandal and even though h peop don't know and not a lkingin point, you need not for impeachment show a violation of a criminal statute. there are other ways in which a president is impeachedt may be the case that a small violation of the law and actual violation of the crimi statute maybe congress would find if it didn't affect the national interest, maybe you wouldn't impeach in that respect.at so with respect to what happened with ukraine, the founders believed there has to be a process by when you remove a president of the united states and for f among othern

i know i've been on the faculty at nyu for going on 26 years, i have not seen curricular changes thethat one would expect. in the 1960s that's what all of those college protests were about. the lack of curricular that addresses the history of race in the country that presented a more realistic take of america so that white america could understand. >> its complicity and the continuing inequality and the continuing racial injustice. and until that happens, that's why i'm optimistic that it can be done. unless i am less optimistic about whether there is the will to do it. >> and the other amazing part of this book that is a little bit separate from the industry is really about these three fields.academia, journalism and entertainment and what came across to me so strongly that i emailed her at like 11:00 p.m. a few nights ago. it's like these are the fields that are representing the world. i thought about the "me too" movement when we saw in the last couple years was the men who were being accused, some of the men, a lot of the men were in journalism, they were political journalists, t

i've been on the faculty at nyu for going on 26 years. i haven't seen curriculum changes the way that one would expect. in the 1960s, that's what all those college protests were about. the faculty of color, the lack of curriculum that addressed the history of race in the country that presented a realistic take of america so that white america could understand its complicity and the continuing inequality and continuing racial injustice and until that happens, i am optimistic that it can be done but i'm less optimistic about the will to do it. >> the other amazing part of the book that's separate from the industry is about academia, journalism and entertainment and what came across so strongly these are the fields representing the world and i thought about the need to move meant and what we saw in the last couple of years as the men who were being accused, some of the men, a lot of the men were in journalism, political journalists telling the story of hillary clinton in 2016, charlie rose and mark lauer and -- matt lauer and mark halperin.

nyu.r, it's curable. bill gates has basically eradicated polio. is so there's all of that when you start taxing the someone so much that their entire salary goes to the government, they're working for the government, you probably are going to see a lot less philanthropy x there's no way you can only tax the top 70,000 rich people and not go into the middle class. so in order to pay for all of her plans, she is going to have to pay -- tax the middle class which will kill the economy. i just want to name a couple of taxes that elizabeth warren is planning. top income tax rate goes back up to 39.6%, a new 14.8% tax for social security, 6% on accumulated wealth, 2% wealth tax above 50 million, 3% above one billion. so she's just putting more tax and more taxes which eventually will have consequences and slow down -- ed: basically, what's the point of making money? let's just write a check -- >> for the government. ed: you had an important interview with andy purdy, he runs security at huawei,

new study by nyu shows teens 25% more marijuana in 11 states where it's allowed compared to states whereheir finding found a potential downside to legalizing the drug. rob: one football fan paying big for a lost bet. jack decided he would live on the roof of a restaurant until the cincinnati bengals won a game. the bengals are now 1 oil 9. he has lived there for more than a month. he does have shelter building a tent for himself with food and tv so he can watch his team lose every day. jillian: that's kind of crazy. rob: the second impeachment hearing begins at 8:30 and "fox & friends" starts right now. ♪ ♪ small town throw down. steve: the president was down in louisiana last night at another trump rally. third visit to louisiana. he is trying his best to make sure that republican is able to oust the democratic governor. ainsley: did you know that that's the only state in the deep south that has a democratic governor right now? steve: yes. ainsley: john bel edwards wants to continue to be the governor of louisiana. pete: he wants to distance himself from national republicans as best he

bring in a former federal prosecutor and a professor at nyu school of law. wow. start with the judge. everything she said. right? including her point about absolute immunity, she says clearly in no uncertain terms the white house can't claim. what do you make how she went about this and what about these officials who refused to testify? >> first thing to know about judge jackson, a really good and respected judge. an obama appointee related by marriage to former speaker of the house paul ryan. she has on both sides of the aisle and a meticulous judge. wrote 120-page statement, spelled it out. exactly right. the idea the president could preclude all high-level white house officials from testifying is an absolute fiction and that's what she said. >> she used -- let's use don mcgahn. he needs to physical appear and testify before congress, how i interpreted it. could he not sit there and say, you know, executive privilege. executive privilege. not answering this. how do you thread that needle? if you're don mcgahn? >> absolutely right. in some way a sweeping opinion

