aftermath, there was the initial response from the obama administration citing an inflammatory video creating protests in the middle east. the obama administration said that was linked to the attack. later they changed the perspective and said the attack was self-contained by an al qaeda-like group. hillary clinton said today something she said in the past. that it was a confews fusing -- confusing time. hillary clinton brought out an email saying that two officers had been killed by an al qaeda-like group. this is at the same time the obama administration administration and the state department were talking about the inflammatory video, trying to show difference there. there has been a lot of focus and discussion on this issue of whether or not secretary clinton was disengaged in the security issues surrounding the benghazi compound. we heard one exchange by a member of congress, pushing her on whether or not she had taken security seriously enough. >> no one ever came to me and said we should shut down our compound in benghazi. >> i'm saying shutting down, i'm saying protecting it. >> there has been talk that the committee's work was on the po

van is a former obama administrationed administration advisor and jeffrey served as white house political director during the regan administration. jeffrey, do you like seeing trump throw jabs at carson saying he is low energy, he brought up carson's religion, you can make of it whatever you will. he said he basically doesn't know about seventh da daday day adevntous? >> no. i spent some time today going back and looking at presidential primaries and both parties and wow, i mean, all the way back to 1960 when john f. kennedy was accusing jeffrey of being a draft dodger and planning on flooding the polar sections of milwaukee with african americans in public housing. these things have been pretty brutal on both sides and frankly, i think historically speaking, this is just as normal as watching grass grow. i really don't see anything and i understand why they do it. they are trying to differentiate themselves from their opponent and draw a sharp line here. so i don't think that there's anything that's new in this at all. we've seen it before and we're going to see it again. >> amanda, invo

obama administration. the obama administration made environmental groups very, very happy today with a surprise decision thatthey did not telegraph. i think groups like greenpeace and other environmental groups never thought this decision would come. but it happened tonight. we've got that news ahead. very exciting news. as we get closer to halloween, i also feel increasingly justified in broadcasting news stories that might keep you up all night. tonight we've also got one of those. it's out of oklahoma. it comes with an aerial map that will haunt you in your dreams. if you can ever sleep well enough to dream again.

indeed, at that hearing, i asked the obama administration head of immigration enforcement, how many murderers did the obama administration release this week? her answer: i don't know. i asked her, how many rapists did the obama administration release this week? her answer: i don't know. how many drunk drivers? i don't know. none of us should be satisfied with that answer. with a president and an administration that refuses to enforce the laws that is willfully and repeatedly releasing violent criminal illegal aliens into our communities and endangering the lives of our families and our children. and for every democratic senator this vote today is a simple decision, with whom do you stand? do you stand with the violent criminal illegal aliens who are being released over and over again because, mind you, a vote "no" is to say the next time, the next murderer like kate steinle's murderer comes in, we shouldn't have a mandatory five-year prison sentence, instead we should continue sanctuary cities that welcome and embrace them, until perhaps it is our family members that lose their lives. it is my hope that in this moment of

united states of america and we know between -- the relationship between the obama administration and netanyahu administration are pretty bad. that is why for the time being, germany is israel's closest ally. sarah: setting the record straight for us. a historian in munich, germany. we appreciate your insight. the european commission has called an emergency sumit to deal with refugees trying to escape the syrian civil war. european union and balkan leaders will try to find a solution for the thousands of people stuck in desperate conditions trying to reach western europe. temperatures are freezing and adding to the israeli is a fire at a makeshift camp in slovenia. reporter: another day, another long journey. but even for the lucky few who make it through the bottleneck, the destinations in western europe are still a long way off. authorities in croatia are trying to limit the number of people crossing through their country, but this means crowds on the other side continue to grow. >> the number is, as you can see, is increasing, so it is challenging to process everyone and a fast way because there are many.

