in our surveys we also found departments are finding greater use for ocea, particularly chinese. several departments have also expressed a need for occasional assistance from ocea, particularly for community events. there's currently no job classification dedicated fully to translation services, but a comparison of (inaudible) presented in this table here. we see the salary benefits and bilink cal pay is estimated at $100,048, and similar services is estimated at $97,000. they are comparable but in house availability, avoidance of the two hour minimum charge and quality of work. in addition to our recommendation of consolidating contracts and using the savings from contractual con suld daition to fund new positions, we are also recommending ocea work with the controller's office to ensure that expenditures are being accurately tracked and pursue the certification of existing employees already drawing upon existing skills. with that we want to thank you for your time and attention and will open it up to your questions and comments. >> thank you, through the chair, just want to tha

lastly we are requiring that ocea maintain a qualified interpreter pool. in addition today i am offering some amendments, mostly clean up language but clarifying when some of the timelines would be for compliance. just to quickly go over that we are adding into our definition section advisory body, city boards and city commissions. we are giving formerly tier 2 departments until next fiscal year to comply with the parts specifically regarding interpretation and translation. we recognize they may need to make some budget asks to comply so we want to encourage them to do so. we are clarifying telephonic messages do not include employee mailboxes. we are including -- for complaints received through city boards, city commissions and advisory bodies they will be part of the complaint process. we are adding additional information that ocea will provide specifically on complaints to the irc, and so again i know that supervisor yee has additional comments but we really want to emphasize that our goal is not to overburden our departments with these requirements. ma

lastly we are requiring that ocea maintain a qualified interpreter pool. in addition today i am offering some amendments, mostly clean up

the second component was that we really wanted to strengthen ocea as sort of the public for where we can access information, seek help for the various departments and so we're going to look to see how we could do that through this year's budget process. so, with that, i know that our nonprofit partners are going to be a huge part of this effort throughout the years, it's not going to end here. with that i would like to actually just make a motion for the amendments that i stated earlier and leave supervisor yee's opportunity to make his amendment at the full board. if we could take that without objection. >> we can take that without objection. >> thank you very much. >> and we will forward to the board with recommendation. >> motion to move if forward to the full board with positive recommendation. >> we will take that without objection and thank you for working on this very important effort. okay can we go on back to item no. 8? i'm not sure we called that yet. we did? okay, great. so we did call item no. 8 and this item, what we can do is move forward as is to the full board. >> i

and the work that went into going out there sending engineers out, sending inspectors out, there was ocea were involved in it as well, there were other investigations going on maybe still going on i know no one at dbi took this lightly, we don't want buildings coming down off hills and i don't think any of us want to think that's something we're brushing under the carpet, there was a -- it's the same as probably any notice of violation, an incident a notice of violation, this is a permit to correct that and as i said, i'm available for any questions on this permit. the terminology for the demolition, i read out the statement from deputy director larry and that's the department's decision. they do have the right to make that decision we have the right to make that decision and i know that there's the difference in the planning code definition and building code, we always talk about trying to get that better and we dealt with it at the board of appeals before, tla's all i have to say, i'm available for any questions from any commissioners. >> i'm still wrestling with the practical implicati

but people -- don't put it in the atlantic a ocea like they want to do because nor'easters will destroy that no problem. and in the rockies, the i-80 corridor, they tried to do that many times. a little bird called the sage grouse in wyoming -- they stopped it. it is -- you know, the problem is, these people in washington, they don't know or care with the money goes. host: got your point, mike. we want to get as many calls as we can in this first segment of "washington journal." taking your calls on the president's $4 trillion budget plan. you can follow along on our twitter page as well. edwin writes in that "the budget is a wish list that is sure to raise agony with congress." drew writes, "everyone knows you have to spend your way out of a recession and also into one." panther -- "got to get rid of the belief, cut taxes and end regulation and they will hire." one entire budget proposal should be a public works initiative." jimmy olsen was the first one in writing in comments with his question. "the nation's most vile people, elected federal officials, reward their cronies with stolen