here is professor of economics at nyu great to have you with us. >> thank you >> what is wrong with thelan the main problem is it's going to affect the aftertax rate of return for the very wealthy. there's a slogan that it doesn't sound like very much but you think about the rate of return on wealth which is around 3 to 4% and if you subtract the top rate warren is proposing of 3%, you're down to zero. >> she has since doubled that to 6% >> that destroys any incentive to invest. >> exactly >> i think up to six% will be in negative territory who is going to sit around and see their wealth earning nothing or negative territory. these people will move their money to other countries your rates started at 05%. sw switzerland that has probably the only successful wealth tax in the world, i think their rate is .3% why do you think a lower rate te tends to work and what should the rate be if we had one in the u.s. >> i'm still in favor of the swiss tax. .3% would lower the return at the top but less than 10%. it's less than most leading fees are on mutual funds. >> it's low enough that people w

professor at nyu stern school of business >> to the extent tim cook is viewed in the public sphere.t's a back handed compliment about him he is a brilliant operator everybody says he's a great executor the implication is that he's not a fantastic innovator. a couple of his innovations are now really by any measure a blockbuster? >> i would agree with that >> the gap i think to answer your question on the innovation piece, he has been stoking a lot of great products and advancing them those two combined are 8% of the revenue, those are businesses that didn't exist when steve jobs was running apple the other piece around innovation that i think gets lost, this is a secretive company. i think there's some pieces around that that still are not affected in the apple share price and not affected in tim cook's record for ceo. >> it would navigate the political shoals as with president trump. >> yeah, one of the biggest skills that a tech ceo needs to have these days is smart government relationships and of all the tech ceo's in the united states top of the pile. you push back a bit on immi

joining me tonight, fox news contributor and nyu professor of medicine.nd millions of people. don't forget, this is the company that was crying when donald trump was elected. this is silicon valley lefty nuttiness. they are getting all the information on people's health. does that concern you as a doctor? >> incredibly. there are patient privacy laws that are supposed so protect my patients from my sharing information with anyone. medical is so important that people's information be protected. health and human services is starting to look into this to see if any regulations have been violated. the idea that doctors and patients don't know about this, i like how you combine it with the idea of big brother where the government is involved with trying to control what healthcare you get, and google is involved with knowing what youring' guy know sees, will be results, everything that you night consider private. do you want it what antibiotic you took? trish: google already has it on 10 million people. >> 2,600 facilities. it's already been accumulated about m

joshua tucker professor politics at new york university is a coprincipal investigator at nyu i laboratory and codirector of the center for social and political behavior specializing in comparativeph politics with emphasis on lectures and voting with use of social media to facilitate. also a co- editor of the monkey cage that appears in the washington post the final witness over the past 15 years has worked with congressional offices to streamline new technologies to develop software solutions for congressional offices full-time worked at the fireside end of the year my did your oily oral testimony is limited to five minutes and without objection you and statements are part of the record you are now recognized for five minutes chairman and vice chairman and members of the committee thank you for the opportunityty to testify today i'm senior fellow from georgetown university along with the congressional research service including member communication the legislative branch patriot committing a goal of s the eye provided historical and contextual review of frank and privilege i discuss its o

. >> after high school, she moved to new york city where she attended nyu. adventure of tom sawyer. >> my parents were not thrilled. i actually have a job. i am going to leave school. just maybe you should, they gave me some grief and also supported me. after moving to los angeles, bell earned the lead in the tv series that put her on the map playing an anti-establishment student veronica mars. i realized i can tell a sassy joke. >> the original series ran for three seasons and maintained a following till this day. bell currently stars in the nbc's hit "the good place." now in its fourth and final season. >> holy mother forking shirt ball. >> it is a crazy thing to walk away from something at the top of its game. >> that does not happen in tv. >> it was hard for all of us because we are really close. it was so fun to come to work with him everyday. i will forever miss it. >> bell's break out film role came in 2008 with "for ggetting sarah marshal." the producer introduced her to dak shepard. >> this guy can talk. and then i didn't know who he was, maybe it i

