dirty water flooded the avenue and the wind toyed with gates and roof tops, alone in a state of semi oblivion. . >> on the day al-matarazzo street was bombed, did you notice how quickly it folded in itself? or the broken tea cups and coffee-stained saucers, the gray matter, and just before the street was eviscerated by those, just before that moment, did you hear the patter, the proclamation, the prayer as they wrangled and swore, denied and affirmed, did you hear the words as they fell? for a thousand years we have, two thousand years, more coffee? what do you think? but this book says -- map, border, industry, collusion, resistance, truth, spirit, faith, doctrine, domain, love, free, portal, wind, cut. did you hear the euphony of the street like a rain forest of song birds pefrpblged among the crinkle and fluttering leaves of newspapers as they addressed if not solved, defined if not created the problems and the promise of tomorrow? did you hear the explosion, the screech, the howl, the scream? did you even know of the dreams imploded inside the molten iron, splayed blood and torn guts acro

we have nooerl 5 trillion in debt owes accumulating he spends us in oblivion. having to spend throughout this process and the president never has the moral courage to leave. now the president is out of it. president is pretty much you can go out and make the big announcements. he never laid out his plans to the american people. the senate never voted on a plan. for all of the criticism with republicans in the conservative ranks they cut cap and balance they at least passed another bill. >> you said the president spent us into oblivion they get -- the previous president president bush half the prescription benefit through ward. they want to put it on the book to say we have to pay for those wars. >> the 7th year in the bush presidency the budget deficit is 153 milli 1$53 billion the last was $450 million. and for every year now it's 1.5 this year 1.65 trillion. four times the one bad year president bush had. you can't make a comparison bush had in 4 years. >> you are beating up on president obama. you don't pay to the idea that the country was facing the potenti

we have nooerl 5 trillion in debt owes accumulating he spends us in oblivion. having to spend throughout this process and the president never has the moral courage to leave. now the president is out of it. president is pretty much you can go out and make the big announcements. he never laid out his plans to the american people. the senate never voted on a plan. for all of the criticism with republicans in the conservative ranks they cut cap and balance they at least passed another bill. >> you said the president spent us into oblivion they get -- the previous president president bush half the prescription benefit through ward. they want to put it on the book to say we have to pay for those wars. >> the 7th year in the bush presidency the budget deficit is 153 milli 1$53 billion the last was $450 million. and for every year now it's 1.5 this year 1.65 trillion. four times the one bad year president bush had. you can't make a comparison bush had in 4 years. >> you are beating up on president obama. you don't pay to the idea that the country was facing the potenti

and if you're spending yourself into oblivion, the solution isn't to spend more, it's to spend less. now, neither side got everything it wanted in these negotiations. but i think it was the view of those in my party that we try to get as much spending cuts as we could from a government we didn't control. our view was we'd get as much spending reduction as we could from a government we didn't control. and that's what we've done with this bipartisan agreement. this is not the deficit reduction package i would have written. the fact that we're on a pace to add another $7 trillion to the debt over the next ten years is certainly nothing to celebrate. but getting it there from more than $9 trillion the president continued to defend until recently is no defeat, either. and slowing down the big-government freight freezing rain its current trajectory will give us the time we need to work toward a real solution or give the american people the time they need to have their voices heard. so much work remains. and to that end, our first step will be to make sure that republicans who sit on the po

has been played for thousands of years polo the tradition of playing the sport had been lost in oblivion in russia for over a century but it's now being revived with help from the sports historic powerhouse argentina but for the young reports. horses count among the most trusted brands of mankind in the world like this is why paula is one of the most. was first lady more than two thousand years ago and he was only slight. change since then. it still takes the same skills to score goals with a long handled mount on the field that's twice as big as a football pitch much as the most important thing in polo is probably the so-called chemistry trying to man on the horse feeling they should be sympathetic to each other and also it's to learn the equitation in childhood although even adult persons who come to the sport late can reach critical results in terms of training hard every day back at the turn of the twentieth century was quite a popular sport in russia but after the revolution the tradition was broken it was only brought back to life several years ago and the most kills a whole club w

if you are spending yourself into oblivion, the solution isn't to spend more, it's to spend less. neither side got everything that it wanted in these negotiations. i think it was the view of those in my party that we try to get as much spending cuts as we could from a government that we didn't control. our view was we'd get as much spending reduction as we could, from a government we didn't control. and that's what we've done with this

and if you're spending yourself into oblivion, the solution isn't to spend more. it's to spend less. now, neither side got everything it wanted in these negotiations. but i think it was the view of those in my party that we try to get as much spending cuts as we could from a government we didn't control. our view was we would get as much spending reduction as we could from a government we didn't control. and that's what we've done with this bipartisan agreement. this is not the deficit reduction package i would have written. the fact that we're on a pace to add another $7 trillion to the debt over the next ten years is certainly nothing to celebrate. but getting it there from more than $9 trillion, the president continued to defend until recently, is no defeat either. and slowing down the big government freight train from its current trajectory would give us the time we need to work toward a real solution or give the american people the time they need to have their voices heard. so much work remains. and to that end, our first step will be to make sure that republ

