senator o'hara. -- professor o'hara. professor? is the professor with us? professor, could you count to 10 please? could you speak? if you can hear me. professor o'hara, if you could speak up, and hear me, please speak up. ok. she must be in the 3g. [laughter] can.-- let's see if we are in contact with her at all. is it working? professor, could you speak up please? you need to unmute your mic, i am told, professor o'hara. how did she do that? [laughter] a quarter in it. i don't know. [laughter] not going to give us a quarter, i know that. can she hear us? i am afraid we have technical difficulties, and i guess what we will do now, if you can fix them in the next 30 seconds let me know, if not, judge barrett, we will hear from you. any progress with professor o'hara? ok. judge, if you do not mind, you can take your mask off, please. raise your right hand. stand up, please. swear that the testimony you are about to get this committee is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you god? tocome to the committee, your family and all the ov

o'hara: very kind of you. it is anticlimactic because you have already heard from the most important person from whom you need to hear. very kind of you to take the time. i want to thank the distinguished members of the committee, senator young and senator braun for the opportunity to speak today. i first came to meet her when, as dean of the law school, we recruited her to the faculty in 2002. i was aware of her reputation as a law student, but i had not taught her. i can well remember that in the initial interview, i was not thinking so much of her as a notre dame alum, but as a candidate in whom many law schools would have an interest. after all, she was first in her class, executive editor of a law review, held two distinguished clerkships for laurence silberman and antonin scalia, and a fellowship at george washington university law school. so, from my standpoint as dean, in a market in which we compete for sterling candidates, amy coney barrett was a -- i was responsible for creating an environment in wh

any progress with professor o'hara? okay. judge, if you don't mind, you can take your mask off, please. raise your right hand. stand up, please. do you solemnly swear that the testimony you're about to give this committee is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you god? thank you. welcome to the committee, to your family, and a great job over there. the floor is yours, judge. >> chairman graham -- let me make sure this is on. ranking member feinstein, and members of the committee, i am honored and humbled to appear before you as a nominee for associate justice of the supreme court. i thank the president for entrusting me with this profound responsibility as well as for the graciousness that he and the first lady have shown my family throughout this process. i thank senator young for introducing me, as he did at my hearing to serve on the seventh circuit. and i also thank senator braun for his support. and while she could not with us via the satellite, i am also grateful to former dean patty o'hara of

let's try professor o'hara. any luck with her? o'hara, any luck with her? apologize for the problem. the floor is yours. o'hara: it is a bit amtek climactic because we've heard from the most important person but it is kind of you to take the time. i've known judge amy coney barrett for just shy of 20 years and i want to thank you, the ranking member and the judiciary committee for the opportunity to speak about her today. i first came to meet her when together with my colleagues we recruited her to the faculty in 2002. i was aware of her reputation but i had not taught her. in the initial interview from my standpoint i was not thinking of her so much as a notre dame alum , but rather as a candidate many law schools would have an interest. she was first in her class, executive editor of a law review, held to distinctive closures. short periods in -- period in private practice. in aom my standpoint market in which law schools compete aggressively for candidates with sterling credentials like hers. amy coney barrett was a big hit and a big win for us. in the c

let's try professor o'hara. any luck with her? >> i'm here, chairman graham. >> thank you. i apologize for the problem. the floor is yours. >> that's very kind of you. it's anticlimactic to because you heard from the most important you need to hear but it's kind to take the time. i have known judge amy coney barrett for shy of 20 years and i want to thank you, the ranking member of distinguish feinstein, senator young and the opportunity to speak about her today. first came to meet her when as dean of the law school together with my colleagues who recruited her to the faculty in 2002. i was aware of her reputation as a law student but i had not taught her. so i can well remember in the initial interview from my standpoint i was not thinking of her so much of "notable quotables" alunote --notre damea candidate of many will have an interest. she was first in the class, executive editor of "law review" and held two clerksship for demandingjuriousists judge silverman and justice antonin scalia. short period of private prac for at baker boss and fellowship at george washington u