in 1986, she became a professor and moved to nyu where she became a professor. she resigned and 97, she's the professor there. in 2011, in addition, she beca became, a job she did until 2018. i don't see anything about the new york post here. her books include making a deal, industrial workers in chicago, which one the bankrupt prize and was a finalist. another book was a consumer's republic for mass consumption in america. which is a widely used college based book. she's also a member of the american academy so i would only say one other word that is, you should read this book cover to cover. don't be cut off by the fact that it has 115 pages. [laughter] there's more content than most footnotes than any book i have ever read. you have to be a scholar to get it. these are stories in and of themselves and they are worth reading. [applause] >> thank you, very much, tony. the headline about the office in new york talked about it. i want to thank tony, not only for introducing me today but for giving me many hours of interviews and you will see, if you read the book

cnn legal an vist jennifer rogers, former prosecutors and melissa murray professor at nyu law school and gloria borger a chief cnn political analyst. on the legal, explain to us watching honing in on this word "refresh "refreshed." how can someone -- shouldn't you tell the truth the first time? what is this refreshed testimony? because we're learning new details about how he went and chatted with the secretary of energy, chatted with the president. told him to go tell the truth. round two goes back, says, okay. yes. essentially quid pro quo not just with regard to this meeting with zelensky at the white house also with regard to the $400 million in military aid? how does that work? >> you should, of course, tell the truth the first time and prepared for your testimony using documents and any other means to refresh your recollection the first time, but oftentimes if what you really want is the information. what you really want is what sondland new and when and what people told him et cetera. he gets another chance. i think they'll want him back in person. they'll give him another chan

he's published journals in science and nature and perhaps the youngest and nyu is the author at heart zero in on thursday this comment rebooting ai. thank you. [applause] [background sounds] >> we had some technical difficulties here. i am here to talk about this new book rebooting ai some of you might have seen as the head of the new york times. but how to build artificial intelligence we can trust. i say we all should be worried about the question because people are building a lot of artificial intelligence they don't say that we can continue trust. the way we put it in the base was visual intelligence as a trust problem we are relying on ai for more but hasn't yet earned our confidence. we also suggest and i also want to suggest that there is a hype problem. a lot of ai is overhyped these days. often my people who are very prominent in the fields. so a group angst, deep learning, a major approach to ai these days and he said the typical person into a mental task with less than one second of thought, we can probably automate it using the ai narrative are in the new future. as a prof

rossini roche committees and associate director of medicine at nyu's' school of medicine. always great to see you. i want to put up on the screen with the leadoff therapist of the road. it's supposed to be going down, meaning the death rate, as it does in other countries. the fact that the number is climbing, there is something terribly wrong about question to you dr. raj come is what is terribly wrong in this country right now? >> that is the burning question. the study didn't answer that question, it did raise the alarm that a buyer we can make compared to other wealthy nations in the world, seeing a decrease in our survival rate or longevity went supposedly with them as a coal advances we shouldn't be seeing that and of fact as you said when we looked at the past 50 plus years there was generally an increase in life expectancy but not true for the last three years. we've heard this somewhat recently and a lot of it was attributed to white populations and things like opioid dependence and addiction, suicide. what's interesting about this study is a child that across all

an nyu professor and a best-selling author and journalist, ceo of the podcast company. great to have all of you here. it's fun to take a moment and really dig in to this beyond each incremental advancement in this story. as you look at both the parallels in history and what's coming in this next week, what stands out to you? >> i think the two things that are different from watergate that are worth watching are, one, that statistic you just said, 75% of people told gallup they watched. we are not going to have 71% of america watching anything because we have such an atomized, fragmented media world. i think this will be a lot of americans just watching benghazi or whatever the -- whether it's witch hunt. >> or people have more options to look at recipes on facebook. this is a world where the politics followed what was available in media and it was just a couple channels. >> that and i think republicans came in line. that over the course of the watergate hearing, you saw republicans taking it very seriously, and we have not had a lot of evidence of republicans willing to

but also, you know, i teach at nyu, one of the student groups they actually chose a project.ose cable versus all these other options. why? because the millennials, the gen zs, they are look agent the future of television, not television, but all streaming. they are all about who is going to give them the best bargain for the most content. >> but the question is, who? because in fact what everyone is now talking about is they may have to acquire six or seven subscriptions to kind of get back to what they had when they had a really -- >> that's why pricing is key here. >> it is. i'm saying even if it is pretty low pricing, you add them all together, it is not great; for. i mean there are people like me whose kids are grown up who see that 21st century fox catalog, you see -- >> disney is in great shape because they have their library. for netflix, it is all -- >> production costs are a little bit of a concern. sorry to interrupt. david: we've got to wrap. >> long-term they are not turning a profit till 2024 according to them on this. david: it is safe to say that one person sho