>> in barack obama administration, your president's administration, a dollar short and a day late, beating her up as if she was the one responsible for all of this, not yourself out, republicans, you're making her stronger, making her look better as she goes into the general presidential run. team. juliet: you were making accusations about daniel murphy being on steroids or something like that. you are so ridiculous. >> seven home runs? juliet: back in the 70s -- >> i have never seen anything like this and nobody around me can explain this. murphy himself can't explain it. let's check to see if his kenyans have shrunk. what the results of a middle whiz tests might be but you are afraid of that. how come i am not invited to the mets rallied? juliet: i'd love to see you invited. >> the queens borough president, the mother of both of -- they will be there. fodder's rights. i should be there as the loyal opposition because i hate the mets and i hate -- no american league. robert: you did a great job today. we work weekends here. because it works for our patients. here, at cancer treatment cent

however, the aim of the obama administration, the objective of the obama administration, is to make sure that this nuclear deal goes ahead, is implemented and enforced as a very separate matter in relation to the syria affair or to crisis in yemen. iran has certainly stepped up its involvement in syria. we know there are no longer just advisors on the ground but there are actually combat forces sent by iran. we see that there has been a lot of movement, not just by iran but also russia who are part of the p5+1. that puts a lot of pressure on president obama and gives a platform to his deals back home where you made a deal with a regional giant that is now going get $150 billion in aid and now is sending up troops directly to syria. >> i guess it has a lot of detractors. we know israel is very unhappy about it and lots of other players in the region. ultimately, do you think this could be the game changer that the obama administration was thinking? >> the hope within the administration was this: hopefully, in the next and then 15 years while this deal is going to survive and be implemente

obama administration. essentially obama administration throwing her under the bus.rguments that hillary clinton got into with president obama over her emails. the biggest problem hillary clinton is facing right now, valerie jarrett is once again underscoring dishonesty from hillary clinton and campaign. biggest problem she is facing voters across the country. number one word associated with her is liar. as a result we've seen her lose support among a lot of key demographics. there was poll out today, showing losing support, excuse me, losing support among black americans. past eight weeks alone she lost 29% with women voters. for democrat-leaning women voters. shoe is in a lot of trouble right now. deirdre: chris, go ahead. >> nice to know now you think everything valerie jarrett says is the gospel. let's hold you to that for future comments. >> that is not exactly what i said here you but draw your own conclusion. >> sounded like, did sound that way to my. >> i'm sure it did. >> not so suggest anything wrong. >> we already know she did something wrong the state dep

what the administration says to the mothers of the child lost to a murderer released by the obama administration because they will not enforce the laws. one wonders what the obama administration says to the child of a man killed via drunk driver released release by the obama administration because they will not enforce our immigration laws and while this administration's refusal to enforce the laws is and -- isn't bad enough, but scandalously poor enforcement of our immigration laws is made much much worse by their lawless actions of the roughly 340 so-called sanctuary jurisdictions across the country. .. ers from cooperating with federal officers. some of the jurisdictions even refuse to honor requests from the federal government to temporarily hold a criminal alien until federal officers can take custody of the individual. not only are these sanctuary policies an affront to rule of law, they are extremely dangerous. according to a recent study by the center for immigration studies, between january 1 and september 30, 2014 -- just a nine-month period -- sanctuary jurisdiction released 9,295 alien offenders that the federal government was seeking to deport. that is roughly 1,

what the administration says to the mother of the child lost to a murderer released by the obama administration because they will not enforce the laws.mi one wonders what the obama administration says to the child of the man killed by a drunk driver released by the obama administration because they will not enforce our immigration laws. while this administration's refusal to to enforce the law is baord enough, the scandalously poor enforcement of our immigration laws is made much much worse by the lawless actions of the roughly 340 sanctuary jurisdictions across the country. although these jurisdictions are more than happy, eager even to take federal taxpayer dollars, they go out of their way to obstruction obstruct and impede enforcement by adopting policies that prohibit their law enforcement officers from cooperating with federal law enforcement officers. some of the jurisdiction even refused to honor requests from the federal government to temporarily withhold an alien. >> not only are these sanctuary policies and affront to rule of law, they are extremely dangerous. according to a recent study by the center for immigration studies, between january 1 and september 30, 2013