senator o'hara. -- professor o'hara. professor? is the professor with us? professor, could you count to 10 please? could you speak? if you can hear me. professor o'hara, if you could speak up, and hear me, please speak up. ok. she must be in the 3g. [laughter] can.-- let's see if we are in contact with her at all. is it working? professor, could you speak up please? you need to unmute your mic, i am told, professor o'hara. how did she do that? [laughter] a quarter in it. i don't know. [laughter] not going to give us a quarter, i know that. can she hear us? i am afraid we have technical difficulties, and i guess what we will do now, if you can fix them in the next 30 seconds let me know, if not, judge barrett, we will hear from you. any progress with professor o'hara? ok. judge, if you do not mind, you can take your mask off, please. raise your right hand. stand up, please. swear that the testimony you are about to get this committee is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you god? tocome to the committee, your family and all the ov

while she could not be with us via satellite, i am also grateful to former dean o'hara of the notre dame law school. she hired me as a professor nearly 20 years ago and she has been a mentor, colleague, and friend ever since. the members of this committee and your other colleagues in the senate would have taken the time to meet with me since my nomination. it has been a privilege to meet you. as i said when i was nominated to serve as a justice, i am used to being in a group of nine, my family. nothing is more important to me, and i am very proud to have been behind me. my husband jesse and i have been married for 21 years. he has been a selfless and wonderful partner every step of the way. i asked my sister, why do you think marriage is hard? we are always saying that. i think it is easy. she looked at me and said, maybe you should ask jesse if she agrees. -- he agrees. i decided not to take her advice because i know i am far luckier in love than i deserve. we are the parents of seven wonderful children. our oldest daughter, emma, is a sophomore in college who just might follow her pare

another piece of information was from miss o'hara. she was the dean of notre dame law school while judge barrett was a professor. remember what she had tosay . i have only communicated with this august committee on two occasions. the first was 10 years ago when i wrote a strong letter in support of now justice kagan n. whose term as dean of harvard law school overlapped with my own. the second is h today introducing and endorsing amy coney barrett, an equally strong terms. some might find these recommendations a juxtaposition, but i find them entirely consistent. >> the committee will hold over ask 4632 on a line consent policy modernization act. i ask unanimous consent that twnotwithstanding the motion of october 15, setting the vote on the barrett nomination at 1 pm, the committee proceed immediately to vote on the barrett nomination. any objection? without objection. on the motion to report the nomination of amy coney barrett to be an associate justice of the supreme court of the united states, the clerk will call the role. favorab

and i am especially grateful to o'hara ofr dean patty notre dame law school. she hired me as a professor nearly 20 years ago and has been mentor, colleague, and friend ever since. i thank the members of this committee -- and your other colleagues in the senate -- who have taken the time to meet with me since my nomination. it has been a privilege to meet you. as i said when i was nominated to serve as a justice, i am used to being in a group of nine -- my family. nothing is more important to me, and i am so proud to have them behind me. my husband jesse and i have been married for 21 years. he has been a selfless and wonderful partner at every step along the way. i once asked my sister, "why do people say marriage is hard? i think it's easy." she said, "maybe you should ask jesse if he agrees." i decided not to take her advice. i know that i am far luckier in love than i deserve. jesse and i are parents to seven wonderful children. emma is a sophomore in college who just might follow her parents into a career in the law. law. vivian came to us from haiti. when

patricia o'hara saying an integrated life of mind, heart and soul the notre dame professor. in an age where public discourse is just full of billous contempt that if you are a conservative, you are automatically despised by the other side. that's just a sad day for the country. >> dana: brian, i thought professor o'hara's comments were so wonderfully said. well-put forward. and she said that she -- this is student of hers. she said i have never seen anybody blow past me in terms of skills and professionalism as amy coney barrett. >> brian: we almost didn't get it. right? it looked as though she was supposed to speak before amy and they couldn't get her through which we are very familiar with that made her comments hey i'm the dean but this is the super star and the fact notre dame which i hear is not a bad school compared to the ivy league schools, okay. but, i think she is going to be really strong. so over the top with the healthcare pictures. the big pictures. high, i want you it meet a family that needs healthcare and this person -- we know about those stories. that's a