. >> you see, we studied the law we learned about the intricacies of the law from institutions like nyu the streets. >> mm-hmm. [ laughter ] and given our legal expertise, we guaranteed rudy he wouldn't see any jail time. just prison time >> mm-hmm. [ laughter ] >> definitely prison time. >> so to our best friend rudy, we say thanks for the selfie and while you're in prison, you probably should be as nice to the brothers you locked up >> mm-hmm. [ light laughter ] [ audience ohs ] >> they will kill you. >> yeah. [ laughter ] >> thanks, rudy. >> thank you, rudy >> jimmy: all right, give it up - [ cheers and applause for giuliani's best friends, the lucas brothers thank you, guys. one selfie some entertainment news. this weekend, "frozen 2" made over $130 million. [ cheers and applause which is why elsa just announced she's running for president and financing her own campaign [ laughter ] some more movie news i saw that daniel craig said that he's done playing james bond [ audience aws ] and the news has left fans shaken [ laughter ] [ cheers and applause the american music awards -- [ li

. >> and "roadhouse" is the best movie about a bouncer that went to nyu ever made. >>> the first arrestk that killed nine americans in mexico. we'll tell you the latest on what we know about the suspect and the victims next. do you have concerns about mild memory loss related to aging? prevagen is the number one pharmacist-recommended memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. if you have postmenopausal osteoporosis and a high risk for fracture now might not be the best time to ask yourself are my bones strong? life is full of make or break moments. that's why it's so important to help reduce your risk of fracture with prolia®. only prolia® is proven to help strengthen and protect bones from fracture with 1 shot every 6 months. do not take prolia® if you have low blood calcium, are pregnant, are allergic to it or take xgeva® serious allergic reactions, like low blood pressure trouble breathing; throat tightness; face, lip, or tongue swelling rash; itching; or hives have happened. tell your doctor about dental

gift of $100 million for $600 million fund that provides free tuition to medical school students at nyu. that's on top of a gift he gave of $250 million. bernie marcus who is into fish, marcus aquarium in atlanta, $250 million. and michael bloomberg -- i can't keep track of everything he's given away terrific human beings. >> there are many people watching and making maybe to most, i don't know, who are watching this who agree with you. we're a network that champions capitalism and all it stands for. but there are people like dalio and benioff -- >> excuse me i don't know what dalio is saying i will listen intently when he appears and says the rich people pay more i have no problem with that i'm advocating for that. >> sure. >> you don't do it through a wealth tax you do it through coming to an agreement what should a tax rate be on wealthy people. >> how do we fix, if you indeed think it needs to be fixed, how do we -- >> education and faster economic growth faster economic growth and education. education. as said to you before, the average lifetime earnings of a college graduate is we

. >> seth: wow >> born in the same hospital we both then went to nyu for grad school and started offot married. >> seth: that's fantastic. [ cheers and applause >> isn't that crazy? >> seth: man, i feel, like if enough things line up. >> yeah. it was, like the universe was saying, like "maybe you guys should consider it." >> seth: but, is this a true story? was it her mother, that when she first saw you on stage at stanford, she was not -- [ laughter ] -- she had a warning for your wife >> she said, "i don't care who you date here, just stay away from that boy. [ laughter ] and she pointed at me. because we did this august wilson play "joe turner has come and gone. and the character is very intense. and i was sort of methody at age 18 just trying to inhabit. and my hair was all scraggly and looking crazy. and she's, like "that negro, no bueno. [ laughter ] stay away. no further way to make sure that your daughter marries the man that you don't want her to end up with. [ laughter ] >> seth: right you can never rule anybody out >> yeah, yeah, yeah. >> seth: uh, thanksgiving plans this