my gosh, when are we going to wake up in this country and realize they are spending us into oblivion. the poor need jobs and need to share responsibility. >> they need it share responsibility. tax the poor, joan. i never heard that in politician. let's go sock it to the poor. this is a new one. from orrin hatch. >> right. it was a bipartisan program. a program under the first george bush. earned income tax credit that says, okay, we are creating low wage jobs. last people are working, working hard, but they are still poor. so a republican began funneling people money, cutting their taxes and that is accepted. milton friedman thought that was good idea. that's how far the country has come is that it was time no bash the hard-working poor people that weren't making to get out of poverty. it is so mean spirited. >> you know in terms of ideology ideology, in terms of corporate power, squeezing of the labor force. to not bring on new hires, but to squeeze the men who are working and that's how we avoid recession. that's the new tool. now to have the citizen's united call bit the supreme co

the road back from oblivion is not a straight road.course one of his usual competitors pinky mickelson. how do you like those pants. from the rough on the par-4 11. ball bounces in for an eagle. but still even par after six. here's tiger back nine and his putter not in top form. he misses the bogey. then on the sixth misses another short put. makes another birdie. he's 1-under for the tournament that is seven shots back of the four leaders. relieving the sting of losing probowl tight end zack miller. kevin bosh formally of the new york giants, more of a pass catcher than a blocker really. in fact, 36 grounds last year for the giants. it is a four year deal set to be at $16 million. here's a story about a young man who probably won't need a student loan to go back to college. jamarcus russell returning to college at lsu. good for him going back to school. i'm hoping he's got a lot of money p.pñççe". [ male announcer ] this... is the montrose pet hospital -- montrose, california. in here, anarchy meets order. working with at&t, doctors s

the road back from oblivion is not a straight road.one of his usual competitors pinky mickelson. how do you like those pants. from the rough on the par-4 11. ball bounces in for an eagle. but still even par after six. here's tiger back nine and his putter not in top form. he misses the bogey. then on the sixth misses another short put. makes another birdie. he's 1-under for the tournament that is seven shots back of the four leaders. relieving the sting of losing probowl tight end zack miller. kevin bosh formally of the new york giants, more of a pass catcher than a blocker really. in fact, 36 grounds last year for the giants. it is a four year deal set to be at $16 million. here's a story about a young man who probably won't need a student loan to go back to college. jamarcus russell returning to college at lsu. good for him going back to school. i'm hoping he's got a lot of money back to pay for tie tuition. >> i hope so. but good for him. thank you for joining us, mornings on mornings on 2 beginning tomorrow morning. like $14.99 jun

make no mistake this is president obama's economy and they have spent us into oblivion. the most important reason to show they are out of town much those who belong to the tea party moment are those who are frustrated. that is people that are in the republican party or the democrat party. when they go down this road they are insulting the vast majority of americans. >>neil: and unless that asteroid hits her, then it is bordering on stupid. thank you, congressman. the world is a strange place. more ahead. [ male announcer ] imagine all of your missed opportunities in one place. the winning horse you could have picked. ♪ that "old flame" you should have called. ♪ that leap of faith you never took. but there's one opportunity that's too good to miss. the lexus golden opportunity sales event, with exceptional values on the lexus is. but only until september 6th. see your lexus dealer. but only until september 6th. diabetes testing? what else is new? you get the blood, hope it's enough, it's-- what's this? freestyle lite® blood glucose test strip. sure, i'll try it, but-- [be

we haven't been bombing the country into an oblivion. this isn't an american-led change p. robin knows far more than i. but the whole point here is this is something that is happening in libya with libyans and for libyans. we have to help assist but we can't be running the show. the president has it run the risk of it not being smooth but he has taken the risk so far. he will have to continue doing the same. >> robin, looking ahead, does the success in libya provide some sort of blueprint or could it provide a blueprint for other countries? we are looking at syria now and some people are talking about how we should go in and dot same thing we did, you know, to gadhafi, so assad. do you have any concern or are you aware of concerns in the region that now the u.s. has a great reason to just start playing openly playing the world's policeman? >> i think that most people in the region understand that libya was a unique case because of its own involvement in international terrorism. you know, it is shenanigans in the past. because of the instability of its leader. this is the be

