nz poisk kanderakh russia has long passed the nz, but in terms of calibers and khas-101x55 they are still trying to somehow stay within their norms - said bohdanov due to the lack of missiles and their low efficiency and accuracy, they were not able to use iranian drones, this is waving 6 which in principle, he didn't show himself in any way, and the gentleman 136, but they don't use shahit on a large scale here, said kyrylo budanov of the command of the air forces of the armed forces of ukraine, we congratulate you, mr. yury, glory to ukraine, and please comment on this information from kirill budanov about the missile defense system which cannot be lower than 30%, and according to the iskanders , bogdanov says that only 13% is left, but the calibers and chaos 101 and 555 are almost half of the remaining 43 corresponding 45. it was good that they informed me because i haven't had time to familiarize myself with it, so statements go quickly, information flows very dynamically in society, so then about nz what is it ? in case of any such unforeseen events or some huge threat that can put p

still have to count on that, he can release as many because everything is equal to the reserve of the nz is about 30%, although in certain types the enemy is, for example, some kind of cander, the enemy has entered this reserve and in separate at the moment, only 13 percent of these rockets remain in the huts. as for the rockets that we saw being used today, i estimated that more than half of them were used. there were about 400 units at the beginning of the war. and now they are here, taking into account this attack. well, somewhere in in the area, there are more than a hundred, between a hundred and two hundred missiles, so the enemy is already, let’s say, planning these massive missile attacks so that , against the background of the air defense capabilities that are growing and growing in ukraine, they could achieve at least some result, mr. valery. extremely professional expert and we would ask you to evaluate now, of course, we will not go into certain secrets of the iranian defense industry, but what should we expect from iranian ballistic missiles of three types of range . so we u

fact that they exhaust their stocks of some kind of missile weapons, instead, they get it from the nz there, others rockets relatively speaking, and how does this situation look definitely on the front, that is, can it be said that they somehow change the type of weapons they use against our defenders. if so, what can this indicate, taking into account their weapons, whatever type and age they are its production , it is death, first of all, brings death to the civilian invoice and critical infrastructure, a-a to expect from the aggressor country and the terrorist regime, and what else - it is some kind of humanity, a-a absolutely no enemy is needed convention war, i realized that he is not as strong as he thought, as he convinced his population, as he tried to convince his own that they are actually the second army of the world, but we showed that the ukrainian people, the ukrainian army is the vanguard of world security, so vitaliy, how much elimination and this world in general, because if they stop helping ukraine, it will be a clear signal not only to russia, but also to other cou

country by the terrorists eh that a bunch of various missiles eh could have been delivered to that nzd during the factory tests there or rejected that way as well part of the missiles, which may be new, which were manufactured without only having to be delivered, and as a result, we just see that 50% of the missiles did not reach ukraine, and this already says something, and it says that these stocks are running out and they are somewhere. of course, but the quality already they are becoming quite doubtful. we saw this based on the results of those strikes with which the ministry of terrorism and attack, as announced yesterday, was satisfied with mr. valeriu, based on what you are saying now. i would like to delve a little into putin's motivation to resort to such missile terrorism, he does n’t have many missiles, he is already forced to get them from new zealand, as you say , in addition, yesterday there was an active discussion as to whether or not this missile strike is actually the answer to the destruction of the crimean bridge, in my opinion, a bit of a simple question, given th

price of the boss others there are rolls-royces, they are present in warehouses and there are some nzsme as great britain, germany, and they can be sent to us and we can make a replacement, so i say that we do not need money, we need to collect such an energy ramstein in order to send the existing equipment to us without money of ukraine and for us to be able to close this problem ukraine is not that it is not able to close this issue it is able to close this issue of course we have the capacity, but if i point out tomorrow they should bear a blow and we will no longer have these factories because they still need to be received. and this is ours , which cannot be impressed and must be used. thank you, once again, i am going through the quotes of the relevant european high-ranking officials and they all talk about active investments in the interests of ukraine, and well, i understand that we are talking about the formation of such an investment

in the same place, again, in nz they are stored surrounded by military equipment. consists of two stages, and by and large. that's when it's all organized. cinema, then we can talk about the possibility of inflicting counterattacks on the enemy and the question again is not that 300,000 people are not in prizes, the main question is, but how these 300,000 people will be armed, equipped with modern weapons, military equipment and modern warfare trained for this. now, if this issue is not resolved in many respects, then, of course, here is mobilization. here, as such, these 300,000 people. well , then, of course, questions may arise for her, but we will still believe that all our commanders will organize the discipline of knowledge and commanders of all these particular and general issues and that they will cope with the post. and what i still ca n’t, well, i can’t help but note. this is what needs to be said. well, as it begins, then the negroes are the torah, then the poles are there, then some objective circumstances in this regard, i really want to paraphrase ale