. >> melissa, constitutional scholar at nyu, one of the things that we saw last week -- i believe jennifer williams is entering the hearing room. the republicans are arguing that the aid went through, no harm, no foul, so nothing wrong here. you also could see them start to move from maybe this was wrong but not an impeachable offense. >> that's definitely the democrat strategy, while this may have happened, there's nothing to see here. this is the usual course of events for a president that's highly unorthodox and a little bit of a maverick in terms of how foreign policy is conducted. >> both witnesses at the witness table standing, facing chairman schiff. they will take their seats, take the oath. chairman schiff just waiting for the reporters now to clear. it's expected to be a long day on capitol hill. we'll be facing testimony this afternoon from kurt volker, the special envoy on morrison, a me national security council who colonel vindman reported to. >> we will come to order. good morning, everyone. this is the third in a public hearing on the impeachment inquiry. without objection

professor at nyu law school,

doj official, former chief of the fraud section in the department of justice, law professor now at nyu. we were talking before we came back about what she represents in this story, the public storytelling only going on for two days this week. she is, as congressman swalwell described her, the anti corruption crusader in this story. >> there was a wonderful vignette about the moment she's told you need to come back today, she was in the middle of giving an award to someone for actually being a crusader. what it does is it raises the issue that you're going to hear a lot from the republican side which is the president has the absolute power to remove her. that's not the issue. the issue is why, why was she removed? the argument is going to be she was standing in the way of an anti corruption effort. she is exhibit a to that not being true. she was incredibly compelling on the fact that she was carrying out american policy that was anti corruption. >> to make this more specific and more granular, donald trump's own friends describe him as someone incapable of learning the moves. his old m

also, a new member of our team, alyssa murray, constitutional law professor at nyu. dan, i'll begin with you. we heard mary outline it from the democrats, they will make ambassador yovanovitch's relevance, should she have left before the conversation with president zelensky. >> right, and i think the key here is for her to describe a culture of corruption. meaning we keep talking about how the goal was to clean up corruption in the ukraine, and we may get from her how corrupt the united states in effect was being, meaning giuliani and its allies and how she was trying. she was known as sort of the anti-corruption person there, that she was trying to get things cleaned up, and instead of being able to execute on that, that she was getting an enormous amount of pushback from giuliani and his two allies and i think that is going to be important for setting the stage, telling the story about what was happening in ukraine, and that then leads into the phone call with zelensky, et cetera. >> we will hear what jon karl said. the president has a right to replace any ambassad

deep accounts of your own constitutional philosophies, and judge wood you gave the madison lecture at nyu and yours was called our 18th century constitution in the 21st century world. you gave an account of why the constitution should evolve in light of social and technological change, and you defend that approach against an originalist approach. to what degree did your die myn approach, how was it influenced by justice blackmun, and i think snainch it's much more systematic than justice blackmun was. >> i was influenced to write the thing by the fact that there are certainly some parts of the constitution everyone thinks of the 8th amendment where the supreme court itself has said and it has never overruled the notion that our standards of what cruel and unusual punishment means have evolved with the times, and if they were hanging horse thieves in 1791, we probably don't want to be hanging horse thieves today and that made a great deal of sense to me. over the years that i worked for justice blackmun and observed the work of the court, i saw so many applications of the broad ranging lan

let's bring in nyu law professor melissa murray. she's been start of our impeachment coverage all week. now, melissa, walk us through the next few steps and next few weeks. we know it heads to the judiciary committee in the house. >> chairman schiff will compile a report and submit it. in that will be perhaps recommended articles of impeachment with the judiciary committee will vote on and once it is voted out of committee it will be presented usually the entire house which will vote and all it takes is a simple majority of the house to issue those articles of impeachment and from there we shift to a trial in the senate. >> and there's been some debate among the republicans about the pace of this trial in the senate. >> well, the pacing of it is going to be really important. the senate gets to set all of the rules for this impeachment trial. it is not like an ordinary criminal trial so they get to set the amount of time they'll spend on this, the amount of witnesses they'll have, the timing of opening and closing statements and the