the obama administration does. >> who's the biggest enemy here -- opec or the obama administration in terms of energy independence? >> in the short term you have to throw in economics. saudi arabia oil is so cheap. they can make money at $10 a barrel. nobody in the united states can. i'm of the opinion that the house of assad will fall within five years. iran will be a regional power. for that reason we have to go into energy independence even if it costs more. >> i don't like the term energy independence. we are not independent when it comes to consuming food. we import food and that's just as important as oil. i want to hit on what steve said. our government has always been the enemy when it comes to energy. in the early 70s we cut oil production from 10 million barrels a day down to 8 million by 1973. we had the national energy act in 1973 by nixon. that was a catastrophe. we need the government to get out of the way. and the market will produce ample energy here in the u.s. >> specifically what we need is help from the federal government. i mean, we have had this oil boom but that

obama administration. the obama administration made environmental groups very, very happy today with a surprise decision that they did not telegraph. i think groups like greenpeace and other environmental groups never thought this decision would come. but it happened tonight. we've got that news ahead. very exciting news. as we get closer to halloween, i also feel increasingly justified in broadcasting news stories that might keep you up all night. tonight we've also got one of those. it's out of oklahoma. it comes with an aerial map that will haunt you in your dreams. if you can ever sleep well enough to dream again. we've also got a cocktail moment tonight for a very sappy reason. there's a lot to come. we've got a big show. it's going to be a very fun show, i think. but we start tonight with the governor of louisiana. his name is bobby jindal. he's fun. he's currently running for president. his presidential campaign is going terribly. bobby jindal reporting he has a grand total of $261,000 cash on hand for his entire presidential campaign. governor jindal is not on track to make it into the next republica

. >>> one of the things i've been struck by during the obama administration is a lot of the really civil rights achievements of this administrationactually been undoing things that were done in the clinton administration. whether it was don't ask/don't tell or the defense of marriage act or the tough on crime mandatory sentences. former president clinton is progressive on all those issues now, but the policy that he signed for politically practical reasons in the '90s have taken the political miracle of barack obama's election and a decade of progressive activism to unwind those things to get back to zero. and so i know that you and president clinton are different people, and i know that -- you're not responsible for what he did as president. but is your approach to civil rights issues the same as his or is it different? >> well, i want to say a word about the issues you mentioned because my take on it is slightly different. on defense of marriage i think what my husband believed, and there was certainly evidence to support it, is that there was enough political momentum to amend the constitution of the united states of america a

obama administration. the obama administration made environmental groups very, very happy today with a surprise decision thathey did not telegraph. i think groups like greenpeace and other environmental groups never thought this decision would come. but it happened tonight. we've got that news ahead. very exciting news. as we get closer to halloween, i also feel increasingly justified in broadcasting news stories that might keep you up all night. tonight we've also got one of those. it's out of oklahoma. it comes with an aerial map that will haunt

of the administration, the obama administration and there's always a tacit kind of you know, you have to agree with the president. if you don't agree with the president as part of his administration generally speaking your voice won't be heard anymore. that's the way it goes. it's why the vice president is in the same sort of bind. it gives an opportunity for sanders to say she got to this late she got to this late she got to this late but couldn't stand up and go against her president in that way too but it is good politics and you'll hear a lot of it in the coming weeks and certainly in the coming days. >> but wait a minute wait a minute wait a minute come on. it's not fair to say that he's being disingenuous that way. she fulshe voted for iraq war we was in the united states senate. when she was in the administration she was one of the most hawkish voices in the administration. she didn't move one way just to apiece obama people. >> absolutely she was in the united states senate. i was referring mostly to keystone and tpp. and keystone martyed when she me was part of the administration. but the president's cabinet is going to be supportive but you're right on that point. >> we