fascinating the critics so simple minded and in fact you talk about how i think at film festival in nz nlz -- new zealand decide stod to screen it and some critics from l.a. were trying to get them to cancel her all across the world in new zealand. >> yeah. the reaction to the film from some of the fiercest critics is fierce. and, you know, yes, and that continued even after my article appeared. if anything, maybe with rejoined fury. and, you know, there's also this -- they raise this sort of series of questions. so one of the principal questions was that of identity, right, as who is this woman to be making this documentary. but then, you know, they go on to say, well, people who are incarcerated can't give their permission to be interviewed, which is an interesting thought for any journalist or documentarian. of course many great documentaries having been made on people who are in prison. you get arguments that, you know, some of the former guantanamo bay prisoners have opposed this film. it's sort of a frankly a moving target, an ever-moving target, and you're told, well, no, no, no

what your culture is paid similarly, i would like an individual who says they don't stand for x, y, nze same sort of conditions. as i said rlier, i am not here to -- i am here to rally our own higher good and ask ourselves, is this the best use of our resources? is this the best use of our time? we support the artists making these comments? if not, behave accordingly. john: we saw neo-nazis hang a banner over and let freeway saying "kanye is right." does someone like kanye saying the things he says make it easier for other people to say these things out loud? lz: i would hate to give kanye credit for things that president trump has already established. i would simply say this is more of the same. when it comes to someone like kanye or however you want to identify him, the reality is, a lot of people that you see spewing antisemitic things did not need a black man from chicago to give him permission to say these things. they were already prepared to say those things. they have already been saying those things. while it is easy to view the situation as kanye giving permission, the realit

funny you plan in life and gu to college and you plan your next steps, but the most profound decision nz life, is how you meet people are random. i was meant to be i think and it was such a great fit being that social worker with the ax, that's it. >> so i see san francisco and san francisco leadership and government as a beacon for the entire country. because we are so up front about what we believe in, we're really up front about inclusivity and i know that, others look at us, many look to us. we've had other departments, contact us in terms of how do you, how do you do this? how do you create a diverse equitable and inclusive workforce? and so, but i would be lying if i said that we don't have any problems in california or in san francisco or in the department. we are out liars, sure? are we doing our best again to address those things with implicit bias training? with changing the culture, our department has made huge huge leaps as has the city and i really feel like san francisco is part of the solution to moving forward in a better way. people are individuals, there are a lot of di

funny you plan in life and gu to college and you plan your next steps, but the most profound decision nzhow you meet people are random. i was meant to be i think and it was such a great fit being that social worker with the ax, that's it. >> so i see san francisco and san francisco leadership and government as a beacon for the entire country. because we are so up front about what we believe in, we're really up front about inclusivity and i know that, others look at us, many look to us. we've had other departments, contact us in terms of how do you, how do you do this? how do you create a diverse equitable and inclusive workforce? and so, but i would be lying if i said that we don't have any problems in california or in san francisco or in the department. we are out liars, sure? are we doing our best again to address those things with implicit bias training? with changing the culture, our department has made huge huge leaps as has the city and i really feel like san francisco is part of the solution to moving forward in a better way. people are individuals, there are a lot of different ty

funny you plan in life and gu to college and you plan your next steps, but the most profound decision nz is how you meet people are random. i was meant to be i think and it was such a great fit being that social worker with the ax, that's it. >> so i see san francisco and san francisco leadership and government as a beacon for the entire country. because we are so up front about what we believe in, we're really up front about inclusivity and i know that, others look at us, many look to us. we've had other departments, contact us in terms of how do you, how do you do this? how do you create a diverse equitable and inclusive workforce? and so, but i would be lying if i said that we don't have any problems in california or in san francisco or in the department. we are out liars, sure? are we doing our best again to address those things with implicit bias training? with changing the culture, our department has made huge huge leaps as has the city and i really feel like san francisco is part of the solution to moving forward in a better way. people are individuals, there are a lot of differen

funny you plan in life and gu to college and you plan your next steps, but the most profound decision nz is how you meet people are random. i was meant to be i think and it was such a great fit being that social worker with the ax, that's it. >> so i see san francisco and san francisco leadership and government as a beacon for the entire country. because we are so up front about what we believe in, we're really up front about inclusivity and i know that, others look at us, many look to us. we've had other departments, contact us in terms of how do you, how do you do this? how do you create a diverse equitable and inclusive workforce? and so, but i would be lying if i said that we don't have any problems in california or in san francisco or in the department. we are out liars, sure? are we doing our best again to address those things with implicit bias training? with changing the culture, our department has made huge huge leaps as has the city and i really feel like san francisco is part of the solution to moving forward in a better way. people are individuals, there are a lot of differen

funny you plan in life and gu to college and you plan your next steps, but the most profound decision nzife, is how you meet people are random. i was meant to be i think and it was such a great fit being that social worker with the ax, that's it. >> so i see san francisco and san francisco leadership and government as a beacon for the entire country. because we are so up front about what we believe in, we're really up front about inclusivity and i know that, others look at us, many look to us. we've had other departments, contact us in terms of how do you, how do you do this? how do you create a diverse equitable and inclusive workforce? and so, but i would be lying if i said that we don't have any problems in california or in san francisco or in the department. we are out liars, sure? are we doing our best again to address those things with implicit bias training? with changing the culture, our department has made huge huge leaps as has the city and i really feel like san francisco is part of the solution to moving forward in a better way. people are individuals, there are a lot of diff