." >> timothy naftali who teachers at nyu, a frequent contributor to cnn. >> jon meacham is pulitzer prize-winning historian. >> and jeffrey england who is the founding director of the center for presidential history. >> and just this month he was named the 2019 smu faculty member of the year by the students. >> tonight's event is moderated by someone who all of you in dallas know. you've heard her voice many times. she asks some of the most penetrating questions i've heard. co-producer of kr's fabulous program. >> i just want to remind everybody that i have an ipad here because we're accepting questions from the audience but we'll take them via twitter so they will filter into me as they come through and the tweet, you can tweet @cph @smu if you've got a question. gentlemen, welcome. we'll start with you, jeffrey, the most obvious question is the one that i know you like the least. that is what did the framers intend when they created a provision for impeachment? >> they intended in case there was ever a problem that a president were to have office and it were discovered that that p

of >> we run a website called suffrage in the media at nyu, where anything that has a media aspect to it, which is everything, that really rises to the surface, we put up. weekly, sot almost there's always new material, and it has one of the best search elements ever. you can search by suffrage era, academic, nonacademic, movies, it set her -- etc. it is all free. >> please join me in thanking our panel. [applause] coming.k you all for [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] @ >> you are watching american history tv. follow us on twitter for information on our schedule and to keep up with the latest history news. >> this weekend on american history tv, pulitzer prize discussesoline fraser the life of laura ingalls wilder, the author of the "little house on the prairie" books. here is a preview. >> i often say, i don't think we would have the "little house" books if it were not for rose. rose had a lot of experience as a writer, had a lot of polish and professionalism. she knew publishing p

professor at nyu law school, clerk for sotomayor. and a daily podcast produced by wnyc studios. kyle cheney covers congress for politico. a week against in the impeachment inquiry. new details on what is at the heart of all of this. that is ukraine. how president trump sees the country may help explain why he was allegedly so willing to use it as a pawn to further his political ambitions. from day one tied to his belief in discredited conspiracy theories about the country's involvement in the 2016 election. it begins with a meeting with three of his top officials quote, they had barely begun their pitch when trump unloaded on them according to current officials with the meeting. in trump's mind, he said the entire leadership colluded with the democrats to undermine his 2016 campaign. they tried to take me down, trump railed. more information on the president's views were shaped from, remember this, robert mueller's investigation. a treasure trove of documents under a freedom of information act request reveals tons of new details about interviews that undermine the mueller report

yet she went on to become incredibly important rhodes scholar and get her masters and doctorate from nyuand ultimately becoming distinguished professor at hunter university of both english and creative writing where she taught memoir. i'm going to read a little bit more for my mother his book. i love the sight of myself, walking up the steps of the newark public library pass alliance patience and fortitude. i would've preferred lionesses. thinking that the kid who grew up on the streets of hoboken new jersey was now walking past the painting of milton his daughters talking down the immortal and taking down the immortal words. now walking down the third floor corridor to the bird collection. now pressing the buzzer. they were actually loving me into the sacred recess where i would soon set next to all of those famous literary scholars whose work i had read and do work of my own. the american dream. my mother his work was highly personal beautifully crafted and deeply researched. she was writing a book when chasing ghosts which was about her father mmr. of which life which is an expert in

the nyu school of medicine associate professor dr. debbie natviaporompo. i hope i got that right.t of people are looking at this and saying they are just complaining about stuff that's always been out there, it's inflation, it isn't that you are particularly targeted or getting particularly fingered for these high costs. you say? >> well, there are a few different things going on. first, there's our culture that's changing, right. so we see people who are indoors more, maybe not exercising, working longer hours -- neil: why are you looking at me? you're right about that. you are exactly right. >> so for old people, may have been more prone to get certain conditions. if you're not moving as much, you don't have as much control over your diet and exercise, maybe higher blood pressure, higher cholesterol which is what we are seeing, more diabetes. neil: in other words, i did see that, that a lot of people are getting these conditions at a much younger age. it's one thing if you're my age, 39 or so, but it's another if you're, well, 39 or so. what's going on? >> exactly. i think part

law professor at nyu. from washington is a white house correspondent for the "new york times". she's also an msnbc contributor. new details emerging overnight after the house intelligence committee released hundreds of pages of testimony from two key witnesses in the impeachment inquiry. closed door testimony from tim morison paints a picture of john bolton working feverishly during a secret august meeting trying to convince him to release the $391 million in security aid to ukraine. investigators say u.s. ambassadors to the eu says he believes he was acting in president trump's direction urging ukraine to announce political investigations. tim morison was on the july 25th phone call, raised red flags, telling government lawyers it could be damaging if it were to be leaked. i recommended that we restrict access to the package. that we did not need quite so many people to have access to the package. williams also weighing in on the president's ukraine call after listening in firsthand saying it struck me as unusual and inappropriate and more political in nature than previous cal