themselves fighting against status quo, making certain we don't continue to salesperson ourselves into oblivion fighting. now, republicans and democrats and leadership on both sides came together and hammered out an agreement. it wasn't a pretty process. it wasn't a great agreement on either side. but it wasn't an honorable compromise and it got us through this crisis. hopefully we can continue on this path and start getting process on the economic growth which is the big issue for everybody out there. >> maria, the only way to get economic growth through revenues? >> i think that is one very critical, important way to get to where we need to go. every economist from left to right will tell you that we can't get where we need to go by just cutting programs. and this is something that the gop does not understand and they don't understand it at their peril. the majority of americans, including the majority of republicans, believe that any teal that is going to get us out of the hole that we're in has got to include shared sacrifice and increased revenue. the president and the democrats will put t

apple's rise to this spot looked impossible only a few years ago, all but written off and heading into oblivione steve jobs returned about 15 years ago. >>> call it a grass roots battle against a very big bank. a washington woman at risk of losesing everything hoped the financial giant would back off on attempts to take her home and business. vera johnson collected 10,000 signatures as part of the effort and she joins me now from seattle. hello, very a. >> i understand you turned in the signatures to the bank just on tuesday, what was their reaction? what did they say? >> i think they were actually kind of visibly shaken by it. i did not actually meet with the same person this time. they did tell me last week that i would have one point of contact. but i think they were visibly shaken. there was a cam remarks i did try to take a picture of that exchange but they asked us to turn the camera off. >> and give us some sense of what your situation is, because i understand all of this really couldn't come at a worst time for you. >> well, i started trying to get a loan modification 18 months ago, ten

my gosh, bhr we going to wake up and realize they're spending us into oblivion? i hear how they're so caring for the poor and so forth. the poor need jobs. they also need to share some of the responsibility. >> they need to share some responsibility. tax the poor, joan. that's a new anthem. i've never heard that in politi politics. for a long time i've heard the republican party be restrained about let's go sock it to the poor. this is a new one from orrin hatch. >> right. and it was a bipartisan program, under the first george bush, the earned income tax credit that said we're creating a lot of low-wage jobs, we don't know what's going on, a lot of people are working hard, but they're still poor, so a republican began funneling people money, cutting their taxes, and that was accepted. milton friedman thought this was a good idea, but now that's socialism. that's how far this country has come, that it's time to bash the hard-working poor people who aren't making enough to get out of poverty rather than help them. it's so mean-spirited. >> in terms of party, parti

i give him credit for that the country is being led into oblivion. >> greta: now the other issue, that's the news breaking over the weekend. when osama bin laden was killed may second, we had a dis-- may 2nd, we had a disabled stealth left behind and pakistan let china look at the helicopter and will do reverse engineering and now they are light-years ahead in their technologies from us. >> not hard to believe. again leadership. we allow countries to take advantage whetherf china, certainly pakistan. you look at pakistan, we give them hundreds of billions of dollars. they do nothing for us. you look at china, they are ripping us like nobody before other than of course opec. the opec nations are really doing a number. oil should right now with this bad economy, be at $30 a barrel. it is close to $90 it should be at $30. if the free market were there oil would be at $30. it is -- it will soon be over $90. if it goes unchecked it will be up to $100, $one 10 and here we go again. -- every time we start to make progress the opec guys sit around the take and they say, they are making a little

as far as leading the country, the country's being led into oblivion. >> greta: now the other issue i want to talk about, the news breaking over the weekend that when osama bin laden was killed on may 2 that, of course, we had a disabled stealth helicopter left behind. now the news that pakistan let china look at the stealth helicopter and will do reverse engineering and now they are light years ahead in their technologies -- from us. >> it is not hard to believe. that's leadership. we allow countries to take advantage, whether it's opec nations, whether it's china, certainly pakistan. but look at pakistan. we give them hundreds of billions of dollars, they do nothing for us. china is ripping us like nobody's ripped us, excepts opec. the opec nations are really doing a number. oil should be at $30 a barrel. it's close to $90. it should be $30. if the free market were there, if the guys didn't sit around the table, oil would be $30 a barrel and it will soon be over $90. if it goes unchecked, it will be $100 and $110 and here we go again. every time we start to make a little progress, t

again, it went into oblivion. >> narrator: by spring, intelligence about al qaeda forces in yemen convincedneill they were about to target his agents. o'neill pleaded with barry mawn to pull them out, and mawn agreed. o'neill's investigation in yemen was effectively over. >> we don't know what would have happened if john could have done his job in yemen and had really had the full backup to go and to really push in yemen, and what kind of networks he could have exposed. but, you know, we do know that there were yemenis involved in the attacks of september 11. so, is it possible that if... if he had been able to really open up that network and really expose that network, that he could have in some way deterred the tragedy of september 11? i don't think we know. but it... it's sad because we won't know the answer to that, but i think there is at least a fighting... he would have had a fighting chance if he'd been able to do his job. >> narrator: by early summer of 2001, other intelligence services were putting the bush white house on full alert. every single indication was that al qaeda was p