let's try professor o'hara. any luck with her? >> i'm here, chairman graham. >> thank you. apologize for the problem. the floor is yours. >> that's very kind of you. it is anti-climactic because you already heard from the most important person from whom you need to hear, but it is very kind of you to take the time. i have known judge amy coney barrett for just shy of 20 years. and i want to thank you, the ranking member, senator feinstein, the distinguished members of the judiciary committee, senator young and senator braun for the opportunity to speak about her here today. i first came to meet her when as dean of the law school together with my colleagues we recruited her to the faculty in 2002. i was aware of her reputation as a law student, but i had not taught her. so i can well remember that in the initial interview for my standpoint i was not thinking of her so much as a notre dame alum, but rather that is a candidate in who many law schools would have an interest. after all, she was first in her class, she was executive editor of the law review, she held two distingu

let's try professor o'hara. any luck with her? >> i'm here. >> we should let you know what's happening. there were three individuals who were to introduce judge barrett, including the former law professor, former dean at notre dame, but they had apparently some technical issues and she was not able to speak. nonetheless, you heard the opening remarks from judge amy coney barrett at the beginning of these confirmation hearings. the real questioning will take place tomorrow in what is expected to be a marathon session. i want to go to pete williams who covers the supreme court. there was a lot said today about the speed of this process, 16 days from the point of nomination. we heard lindsey graham talk about we could have pushed this through but we decided to hold hearings. tell us what's normal here and what's abnormal here about this process? >> i think what's abnormal about it is to do it this fast at a time when the senate has become so contentious. yes, it's true, as many republicans pointed out that there were times in the pas

so, they're going to kick it th statements, introductions from indiana senators and from patricia o'hara, who is a former dean ofe notre aw school. and then we'll hear statements from judgearrett herself and from the senators on the senate judiciary committee. after that, they will move on to questis for judge barrettrom the senators on the committee, which is really where the meat of the hearings will be. and then we'll hear teimony from legal experts and people from judge barrett's life supporting her nominion and probably some opposing her nomination. in>> sreenivasan: at this if anybody's watched any of the previous two nominationyo hearingshave the team that supports the justice. that party asks easy questions. and the team that opposes the nominee asks ver ones.cult given the composition of the senate, it's sort of foregone conclusion at this point. >> it certainly does seem that way. the republicans would need several senators to defect, and there's no sign ofinhat at this there are two senators, senator lisa murkowski of alaska and senator susan collins of maine, who had said tha

obama also got a new club which are calm o'hara's probably a few others to do the same clearing the way for old man dixiecrat by rigging the primaries the d.n.c. successfully alienated every young person who was turned on by bernie sanders democratic socialist movement all the energy behind common sense progress like giving everyone health care and raising the minimum wage and taxing the rich all that energy was stamped out by the neo liberals like a rod that had caught on fire nancy pelosi sprained both her knees while she was stamping so hard people under 30 got to see for themselves that our system is completely rigged for the rich and powerful but i guess it's good they learned it now because they had to learn it sometime kind of like how to please a lady with one hand handcuffed behind your back and chocolate mousse covering your eyes you should learn it early because you'll need it eventually number 3 if joe biden loses blame the mainstream media we now know that during the 2016 election the media gave trump $23.00 times as much coverage as bernie sanders and 10 times as much cove