my favorite is ken langone he's really helped change nyu.'t understand why she and sanders find a need to criticize billionaires and as far as mike is concerns, they'll take a billionaire to probably raise taxes on other people and i believe, by the way, in the progressive income tax structure. i believe rich people should pay more in taxes. and with the right numbers, i don't know, as i speak to you on the phone, i look at a quote here from a gentlemen, since this is an area where many people are concerned about fairness and social justice, what is your share of what someone else has worked for? that's the question. i'll ask the three of you. i don't know what you make for a living, but i know you work hard and you're very conscientiousness. how many months a year do you want to work for yourself and for the government i've said publicly, i'll be willing to work six months for the government, six for myself how many months do you want to work for yourself and how many do you want to work for the government >> i agree lee, i think that feels

nyu school of medicine has been renamed. >> been renamed. had the right to name the med school because of a major gift we made. we chose to name it after bob grossman, the dean, ceo, took over 12 years ago, led transformation of one of the greatest health care facilities in the world. there are a lot of great ones. what this man has done with this place, that night we raised $150 million in a single night. >> whoa. how much was a ticket? >> a lot of money. what the hell is her name -- brian: elizabeth warren. >> warren, she won't spend it. she could afford it. she won't spend it. these politicians will give all the barbed-wire they can eat out of that are pocket for nothing. brian: good to see you. ainsley: we love the one restaurant. >> dimaggios. steve: talking about theater down in washington. we'll take you there live coming up after this. >> god bless you. do you have concerns about mild memory loss related to aging? prevagen is the number one pharmacist-recommended memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores ev

ken langone gave $100 million to nyu medical school. does he want to eliminate that too?ng amazing typically and so you worry about innovation. i think it's great jamie dimon's pushing back on this attack on success but he's still conceding the inequality argument to elizabeth warren and i think he and everyone else in the economy needs to explain why her inequality stats are bogus and it's really hasn't changed that much over time. maria: i think you're spot-on. the fact is, jamie dimon opened the door to elizabeth warren with that whole craziness that the business roundtable came out with and said oh, profits are no longer important. other stakeholders are important. i mean, no kidding, your employees and the constituents, the communities you work in are important. you had to tell us that? and while telling us profits aren't important? that's ridiculous and total pr in my view. >> one of the things we have to remember, we're in an election year. during the primary we have to hear crazy things on both sides. you're going to hear the craziest of the crazy until you get to

that's the same group that is giving $100 million to nyu, giving $350 million to mit, millions more to's behavior when their tax rates go above 100%? >> well, basically it depends on how the system works. essentially, if you say the tax rate's are very high but continue to make charitable donations tax deductible it will increase charitable donations, not decrease them. it all depends on how the tax system works. what i would favor would be a vast expansion and a much tougher estate tax. we know the tougher estate tax would actually lead to more charitable donations. so i think that basically which way charity goes depends on the structure. maria: even there, though, you're going to have unintended consequences where people will spend money differently. and these very left policies are being questioned by a lot of people because much of the country is not there. they don't want to see 100% tax rates. even former president obama is warning democrats about liberal policies being proposed by some 2020 hopefuls. he's saying to voters they have to be rooted in reality. here's what the forme

marc siegel is a fox news contributor, professor of medicine at nyu. why canada? canadian prices that would make it cheaper to import drugs from there? it's because they are lower. the reason i think he is choosing canada is because he will have less of a pushback from people who say the fda cannot insure quality if you bring prescription drugs back from other countries. with canada, it is easy for them to look them over. i will take the oath take the secret here. drug manufacturing is now a worldwide market. it is not the way it used to be where all drugs were made in the united states. we are having problems with generics that are made in india and china and maintaining quality. but the drugs in canada are fairly easy for the fda to look over. b6 is saying that a lot of other things they are doing too, jon and sandra, increasing price transparency, getting more generic drug alternatives approved. and that is as opposed to the uploads a plan, is saying that the federal government in the form of medicare for some of our most expensive drugs, negotiate those prices