commissioner o'ryly i -- o'rielly i know you're leading the charge on on 3.5. >> we have to make sure we don't cause interference. a couple months ago we thought might separate time-was. i was briefed yesterday that things are line up is inly and i think q1 of next year is not irrational, if not earlier. we hope to do some things i can't speak of but announce some things latest this year and then soon after. things are lining up nicely. but ick go back dish don't want to waste your time. you mentioned the opinion regarding charts at the. getting back to congressman doyle's part. charter had advocated a different position in term -- they haven't favored -- they favored separate counties and i'm trying to find a commonality of the different intend. those that favored census tracks have not invocated for one inch. they will not yield anything so it's been hard to find commonality and you mentioned chart sore i thought i'd bring that up. >> thank you nor update. back in march after a very long waite the d.c. circuit court issued an opinion on the consumption protection act. in particular

with that i want to ask commissioner o'rielly a question. some of my colleagues on the other side have articulated their interest in giving the fcc more of a presence on cyber security issues. my concern over cyber securities is well-founded, but to my understanding the fcc should not play a lead role, on identifying and mitigating these vulnerabilities. the fcc has a long tradition of deferring to expert agencies with relevant intelligence and national security expertise. the fcc routinely refers applications for transfers to certain licenses to an informal working group in the executive branch, known as team telecom, to review the security of each transaction. do you believe the fcc has anything new or unique to add to our nations cyber security work or to the security that we currently have? >> i'll be careful in terms of what i can say in public. but i do believe that the authority has been provided by congress, it's not my question who congress gave authority to but other agencies besides the fcc on the issue of cyber security, that is

with that i want to ask commissioner o'rielly a question. some of my colleagues on the other side have articulated their interest in giving the fcc more of a presence on cyber security issues. my concern over cyber securities is well-founded, but to my understanding the fcc should not play a lead role, on identifying and mitigating these vulnerabilities. the fcc has a long tradition of deferring to expert agencies with relevant intelligence and national security expertise. the fcc routinely refers applications for transfers to certain licenses to an informal working group in the executive branch, known as team telecom, to review the security of each transaction. do you believe the fcc has anything new or unique to add to our nations cyber security work or to the security that we currently have? >> i'll be careful in terms of what i can say in public. but i do believe that the authority has been provided by congress, it's not my question who congress gave authority to but other agencies besides the fcc on the issue of cyber security, that is