what the administration says to the mother of the child lost to a murderer released by the obama administration because they will not enforce the laws. one wonders what the obama administrations to the child of the man killed by a drunk driver released by the obama administration because they will not enforce our immigration laws. and the white house's administration refusal to enforce laws is bad enough. the scandalously poor enforcement of our immigration laws is made much, much worse by the lawless actions of the roughly 340 so-called sanctuary jurisdictions across the country. although these jurisdictions are more than happy, eager even to take federal taxpayer dollars, they go out of their way to obstruct and impede federal immigration enforcement by adopting policies that prohibit their law enforcement officers from cooperating with federal officers. some of the jurisdictions even refuse to honor requests from the federal government to temporarily hold a criminal alien until federal officers can take custody of the individual. not only are these sanctuary policies an affront to rule of law, they are extremely dangerous. according to a recent study by the center for imm

obama administration's failure to respond to these iranian threats tonight with house foreign affairs committee member congressman lee zeldin. >>> also tonight, new fox poll shows stunning 70% of americans say the obama administration doesn't have a plan in syria. in fact, the majority of 53% of say vladimir putin has the upper hand in the syrian conflict. we'll be talking about all of that and much more with colonel ralph peters. >>> and hillary clinton delivering what analysts say was a polished performance at last night's democratic debate, but was it enough to keep vice president joe biden on the sidelines? we'll have a full report for you, complete analysis tonight. >>> our top story, iran is stepping up its military provocations. iranian state television broadcasting unprecedented video today of a deep underground tunnel packed with missiles and launcher units, iranian officials say those missiles and hardware could be used if, quote, enemies make a mistake, end quote. the pictures released three days after iran tested a new long-range ballistic missile, that the white house says may have breached a u.n. security council resolution. the administration saying ever so tepedly that it will raise the issue at the

administration has failed to cooperate in the investigation. the only reason that there is a benghazi committee, is that the obama administration and state department fateed to cooperate. the obama administrationsled the american people about the benghazi. we know that they intentionally lied about why this terrorist attack happen. they said it was spontaneous reaction from the youtube video and just weeks before the president and we they knew it was a terrorist attack. >> number two, kevin mccarthy. >> the obama administration intentionally misled the american people. >> the republican caucus in the united states house of representative said out of his own mouth indicated. >> richard, richard. it was the numbers. >> why do you want it? it is black and white here, jon. >> when you both speak no body's points get cross. >> the house as a body is an investigative body and in the end of the day they have to get to what happened to four americans. the state department was fully aware of the potential terrorist attack happening. we knew that personnel were potentially going to be attacked and the u.s. facility faced an attack in september 11th, 2012, and the state department knew there was a danger

the obama administration inherited this. the obama administration took effect:15 extraordinary measures to pull the economy back from the brink. economists alan blindser and mark zandi writing for the center on budget policy priorities estimated that without the measures taken in the late 2008 and early 2009, the peak decline in the real gross domestic product which was would have closed to a stunning 14%. the economy would have contract bid more than three years, more than twice as long as it does. more than 17 million jobs would have been lost, about twice the actual number. the unemployment rates would have peaked at just under 16 rather than at the actual 10%. the budget deficits would have grown to more than 20% of g.d.p., about double the actual peak of 10%, topping at $2.8 trillion in f.y. 2011. my point, mr. president, is the actions taken by the obama administration pulled our economy out of the recession and back to growth. it did it in a responsible manner. so we took emergency measures necessary to stop the economic freefall, and since t