any progress with professor o'hara?okay, judge, if you don't mind, you can take the mask off, please. raise your right hand. stand up, please. do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give this committee is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you, god? welcome to the committee, to your family, a great job over there. the floor is yours, judge. >> ranking member feinstein and members of the committee, i'm honored and humbled to appear before you today as a nominee for associate justice of the supreme court. i think the president for entrusting me with this profound responsibility as well as for the graciousness that he and the first lady have shown my family throughout this process. i thank senator young for introducing me as he did at my hearing to serve on the seventh circuit. and i also think senator braun for his support. and while she could not be with us via the satellite, i am also grateful to the former dean patty o'hara at notre dame law school. she hired me as a profes

let's try professor o'hara, any luck with her? >> i'm here, chairman graham. >> thank you. i apologize for the problem. the floor is yours. >> that's very kind of you. it's anticlimb maccic, because you've already heard from the most important are important person. >>> let's talk about what we just heard it was interesting to the end there, jeffrey, he talked about the different perspectives she will bring, but primarily, the first mother of school-age children, the first justice from the 7th circuit, and the only sitting justice who didn't attend law school at harvard or yale. with particular interest, i think we were listening to what she said about her time clerking for justice scalia and the similarities she shares with him as how he viewed the law. what did you take away from this? >> i thought the most important passage was when she said the policy choices should be left to the people's representatives. it's important to remember what that means in the context of what the supreme court does justice scalia felt like in a state wants to ban a marriage, that's a policy d

the trading nation team, jc o'hara, mark tepper.ong earnings report from amd, strengthened pc, gaming and data center yet the stock is selling off down 5%. tell us why. >> i think it's a buying opportunity. first and foremost shareholders are being diluted but for really good reason. they're going to have just an absolutely much better company if you think about it, amd with this xyzilxilinx we bought it because of its data center, pcs and gaming there's two new gaming stations coming out, a new playstation and xbox and guess whose chips are in there not nvidia amd. i tried to buy one for my son and they're all sold out now you add in the programmable chip, it gets them into that booming 5g cycle as i said, shareholders are being diluted. you'll be better off because you have an excellent end market >> your thoughts on how the market is responding to this $35 billion deal and how it compares to other deals in the chip semiconductor history? >> any time there's a deal, stocks directly involved always experience choppy trading over th

for example, frank o'hara has a great poem that reflects on the entrance to central park he says victory seems to be leading a horse into bergdorf goodman's. it's a comment on the way that is a monument to gilded age commercial material. kate: speaking of the relationship of the moment between where a culture is built and what happens to it later, one of the questions some he asking now is what examples are there of a culture using civil war veterans as models for their monuments and what difference does that make to our own perception of the monument? nobody remembers who the person was and it later becomes a universal symbol or the meaning might have been one thing when they knew who it was who was portrayed there and that meaning dissipates? how do we understand the meaning of the monument in those cases? thomas: there are a lot of examples of people put forward as the models for civil war monuments. are more credibly put forward than others will stop there are a lot of cases where it is claimed somewhat as the model for the monument, no question. in which lots of ways this topic is o

>> "gone with the wind" which romanticizes slavery in the a i antebellum south, and even scarlet o'hara job managing a business. last year when pete buttigieg was running for president, he said alfred e newman cannot be president. buttigieg said he had to google it. recently trump also took a jab at dr. anthony fauci sea he gets more airtime than bob hope. bob hope, who died in 2003, is an icon, no doubt, but he was in his 50s in the 1950s. it's not just trump, but the folks he surrounded himself with. listen to his former campaign chairman, later convicted and sent to prison. here's paul manafort trying to explain why women voters for phlox to president trump. >> many women believe their husbands can't afford to pay for the family bills. >> you know what you said, women are concerned about their husbands' income. >> i can speak personally to that. >> is that the big concern? >> because they can't afford their lives anymore. that's the point. >> the president's 1950s world view extends far bedownthe household. he once cited the '40s and '50s at a time when we were not pushed around, res

