in a 2011 book by bill o'rielly and martin daugaard, they res recollect on isaac's argument. for example, they suggest at one point that stanton hoped that both lincoln and johnson were killed that stanton himself could become prosecute. that is nonsense. the act of succession which was in place at the time provided that the order was president, vice president, the president -- secretary of war is not on the list. and if there had been an election, everyone, i mean would have said, well, there's no chance stanton, given all the things that he did during the war would be a candidate for president. that book as you may recall, i'm sure the ford's people know. there's a controversy on whether that book should be stocked in the bookstore here in the ford's theater and the parks decided in the to, viewed as not sufficiently serious. [ applause ] >> that is an appropriate part to applaud. whatever questions you would like to ask about. [ applause ] >> yes. >> of course in your book about stanton you go over the times he had disagreements with various generals and had an opinion abo

that the fcc commissioners who have been speaking out on this issue over the past couple of years, o'rielly in particular, they have been emphasizing that there is a distinction between v2v or v 2 x is real time safety. it has to be available to everyone or it is not going to work. this is a technology that is completely dependent on the network effect on every car having this. and it all being you know, every car able to talk the same language. there's a distinction between that and the other car applications. perhaps, using alternative you know, radios on the same chip. and what i've been hearing recently from mobile carriers is an acknowledgment of that distinction. it is important. they're saying that oh, look, for you know, the government is going to have to tell us and say that -- that every car for safety purposes, every car has to have -- and even if there's not a mandate, if you are going to have a safety signaling, it must be the same interface. it has to be interop rabble. and they are saying that has to be a peer to peer communication. we're not talking -- for safety, we're not

with ntia administrator redl to review the 3.4 ghz band and band and also why i asked commissioner o'rielly to take the lead on the 3.5 gigahertz and it would take a close look at making available the 3.7-4.2 gigahertz band for terrestrial use and help to propose next steps on that in the coming months. we are taking another at unlicensed spectrum opportunities below eight gigahertz with a particular focus on studying new opportunities for shared use in the six gigahertz band and elsewhere. if that's not enough shoptalk for you, the good news is commissioners car riley will be joining you this afternoon. let me just close by thinking free state foundation once more for elevating the policy discussion on key medications issues. the goal is clear. connecting everyone and bring the benefits of the internet age to all americans. meeting that goal will not be easy but events like this helps steer us in the right direction. so thank you to free state and thank you to everyone taking part in this important discussion about the future of our digital economy. have a great conference. [applause] >> o