apparently the obama administration says that it does. it's no surprise that this administration cooks up an imaginary number for those theoretical benefits. not direct benefits but they're quoted ancillary benefits. and they say it's big enough to balance the very real cost that american families feel. it's all the way to -- it's all a way to justify these ridiculous rules that destroy jobs, restrict free doom and do very little good -- freedom and do very little good for americans. it is washington and this administration run amok. is the obama administration trying to make sure that our economy continues to limp along like it has for the past 6 1/2 years? is that what they want? in 172 the clean water act was meant to protect navigable waters. it was reasonable. we want to protect our navigable waters. today the administration has a new water rule. it's called waters of the united states. it's going to give washington bureaucrats control over everything from irrigation ditches to small natural ponds in someone's back sp backyard. this is unreasonable. where does it end? bipart

audience this when hillary was asked what would be the difference between an obama administration and a hillary administrationughters you, too, can grow up to be president. >> secretary clinton, how would you not be a third term of president obama? >> well, i think that's pretty obvious. i think being the first woman president would be quite a change. well, i can't think of anything more of an outsider than electing the first woman president, but i'm not just running because i would be the first woman president. >> well, it sure sounds like that's the reason she's running. >> i think she probably could have said that four or five more times during the course of the night. >> that's what she's saying, she's a woman, vote for me. >> we've had 44 men in the white house and many of them have proven that any man in america can be president -- >> some of them have proved that any fool in the country can be president. >> i think the rationale for her running has always been this, i worry more about a third term not just obama but a third term of clinton and i think to a certain extent that cast of characters on the

obama administration's foreign policy. here at home the e.p.a. should be cleaning up the environment, not poisoning american rivers and lakes. until the obama administration gets its priorities straight, congress will have to act to stop it. republicans have introduced legislation to block some of the administration's most egregious new rules. senator ernst has filed a resolution against the so-called waters of the united states, the wotus rule. i've introduced legislation to replace the wotus rule with one that actually protects waterways while preventing washington's takeover of nonnavigable waterways. senator mcconnell and senator cap toe have -- capito have filed resolutions against the power plants. senator flake has filed one against the burdensome new ozone standard. mr. president, we're going to keep a spotlight on this administration as it negotiates this new climate change treaty. we're going to stop it from committing this country to another bad deal, and the rest of us will be paying for that bad deal long after president obama is out of office. congress is going to hold the obama administration accountable, accountable, and rein in the washin

obama administration. how can president obama gain the upper hand on putin? lieutenant colonel ralph peters is a fox news strategic analyst with some perspective on this and how does the obama administrationhand on vladimir putin? >> the obama administration will never gain the upper hand on putin. it's just not going to happen. obama is going to be gaone from office and putin will be there. vladimir putin is burning down our strategic house and the president's response is, oh, don't worry. he's going to run out of matches. putin is not operating from a position of weakness. good god, has he retreated one inch in crimea or ukraine? he has gone in, timed beautifully because iran is trapped by the deal and has to shore up an ally and he is acting decisively. it's not a kwaquagmire for russ. putin is a genius at getting big returns on a small investment. >> let me ask about that. your training, we should point out colonel peters, is in soviet russian analysis. you spent a lot of time there in russia. so based on your understanding of the russian leadership and its culture, what is vladimir putin up to with his moves to not only back assad and syria but also cooperating with the iranian regim

administration, the obama administration, how would you rate how the economy has performed and how they've done with the u.s. economy? >> well, if i was running a campaign in 2016, what i would say -- >> do you want that job? >> -- is -- no chance. if i was running, i would say, okay, let's look where we are. we're going to be pretty much at full employment in 2016. interest rates will be pretty much at multigeneration if not all-time lows. mortgage rates, all-time lows. gasoline prices are near their lows. corporate profits and stock prices are at or near all-time highs. we are -- we have universal health care. fewer american soldiers are being killed in harm's way than in past administrationsyeah, there's a lot of problems, but this administration has not done a bad job, and i think, you know, it could always be better. we know that. but if we look at where we were when barack obama took office in '09, the world was coming to an end. and the banking system has been healed. i tell my friends in corporate america, what do you have to complain about? i mean, your stock prices are all-time high, corporate profits are all-time highs. tax rates are still at lows. i mean, this has not been a bad eight years in terms of improvement. >> you have isis. a huge outlier. you also have the growing income gap. you have millions of americans long-term unemployed. >> absolutely. >> you have this widening income gap that makes rising up that escalator so much harder. >> right. >> that's a big problem, is it not? >> there's no doubt about it. there's problems, but we also have 10% deficits. we're almost at zero now. i mean, you know, if you look at the laundry list of issues we have, back in