liken johnson, sort of scarlet o'hara in gone with the wind, lyndon does not promise never to go hungry again. he promises never to be the idealistic fool his father had been, who played a promising political career into working on that road crew. he vowed he would succeed. he would succeed, not only in the most nefarious ways politically, but also that he would be -- let everyone know how clever and nefarious he was. he worked himself up from congressman, aid, he is elected to u.s. senate by 87 votes. those 87 votes are highly fraudulent. achieved a great landslide of his own in 1964. he becomes senate majority leader and makes it into a position of great responsibility and power, unprecedented. he is the number two most powerful person in the country in the 1950's. and he wants to be president in 1960. is of richardtion milhouse nixon. , thes his story begins ambitions are small compared to jfk and to lbj. he is a typical american. no dynasty there. or family is not going up down. his father is a streetcar conductor in ohio who moved to california to get away from the cold and frost b

o'hara. she was the dean of notre dame law school while judge barrett was the professor. hat she had t. i have only communicated with this august committee on two occasions. the first was 10 years ago and i wrote a strong letter in support of now-justice elana kagan. whose term as dean of harvard law school overlapped with my own. the second is today introducing ,nd endorsing amy coney barrett an -- in equally strong terms. some might find these inommendations juxtaposition. i find them entirely consistent. i voted for both. the committee will hold over s-4632. that,unanimous consent notwithstanding the motion of october 15, setting the vote on the barrett nomination at 1:00 p.m., the committee proceed immediately to vote on the barrett nomination. any objections? without objection. on the motion to report the nomination of amy coney barrett to being associate justice of the supreme court of the united states, the clerk will call the roll. favorably to the floor, the clerk will call the roll. [voting] >> mr. chairman, the boats are s. yea senator cornyn. sen. cornyn: mr.

fresh off their historic, zamboni-like sweep of the emmys, the cast of "schitt's creek," catherine o'harawith us, along with tenacious d. and later this week, we keep it going with riz ahmed, norman reedus and tim mcgraw. please join us for all of that. our first guest is one of the funniest men on tv, and he's not even on a comedy show. he is covering the western conference finals on "inside the nba" for tnt. please welcome, nba hall-of-famer, sir charles barkley. >>> hi, charles. >> what's up, jimmy? >> how are you? >> man, i'm doing good. welcome back off of vacation. >> thanks, you know i love you and i really was happy that you agreed to be my first guest back to help ease me back in to this, so thank you very much. >> hey, listen, so you were fly fishing, huh? >> i did go fly fishing, i know you like to fish, do you fly fish? >> i have never been fly fishing. you have to teach me how to fly fish. >> i would love to do that, just the two of us in a boat alone, would be something very special. >> no. no. no. we are not going a boat together, brother. no. >> then the deal's off, i don'

o'hara took the test at london heath row before flying to newark. showed your phone whenever you needed to prove you had taken that test? >> yes, yes, when i went to board the flight, i scanned it right in, and it gave the authorization that i was covid-19 negative. >> i felt much safer knowing that everyone around me had just tested. everyone was negative. >> reporter: but it's not just test results. meyer says the system is ready to eventually process vaccination records. what happens when a vaccine comes out? is this app still relevant? >> very much so. remember there's not just one vaccine. remember there are many promising vaccine candidates. what that means is, countries who are making this decision about whether or not to let people enter the country, they need to know did this person get vaccinated, which vaccine did they get. >> reporter: gio benitez, abc news, new york. >>> it's a sound that most of us haven't heard in san francisco in a while because of the pandemic but the cable car chime is back. ♪ the musical talents of cable car gripm

o'hara took the test at london heath row before flying to newark.ou showed your phone whenever you needed to prove you can taken that test? >> yes, yes, when i went to board the flight, i scanned it right in, and it gave the authorization that i was covid-19 negative. >> i felt much safer knowing that everyone around me had just tested. everyone was negative. >> reporter: but it's not just test results. meyer says the system is ready to eventually process vaccination records. what happens when a vaccine comes out? is this app still relevant? >> very much so. remember theres a s are many promising vaccine candidates. countries who are making this decision about whether or not to let people enter the country, they need to know did this person get vaccinated, which vaccine did they get. >> reporter: gio benitez, abc news, new york. >>> it's a sound that most of us haven't heard in san francisco in a while because of the pandemic but the cable car chime is back. sounds nice. the musical talents of cable car gripmen shined during a ringoff yesterday. the