root of what hails us or we'll simply use what time we have left to recklessly spend our way into oblivion. let's bring in a man hoop has his money where he mouth is. one of great voices that approved the financial efforts in 2008, and one of the great authors before that anticipating and warning of these very problems. your interpretation of today's events in the news of the day, bill? >> well, dylan, this is largely a symbolic gesture. it does not necessarily impact anything in finance other than some collateral requirements and that's not really going to come into play. what it can impact is confidence, and all markets, and the prices of all markets, have a confidence element to them. so confidence is shaken. but as a catalyst what it does is, it focuses people on the fact that -- that the debts of this country that are the problem are not just our $14 trillion in outstanding debt. the future unfunded liability, as we see causing bankruptcy in small municipalities around the country, is the real problem. so this is the starter's pistol to say we don't get to kick the can down the road a

and then, of course, the fact it was an embarrassment and it has everything to recommend it for oblivion. here's the thing, it changed this country in some very important ways. it changed how the americans looked at their government and how the rest of the world looked at us. prior to that it was a cynical american who doubted he lived in a mighty nation engaged in worthy debates. after world war ii. the bay of pigs made that view a lot harder to hold on to. it had the distinction of making the united states look both strong and weak. this is what kennedy's aide arthur schlesinger wrote in his journal. we look like imperialists we look like ineif he can actual imperialists and we look stupid ineffective imperialists which is worst of all. in many ways the 1960s, that decade of questioning authority began with the bay of pigs. this was the first step into the vietnam era, even before vietnam. actually, what you may not realize -- what i did not realize until i wrote the book, how much vietnam itself owes to the bay of pigs. i want to go back a bit in time, back a few years before the bay

we are going down a road that we are just going to spend ourselves into oblivion. simply cannot do that. to try these failed policies again gets us nowhere. right now we just don't seem -- the president nor the congress seemed to have the backbone to do the things necessary. we need to get rid of some of these onerous regulations that we have put on business and on individuals. host: can you give an example? caller: the corporate tax, we need to lower that so we are competitive. we have dodd-frank regulation that businesses are having to jump through so many loopholes. on top of that you have the obamacare, which has caused enormous confusion and apprehension in the business community. i think all of these things has served to bring us to the point we are at. businesses seem to be so reluctant. there's a lot of money sitting on the sidelines out there, but the businesses seem to be reluctant. i think it's because they're so much confusion and about all this regulation, all of this big government. some where it has to end. host: what kind of work do you do in pittsb

and if you're spending yourself into oblivion, the solution isn't to spend more, it's to spend less. now, neither side got everything it wanted in these negotiations. but i think it was the view of those in my party that we try to get as much spending cuts as we could from a government we didn't control. our view was we'd get as much spending reduction as we could from a government we didn't control. and that's what we've done with this bipartisan agreement. this is not the deficit reduction package i would have written. the fact that we're on a pace to add another $7 trillion to the debt over the next ten years is certainly nothing to celebrate. but getting it there from more than $9 trillion the president continued to defend until recently is no defeat, either. and slowing down the big-government freight freezing rain its current trajectory will give us the time we need to work toward a real solution or give the american people the time they need to have their voices heard. so much work remains. and to that end, our first step will be to make sure that republicans who sit on the po

and if you're spending yourself into oblivion, the solution thii isn't to send more. it is to spend less. as neither side got everything itrm wanted in these negotiations, a but i think it was the view of those for my party that we try s to get as much spending cuts as the code from the government weu didn't control. our view as we would get as much spendinge reductionistic herd from a government we didn'tld control and that's what we'vete. done with this bipartisanadd agreement. anoth $ this is not the deficit reduction package i would'vecero written.te. the fact we're on the page to add another $7 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years the lyrtainly nothing to celebrate.t but getting it there for more than 9 trillion thean president can do need to defend untilrent recently is no deceit eitherutig been slowing down the big time government freight train from its current trajectory will give us the time we need to work towards neede a real solution oe the american people time they need to have their voices heard. so much work remains.ommitt to that end, our first

and if you're spending yourself into oblivion, the solution isn't to spend more, it's to spend less. now, neier side got everything it wanted in these netiations. but i think it was the view of those in my party that we try to get as much spending cuts as we could from a government we didn't control. our view was we'd get as much spending reduction as we could from a government we didn't control. and that's what we've done with this bipartisan agreement. this is not the deficit reduction package i would have written. the fact that we're on a pace to add another $7 trillion to the debt over the next ten years is certainly nothing to celebrate. but getting it there from more than $9 trillion the president continued to defend until recently is no defeat, either. and slowing down the big-government freight freezing rain its current trajectory will give us the time we need to work toward a real solution or give the american people the time they need to have their voices heard. so much work remains. and to that end, our first step will be to make sure that republicans who sit on the powerf