administration, the obama administration is relying on the exact same authorization for the use of military force that was signed into law on september 18th, 2001. that was meant for president bush to go after al qaeda. al qaeda which took the buildings down in hit the pentagon and shankesville. he sent troops into afghanistan, and then into iraq. president obama's lawyers argue the law still works to fight the new enemy, the islamic state, and to fight them in a new place in syria. with is news is professor of law at washington college of law. is this legal? >> well, shep, think that's a great question. it really boils down to what you just teed up, which does this 14-year-old statute, the authorization for the use of military force, really apply to isis? the obama administrationg for 14 months it does, and all the while, as you noted, congress has done nothing, so i think it's a close dahl but i think congress has an obligation to step up and say something if it's not. >> you think it's a close call that the congress of the united states should step in and have a debate and authorize one way or our troops are sent to war? that's a close call, professor? >> no, don't it's a close call that congress should step in. one thing on which everyone agrees is is that it would be better if congress were to step inch the question is what happens if congress doesn't step in it? hasn't yet. i think that's where the legal argument is closer because it turns on whether we really do accept the notion that isis is basically a successor to al qaeda and taste, therefore, covered by the statute. i completely agree that we would all be better off if congress were to actually step in and pass a new statute and update the law to adjust for the threat we face today. the hard questio

give money and arms why not give nuclear material lie claim it is not you that obama administration -- the obama administrationh is going to keep his promises. if you are naive enough to think ayatollah is going to keep promises if a dirty bomb went off iran gave it to a group of terrorists said we didn't president obama would say we have no proof that keeps me up at night a president not vigilant,a saebt beforehand led us to disaster in the middle east just as bad fw not worse making an agreement with signing an agreement with a man said death to israel death to americans, so that is what keeps me up at night we don't have someone really protecting us against the real dangers living in some kind of fantasy world about islamist extremity terrorism oh, my god i just said islamist extremist terrorismday we are going to leave middle east leave a vacuum. >> a plan to kill i was with a group seals i said when you were in you afghanistan how much more information than getting now they said we were getting a tremendous amount of information every single day. they said to me if we remained in iraq if biden and tournam

. >> you get the impression that over time not just the bush administration, but the obama administration is dealing with the problem that might not be one that the u.s. can solve. >> well, one of our problems is, as a country we've got this tradition of assuming we can solve any problem that comes at us. this is a tough one. the british used to say about the arab-israeli situation it's not soluble, it's manageable. that was a very unamerican approach to the issues. now we're not managing the situation well in iraq. and even with iran on the isil case that we've got to find a way to coordinate our operations. >> thank you. >> president machood abbas said tha--mahmood abbas said that we need to work together. >> the crackdown in the occupied west bank resumed before dawn. the israeli army ran several houses arresting two people in the city of nablis. the resistence was fierce. neighbors say it was an act of calculated cruelty given that the attacks happened a year ago. it was described as another illegal act of collective punishment. >> yesterday at midnight army forces came and raided hou