while she could not be with us via the satellite, i am also grateful to former dean patty o'hara of the know notre dame. i thank the members of this committee and your other colleagues in the senate who have taken the time to meet with me since my nomination it's been a privilege to meet you. as i have said, umenyiora used to be in a group of nine. nothing is more important to me than my family. my husband and i have been married for 21 years. he's been a selfless and wonderful partner every step of the way. i once asked my sister, why do you think marriage is hard? people are always saying that. i think it's easy. she looked at me and sell, well, maybe you should ask jessie if he agrees with that. i decided not to take her advice, because i know i am far luckier in love than i deserve. jessie and i are parents to seven wonderful children. our oldest daughter, emma, is a sophomore in college, who just might follow her parents into a career in the law. next is vivian, who came to us from haiti. when vivian arrived, she was so weak we were told she might never talk or walk normally, but n

let's try professor o'hara, any luck with her? charles: good afternoon. i'm charles payne. this is "making money," right now, amy coney barrett giving her opening statement and already weird and contentious supreme court confirmation hearing. we'll have much more on this throughout the hour including what it means for business stocks and the election. meanwhile, folks, the stock market continues its october rebound. all the major broad equity indices have edged much higher and they're very close to their all-time highs. meanwhile financial headline writers continue to hype a potential fiscal stimulus package. the fact is that the story is beginning to sound like the they who cried wolf. i think there are buy signals in three years very important technically. the advance-decline line i talked about it on friday breaking out big time is a great track record for predicting stock market rallies. behavioral, big time wall street legends predicting impending doom and sentiment for bearish than bullish. behavioral analysis is flashing a buy signal. fundamentally, early earnings re

(applause) >> my name is jim o'hara, and i am a member of the board, and of the executive committee of the supreme court historical society. the society is deeply honored to be the host of tonight's national heritage lecture. a few observations before the ending is over. first, justice kagan, judge game spurred, judge angle meyer, professor kennedy, thank you for your insights and stories of your time with justice thurgood marshall. this has been a warm and wonderful evening, and i am honored to have been part of it. the national heritage lecture is sponsored each year by the supreme court historical society, the white house historical society, in the united states capital historical society. since 1991, when justice delivered a rousing talk on president roosevelts 1937 court packing. the organizations have rotated hosting duties each year. this evening's national heritage lecture is of course a celebration of justice thurgood marshall 50 years after his ascension to the supreme court. the society, all of us here are deeply honored to be joined this evening by his wife, cecilia marshal

so, here is what dean o'hara said. of notre dame law school, who hired barrett to be a professor. i've only communicated with of this committee on two occasions. the first was ten years ago when i wrote a strong letter in support of now justice elena kagan, whose term is dean of harvard law school and overlappedth with my own. the second is today, introducing and endorsing amy coney barrett, and in equally strong terms. some might find these recommendations to be i in juxtaposition, but i find them entirely consistent. and to anybody wondering about judge h barrett, i would highly recommend that you look at the aba's recommendations in the process they used to find her well-qualified. not one person uttered a negative word about her character, according to the aba. someone said to the aba the myth is real, she is a staggering academic mind. she's incredibly honest and forthright. she's exactly who you think she is. nothing about her f is fake. she's good, decent, simple, sincere, exemplary of a living integrated life. the standing committee would have been hard-pressed to come up

