there are such in relation to oask judges, for example, several dozen, 65, at least, the ones we areit is known, very likely, much more. only now have they begun to open disciplinary cases against individual judges of the district administrative court of the city of kyiv, actually not fulfilling their own regulations, which state that such cases should be considered as a matter of priority. instead, they prioritize closing complaints, allegedly those that are rubbish, as they call them. meanwhile, the term of prosecution for disciplinary cases is only three years. so, due to the expiration of the deadlines for... hundreds of cases regarding maidan judges were hidden, the supreme council of justice did not have enough time to consider these complaints, now they themselves determined that such complaints are a priority, so god forbid that this should not happen, because it has been going on for more than a year, for about six months the complaints of the supreme council of justice have been considered again, which again will not have enough time to consider those complaints that are, w

resonance and cases that can end in the dismissal of a judge, and there are such cases in relation to oaskdges, for example, several dozen, 65, at least, those that we know about, very likely, much more, only now they started opening disciplinary cases against individual judges. of the district administrative court of the city of kyiv, in fact not fulfilling their own regulation, which states that such cases should be considered as a matter of priority, that is why they close complaints as a matter of priority, allegedly the ones that are trash, as they call them, meanwhile, the term of prosecution in disciplinary cases is only three years, so hundreds of cases regarding maidan judges were closed after the expiration of the time limit, the supreme council of justice did not have enough time to consider these complaints, now they will decide for themselves. that such complaints are a priority, so that it does not turn out like this, god forbid, because it has been going on for more than a year, for about six months the complaints have again been considered by the supreme council of justice,

in the odious oask, he challenged the negative conclusion of the public council of virtue. then he tried in the supreme court... to appeal the decision of the supreme court itself. experts considered these actions as an attempt to evade the qualification assessment. the judge provided known or exposed information in the qualification procedures and tried to avoid passing the qualification examination. pavlo gorbasenko was appointed a judge of the economic court of the kyiv region by presidential decree in 2010. i used in family, friendly and other career implementation. of 2007. was married to was married to the daughter of a person who at that time was a judge of the supreme court of ukraine and the head of the judicial chamber in this case, as well as a member of the higher raditsa. at the end of the zeros, gorbasenko, who worked as a legal consultant in a private firm, suddenly decided to change his activities and got a job at the commercial court of the kyiv region, just during the time when his then father-in-law valentyn barbara was a member of the higher court. counc

to oask, he contested the negative conclusion of the civic council of virtue, then tried to challenge the supreme court itself in the supreme court. experts considered these actions as an attempt to evade the qualification assessment. the judge gave notice of whether the information and procedure had been leaked and attempted to be evaded passing the qualification. pavlo gorbasenko was appointed a judge of the commercial court of the kyiv region by presidential decree in 2010. used family, friendly and other informal connections to pursue a career, since 2007 , gorbasenko was married to his daughter-in-law, a person who at that time was a judge of the supreme court of ukraine and the head of the judicial bagaat, the basis of this case, and also a member of the higher raditsia. at the end of the zeros , gorbasenko, who worked as a legal consultant in a private firm, suddenly decided to change activity and got a job in... the economic court of the kyiv region, just during the time when his then father-in-law valentin barbara was a member of the supreme council of justice. an interesting

resonance and cases that can end in the dismissal of a judge, there are such cases in relation to oaskges, for example, several dozen 65, at least those that we know about, very likely much more, only now they can... open disciplinary cases with regarding individual judges of the district administrative court of the city of kyiv, in fact not fulfilling their own regulations, in which it is written that such cases should be considered as a priority, instead , they prioritize complaints, allegedly those that are garbage, as they call them. at the same time, the term of prosecution in disciplinary cases is only three years, so hundreds of cases against maidan judges were closed due to the expiry of the time limit, there was not enough time. to the supreme council of justice to consider these complaints, now they themselves have determined that such complaints are a priority, so god forbid that this should not happen, because it has been going on for more than a year, for about six months complaints have been considered again by the supreme council of justice, which again did not there wil

office and the courts with complaints and lawsuits is a common thing for gorbasenko in the odious oask, he challenged the negative conclusion of the public council of integrity. then he tried to challenge the decision of the vkk itself in the supreme court. experts considered these actions as an attempt to evade the qualification assessment. the judge provided notice of whether information was disclosed in the assessment procedures and attempted evade passing. pavlo gorbasenko was appointed. of the commercial court of kyiv region by decree of the president in 2010 used family friendships and others to carry out his career since 2007 gorbasenko was married to was married to a daughter of a person who at that time was a judge of the supreme court of ukraine and the head of the judicial chamber was mainly in the case, as well as a member of the supreme council of the universe. at the end of zeros hump'. who worked as a legal consultant in a private firm, suddenly decided to change his activity and got a job in the commercial court kyiv region. just during the time when his then father-in-

high public resonance and cases that can end in the dismissal of a judge, and such is with regard to oaskudges, for example, several dozen, 65 at least, those that we know of, very likely, many more, only now they have begun to open disciplinary cases. regarding individual judges of the district administrative court of the city of kyiv, in fact not fulfilling their own regulation, which states that such cases should be considered as a priority, instead , they prioritize complaints, allegedly those that are garbage, as they call them, meanwhile the term of appeal to responsibility for disciplinary matters in just three years, hundreds of cases against maidan judges were closed after the expiry of the deadlines, and the supreme council of justice did not have enough time to consider these complaints. ugh, now they themselves have determined that such complaints are a priority, so that it does not turn out like this, god forbid, because it has been going on for more than a year, for about six months complaints have been considered again by the supreme council of justice, which again will not