the obama administration considers a major administration shift in the crisis. trying to revive efforts to the catastrophic civil war. in washington, officials are setting up a -- officials say setting up a no-fly zone is on the table. at least 42 people are dead a truck crashed. more stimulus by the european central bank. indicators point to the risk of a slowdown. mario draghi suggested more stimulus may be needed by the end of the year. hill, vote counting. the next speaker of the house will be paul ryan. the job.ccept a formal vote will be held next week. congress has 10 days to raise the debt ceiling. 's jeff bezos third richest person. shares jumped 10% after an upbeat report. tom: let me do a quick data check. futures up. they advanced through the morning. yield, 2.03, 2.04. alan ruskin stepped onto the set. is .6209ear u.s. note and the two-year german note is not. it is -0.32. that is a wider spread. higher u.s. yield to lower german yield. that gets your attention. . snapshot of the euro this is a massive call. pascual talk about barclays. in alanay to

if the obama administration wishes to do it, the administration does not want to be pushed into any kindronounced role in syria. is the a no-fly zone best way to protect civilians and limit the ability of the syrian government to extend its power. david: i want to ask about the diplomatic channels between the u.s. and russia. a chilly meeting between president putin and president obama and a warm relationship the o-matichey have equivalent of a friendship. what does that mean for the diplomatic relationship between the two countries? thaturns: it is important we have talks between the government. theye sanctioning government and trying to isolate russia. to be realistic, russia has a major impact and influence in syria and russia was a major part of iran negotiations. afghanistan and counter narcotics and north korea, russia is a factor in the world. servingn in diplomacy both republican and democratic administrations that you most often have to work with governments you might not like very much. you have to work with it, if you are looking for nonmilitary solutions. is going toat war en

of things to show that this is not a continuation of the obama administration, although she does support many things passed by this administration and supported by the administration. >> right. absolutely, tamron. she often says on the trail she's not running for a third obama term, and she's not running for a third term of her husband's administration either for that matter. and on most of the issues where she's broken with the white house, she's lined up with the left wing of her party. you know, keystone and tpp being the latest. and in general, you know, she has to balance here between wanting to show a difference from the white house and wanting to appeal to the left, but also not wanting to weaken the white house too much. it's very difficult for a party to win a third term in the white house after they've had it for two. so she wants to keep obama as strong as possible. she wants to keep his poll numbers up as much as possible. that's why she's trying to do this balancing act here. >> all right. joining us now from the white house, thank you very much, alex. let's bring in peter alexander. and peter, it was at a news conf

indeed, at that hearing, i asked the obama administration head of immigration enforcement, how many murderers did the obama administration release this week? her answer: i don't know. i asked her, how many rapists did the obama administration release this week? her answer: i don't know. how many drunk drivers? i don't know. none of us should be satisfied with that answer. with a president and an administration that refuses to enforce the laws that is willfully and repeatedly releasing violent criminal illegal aliens into our communities and endangering the lives of our families and our children. and for every democratic senator this vote today is a simple decision, with whom do you stand? do you stand with the violent criminal illegal aliens who are being released over and over again because, mind you, a vote "no" is to say the next time, the next murderer like kate steinle's murderer comes in, we shouldn't have a mandatory five-year prison sentence, instead we should continue sanctuary cities that welcome and embrace them, until perhaps it is our family members that lose their lives. it is my hope that in this moment of

i give the obama administration a lot of credit -- yes, let's give the obama administration a lot of edit for their energy and climate change policy. [applause] ms. clinton: they have been struggling with this. they had begun to come out with recommended regulations, like, for example, to control methane emissions. i think you also have to have very tough water standards. to expertsom talking in the obama administration, and on the outside, here is what they have convinced me of. this is the following. there are some places in our extractionre this technique may be appropriate if we do more research, and figure out how to cut the methane emissions, and keep the water clean. there are lots of other places where it is not. part of what the federal government needs to start doing is draw some minds, and inform states and localities, and we should also never preempt states and localities from saying no. if a local government says, no, not here, they should be able to do that. [applause] part of the reason why i think the obama administration experts have taken this position is we have to