sean o'hara back with us.an industry and a way to sort of invest in that and for those who looked at the airline industry, this could either be a great vehicle if things were going really well, or a bad vehicle these days when things are not going well. what does it say? this is an overkill, it got even more selling steam based on this latest virus news, or what's driving it, do you think? >> thanks, neil, for having me. i think it's the fear of things slowing down. i think this was a very speculative play. airlines got as they say, cheap, if you will, but i think there's going to be quite a long time before they get back to their pre-covid levels. there's a couple things that are headwinds. second home sales have risen, rv sales have risen, and business travel's probably not coming back. so people on their vacation choices are probably going to i don't theiruse their rv or go t their second home as opposed to flying. we will see to she tee the shakt about business travel. i would like to see something that is

the story that my colleague robert o'hara and i wrote today was about the president's physician and howrt of pressed around and manipulated into not really telling the full story. and probably it seems manipulated into allowing the president to take a joy ride outside of walter reed hospital while he is infected and going through a course of five days of is he veerus medication that is reserved for people with severe covid cases. i spoke with two doctors who are veterans in treating covid patients and they told me they would have been fired on the spot if they have allowed a patient of donald trump's age and a case like his to leave the hospital. it would be inappropriate per rule number three of the government, don't leave the house if you're sick. it is a big issue. meanwhile, doctors are looking closely at that hermetically sealed sufficient that the president decided to ride in, because let's be honest, the covid virus that he tells us we shouldn't be afraid of is teaming in that vehicle. and whoever is driving him, a secret service agent, and whoever is sitting alongside him, a sec

president, professor o'hara also noted in her letter that she doesn't write glowing reviews for federal judiciary nominees on a regular basis. she said the only similar letter she had written was in support of elena kagan's nomination to the supreme court. she went and on i quote, i feel every bit as strongly about judge barrett's qualifications for a position as associate justice as i felt about justice kagan. and while i have not always agreed with the american bar association judicial rankings, they certainly got tt right with -- got it right with judge barrett. i'm struck by the testimony that the head of the a.b.a. committee sent to the judiciary committee. the a.b.a. standing committee on the federal judiciary is the body that provides the a.b.a.'s evaluation of the a.b.a.'s official nominees. in her testimony detailing the well-qualified rating that the a.b.a. gave to judge barrett, the head of the a.b.a. noted, lawyers and judges praised nominee's integrity. most remarkably with interviews in the legal profession who know judge barrett whether for years or decades, not one perso

here now, dennis gartman, ryan payne and sean owe o o'hare are- sean o'hara.on delta, out any moment. as soon as we have the numbers we'll get them to you. delta shares are down three quarters of a percent, ryan. but we know that the airline sector has been crushed with the shutdown. what are your expectations? >> well, it's all going to come down is the news worse than expected or are they losing less money than expected. right now it's just about a cash burn for all the airlines. so it's going to be interesting to see how much they're burning. to put it in perspective, back in april when it was really, really dire, they were losing $100 million a day, maria. that's come down to about 2 of $25 million a day. that number continues to come down and they can be at a zero cash burn by the end of the year then they should be in pretty good position. without any new stimulus coming from capitol hill, it's really about reserving cash and i think that's what the street is going to be looking at this morning. maria: that's a really good point. how will it hold onto an

o'hara. she was the dean of notre dame law school while judge barrett was a professor. remember what she had to say. i have only communicated with this august committee on two occasions. the first was two years -- 10 years ago when i wrote a strong letter in support of now justice kagan. whose term as dean of harvard law school overlapped with my own. the second is today introducing and endorsing amy coney barrett, in equally strong terms. some might find these recommendations in juxtaposition but i find them entirely consistent. so do i. i voted for both. the committee will hold over s46.32 modernization act. i ask unanimous consent that notwithstanding the motion of october 15th setting the vote on the barrett nomination at 1:00 p.m., the committee proceed immediately to vote on the barrett nomination. any objection? without objection. on the motion to report the nomination of amy coney barrett to be at associate justice of the supreme court of the united states, the clerk will call the roll. favorably to the floor the clerk will call the roll. [clerk doing roll call]