is obita, and this is a passage which we respectfully submit does properly represent those rationalesial and manageable standards was the other reason why it was political to get both strands in the single helpful quotation. so those are the three core principles of propositions we take from that case. we do accept that it is for the court to decide on the limits of the court to decide on the limits of the extent of the prerogative power. i do. and do you further accept that the prerogative powers are constrained by overarching fundamental rights? my lord, in some circumstances, they are. established principles. so there are constraints to the power, and it is the purpose and role of the court to consider what those constraints are and whether they have been exceeded. what those constraints are and whether they have been exceededm is. i don't seek to deny that. i think my learned friend sought to rely below not so much here but on the rule of law in supporting his case, and we respectfully submit precisely for the reasons my lot has just given, the rule of law does not advance his cas