administration, or the obama administration, he was head of federal reserve first four years of that. did he express that? here are the um human being tha broke the law, here's the evidence i have and we should start an investigation. should we wait fort book to come out when nobody should be prosecuted? >> there's no journalist in america who would be happy to have berne bernanke say anything to him or her. now he has a book coming out, people should be in prison. you know what he doesn't say? which people, not one name. >> or what the crime is or what the evidence is. a lot of people got away with a lot of bad things. some was bad as a result. some risky financial ventures with other people's money. some was undoubtedly criminal behavior. as you said only one person was prosecuted for this. people in the government caused this to happen. people in private banking caused this to happen. nobody, except this one guy was seriously pursued. justice department today, with a year and a half to go in the president's administrationdifferent attitude. today it says it will not give corporations a break. it will not fine them unless they cough up the names of individuals who did that stuff. in terms of the crisis of '07, way too little and way too late. >> we bailed these banks out. >> we did. >> we didn't bail out any average joe who lost his house, we didn't bail out the little guy. we didn't p put anybody in gale. we bailed out the banks. one guy from credit swiss. and now he speaks? >> you and i sat here when they first defeated it and tweaked it and sat here when they passed it. where is that money going to? not who lost it. it went to aig and big banks so they could be made whole again. job to provide an atmosphere of freedom in which nobody can commit fraud against anybody else and get away with it? >> people should be in prison. we don't know which people. we don't know for which crimes, but we do know it's being said in a book which drops tomorrow. he might. i won't. >> i bet the book will sell just becau

the obama administration says the focusthe day -- on privacy administration will to opt out of third providers. there will be less soybean supply next year. they lowered the estimate. analysts surveyed by bloomberg have predicted lower corn yields. that is a look at her first word news right now. if it was in the latest news on bloomberg.com. david: thank you. the commodity markets just closed. let's take a look at the biggest movers. ramped up the biggest weekly advance, and sink rallied the most. very fascinating, closing down southernerating in america. what exactly will this do with the deadlines in california? much theyou very invitation to come on bloomberg is. -- news. a risky bet,ol is not for investors but obviously for pension ears. today we have a couple of gdp from carbon. valued at 500 ilion dollars in the upcoming year 26 the -- 2016, with will begin testing divestingfrom -- holdings. the bottom line is that continued investments in thermal aal is a risky bet and is horrific thing for the public health of our children. david: you mentioned the size of those pension prog

that thee also said obama administration's concern that the next administration is your public and and it will be anything -- is republican and there will be anything to protect housing -- global housing going forward. the opportunity is, you've got what is a private company, shareholders still own 20% of the company. the government owns 80%, the government has lent money to the company which has been more than paid back. there's an opportunity for a settlement with the shareholders where there is plenty of room between what the business is worth and -- rebuildct the taxpayer, the capital, we does need some time to negotiate with. i can't speak to the accuracy of this report. prevails, there is an opportunity to resolve fannie and freddie in a way to minimizes risk the taxpayer and maximizes profit. >> i have to use my time judiciously. herbal life, anything new? >> none i can report. [laughter] >> productions for next year. 2016 productions, tell me something i have not heard. the big idea, what you looking at, thinking about? i have the equivalent in politics. my view is, michael blo

obama administration. i would argue to you that there are at least two priorities which right now concern the administration much more than what to do about the problem of the much-too promised land. number one, seeing the implementation of this administration. iran and the p5+1 have agreed on a rather consequential nuclear accord. that is a critically important issue. the obama administration does not want during this period of impletiontation, i would argue, to pick a fight with benjamin netanyahu over the peace process. in fact, i suspect that you may see a cooling of relations, and i mean that in a stabilizing manner. a cooling of relations of this soap opera that we've seen between obama and netanyahu over the last seven years. i think netanyahu has resigned himself to the fact that th it is reality. number two is iraq and syria. russia's insertion of itself into an already complicated situation. those are the two major priorities right now that the u.s. has. israeli-palestinian peace is not one of them, in part, ali because israelis and palestinians are simply not ready right now for primetime. the re